Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology 2/2010

01.11.2010 | Clinical Study - Patient Study

Low-dose fotemustine for recurrent malignant glioma: a multicenter phase II study

verfasst von: Alessandra Fabi, Giulio Metro, Antonello Vidiri, Gaetano Lanzetta, Mariantonia Carosi, Stefano Telera, Marta Maschio, Michelangelo Russillo, Isabella Sperduti, Carmine M. Carapella, Francesco Cognetti, Andrea Pace

Erschienen in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology | Ausgabe 2/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Fotemustine at the conventional dose of 100 mg/m2 is an active treatment for recurrent malignant gliomas (RMGs). However, it is associated with a relevant incidence of severe myelotoxicity, which is not justified in the palliative setting of this disease. This study was conducted to address whether administration of fotemustine at 60 mg/m2 (induction) followed by 75 mg/m2 (maintenance) would preserve clinical activity with the advantage of improved tolerance. Forty patients with RMGs pretreated with ≤2 lines of chemotherapy were enrolled. Median age was 57 years (26–80) and median Karnofsky performance status was 80 (60–100). Thirty-one patients (77.5%) had tissue available for analysis of the O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter which was found to be methylated in 14 cases (45%). Overall, 8 partial responses (20%) and 13 disease stabilizations (32.5%) were observed for a disease-control rate of 52.5%. At 6 months, 21% of patients were free from progression. Grades 3 and 4 platelet and white blood cell toxicity occurred in ≤10% of patients, and no patients discontinued treatment because of toxicity. No significant difference was observed for disease control rate between methylated and unmethylated patients, although a trend toward improved progression-free survival was reported for methylated patients. Low-dose fotemustine has activity comparable with that of the full-dose regimen, therefore it should be preferred for its greater tolerability. The role of MGMT gene promoter methylation status in relation to sensitivity to fotemustine is still unclear and needs further evaluation in future clinical trials.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat De Vita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA (2008) Cancer, principles & practice of oncology, 8th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia De Vita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA (2008) Cancer, principles & practice of oncology, 8th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayes MT, Bartley J, Parsons PG, Eaglesham GK, Prakash AS (1997) Mechanism of action of fotemustine, a new chloroethylnitrosourea anticancer agent: evidence for the formation of two DNA-reactive intermediates contributing to cytotoxicity. Biochemistry 36:10646–10654CrossRefPubMed Hayes MT, Bartley J, Parsons PG, Eaglesham GK, Prakash AS (1997) Mechanism of action of fotemustine, a new chloroethylnitrosourea anticancer agent: evidence for the formation of two DNA-reactive intermediates contributing to cytotoxicity. Biochemistry 36:10646–10654CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Levin VA (1980) Relationship of octanol/water partition coefficient and molecular weight to rat brain capillary permeability. Med Chem 23:682–684CrossRef Levin VA (1980) Relationship of octanol/water partition coefficient and molecular weight to rat brain capillary permeability. Med Chem 23:682–684CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Meulemans A, Giroux B, Hannoun P, Robine D, Henzel D (1991) Comparative diffusion study of two nitrosoureas: carmustine and fotemustine in normal rat brain, human and rat brain biopsies. Chemotherapy 37:86–92CrossRefPubMed Meulemans A, Giroux B, Hannoun P, Robine D, Henzel D (1991) Comparative diffusion study of two nitrosoureas: carmustine and fotemustine in normal rat brain, human and rat brain biopsies. Chemotherapy 37:86–92CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Frenay M, Giroux B, Khoury S, Derlon JM, Namer M (1991) Phase II study of fotemustine in recurrent supratentorial malignant gliomas. Eur J Cancer 27:852–856CrossRefPubMed Frenay M, Giroux B, Khoury S, Derlon JM, Namer M (1991) Phase II study of fotemustine in recurrent supratentorial malignant gliomas. Eur J Cancer 27:852–856CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Malhaire JP, Lucas B, Simon H, Person H, Dam-Hieu P, Labat JP (1999) Fotemustine (Muphoran) in 22 patients with relapses of high-grade cerebral gliomas. Bull Cancer 86:289–294PubMed Malhaire JP, Lucas