nach oben

Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2019 | Research

Maternal genetic contribution to pre-pregnancy obesity, gestational weight gain, and gestational diabetes mellitus

verfasst von: Selvihan Beysel, Nilnur Eyerci, Mustafa Ulubay, Mustafa Caliskan, Muhammed Kizilgul, Merve Hafızoğlu, Erman Cakal

Erschienen in: Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome | Ausgabe 1/2019

Abstract

Introduction

Pre-pregnancy obesity, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and gestational weight gain (GWG) are associated with each other. This is the first study to investigate whether genetic variants were associated with having GDM, and whether genetic variants-related GDM were associated with adiposity including pre-pregnancy obesity and excessive GWG in Turkish women.

Patients and methods

Women with GDM (n = 160) and without GDM (n = 145) were included in case-controlled study. Genotyping of the HNF1A gene (p.I27L rs1169288, p.98V rs1800574, p.S487N rs2464196), the VDR gene (p.BsmI rs1544410, p.ApaI rs7975232, p.TaqI rs731236, p.FokI rs2228570), and FTO gene (rs9939609) SNPs were performed by using RT-PCR.

Results

The FTO AA genotype was associated with an increased risk of having GDM (AA vs. AT + TT, 24.4% vs. 12.4%, OR = 2.27, 95% CI [1.23–4.19], p = 0.007). The HNF1A p.I27L GT/TT genotype was associated with increased GDM risk (GT + TT vs. GG-wild, 79.4% vs. 65.5%, OR = 2.02, 95% CI 1.21–3.38], p = 0.007). However, all VDR gene SNPs and the HNF1A p.A98V, p.S487N were not associated with having GDM (p > 0.05). The FTO AA genotype was associated with an increased risk for pre-pregnancy overweight/obesity (OR = 1.43, 95% CI [1.25–3.4], p = 0.035), but not associated with excessive GWG after adjusting for pre-pregnancy weight (p > 0.05). Pre-pregnancy weight, weight at delivery, and GWG did not differ in both VDR and HNF1A gene carriers (p > 0.05). HOMA-IR and HbA1c were increased in both p.I27L TT and FTO AA genotype carriers (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The adiposity-related gene FTO is associated with GDM by the effect of FTO on pre-pregnancy obesity. The diabetes-related p.I27L gene is associated with GDM by increasing insulin resistance.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

GDM

gestational diabetes mellitus

GWG

gestational weight gain

BMI

body mass index

SNPs

single nucleotide polymorphisms

IOM

Institute of Medicine

HNF1A

hepatocyte nuclear factor 1α

FTO

the fat mass and obesity associated gene

VDR

vitamin D receptor

HOMA-IR

homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance

HbA1c

hemoglobin A1c

Introduction

Maternal obesity and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a growing public health problem worldwide [1]. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) developed guidelines for gestational weight gain (GWG) during pregnancy; however, no specific recommendations could be made for GDM and multiethnic differences [2, 3]. Both pre-pregnancy obesity and excessive GWG are related to increased risk of maternal obesity and GDM [3]. Becoming pregnant or gaining too much weight during pregnancy are the risk factors for adverse perinatal complications and increased risk for future metabolic disease in overweight/obese women, both for the mothers and their offspring [1, 4]. Pre-pregnancy obesity and excessive GWG may have additive negative impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with GDM [5, 6]. Pre-pregnancy obesity, gestational diabetes, and excessive GWG are associated with multiple factors such as the environment, behavior, and genetics; however, understanding these associations is complex [1, 3]. Diabetes-related or maternal and/or fetal adiposity-related genetic variants have been associated with GDM, pre-pregnancy weight, and GWG during pregnancy [7‐9]. Kawai et al. reported that common type 2 diabetes risk variants were associated with increased risk of GDM [8]. Genetic variants were associated with GDM and progression to pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus in women with prior GDM [9]. Evidence has been presented for a genetic predisposition to GDM risk and also a change in GWG during pregnancy [7, 10‐13], and gene–environment interactions could explain the variation in GWG and GDM.

The fat mass and obesity-associated gene (FTO) rs9939609 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) was associated with increased risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes, as well as GDM [10]. The FTO SNPs have been reported to be associated with pre-pregnancy obesity [8] and excessive GWG [11]. The FTO variants related to type 2 diabetes are mediated by the effect of the FTO gene on body mass index (BMI); however, the exact mechanisms of this relation have not been identified [10, 11]. Vitamin D shows its cellular activity by binding to vitamin D receptors (VDR). VDR, as a transcription factor, has a role in the regulation of insulin secretion from pancreatic beta cells [14]. VDR has effect on proliferation, differentiation, and activation of immune cells and cytokine production, and subsequently type 2 diabetes occurs [15, 16]. Hepatocyte nuclear factor 1A (HNF1A), as a transcription factor, has a role in the function of pancreas beta cells [17]. Endocrine and exocrine pancreatic cells express HNF1A in the developmental stage. HNF1A is necessary for the glucose response to insulin secretion and glucose metabolism [18]. Women with HNF1A mutation are diagnosed as having monogenic form of diabetes type 3 (MODY3), and these women usually present with GDM, and diabetes persisting after delivery [17‐19].

This is the first study to investigate the effect of HNF1A gene, VDR gene, and FTO gene variants on having GDM, pre-pregnancy obesity, and excessive GWG in Turkey. We aimed to examine whether these genetic variants would associate with having GDM, and then, whether the genetic variants that associated with GDM would associate with adiposity including pre-pregnancy obesity and excessive GWG. The VDR gene (encoding as SNPs p.BsmI, p.ApaI, p.TaqI, and p.FokI), and, HNF1A gene (encoding as SNPs p.I27L, p.A98V, and p.S487N) were chosen because these genetic variants have been reported to be associated with type 2 diabetes, as well as GDM risk [12, 14‐20]. We also investigated the obesity-related FTO gene rs9939609 SNP because it is associated with both GDM and gestational body weight during pregnancy [10, 13, 20]. Genetic variants are implicated in the pathogenesis of GDM. Evidence suggests the genetic alterations in genes responsible for metabolic changes during pregnancy predispose to GDM [7]. We also hypothesized that these diabetes and adiposity-related genetic variants would likely be associated with GDM risk and gestational body weight during pregnancy.

