nach oben

Erschienen in:

22.04.2016 | Original Article

Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study

verfasst von: Luciano Casagrande, Alejandra Tejeda Seminario, Marcos Britto Correa, Stefanie Bressan Werle, Marisa Maltz, Flávio Fernando Demarco, Fernando Borba de Araujo

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this retrospective university-based study has been to evaluate the longevity and factors associated with failures of adhesive restorations performed in deep carious lesions of permanent molars after complete (CCR) and selective caries removal (SCR).

Materials and methods

The sample was composed of composite resin and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) restorations placed in permanent molars of children attending a university dental service who were followed up for up to 36 months. Information collected retrospectively from clinical records was used for analyzing data. The following factors were investigated: gender, caries experience, visible plaque and gingival bleeding indexes, operator’s experiences, number of restored surfaces, and type of capping and restorative materials. The Kaplan-Meier survival test was used to analyze the longevity of the restorations. Multivariate Cox regression analysis with shared frailty was used to assess the factors associated with failures (p < 0.05).

Results

Four hundred seventy-seven restorations carried out in 297 children (9.1 ± 1.7 years) were included in the analysis. The survival of the restorations reached 57.9 % up to 36 months follow-up with an overall annual failure rate of 16.7 %. There was no difference in restoration longevity when CCR or SCR was performed (p = 0.163); however, CCR presented more pulp exposure (p < 0.001). Multi-surface restorations showed more failures than single-surface (HR 3.22, 95 % CI 1.49; 6.97), and teeth restored with RMGIC had a lower survival rate than those restored with composite resin (HR 4.11, 95 % CI 1.91; 8.81). Patients with evidence of gingivitis had more risk of failure in their restorations (HR 2.88, 95 % CI 1.33; 6.24).

Conclusion

Overall, adhesive restorations performed in young permanent molars of high caries risk children presented limited survival, regardless of the caries removal technique. Risk factors for failure were identified as multi-surface fillings, RMGIC restorative material, and poor oral hygiene, reflected by gingival bleeding.

Clinical relevance

Composite fillings associated with a strict caries preventive regimen may play an important role in the survival of restorations placed in high caries risk children.

Petersen PE (2003) The World Oral Health Report 2003: continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century—the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 31:3–24CrossRefPubMed

SB BRAZIL (2010) National research on oral health 2010: main results

Schwendicke F, Stolpe M, Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S, Dörfer CE (2013) Cost-effectiveness of one- and two-step incomplete and complete excavations. J Dent Res 10:880–887CrossRef

Ricketts D, Lamont T, Innes NP, Kidd E, Clarkson JE (2013) Operative caries management in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3. doi:10.1002/14651858

Schwendicke F, Dörfer CE, Paris S (2013) Incomplete caries removal: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 92:306–314CrossRefPubMed

Maltz M, Garcia R, Jardim JJ, de Paula LM, Yamaguti PM, Moura MS, Garcia F, Nascimento C, Oliveira A, Mestrinho HD (2012) Randomized trial of partial vs. stepwise caries removal: 3-year follow-up. J Dent Res 91:1026–1031CrossRefPubMed

Ericson D (2007) The concept of minimally invasive dentistry. Dent Updat 34:9–10

Thompson V, Craig RG, Curro FA, Green WS, Ship JA (2008) Treatment of deep carious lesions by complete excavation or partial removal: a critical review. J Am Dent Assoc 139:705–712CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hayashi M, Fujitani M, Yamaki C, Momoi Y (2011) Ways of enhancing pulp preservation by stepwise excavation—a systematic review. J Dent 39:95–107CrossRefPubMed

10.

Schwendicke F, Meyer-Lueckel H, Dörfer C, Paris S (2013) Attitudes and behaviour regarding deep dentin caries removal: a survey among German dentists. Caries Res 47:566–573CrossRefPubMed

11.

Schwendicke F, Kern M, Meyer-Lueckel H, Boels A, Doerfer C, Paris S (2014) Fracture resistance and cuspal deflection of incompletely excavated teeth. J Dent 42(2):107–113CrossRefPubMed

12.

Hevinga MA, Opdam NJ, Frencken JE, Truin GJ, Huymans MC (2010) Does incomplete caries removal reduce strength of restored teeth? J Dent Res 89:1270–1275CrossRefPubMed

13.

Maltz M, Jardin JJ, Mestrinho HD, Yamaguti PM, Podestá K, Moura MS, de Paula LM (2013) Partial removal of carious dentine: a multicenter randomized controlled trial and 18-month follow-up results. Caries Res 47:103–109CrossRefPubMed

14.

Ainamo J, Bay I (1975) Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque. Int Dent J 25:229–235PubMed

15.

Lang NP, Tonetti MS (2003) Periodontal risk assessment (PRA) for patients in supportive periodontal therapy (SPT). Oral Health Prev Dent 1:7–16PubMed

16.