B, Simon H, Person H, Dam-Hieu P, Labat JP (1999) Fotemustine (Muphoran) in 22 patients with relapses of high-grade cerebral gliomas. Bull Cancer 86:289–294PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Trevisan E, Laguzzi E, Ruda R, Guarneri D, Soffietti R (2008) Safety and efficacy of fotrmustine in recurrent or progressive gliomas. J Neurol 255:93 (abstract)CrossRef Trevisan E, Laguzzi E, Ruda R, Guarneri D, Soffietti R (2008) Safety and efficacy of fotrmustine in recurrent or progressive gliomas. J Neurol 255:93 (abstract)CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Khayat D, Lokiec F, Bizzari JP, Weil M, Meeus L, Sellami M, Rouesse J, Banzet P, Jacquillat C (1987) Phase I clinical study of the new amino acid-linked nitrosourea, S 10036, administered on a weekly schedule. Cancer Res 47:6782–6785PubMed Khayat D, Lokiec F, Bizzari JP, Weil M, Meeus L, Sellami M, Rouesse J, Banzet P, Jacquillat C (1987) Phase I clinical study of the new amino acid-linked nitrosourea, S 10036, administered on a weekly schedule. Cancer Res 47:6782–6785PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Brandes AA, Tosoni A, Franceschi E, Blatt V, Santoro A, Faedi M, Amistà P, Gardiman M, Labianca R, Bianchini C, Ermani M, Reni M (2009) Fotemustine as second-line treatment for recurrent or progressive glioblastoma after concomitant and/or adjuvant temozolomide: a phase II trial of Gruppo Italiano Cooperativo di Neuro-Oncologia (GICNO). Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 64:769–775CrossRefPubMed Brandes AA, Tosoni A, Franceschi E, Blatt V, Santoro A, Faedi M, Amistà P, Gardiman M, Labianca R, Bianchini C, Ermani M, Reni M (2009) Fotemustine as second-line treatment for recurrent or progressive glioblastoma after concomitant and/or adjuvant temozolomide: a phase II trial of Gruppo Italiano Cooperativo di Neuro-Oncologia (GICNO). Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 64:769–775CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Fabi A, Metro G, Russillo M, Vidiri A, Carapella CM, Maschio M, Cognetti F, Jandolo B, Mirri MA, Sperduti I, Telera S, Carosi M, Pace A (2009) Treatment of recurrent malignant gliomas with fotemustine monotherapy: impact of dose and correlation with MGMT promoter methylation. BMC Cancer 9:101CrossRefPubMed Fabi A, Metro G, Russillo M, Vidiri A, Carapella CM, Maschio M, Cognetti F, Jandolo B, Mirri MA, Sperduti I, Telera S, Carosi M, Pace A (2009) Treatment of recurrent malignant gliomas with fotemustine monotherapy: impact of dose and correlation with MGMT promoter methylation. BMC Cancer 9:101CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Macdonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC Jr, Cairncross JG (1990) Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 8:1277–1280PubMed Macdonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC Jr, Cairncross JG (1990) Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 8:1277–1280PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat A’Hern RP (2001) Sample size tables for exact single-stage phase II designs. Stat Med 20:859–866CrossRefPubMed A’Hern RP (2001) Sample size tables for exact single-stage phase II designs. Stat Med 20:859–866CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fabrini MG, Silvano G, Lolli I, Perrone F, Marsella A, Scotti V, Cionini L (2009) A multi-institutional phase II study on second-line Fotemustine chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 92:79–86CrossRefPubMed Fabrini MG, Silvano G, Lolli I, Perrone F, Marsella A, Scotti V, Cionini L (2009) A multi-institutional phase II study on second-line Fotemustine chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 92:79–86CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Scoccianti S, Detti B, Sardaro A, Iannalfi A, Meattini I, Leonulli BG, Borghesi S, Martinelli F, Bordi L, Ammannati F, Biti G (2008) Second-line chemotherapy with fotemustine in temozolomide-pretreated patients with relapsing glioblastoma: a single institution experience. Anticancer Drugs 19:613–620CrossRefPubMed Scoccianti S, Detti B, Sardaro A, Iannalfi A, Meattini I, Leonulli BG, Borghesi S, Martinelli F, Bordi L, Ammannati F, Biti G (2008) Second-line chemotherapy with fotemustine in temozolomide-pretreated patients with relapsing glioblastoma: a single institution experience. Anticancer Drugs 19:613–620CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Taal W, Brandsma D, de Bruin HG, Bromberg JE, Swaak-Kragten AT, Smitt PA, van ES CA, van den Bent MJ (2008) Incidence of early pseudo-progression in a cohort of malignant glioma patients treated with