Patients and methods

Study population

Pregnant women referred to tertiary hospital, Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, Ankara, from 2015 to 2016, were included in this case-control study. Women with GDM (n = 160) and age- and gestational age-matched women without GDM as controls (n = 145) were included in the study. Gestational age was assessed from the date of the last menstrual period and clinical assessment. A 2-h, 75-g oral glucose tolerance test at 24 to 28 weeks gestation age was performed for all pregnant women, irrespective of family history of DM or any other risk factors for GDM. Glucose concentrations after fasting, and 1 and 2 h after glucose administration < 92 mg/dl, < 180 mg/dl, and < 153 mg/dl, respectively, were considered normal. When the pregnant women’s glucose concentration was higher than any of these values, the women were diagnosed as having GDM [12]. Women whose GDM was diagnosed according to these criteria, aged 22–38 years, and whose pregnancy age was 24–48 weeks were included in the study. Women with GDM who had pre-existing type 2 diabetes, GDM observed in prior pregnancy, GDM with chronic disease such as hypertension, thyroid disorders, cardiac, hepatic or renal dysfunction were excluded. Women aged 22–38 years and with pregnancy age 24–28 weeks, with no GDM, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, thyroid disorders, cardiac, hepatic or renal dysfunction were accepted as controls and included in the study. Treatment of diet with or without insulin therapy was recorded. Weight, height, and systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured in all participants. Body mass index (BMI, kg/m²) was calculated as weight (kg)/height² (m²). Women were categorized as underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m²), normal weight (BMI = 18.5–24.9 kg/m²), overweight (BMI = 25–29.9 kg/m²), and obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²). Maternal weight before pregnancy, pre-pregnancy weight, was obtained through a questionnaire. Maternal weight was measured at delivery. Gestational weight gain (GWG) was calculated as the difference between the maternal weight at delivery and pre-pregnancy weight. The recommended GWG was calculated based on IOM guidelines related with pre-pregnancy BMI: underweight, a gain of 12.5–18 kg; normal weight, a gain of 11.5–16 kg; overweight, a gain of 7–11.5 kg; and obese, a gain of 5–9 kg. After this, GWG was divided into three categories: low, if the weight was below the recommendation; adequate, if the weight gain was within the recommendation; and high, if the weight gain was above the recommendation [21]. Serum glucose, insulin, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) concentrations were measured at 24–28 weeks of pregnancy. Insulin resistance was calculated using the homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR): [fasting plasma insulin (µIU/ml) × fasting plasma glucose (mg/dl)]/405 [12]. This study was approval by Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Teaching and Training Research Hospital Ethics Board (Number. 24.04.2015-13/25). Written informed consent was obtained from each participant.

Genotyping

Genetic analyses for the VDR gene SNPs p.FokI (rs2228570), p.BsmI (rs1544410), p.ApaI (rs7975232), and p.TaqI (rs731236) and the HNF1A gene SNPs p.S487N (rs2464196, p.Ser486Asn), p.A98V (rs1800574, p.Ala98Val), p.I27L (rs1169288, p.Ile27Leu) and the FTO gene rs939609 SNPs were performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) amplification. Genomic DNA was isolated from collected peripheral blood samples of the subjects using DNA Isolation Kit (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Genotyping of each SNP in the VDR gene, HNF1A gene, and FTO gene was independently conducted using a pre-validated fluorescence-based allele-specific PCR assay, KASPar (KBiosciences, Hoddesdon, UK) and performed on a Rotor-Gene Q real-time cycler (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Allele discrimination was made using Rotor-Gene Q software v.2.3.1 (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The genotype calling was performed blind without information on the clinical phenotypes.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 18.0 (SPSS, Inc) software. Variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median (min–max), percentages (%), odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI). Normality was tested using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk W test. SNPs are expressed as allelic frequency (q) or prevalence of genotypes (%). Categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, where appropriate. Student’s t-test was used for normally distributed continuous variables or log-transformed variables between two groups. The Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) at individual loci was assessed using the Chi-square test. Multiple logistic regression analysis and the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was tested using models and ORs were calculated: dominant (major allele homozygotes vs. heterozygotes + minor allele homozygotes), recessive (major allele homozygotes + heterozygotes vs. minor allele homozygotes) and codominant (major allele homozygotes vs. heterozygote and minor allele homozygotes vs. major allele homozygotes). Pair-wise linkage disequilibrium (LD) and correlation coefficients (r²) were analyzed using the HAPLOVIEW program. We made a variable reflecting all possible combinations of genotypes for each SNP. Power analysis was performed using web-based software http://osse.bii.a-star.edu.sg/calculation2.php. The power of study was 65%. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

Results

The mean age, gestational age, and height were similar between the women with GDM and controls (p > 0.05). Pre-pregnancy overweight/obesity were increased in women with GDM compared with controls (p < 0.05). Weight at delivery and excessive GWG were increased in women with GDM compared with the controls (p < 0.05). Serum glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, and HbA1c were increased in women with GDM compared with the controls (p < 0.05, each). The clinical features of the subjects are shown in Table 1. Minor allele frequency of the HNF1A, VDR, and FTO genes is shown in Table 2. These frequencies were in HWE except p.A98V. Haploview analysis showed that the HNF1A, VDR, and FTO genes were not in LD. The risk alleles of the HNF1A gene (p.S487N, and p.A98V) and, VDR gene (p.ApaI, p.TaqI, p.BsmI and p.FokI) were similar between women with GDM and the controls (p > 0.05, each). Genotype analysis is shown in Table 3.

