Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery 1/2022

Open Access 01.12.2022 | Review

Melatonin as a treatment for migraine sufferers: a systematic review

verfasst von: I Made Oka Adnyana, Clarissa Tertia, I Putu Eka Widyadharma, Ni Putu Ayu Putri Mahadewi

Erschienen in: The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery | Ausgabe 1/2022

Abstract

Background

Migraine is a primary headache with a prevalence of 12–20% in the world. Approximately 38% sufferers were indicated for prophylactic therapy, but only a small proportion (3–13%) received prophylactic therapy. The role of melatonin in migraine is to protect the brain against toxins through anti-free radical activity, inhibition of the release of inflammatory factors and neurotransmitters.

Results

This review uses the PRISMA protocol and uses source from Pubmed. A total of 142 articles were found according to the search strategy. 5 articles were collected with a randomized-controlled trial design that matched the inclusion criteria. Of the 5 articles, there were only 2 articles that proved significant where melatonin gave better results compared to placebo in migraine sufferers, especially in the frequency of attacks, duration, and reduction in the use of other analgesics. Based on the dose and duration of melatonin administration, although most use a dose of 3 mg melatonin with a duration of 2–3 months, this still needs to be investigated further because the available data are not sufficient. In addition, the use of melatonin before going to bed at night is said to be better because it is associated with the majority of side effects that occur, namely sleepiness.

Conclusion

Studies on melatonin and migraine with a randomized-controlled trial design are still limited so there is not enough evidence to support the administration of melatonin as a treatment for migraine sufferers, including the safety and side effects, especially for a long period of time.
Hinweise

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
CGRP
Calcitonin gene-related peptide
IL-6
Interleukin-6
TNF-α
Tumor necrosis factor-α
rTMS
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
PSQI
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
MIDAS
Migraine Disability Assessment Score

Background

Migraine is a primary headache that interferes with the patient's activities with a prevalence of 12–20% in the world, 3–5% in children and 18% in adults with a dominance in women (2–3 times more than men) [110]. Migraine is the second leading cause of disability according to the 2016 Global Burden of Disease Study [4].
Approximately 38% sufferers were indicated for prophylactic therapy, but only a small proportion (3–13%) received prophylactic therapy. Whereas the provision of prophylactic therapy is very useful, especially in chronic migraine sufferers by obtaining a decrease in the severity and frequency of attacks so as to improve the quality of the sufferer. In addition, prophylactic therapy is expected to reduce the use of migraine abortive therapy [1, 3, 5, 11]. Migraine, especially if it becomes chronic, will cause a decrease in the quality of life of the sufferer. Management for chronic migraine is still very limited, even though preventive/prophylactic therapy can prevent episodic migraine from developing into chronic migraine [5].
Based on guidelines from the American Academy of Neurology and the American Headache Society, the recommended prophylactic therapy is anti-epileptic therapy such as sodium valproate, topiramate, beta blockers such as propranolol, metoprolol and timolol with Level A. Level B includes antidepressants such as amitriptyline, venlafaxine, and other beta blockers such as nadolol [6, 1115]. There are several integrative therapies used to prevent migraines such as vitamin D, melatonin, coenzyme Q10, riboflavin, and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA). In migraine sufferers, low levels of melatonin and melatonin metabolites in urine are found. In addition, migraine sufferers are often associated with disturbed sleep patterns, so that studies have begun to examine the relationship between melatonin and migraine with activation of melatonin receptors in the hypothalamus [13, 16].
Melatonin (N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine) is a tryptophan derivative that plays role in regulating circadian rhythms and pathophysiology of migraine. Melatonin is synthesized in the pineal gland (the amino acid tryptophan), where the suprachiasmatic nucleus located in the hypothalamus plays a role in regulating the synthesis and secretion of melatonin, especially at night. The light signal will be transmitted through the retinal ganglion cells [2, 7, 1620].
Melatonin is associated with regulation of circadian rhythms and sleep, in addition, because of its availability in almost all countries, affordable prices and minimal side effects, melatonin is being investigated as a treatment for migraine [7]. In a study in Colorado, melatonin compared with amitriptyline gave an improvement in headache frequency > 50% (54% and 39%), and melatonin gave a much greater effect than placebo (54% and 20%), with a sleep-stimulating effect [11, 19]. In a Brazilian study by Gonçalves et al., melatonin 3 mg was superior to either amitriptyline 25 mg or a placebo. Amitriptyline has side effects such as dry mouth, somnolence, dizzy, weight gain and fatigue. In the study of Alkhaffaf et al., topiramate had more side effects than melatonin such as paresthesias, impaired attention and concentration, and anorexia. Melatonin can reduce body weight in some patients through the mechanism of inhibiting the change of preadipocytes into adipocytes thereby reducing visceral adipose tissue and triglyceride levels, increasing metabolism by converting white adipose tissue into brown adipose tissue. In addition, melatonin can lower blood pressure and glucose levels, so it needs attention and monitoring in people with hypertension and diabetes [1, 3].
The role of melatonin in migraine is to protect the brain against toxins through anti-free radical activity, inhibition of the release of inflammatory factors (anti-inflammatory effect), regulate neurotransmitters and neuronal pathways by inhibiting the formation of nitric oxide, inhibition of dopamine and glutamate release, modulation serotonin and CGRP (calcitonin gene-related peptide). Melatonin also plays a role in membrane stabilization so that it can maintain the structural integrity and function of the brain. In addition, melatonin has analgesic properties by inhibiting prostaglandins and other substances that can produce pain, increasing the release of β-endorphins and stimulating GABAergic (γ-aminobutyric acid). In addition, in animal studies, melatonin plays a role in cortical spreading depression by decreasing trigeminal nociceptive activation [1, 3, 1624]. In migraine sufferers, sleep disturbances are more pronounced, which were found to be five times higher than healthy person [25].
In addition, there is a relationship between melatonin levels and mood disorders. In a study conducted by Kozak et al. Beck anxiety inventory and Pittsburgh sleep quality index scores were found to be higher in migraine sufferers than healthy controls. Sleep disturbances and anxiety can be factors that trigger migraine [16] Besides, studies have shown that people with insomnia have an increase in the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, adrenocorticotropic hormone, cortisol, inflammatory cytokine IL-6 (interleukin-6) and TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor-α), which are associated with pain [26]. Overall, melatonin secretion is associated with migraine, sleep and human psychology [4, 16].
Based on these studies, a theory was formed that melatonin can play a role in the management of headaches, namely the relationship between the hypothalamus and melatonin in improving sleep quality and no serious side effects were found on melatonin administration [27, 28]. The aim of this study was to provide a systematic review of the administration of melatonin as a treatment for migraine sufferers both in terms of attack frequency, intensity, duration, severity of headache attacks and also the side effects produced.

