Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Current Cardiology Reports 2/2010

01.03.2010

Low-Flow, Low-Gradient, Normal Ejection Fraction Aortic Stenosis

verfasst von: Philippe Pibarot, Jean G. Dumesnil

Erschienen in: Current Cardiology Reports | Ausgabe 2/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

A substantial proportion of patients with severe aortic stenosis may paradoxically have low transvalvular flow and a low gradient, despite the presence of normal left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction. These patients are characterized by pronounced LV concentric remodeling with small LV cavity size, impaired LV filling, altered myocardial function, and worse prognosis. This frequent clinical entity is often misdiagnosed, which may lead to an underestimation of aortic stenosis severity and thereby to underutilization or inappropriate delay of surgery. It is important to recognize this entity so we do not deny surgery to a symptomatic patient with small aortic valve area and low gradient. Thus, when there is a discordance between the valve area (in the severe range) and the gradient (in the moderate range) in patients with preserved LV ejection fraction, a more comprehensive Doppler echocardiographic evaluation and potentially other diagnostic tests may be required to confirm disease severity and guide therapeutic management.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J, et al.: Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: the Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2007, 28:230–268.PubMed Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J, et al.: Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: the Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2007, 28:230–268.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, et al.: ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2006, 114:e84–e231.CrossRefPubMed Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, et al.: ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2006, 114:e84–e231.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Monin JL, Quere JP, Monchi M, et al.: Low-gradient aortic stenosis: operative risk stratification and predictors for long-term outcome: a multicenter study using dobutamine stress hemodynamics. Circulation 2003, 108:319–324.CrossRefPubMed Monin JL, Quere JP, Monchi M, et al.: Low-gradient aortic stenosis: operative risk stratification and predictors for long-term outcome: a multicenter study using dobutamine stress hemodynamics. Circulation 2003, 108:319–324.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Clavel MA, Fuchs C, Burwash IG, et al.: Predictors of outcomes in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: results of the multicenter TOPAS Study. Circulation 2008, 118:S234–S242.CrossRefPubMed Clavel MA, Fuchs C, Burwash IG, et al.: Predictors of outcomes in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: results of the multicenter TOPAS Study. Circulation 2008, 118:S234–S242.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat deFilippi CR, Willett DL, Brickner ME, et al.: Usefulness of dobutamine echocardiography in distinguishing severe from nonsevere valvular aortic stenosis in patients with depressed left ventricular function and low transvalvular gradients. Am J Cardiol 1995, 75:191–194. deFilippi CR, Willett DL, Brickner ME, et al.: Usefulness of dobutamine echocardiography in distinguishing severe from nonsevere valvular aortic stenosis in patients with depressed left ventricular function and low transvalvular gradients. Am J Cardiol 1995, 75:191–194.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, et al.: Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2003, 108:983–988.CrossRefPubMed Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, et al.: Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2003, 108:983–988.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kulik A, Burwash IG, Kapila V, et al.: Long-term outcomes after valve replacement for low-gradient aortic stenosis: impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation 2006, 114(Suppl I):I5553–I5558. Kulik A, Burwash IG, Kapila V, et al.: Long-term outcomes after valve replacement for low-gradient aortic stenosis: impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation 2006, 114(Suppl I):I5553–I5558.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tribouilloy C, Levy F, Rusinaru D, et al.: Outcome after aortic valve replacement for low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis without contractile reserve on dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, 53:1865–1873.CrossRefPubMed Tribouilloy C, Levy F, Rusinaru D, et al.: Outcome after aortic valve replacement for low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis without contractile reserve on dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, 53:1865–1873.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Bogaty P, Pibarot P: Paradoxical low flow, low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation 2007, 115:2856–2864. This is the first study to describe this new clinical entity of paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe AS with preserved LVEF. This is probably the article in this list that should be read in priority when one wants to learn more about this particular topic. CrossRefPubMed •• Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Bogaty P, Pibarot P: Paradoxical low flow, low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation 2007, 115:2856–2864. This is the first study to describe this new clinical entity of paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe AS with preserved LVEF. This is probably the article in this list that should be read in priority when one wants to learn more about this particular topic. CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat • Cramariuc D, Cioffi G, Rieck AE, et al.: Low-flow aortic stenosis in asymptomatic patients: valvular arterial impedance and systolic function from the SEAS substudy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009, 2:390–399. This is an important study that confirms the results of Hachicha et al. [9••] in a large prospective series of asymptomatic patients. CrossRefPubMed • Cramariuc D, Cioffi G, Rieck AE, et al.: Low-flow aortic stenosis in asymptomatic patients: valvular arterial impedance and systolic function from the SEAS substudy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009, 2:390–399. This is an important study that confirms the results of Hachicha et al. [9••] in a large prospective series of asymptomatic patients. CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG: Aortic stenosis: look globally, think globally. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009, 2:400–403.CrossRefPubMed Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG: Aortic stenosis: look globally, think globally. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009, 2:400–403.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat • Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P, Carabello B: Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment. Eur Heart J 2010, 31:281–289. This is an interesting viewpoint article of paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient AS. It also provides important additional results of the study by Hachicha et al. [9••]. CrossRefPubMed • Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P, Carabello B: Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment. Eur Heart J 2010, 31:281–289. This is an interesting viewpoint article of paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient AS. It also provides important additional results of the study by Hachicha et al. [9••]. CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat • Barasch E, Fan D, Chukwu EO, et al.: Severe isolated aortic stenosis with normal left ventricular systolic function and low transvalvular gradients: pathophysiologic and prognostic insights. J Heart Valve Dis 2008, 17:81–88. This is an important study showing that patients with normal LVEF, low-flow, low-gradient. AS have a 50% lower referral to surgery but a twofold increase in mortality. PubMed • Barasch E, Fan D, Chukwu EO, et al.: Severe isolated aortic stenosis with normal left ventricular systolic function and low transvalvular gradients: pathophysiologic and prognostic