Table 1

Characteristics of subjects

	Controls (n = 145)	Gestational diabetes mellitus (n = 160)	p
Age (year)	28.25 ± 5.15	29.35 ± 5.36	0.075
Gestational age (weeks)	26.27 ± 1.48	25.99 ± 1.65	0.137
Height (cm)	160.40 ± 5.71	159.21 ± 5.95	0.076
Pre-pregnancy weight (kg)	61.74 ± 11.98	76.21 ± 11.27	0.001
Pre-pregnancy BMI (kg/m²)	24.06 ± 4.82	30.21 ± 5.10	0.001
Pre-pregnancy BMI (%)			0.001
Underweight (< 20 kg/m²)	23.4	3.8
Normal weight (20–24.9 kg/m²)	38.6	8.8
Overweight (25–29.9 kg/m²)	26.2	34.4
Obesity (≥ 30 kg/m²)	11.7	53.1
Pre-pregnancy overweight/obesity (%)^a	37.9	87.5	0.001
Weight at delivery (kg)	77.60 ± 12.59	87.58 ± 11.54	0.001
BMI at delivery (kg/m²)	30.24 ± 5.18	34.71 ± 5.30	0.001
Gestational weight gain (kg)	16.05 ± 5.43	11.56 ± 2.72	0.001
Gestational weight gain (%)^b			0.011
Excessive	44.1	61.2
Adequate	46.9	33.1
Below	9.0	5.6
Glucose (mg/dl)	72.39 ± 7.12	101.67 ± 11.99	0.001
İnsulin (µIU/ml)	8.07 ± 2.02	11.93 ± 4.78	0.001
HOMA-IR	1.42 ± 0.39	3.06 ± 1.26	0.001
HbA1c (%)	5.01 ± 0.32	5.51 ± 0.43	0.001
Systolic BP (mmHg)	108.06 ± 8.74	110.84 ± 11.23	0.052
Diastolic BP (mmHg)	72.70 ± 5.62	73.48 ± 5.11	0.207

Italics represents significant p-values

PPO pre-pregnancy overweight/obesity, GDM gestational diabetes mellitus, GWG gestational weight gain, BMI body mass index, BP blood pressure, HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance, HbA1c hemoglobin A1c

^aPrepregnancy overweight/obesity is defined as the percentage of subjects with having BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²

^bRecommended gestational weight gain was calculated based on Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations according to pre-pregnancy BMI

Table 2

Minor allele frequency of polymorphisms

	Risk allele	MAF for study sample
HNF1A I27L rs1169288	T	0.44
HNF1A S487N rs2464196	T	0.37
HNF1A A98V rs1800574	T	0.10
VDR ApaI rs7975232	C	0.42
VDR TaqI rs731236	C	0.35
VDR BsmI rs1544410	G	0.45
VDR FokI rs2228570	T	0.35
FTO rs9939609	A	0.37

MAF minor allele frequency

Table 3

Genotype analysis of HNF1A gene, VDR gene and FTO gene polymorphisms

	Controls, n	Gestational diabetes, n	OR (95% CI)	p
FTO gene rs9939609 (%)				0.011*
Co-dominant wild type TT	73	59
Heterozygous AT	54	62	1.42 (0.86–2.24)	0.169**
Homozygous AA	18	39	2.68 (1.39–4.13)	0.003***
Dominant (AT + AA/TT)	72 vs. 73	101 vs. 59	1.73 (1.12–2.74)	0.018
Recessive (AA/AT + TT)	18 vs. 127	39 vs. 121	2.27 (1.23–4.19)	0.007
HNF1 gene I27L rs1169288 (%)				0.009*
Co-dominant wild type GG	50	33
Heterozygous GT	78	94	1.82 (1.13–3.12)	0.026**
Homozygous TT	17	33	2.94 (1.41–4.16)	0.003***
Dominant (GT + TT/GG)	95 vs. 50	127 vs. 33	2.02 (1.21–3.38)	0.007
Recessive (TT/GT + GG)	17 vs. 128	33 vs. 127	1.95 (1.13–3.49)	0.036
HNF1 gene S487N rs2464196 (%)				0.919*
Co-dominant wild type CC	61	64
Heterozygous CT	62	72	1.10 (0.67–1.80)	0.684**
Homozygous TT	22	24	1.04 (0.52–2.04)	0.910***
Dominant (CT + TT/CC)	84 vs. 61	96 vs. 64	1.11 (0.70–1.76)	0.683
Recessive (TT/CT + CC)	22 vs. 123	24 vs 136	0.98 (0.52–1.84)	0.966
HNF1 gene A98V rs1800574 (%)				0.433*
Co-dominant wild type CC	121	130
Heterozygous CT	22	24	1.01 (0.54–1.90)	0.962**
Homozygous TT	2	6	2.79 (0.55–12.45)	0.196***
Dominant model (CT + TT/CC)	24 vs. 121	30 vs. 130	1.16 (0.64–2.10)	0.615
Recessive model (TT/CT + CC)	2 vs. 143	6 vs. 154	2.78 (0.55–12.5)	0.196
VDR gene ApaI rs7975232 (%)				0.199*
Co-dominant wild type AA	52	48
Heterozygous AC	73	78	1.15 (0.69–1.91)	0.571**
Homozygous CC	20	34	1.84 (0.93–3.62)	0.076***
Dominant (AC + CC/AA)	93 vs. 52	112 vs. 48	1.30 (0.80–2.10)	0.279
Recessive (CC/AA + AC)	20 vs. 125	34 vs. 126	1.68 (0.92–3.02)	0.088
VDR gene TaqI rs731236 (%)				0.472*
Co-dominant wild type TT	82	81
Heterozygous CT	33	37	1.13 (0.64–1.98)	0.658**
Homozygous CC	30	42	1.41 (0.80–2.48)	0.222***
Dominant (CT + CC/TT)	63 vs. 82	79 vs. 81	1.26 (0.82–2.04)	0.301
Recessive (CC/CT + TT)	30 vs. 115	42 vs. 118	1.36 (0.81–2.32)	0.253
VDR gene BsmI rs1544410 (%)				0.461*
Co-dominant wild type AA	57	53
Heterozygous AG	52	63	1.32 (0.78–2.24)	0.290**
Homozygous GG	36	45	1.37 (0.76–2.44)	0.284***
Dominant (AG + GG/AA)	88 vs. 57	108 vs. 53	1.34 (0.841–2.15)	0.215
Recessive (GG/AG + AA)	36 vs. 109	45 vs. 116	1.18 (0.71–1.97)	0.515
VDR gene FokI rs2228570 (%)				0.191*
Co-dominant wild type CC	78	76
Heterozygous CT	43	44	1.05 (0.62–1.77)	0.855**
Homozygous TT	24	40	1.71 (0.94–3.10)	0.076***
Dominant (CT + TT/CC)	67 vs. 78	84 vs. 76	1.28 (0.82–2.01)	0.272
Recessive (TT/CT + CC)	24 vs. 121	40 vs. 120	1.68 (0.95–2.59)	0.070