chemoirradiation with temozolomide. Cancer 113:405–410CrossRefPubMed Taal W, Brandsma D, de Bruin HG, Bromberg JE, Swaak-Kragten AT, Smitt PA, van ES CA, van den Bent MJ (2008) Incidence of early pseudo-progression in a cohort of malignant glioma patients treated with chemoirradiation with temozolomide. Cancer 113:405–410CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Brandes AA, Franceschi E, Tosoni A, Blatt V, Pession A, Tallini G, Bertorelle R, Bartolini S, Calbucci F, Andreoli A, Frezza G, Leonardi M, Spagnolli F, Ermani M (2008) MGMT promoter methylation status can predict the incidence and outcome of pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. J Clin Oncol 26:2192–2197CrossRefPubMed Brandes AA, Franceschi E, Tosoni A, Blatt V, Pession A, Tallini G, Bertorelle R, Bartolini S, Calbucci F, Andreoli A, Frezza G, Leonardi M, Spagnolli F, Ermani M (2008) MGMT promoter methylation status can predict the incidence and outcome of pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. J Clin Oncol 26:2192–2197CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Fabi A, Russillo M, Metro G, Vidiri A, Di Giovanni S, Cognetti F (2009) Pseudoprogression and MGMT status in glioblastoma patients: implications in clinical practice. Anticancer Res 29:2607–2610PubMed Fabi A, Russillo M, Metro G, Vidiri A, Di Giovanni S, Cognetti F (2009) Pseudoprogression and MGMT status in glioblastoma patients: implications in clinical practice. Anticancer Res 29:2607–2610PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Fazeny-Dörner B, Veitl M, Wenzel C, Piribauer M, Rössler K, Dieckmann K, Ungersböck K, Marosi C (2003) Second-line chemotherapy with dacarbazine and fotemustine in nitrosourea-pretreated patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. Anticancer Drugs 14:437–442CrossRefPubMed Fazeny-Dörner B, Veitl M, Wenzel C, Piribauer M, Rössler K, Dieckmann K, Ungersböck K, Marosi C (2003) Second-line chemotherapy with dacarbazine and fotemustine in nitrosourea-pretreated patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. Anticancer Drugs 14:437–442CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Silvani A, Lamperti E, Gaviani P, Eoli M, Fiumani A, Salmaggi A, Falcone C, Filippini G, Botturi A, Boiardi A (2008) Salvage chemotherapy with procarbazine and fotemustine combination in the treatment of temozolomide treated recurrent glioblastoma patients. J Neurooncol 87:143–151CrossRefPubMed Silvani A, Lamperti E, Gaviani P, Eoli M, Fiumani A, Salmaggi A, Falcone C, Filippini G, Botturi A, Boiardi A (2008) Salvage chemotherapy with procarbazine and fotemustine combination in the treatment of temozolomide treated recurrent glioblastoma patients. J Neurooncol 87:143–151CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T, Hamou MF, de Tribolet N, Weller M, Kros JM, Hainfellner JA, Mason W, Mariani L, Bromberg JE, Hau P, Mirimanoff RO, Cairncross JG, Janzer RC, Stupp R (2005) MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:997–1003CrossRefPubMed Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T, Hamou MF, de Tribolet N, Weller M, Kros JM, Hainfellner JA, Mason W, Mariani L, Bromberg JE, Hau P, Mirimanoff RO, Cairncross JG, Janzer RC, Stupp R (2005) MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:997–1003CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Soffietti R, Rudà R, Trevisan E, Picco E, Guarneri D, Caroli M, Fabrini M, Scotti V (2009) Phase II study of bevacizumab and nitrosourea in patients with recurrent malignant glioma: a multicenter Italian study. J Clin Oncol 27:15s (suppl; abstr 2012)CrossRef Soffietti R, Rudà R, Trevisan E, Picco E, Guarneri D, Caroli M, Fabrini M, Scotti V (2009) Phase II study of bevacizumab and nitrosourea in patients with recurrent malignant glioma: a multicenter Italian study. J Clin Oncol 27:15s (suppl; abstr 2012)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Low-dose fotemustine for recurrent malignant glioma: a multicenter phase II study
verfasst von
Alessandra Fabi
Giulio Metro
Antonello Vidiri
Gaetano Lanzetta
Mariantonia Carosi
Stefano Telera
Marta Maschio
Michelangelo Russillo
Isabella Sperduti
Carmine M. Carapella
Francesco Cognetti
Andrea Pace
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2010
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology / Ausgabe 2/2010
Print ISSN: 0167-594X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7373
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-010-0163-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2010

Journal of Neuro-Oncology 2/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.