Bjorndal L, Larsen T, Thylstrup A (1997) A clinical and microbiological study of deep carious lesion during stepwise excavation using long treatment intervals. Caries Res 31:411–417CrossRefPubMed

17.

Barthel CR, Rosenkranz B, Leuenberg A, Roulet JF (2000) Pulp capping of carious exposures: treatment outcome after 5 and 10 years: a retrospective study. J Endod 26:525–528CrossRefPubMed

18.

Schwendicke F, Kern M, Blunck U, Dörfer C, Drenck J, Paris S (2014) Marginal integrity and secondary caries of selectively excavated teeth in vitro. J Dent 10:1261–1268CrossRef

19.

Yoshiyama M, Tay FR, Doi J, Nishitani Y, Yamada T, Itou K, Carvalho RM, Nakajima M, Pashley DH (2002) Bonding of self-etch and total-etch adhesives to carious dentin. J Dent Res 8:556–560CrossRef

20.

Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ (2012) Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater 28:87–101CrossRefPubMed

21.

Pallesen U, van Dijken JW, Halken J, Hallonsten AL, Höigaard R (2013) Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in permanent teeth in public dental health service: a prospective 8 years follow up. J Dent 4:297–306CrossRef

22.

De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Lambrechts P et al (2005) Fatigue resistance of dentin/composite interfaces with an additional intermediate elastic layer. Eur J Oral Sci 113:77–82CrossRefPubMed

23.

van de Sande FH, Da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Basso GR, Patias R, da Rosa QF, Demarco FF et al (2015) 18-year survival of posterior composite resin restorations with and without glass ionomer cement as base. Dent Mater 31:669–675CrossRefPubMed

24.

Azevedo MS, Vilas Boas D, Demarco FF, Romano AR (2010) Where and how are Brazilian dental students using glass ionomer cement? Braz Oral Res 24:482–487CrossRefPubMed

25.

Taha NA, Palamara JE, Messer HH (2009) Cuspal deflection, strain and microleakage of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with direct resin composites. J Dent 37:724–730CrossRefPubMed

26.

Basso GR, Della Bona A, Gobbi D, Cecchetti D (2011) Fluoride release from restorative materials. Braz Dent J 22:355–358CrossRefPubMed

27.

Casagrande L, Dalpian DM, Ardenghi TM, Zanatta FB, Balbinot CE, García-Godoy F, De Araujo FB (2013) Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results. Am J Dent 6:351–355

28.

Barbosa RP, Pereira-Cenci T, Silva WM, Coelho-de-Souza FH, Demarco FF, Cenci MS (2012) Effect of cariogenic biofilm challenge on the surface hardness of direct restorative materials in situ. J Dent 40:359–363CrossRefPubMed

29.

Pinto Gdos S, Oliveira LJ, Romano AR, Schardosim LR, Bonow ML, Pacce M et al (2014) Longevity of posterior restorations in primary teeth: results from a paediatric dental clinic. J Dent 42:1248–1254CrossRefPubMed

30.

Da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Donassollo TA, Cenci MS, Loguercio AD, Moraes RR, Bronkhorst EM, Opdan NJ, Demarco FF (2011) 22-year clinical evaluation of the performance of two posterior composites with different filler characteristics. Dental Mater 27:955–963CrossRef

31.

Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA (2007) Longevity and reasons for failure of sandwich and total-etch posterior composite resin restorations. J Adhes Dent 9:469–475PubMed

32.

Van Nieuwenhuysen JP, D’Hoore W, Carvalho J, Qvist V (2003) Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth. J Dent 31:395–405CrossRefPubMed

33.

Broadbent JM, Thomson WM, Boyens JV (2011) Dental plaque and oral health during the first 32 years of life. Am J Dent 142:415–426CrossRef

34.

van de Sande FH, Opdam NJ, Rodolpho PA, Correa MB, Demarco FF, Cenci MS (2013) Patient risk factors’ influence on survival of posterior composites. J Dent Res 92:78–83CrossRef

35.

Moura FR, Romano AR, Lund RG, Piva E, Rodrigues Júnior SA, Demarco FF (2011) Three-year clinical performance of composite restorations placed by undergraduate dental students. Braz Dent J 22:111–116PubMed

36.

Opdam NJM, Bronkhorst E, Cenci M, Huysmans MC, Wilson NHF (2011) Age of failed restorations: a deceptive longevity parameter. J Dent 39:225–230CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study
verfasst von: Luciano Casagrande
Alejandra Tejeda Seminario
Marcos Britto Correa
Stefanie Bressan Werle
Marisa Maltz
Flávio Fernando Demarco
Fernando Borba de Araujo
Publikationsdatum: 22.04.2016
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1832-1

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study