Categorical variables were analyzed with Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, where appropriate. Multiple logistic regression analysis and Fisher’s exact test were tested using models: dominant (major allele homozygotes vs heterozygotes + minor allele homozygotes), recessive (major allele homozygotes + heterozygotes vs minor allele homozygotes) and codominant (major allele homozygotes vs heterozygote and minor allele homozygotes vs major allele homozygotes)

Italics represents significant p-values

*p Wild vs homozygous vs heterozygous

**p heterozygous vs wild

***p homozygous vs wild type

The FTO gene rs9939609 distribution was TT-wild, heterozygote AT, and homozygote AA at 50.3%, 37.2%, and 12.4% in the controls, and 36.9%, 38.8%, and 24.4% in women with GDM (p = 0.011). The FTO gene AA genotype was associated with an increased risk of GDM more than the TT/AT genotype in co-dominant, dominant, and recessive models (dominant: AT + AA vs. TT-wild, 63.1% vs. 49.7%, OR = 1.73, 95% CI [1.12–2.74], p = 0.018, and recessive: AA vs. AT + TT, 24.4 vs. 12.4%, OR = 2.27, 95% CI [1.23–4.19], p = 0.007) (Table 3). The FTO AA/AT genotype had a greater association with pre-pregnancy overweight/obesity than TT-wild genotype (p < 0.05) (Table 4). Pre-pregnancy weight (p < 0.05) and weight at delivery (p < 0.05) progressively increased from the AA genotype to the TT genotype. GWG was increased in AT/AA genotype compared with the TT genotype (p < 0.05). Serum glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, and HbA1c were higher in the AA genotype compared with the TT genotype (p < 0.05). The FTO AA genotype was associated with a greater risk of pre-pregnancy overweight/obesity compared with AT/TT genotypes (OR = 1.43, 95% CI [1.25–3.4], p = 0.035). The FTO AA genotype was associated with excessive GWG risk compared with the TT and AT genotype (OR = 1.73, 95% CI [1.62–3.15], p = 0.034); however, this association was lost after adjusting for pre-pregnancy weight (OR = 1.1, 95% CI [0.94–2.38], p > 0.05).

Table 4

Clinics of pregnants according to the FTO gene rs9939609 SNP

	TT-wild (n = 132)	AT (n = 116)	AA (n = 57)	p*	p**	p***
Controls (%)	55.3 (n = 73)	46.6 (n = 54)	31.6 (n = 18)	0.169	0.003	0.060
Gestational diabetes mellitus (%)	44.7 (n = 59)	53.4 (n = 62)	68.4 (n = 39)
Pre-pregnancy BMI (%)				< 0.001	0.001	0.011
Underweight (< 20 kg/m²)	18.2	10.3	7.0
Normal weight (20–24.9 kg/m²)	33.3	16.4	12.3
Overweight (25–29.9 kg/m²)	19.7	44.8	26.3
Obesity (≥ 30 kg/m²)	28.8	28.4	54.4
Pre-pregnancy overweight/obesity (%)^a	48.5 (n = 64)	73.3 (n = 85)	80.7 (n = 46)	< 0.001	0.001	0.284
Gestational weight gain (%)^b				0.001	< 0.001	0.014
Below	12.1	3.4	3.6
Adequate	51.5	37.9	16.1
Excessive	36.4	58.6	80.4
Excessive GWG (%)	36.4 (n = 48)	58.6 (n = 68)	80.4 (n = 46)	0.001	< 0.001	0.003
Pre-pregnancy weight (kg)	65.79 ± 13.80	69.69 ± 11.31	76.78 ± 14.81	0.016	< 0.001	0.001
Pre-pregnancy BMI (kg/m²)	25.80 ± 5.80	27.46 ± 5.03	30.36 ± 6.27	0.017	< 0.001	0.001
Weight at delivery (kg)	78.52 ± 13.01	83.84 ± 9.80	90.78 ± 14.79	0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001
BMI at delivery (kg/m²)	30.77 ± 5.56	33.03 ± 4.72	35.86 ± 6.22	0.001	< 0.001	0.001
Gestational weight gain (kg)	10.93 ± 3.77	12.93 ± 2.31	13.98 ± 4.91	0.029	0.021	0.654
Glucose (mg/dl)	84.64 ± 18.01	88.06 ± 17.65	91.64 ± 17.25	0.134	0.014	0.207
İnsulin (µIU/ml)	9.61 ± 4.35	10.18 ± 3.72	11.27 ± 4.89	0.315	0.039	0.148
HOMA-IR	2.16 ± 1.26	2.33 ± 1.18	2.65 ± 1.37	0.307	0.033	0.159
HbA1c (%)	5.22 ± 0.48	5.24 ± 0.41	5.41 ± 0.51	0.685	0.018	0.027
Systolic BP (mmHg)	110.41 ± 9.59	108.87 ± 10.61	108.77 ± 10.74	0.232	0.298	0.951
Diastolic BP (mmHg)	73.74 ± 5.43	72.81 ± 5.03	72.24 ± 5.75	0.169	0.090	0.503