insights. J Heart Valve Dis 2008, 17:81–88. This is an important study showing that patients with normal LVEF, low-flow, low-gradient. AS have a 50% lower referral to surgery but a twofold increase in mortality. PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Weidemann F, Herrmann S, Stork S, et al.: Impact of myocardial fibrosis in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 2009, 120:577–584. This is a very important and comprehensive study showing that patients with small AVA, normal LVEF, and low gradient have more myocardial fibrosis and reduced myocardial systolic function. CrossRefPubMed •• Weidemann F, Herrmann S, Stork S, et al.: Impact of myocardial fibrosis in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 2009, 120:577–584. This is a very important and comprehensive study showing that patients with small AVA, normal LVEF, and low gradient have more myocardial fibrosis and reduced myocardial systolic function. CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Strotmann JM, Lengenfelder B, Blondelot J, et al.: Functional differences of left ventricular hypertrophy induced by either arterial hypertension or aortic valve stenosis. Am J Cardiol 2008, 101:1493–1497.CrossRefPubMed Strotmann JM, Lengenfelder B, Blondelot J, et al.: Functional differences of left ventricular hypertrophy induced by either arterial hypertension or aortic valve stenosis. Am J Cardiol 2008, 101:1493–1497.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat • Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P: Usefulness of the valvuloarterial impedance to predict adverse outcome in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, 54:1003–1011. This is an important study that demonstrates the usefulness of the valvuloarterial impedance to estimate the global hemodynamic load and to predict outcomes in patients with AS. CrossRefPubMed • Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P: Usefulness of the valvuloarterial impedance to predict adverse outcome in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, 54:1003–1011. This is an important study that demonstrates the usefulness of the valvuloarterial impedance to estimate the global hemodynamic load and to predict outcomes in patients with AS. CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerdts E: Left ventricular structure in different types of chronic pressure overload. Eur Heart J 2008, 10(Suppl. E):E23–E30. Gerdts E: Left ventricular structure in different types of chronic pressure overload. Eur Heart J 2008, 10(Suppl. E):E23–E30.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Pagé A, Dumesnil JG, Clavel MA, et al.: Metabolic syndrome is associated with more pronounced impairment of LV geometry and function in patients with calcific aortic stenosis: a substudy of the ASTRONOMER trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009 (in press). Pagé A, Dumesnil JG, Clavel MA, et al.: Metabolic syndrome is associated with more pronounced impairment of LV geometry and function in patients with calcific aortic stenosis: a substudy of the ASTRONOMER trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009 (in press).
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Dumesnil JG, Shoucri RM: Quantitative relationships between left ventricular ejection and wall thickening and geometry. J Appl Physiol 1991, 70:48–54.PubMed Dumesnil JG, Shoucri RM: Quantitative relationships between left ventricular ejection and wall thickening and geometry. J Appl Physiol 1991, 70:48–54.PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Briand M, Dumesnil JG, Kadem L, et al.: Reduced systemic arterial compliance impacts significantly on left ventricular afterload and function in aortic stenosis: implications for diagnosis and treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:291–298.CrossRefPubMed Briand M, Dumesnil JG, Kadem L, et al.: Reduced systemic arterial compliance impacts significantly on left ventricular afterload and function in aortic stenosis: implications for diagnosis and treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:291–298.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Pai RG, Varadarajan P, Razzouk A: Survival benefit of aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis with low ejection fraction and low gradient with normal ejection fraction. Ann Thorac Surg 2008, 86:1781–1789.CrossRefPubMed Pai RG, Varadarajan P, Razzouk A: Survival benefit of aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis with low ejection fraction and low gradient with normal ejection fraction. Ann Thorac Surg 2008, 86:1781–1789.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Dumesnil JG, Dion D, Yvorchuk K, et al.: A new, simple and accurate method for determining ejection fraction by Doppler echocardiography. Can J Cardiol 1995, 11:1007–1014.PubMed Dumesnil JG, Dion D, Yvorchuk K, et al.: A new, simple and accurate method for determining ejection fraction by Doppler echocardiography. Can J Cardiol 1995, 11:1007–1014.PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Garcia D, Kadem L: What do you mean by aortic valve area: geometric orifice area, effective orifice area, or gorlin area? J Heart Valve Dis 2006, 15:601–608.PubMed Garcia D, Kadem L: What do you mean by aortic valve area: geometric orifice area, effective orifice area, or gorlin area? J Heart Valve Dis 2006, 15:601–608.PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Minners J, Allgeier M, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, et al.: Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J 2008, 29:1043–1048. This is a very important study showing that there are inconsistencies in the criteria of AVA and mean gradient proposed in the guidelines to grade severe AS. CrossRefPubMed •• Minners J, Allgeier M, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, et al.: Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J 2008, 29:1043–1048. This is a very important study showing that there are inconsistencies in the criteria of AVA and mean gradient proposed in the guidelines to grade severe AS. CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Orsinelli DA, Aurigemma GP, Battista S, et al.: Left ventricular hypertrophy and mortality after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. A high risk subgroup identified by preoperative relative wall thickness. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993, 22:1679–1683.PubMedCrossRef Orsinelli DA, Aurigemma GP, Battista S, et al.: Left ventricular hypertrophy and mortality after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. A high risk subgroup identified by preoperative relative wall thickness. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993, 22:1679–1683.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Duncan AI, Lowe BS, Garcia MJ, et al.: Influence of concentric left ventricular remodeling on early mortality after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2008, 85:2030–2039.CrossRefPubMed Duncan AI, Lowe BS, Garcia MJ, et al.: Influence of concentric left ventricular remodeling on early mortality after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2008, 85:2030–2039.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Aortic valve calcification measured by multislice computed tomography in aortic stenosis - correlation with hemodynamic severity and clinical implication for patients with low ejection fraction. Cueff C, Serfaty JM, Cimadevilla C, et al. Eurecho 2009. Madrid December 10, 2009. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009, 10: ii45-ii73 [Abstract]. Aortic valve calcification measured by multislice computed tomography in aortic stenosis - correlation with hemodynamic severity and clinical implication for patients with low ejection fraction. Cueff C, Serfaty JM, Cimadevilla C, et al. Eurecho 2009. Madrid December 10, 2009. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009, 10: ii45-ii73 [Abstract].
Metadaten
Titel
Low-Flow, Low-Gradient, Normal Ejection Fraction Aortic Stenosis
verfasst von
Philippe Pibarot
Jean G. Dumesnil
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2010
Verlag
Current Science Inc.
Erschienen in
Current Cardiology Reports / Ausgabe 2/2010
Print ISSN: 1523-3782
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-3170
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-010-0090-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2010