Italics represents significant p-values

*p TT wild type vs heterozygote AT

**p TT wild type vs homozygote AA

***p heterozygote AT vs homozygote AA

^aPrepregnancy overweight/obesity is defined as the percentage of subjects with having BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²

^bRecommended gestational weight gain was calculated based on Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations according to pre-pregnancy BMI

The HNF1A gene p.I27L distribution of GG-wild, GT, and TT was 34.5%, 53.8%, and 11.7% in the controls, and 20.6%, 58.8%, and 20.6% in women with GDM (p = 0.009). The HNF1A gene p.I27L TT/GT genotype was associated with a greater risk of GDM in comparison with the GG genotype in co-dominant, dominant, and recessive models (dominant: GT + TT vs. GG-wild, 79.4 vs. 65.5%, OR = 2.02, 95% CI [1.21–3.38], p = 0.007 and recessive: TT vs. GT + GG, 20.6 vs. 11.7%, OR = 1.95, 95% CI [1.13–3.49], p = 0.036) (Table 3). Pre-pregnancy weight, weight at delivery, and GWG were similar between p.I27L genotypes (p > 0.05) (Table 5). Glucose, HOMA-IR, and HbA1c were increased in the p.I27L TT genotype compared with the GG-wild type (p < 0.05). Pre-pregnancy weight, weight at delivery, and GWG did not differ between the VDR and HNF1A gene carriers (p > 0.05).

Table 5

Clinics of pregnant women according to the HNF1A gene p.I27L

	GG wild (n = 83)	GT (n = 172)	TT (n = 50)	p*	p**	p***
Controls (%)	60.2 (n = 50)	45.3 (n = 78)	34.0 (n = 17)	0.026	0.003	0.153
Gestational diabetes mellitus (%)	39.8 (n = 33)	54.7 (n = 94)	66.0 (n = 33)
Pre-pregnancy BMI (%)				0.653	0.622	0.695
Underweight (< 20 kg/m²)	15.7	13.4	8.0
Normal weight (20–24.9 kg/m²)	21.7	23.3	24.0
Overweight (25–29.9 kg/m²)	33.7	27.9	34.0
Obesity (≥ 30 kg/m²)	28.9	35.5	34.0
Pre-pregnancy overweight/obesity (%)^a	62.7 (n = 52)	63.4 (n = 109)	68.0 (n = 34)	0.911	0.532	0.547
Gestational weight gain (%)^b				0.112	0.804	0.342
Below	3.6	9.4	6.0
Adequate	45.8	35.1	46.0
Excessive	50.6	55.6	48.0
Excessive GWG (%)	50.6 (n = 42)	55.8 (n = 96)	48.0 (n = 24)	0.434	0.771	0.329
Pre-pregnancy weight (kg)	67.93 ± 13.64	70.12 ± 14.28	68.94 ± 11.42	0.247	0.665	0.592
Pre-pregnancy BMI (kg/m²)	26.78 ± 5.74	27.51 ± 6.06	27.35 ± 5.24	0.364	0.568	0.870
Weight at delivery (kg)	81.84 ± 13.34	83.56 ± 13.50	81.98 ± 10.73	0.338	0.951	0.445
BMI at delivery (kg/m²)	32.25 ± 5.66	32.77 ± 5.88	32.50 ± 5.13	0.503	0.795	0.772
Gestational weight gain (kg)	14.02 ± 4.60	13.67 ± 4.83	13.24 ± 4.98	0.583	0.359	0.434
Glucose (mg/dl)	83.89 ± 17.10	86.88 ± 17.69	94.06 ± 18.23	0.203	0.002	0.013
İnsulin (µIU/ml)	9.52 ± 3.16	10.30 ± 4.76	10.64 ± 4.09	0.215	0.108	0.681
HOMA-IR	2.10 ± 1.01	2.36 ± 1.37	2.54 ± 1.23	0.155	0.045	0.470
HbA1c (%)	5.15 ± 0.40	5.29 ± 0.50	5.32 ± 0.41	0.048	0.037	0.736
Systolic BP (mmHg)	109.93 ± 10.07	109.27 ± 10.26	109.70 ± 10.37	0.626	0.896	0.797
Diastolic BP (mmHg)	73.20 ± 5.47	73.11 ± 5.26	72.94 ± 5.63	0.901	0.790	0.838

Italics represents significant p-values

*p wild GG vs heterozygote GT

**p wild GG vs homozygote TT

***p heterozygote GT vs homozygote TT

^aPrepregnancy overweight/obesity is defined as the percentage of subjects with having BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²

^bRecommended GWG was calculated based on Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations according to pre-pregnancy BMI

Discussion

Both the FTO AA genotype and HNF1A p.I27L GT/TT genotype were associated with an increased risk of having GDM in Turkish women. However, the VDR gene (p.ApaI, p.TaqI, p.FokI, p.BsmI) and HNF1A gene (p.A98V, p.S487N) were not associated with having GDM. Insulin resistance and impaired glucose metabolism was observed in both p.I27L TT and FTO AA genotype carriers. The FTO AA genotype was associated with an increased risk for pre-pregnancy overweight/obesity, but not associated with excessive GWG after adjusting for pre-pregnancy weight. The association of the adiposity-related gene FTO with GDM might be mediated by the effect of FTO on pre-pregnancy obesity. The diabetes-related p.I27L gene was associated with GDM by increasing insulin resistance.

Our results demonstrated that the VDR gene p.ApaI, p.TaqI, p.BsmI, and p.FokI genotypes were not associated with having GDM in Turkish women. The VDR gene and HNF1A gene SNPs were not associated with pre-pregnancy weight, weight at delivery, and GWG during pregnancy. The associations of the VDR gene and HNF1A gene with pre-pregnancy weight, weight at delivery, and GWG have not been investigated in previous studies. El-Beshbishy et al. reported that p.BsmI and p.FokI were not associated with GDM in Saudi women [22]. Incompatible to our results, p.FokI [23], p.ApaI, and p.TaqI [22] were associated with an increased risk of GDM in Iranian women [24]. We found that the HNF1A gene p.A98V and p.S487N were not associated with GDM in Turkish women. Zurawek et al. reported that p.I27L, p.A98V, and p.S487N were not associated with GDM in Polish women [25]. No relationship was reported between p.A98V and GDM in Danish women [12]; however, insulin secretion was decreased in p.A98V carriers without GDM [26], which is compensated by increasing insulin sensitivity [27]. Our data show that the HNF1A gene p.I27L GT/GG genotype was associated with an increased risk of GDM (OR = 2.02, 95% CI [1.21–3.38], p = 0.007). Pre-pregnancy weight, weight at delivery, and GWG were not associated with p.I27L genotypes. Insulin resistance and impaired glucose metabolism was observed in p.I27L TT carriers. We suggest that the diabetes-related p.I27L gene was associated with the increased risk of GDM by impairing glucose metabolism and increasing insulin resistance. Similarly, p.I27L was associated with an increased GDM risk in Scandinavian women by the effect of p.I27L on pancreas beta cell function [28] and insulin resistance [29]. Decreased beta cell function/transcriptional activity, decreased glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, increased insulin resistance, and increased type2 diabetes risk have been found in p.I27L + p.S487N carriers (if also including p.A98V) [27, 30, 31]. HNF1A controls beta cell function by regulating target genes such as glucose transporter 2, liver pyruvate kinase, collectrin, hepatocyte growth factor activator, and HNF4A. Decreased HNF1A activity causes decreased beta cell mass and expression of these target genes, which lead to impaired insulin secretion [17, 18]. Beta-cell dysfunction is more prone to developing impaired glucose tolerance during pregnancy [28].

The FTO gene AA genotype was associated with an increased risk of having GDM (OR = 2.27, 95% CI [1.23–4.19], p = 0.007). The FTO AA genotype had a greater risk for pre-pregnancy overweight/obesity (OR = 1.43, 95% CI [1.25–3.4], p = 0.035). The FTO AA genotype was not associated with GWG after adjusting for pre-pregnancy weight (OR = 1.1, 95% CI [0.94–2.38], p > 0.05). Insulin resistance and impaired glucose metabolism were observed in FTO AA genotype carriers. We suggest that the adiposity-related gene FTO was associated with increased risk of GDM by increasing pre-pregnancy obesity. Similarly, previous studies have shown that the FTO rs9939609 AA genotype was associated with higher pre-pregnancy weight [10, 13, 32]. Lawlor et al. reported that maternal fat or fetal fat adiposity-related variants were not associated with excessive GWG, but the FTO gene was associated with pre-pregnancy overweight [33]. The FTO gene has a role in the regulation of adiposity-related phenotypes through the effect of FTO on weight gain during younger ages [34] and continues throughout life [10]. FTO is expressed in the hypothalamic region, which regulates appetite [35], and this would contribute to energy intake and body fat mass [36]. Our data demonstrated that FTO gene AA genotype carriers were heavier before pregnancy, but AA carriers did not have significant weight gain during pregnancy. Chiou et al. reported that the FTO gene was associated with pre-pregnancy obesity and a tendency to gain less weight throughout pregnancy [5]. Consistent with our data, the FTO gene was not associated with greater GWG after adjusting for pre-pregnancy BMI in Caucasian and African-American populations [37]. The FTO gene was not associated with GWG according to the period of pregnancy in British [33] and Brazilian women [10]. Moreover, GWG comprises other factors such as the fetus, amniotic fluid, and placenta [10]. Pregnant women have biologic, behavioral, and hormonal changes throughout pregnancy [11]. Pre-pregnancy body weight shows maternal nutritional changes before conception, whereas GWG represents fetal-maternal physiologic conditions associated with genetic and nutrition factors [1]. This could modify the genetic contributions of the maternal FTO, HNF1A, and VDR gene variants on pre-gestational weight and GWG, as well as GDM [13, 33]; however it is not fully known which of these conditions is more associated with these disorders.

There are some limitations in our study that should be considered. We did not report the GWG according to gestational weeks. The small sample size resulted in a lower power for investigating a significant effect of any of the HNF1A, VDR, and FTO gene SNPs on weight changes during pregnancy. Also, we did not control our data for confounding variables such as nutrition, education, smoking and parity.

Conclusion

Both the FTO AA genotype and HNF1A p.I27L GT/TT genotype were associated with increased GDM risk in Turkish pregnant women. However, the VDR gene p.ApaI, p.TaqI, p.FokI, p.BsmI and the HNF1A gene p.A98V, p.S487N genotypes were not associated with having GDM. The diabetes-related p.I27L gene was associated with GDM by increasing insulin resistance. The diabetes-related HNF1A p.I27L gene was associated with insulin resistance, which might contribute to developing GDM. The FTO AA genotype was associated with pre-pregnancy overweight/obesity, but did not contribute to significant weight gain during pregnancy. The adiposity-related gene FTO was associated with GDM by the effect of FTO on pre-pregnancy obesity. The FTO gene was associated with pre-pregnancy obesity, which might contribute to developing GDM. Genetic factors involved in GDM, pre-pregnancy weight, and GWG should be identified for the prevention of adverse complications of GDM and obesity during pregnancy. Further studies with multiethnic and larger populations are needed to find genetic variants related to GDM, pre-pregnancy obesity, and GWG during pregnancy.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

This study was approved by Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Teaching and Research Hospital Ethics Board (Number.24.04.2015-13/25). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Bianchi C, de Gennaro G, Romano M, Aragona M, Battini L, Del Prato S, Bertolotto A. Pre-pregnancy obesity, gestational diabetes or gestational weight gain: which is the strongest predictor of pregnancy outcomes? Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;144:286–93.CrossRef