Current Cardiology Reports 2/2010 Zur Ausgabe

ReviewPaper

The SEAS Trial

Nach Herzinfarkt mit Typ-1-Diabetes schlechtere Karten als mit Typ 2?

29.05.2024 Herzinfarkt Nachrichten

Bei Menschen mit Typ-2-Diabetes sind die Chancen, einen Myokardinfarkt zu überleben, in den letzten 15 Jahren deutlich gestiegen – nicht jedoch bei Betroffenen mit Typ 1.

Erhöhtes Risiko fürs Herz unter Checkpointhemmer-Therapie

28.05.2024 Nebenwirkungen der Krebstherapie Nachrichten

Kardiotoxische Nebenwirkungen einer Therapie mit Immuncheckpointhemmern mögen selten sein – wenn sie aber auftreten, wird es für Patienten oft lebensgefährlich. Voruntersuchung und Monitoring sind daher obligat.

GLP-1-Agonisten können Fortschreiten diabetischer Retinopathie begünstigen

24.05.2024 Diabetische Retinopathie Nachrichten

Möglicherweise hängt es von der Art der Diabetesmedikamente ab, wie hoch das Risiko der Betroffenen ist, dass sich sehkraftgefährdende Komplikationen verschlimmern.

TAVI versus Klappenchirurgie: Neue Vergleichsstudie sorgt für Erstaunen

21.05.2024 TAVI Nachrichten

Bei schwerer Aortenstenose und obstruktiver KHK empfehlen die Leitlinien derzeit eine chirurgische Kombi-Behandlung aus Klappenersatz plus Bypass-OP. Diese Empfehlung wird allerdings jetzt durch eine aktuelle Studie infrage gestellt – mit überraschender Deutlichkeit.

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.