Viecceli C, Remonti LR, Hirakata VN, Mastella LS, Gnielka V, Oppermann MLR, Silveiro SP, Reichelt AJ. Weight gain adequacy and pregnancy outcomes in gestational diabetes: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2017;18:567–80.CrossRef

Li C, Liu Y, Zhang W. Joint and independent associations of gestational weight gain and pre-pregnancy body mass index with outcomes of pregnancy in Chinese women: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0136850.CrossRef

Blackwell SC, Landon MB, Mele L, Reddy UM, Casey BM, Wapner RJ, Varner MW, Rouse DJ, Thorp JM, Sciscione A, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network, et al. Relationship between excessive gestational weight gain and neonatal adiposity in women with mild gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:1325–32.CrossRef

Chiou Y-L, Hung C-H, Liao H-Y. The impact of prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain on perinatal outcomes for women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2018;15:313–22.CrossRef

Egan AM, Dennedy MC, Al-Ramli W, Heerey A, Avalos G, Dunne F. ATLANTIC-DIP: excessive gestational weight gain and pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational or pregestational diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:212–9.CrossRef

Dias S, Pheiffer C, Abrahams Y, Rheeder P, Adam S. Molecular biomarkers for gestational diabetes mellitus. Sci: Int J Mol; 2018. p. 19.

Kawai VK, Levinson RT, Adefurin A, Kurnik D, Collier SP, Conway D, Stein CM. A genetic risk score that includes common type 2 diabetes risk variants is associated with gestational diabetes. Clin Endocrinol. 2017;87:149–55.CrossRef

Cormier H, Vigneault J, Garneau V, Tchernof A, Vohl M-C, Weisnagel SJ, Robitaille J. An explained variance-based genetic risk score associated with gestational diabetes antecedent and with progression to pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes: a cohort study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;122:411–9.CrossRef

10.

Martins MC, Trujillo J, Farias DR, Struchiner CJ, Kac G. Association of the FTO (rs9939609) and MC4R (rs17782313) gene polymorphisms with maternal body weight during pregnancy. Nutrition. 2016;32:1223–30.CrossRef

11.

Warrington NM, Richmond R, Fenstra B, Myhre R, Gaillard R, Paternoster L, Wang CA, Beaumont RN, Das S, Murcia M, et al. Maternal and fetal genetic contribution to gestational weight gain. Int J Obes. 2018;2005(42):775–84.CrossRef

12.

Lauenborg J, Damm P, Ek J, Glümer C, Jørgensen T, Borch-Johnsen K, Vestergaard H, Hornnes P, Pedersen O, Hansen T. Studies of the Ala/Val98 polymorphism of the hepatocyte nuclear factor-1alpha gene and the relationship to beta-cell function during an OGTT in glucose-tolerant women with and without previous gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med J Br Diabet Assoc. 2004;21:1310–5.CrossRef

13.

Gaillard R, Durmuş B, Hofman A, Mackenbach JP, Steegers EAP, Jaddoe VWV. Risk factors and outcomes of maternal obesity and excessive weight gain during pregnancy. Obesity. 2013;21:1046–55.CrossRef

14.

Bid HK, Konwar R, Aggarwal CG, Gautam S, Saxena M, Nayak VL, Banerjee M. Vitamin D receptor (FokI, BsmI and TaqI) gene polymorphisms and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a North Indian study. Indian J Med Sci. 2009;63:187–94.CrossRef

15.

Zhang J, Li W, Liu J, Wu W, Ouyang H, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Liu L, Yang R, Liu X, et al. Polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor gene and type 1 diabetes mellitus risk: an update by meta-analysis. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012;355:135–42.CrossRef

16.

Xia Z, Hu Y, Zhang H, Han Z, Bai J, Fu S, Deng X, He Y. Association of vitamin D receptor Fok I and Bsm I polymorphisms with dyslipidemias in elderly male patients with type 2 diabetes. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2014;34:1562–8.PubMed

17.

Balamurugan K, Bjørkhaug L, Mahajan S, Kanthimathi S, Njølstad PR, Srinivasan N, Mohan V, Radha V. Structure–function studies of HNF1A (MODY3) gene mutations in South Indian patients with monogenic diabetes. Clin Genet. 2016;90:186–495.CrossRef

18.

Yamagata K. Roles of HNF1α and HNF4α in pancreatic β-cells: lessons from a monogenic form of diabetes (MODY). Vitam Horm. 2014;95:407–23.CrossRef

19.

Kwak SH, Kim S-H, Cho YM, Go MJ, Cho YS, Choi SH, Moon MK, Jung HS, Shin HD, Kang HM, et al. A genome-wide association study of gestational diabetes mellitus in Korean women. Diabetes. 2012;61:531–41.CrossRef

20.

Klemetti M, Hiltunen LM, Heino S, Heinonen S, Kajantie E, Laivuori H. An obesity-related FTO variant and the risk of preeclampsia in a Finnish study population. J Pregnancy. 2011;2011:251470.CrossRef

21.

Institute of Medicine (US), National Research Council (US) Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines. Weight gain during pregnancy: reexamining the guidelines. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009.

22.

El-Beshbishy HA, Tawfeek MA, Taha IM, FadulElahi T, Shaheen AY, Bardi FA, Sultan II. Association of vitamin D receptor gene BsmI (A>G) and FokI (C>T) polymorphism in gestational diabetes among Saudi Women. Pak J Med Sci. 2015;31:1328–33.PubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Aslani S, Hossein-Nezhad A, Mirzaei K, Maghbooli Z, Afshar AN, Karimi F. VDR FokI polymorphism and its potential role in the pathogenesis of gestational diabetes mellitus and its complications. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2011;27:1055–60.CrossRef

24.

Rahmannezhad G, Mashayekhi FJ, Goodarzi MT, Rezvanfar MR, Sadeghi A. Association between vitamin D receptor ApaI and TaqI gene polymorphisms and gestational diabetes mellitus in an Iranian pregnant women population. Gene. 2016;581:43–7.CrossRef

25.

Zurawek M, Wender-Ozegowska E, Januszkiewicz-Lewandowska D, Zawiejska A, Nowak J. GCK and HNF1alpha mutations and polymorphisms in Polish women with gestational diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007;76:157–8.CrossRef

26.

Urhammer SA, Fridberg M, Hansen T, Rasmussen SK, Møller AM, Clausen JO, Pedersen O. A prevalent amino acid polymorphism at codon 98 in the hepatocyte nuclear factor-1alpha gene is associated with reduced serum C-peptide and insulin responses to an oral glucose challenge. Diabetes. 1997;46:912–6.CrossRef

27.

Bergman BC, Howard D, Schauer IE, Maahs DM, Snell-Bergeon JK, Eckel RH, Perreault L, Rewers M. Features of hepatic and skeletal muscle insulin resistance unique to type 1 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:1663–72.CrossRef

28.

Shaat N, Karlsson E, Lernmark A, Ivarsson S, Lynch K, Parikh H, Almgren P, Berntorp K, Groop L. Common variants in MODY genes increase the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 2006;49:1545–51.CrossRef

29.

Chiu KC, Chuang L-M, Chu A, Yoon C, Wang M. Comparison of the impact of the I27L polymorphism of the hepatocyte nuclear factor-1alpha on estimated and measured beta cell indices. Eur J Endocrinol. 2003;148:641–7.CrossRef

30.

Awa WL, Thon A, Raile K, Grulich-Henn J, Meissner T, Schober E, Holl RW, DPV-Wiss Study Group. Genetic and clinical characteristics of patients with HNF1A gene variations from the German-Austrian DPV database. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;164:513–20.CrossRef

31.

Winckler W, Burtt NP, Holmkvist J, Cervin C, de Bakker PIW, Sun M, Almgren P, Tuomi T, Gaudet D, Hudson TJ, et al. Association of common variation in the HNF1alpha gene region with risk of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2005;54:2336–42.CrossRef

32.

Andraweera PH, Dekker GA, Leemaqz S, McCowan L, Roberts CT, SCOPE consortium. The obesity associated FTO gene variant and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: evidence from the SCOPE study. Obesity. 2016;24:2600–7.CrossRef

33.

Lawlor DA, Fraser A, Macdonald-Wallis C, Nelson SM, Palmer TM, Davey Smith G, Tilling K. Maternal and offspring adiposity-related genetic variants and gestational weight gain. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94:149–55.CrossRef

34.

Hardy R, Wills AK, Wong A, Elks CE, Wareham NJ, Loos RJF, Kuh D, Ong KK. Life course variations in the associations between FTO and MC4R gene variants and body size. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19:545–52.CrossRef

35.

Gerken T, Girard CA, Tung Y-CL, Webby CJ, Saudek V, Hewitson KS, Yeo GSH, McDonough MA, Cunliffe S, McNeill LA, et al. The obesity-associated FTO gene encodes a 2-oxoglutarate-dependent nucleic acid demethylase. Science. 2007;318:1469–72.CrossRef

36.

Meyre D, Proulx K, Kawagoe-Takaki H, Vatin V, Gutiérrez-Aguilar R, Lyon D, Ma M, Choquet H, Horber F, Van Hul W, et al. Prevalence of loss-of-function FTO mutations in lean and obese individuals. Diabetes. 2010;59:311–8.CrossRef

37.

Stuebe AM, Lyon H, Herring AH, Ghosh J, Wise A, North KE, Siega-Riz AM. Obesity and diabetes genetic variants associated with gestational weight gain. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:283.e1–e17.CrossRef

Titel: Maternal genetic contribution to pre-pregnancy obesity, gestational weight gain, and gestational diabetes mellitus
verfasst von: Selvihan Beysel
Nilnur Eyerci
Mustafa Ulubay
Mustafa Caliskan
Muhammed Kizilgul
Merve Hafızoğlu
Erman Cakal
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2019
Verlag: BioMed Central
Erschienen in: Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome / Ausgabe 1/2019
Elektronische ISSN: 1758-5996
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-019-0434-x

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Reizdarmsyndrom: Diäten wirksamer als Medikamente

29.04.2024 Reizdarmsyndrom Nachrichten

Bei Reizdarmsyndrom scheinen Diäten, wie etwa die FODMAP-arme oder die kohlenhydratreduzierte Ernährung, effektiver als eine medikamentöse Therapie zu sein. Das hat eine Studie aus Schweden ergeben, die die drei Therapieoptionen im direkten Vergleich analysierte.

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

25.04.2024 Allergien und Intoleranzreaktionen Nachrichten

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Introduction

Patients and methods

Results

Conclusion

Publisher's Note

Introduction

Patients and methods

Study population

Genotyping

Statistical analysis

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Acknowledgements

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Consent to publish

Competing interests

Publisher's Note

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Prevalence and clinical characteristics of hypertension and metabolic syndrome in newly diagnosed patients with ketosis-onset diabetes: a cross-sectional study

An attempt to reverse cardiac lipotoxicity by aerobic interval training in a high-fat diet- and streptozotocin-induced type 2 diabetes rat model

Hyperhomocysteinemia is an independent risk factor of atherosclerosis in patients with metabolic syndrome

Midnight salivary cortisol secretion and the use of antidepressants were associated with abdominal obesity in women with type 1 diabetes: a cross sectional study

Age-specific diabetes risk by the number of metabolic syndrome components: a Korean nationwide cohort study

Glycemic variability is associated with vascular calcification by the markers of endoplasmic reticulum stress-related apoptosis, Wnt1, galectin-3 and BMP-2

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Reizdarmsyndrom: Diäten wirksamer als Medikamente

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

Update Innere Medizin