Methods

This study was conducted in January 2022 using a search from Pubmed according to the PRISMA protocol. The search strategy was carried out from 2010 to 2022 using 2 keywords, “migraine” AND “melatonin”. This study aims to find research based on randomized clinical trials that examine the use of melatonin as a therapy in migraine sufferers, including as prophylaxis.
The inclusion criteria were an English-language study, a randomized clinical trial, and a complete manuscript. Articles in the form of case reports, descriptive studies, cross-sectional studies, cohort studies and case–control studies were excluded. Then the titles and abstracts were screened manually according to the eligibility criteria (Table 1).
Table 1
Eligibility criteria
 
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Population
People (human) with migraine
Animal model
Intervention
Melatonin
Do not use melatonin
Control
Placebo and/or other drugs
Outcomes
Migraine improvement with specific criteria
Do not measure migraine improvement
Study design
Randomized-controlled trial
Case–control, descriptive study, cross-sectional study, cohort study, case–control study
Language
English
Non-English
Statistics
There is an analytical statistics
Only descriptive, no analytical statistics
Full text
Available
Unavailable
In this study, through our search strategy, we found 142 articles, then 130 were excluded because they were not randomized-controlled trials. Of the 12 articles, further screening was carried out, namely by year, where this study used studies from 2010 to 2022 and excluded 4 articles. A total of 8 articles were attained and screened further either by title, content and availability of complete manuscripts. A total of 1 article was found to assess rTMS (repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation) for migraine and did not assess melatonin in that study, 1 article was not available in full text, and 1 article was conducted on people with epilepsy not migraine sufferers, therefore these three articles were excluded so that in the end 5 articles were collected that matched with the inclusion and exclusion criteria of researchers (Fig. 1).
Two authors (IMAO and CT) screened the titles and abstracts of all studies that met the eligibility criteria, then proceeded to read and screen the full manuscripts of these studies. The discrepancy between the two authors will be resolved by the third and fourth author.
Quality assessment for randomized-clinical trial study is the JADAD scale. A score of 0–2 is considered low quality, while a score of 3–5 is of good quality. From the 5 studies that we got, in general, the quality of the studies is quite good. Most of the studies were randomized, blinded and there was an explanation for participants dropping out (Table 2).
Table 2
JADAD scale
JADAD scale
Gelfand et al. [22]
Gelfand et al. [29]
Ebrahimi-Monfared et al. [30]
Gonçalves et al. [1]
Alstadhaug et al. [31]
Was the study described as random?
1
1
1
1
1
Was the randomization scheme described and appropriate?
1
1
1
1
1
Was the study described as double-blind?
0
1
1
1
1
Was the method of double blinding appropriate? (were both the patient and the assessor appropriately blinded?)
0
0
1
1
0
Was there a description of dropouts and withdrawals?
1
1
1
1
0
Total score
3/5
3/5
5/5
5/5
3/5
The studies assessed were conducted in Norway, Iran, Brazil and 2 studies in the USA. The number of participants ranged from 26 to 178 participants with a range of study periods varying from 2 to 4 months. The age of the participants in 2 studies was teenagers while the other 3 studies were over 30 years old (Table 3). 2 studies compared melatonin with placebo in migraine sufferers, 2 in addition to comparing melatonin with placebo, also compared with other drugs, while 1 study compared melatonin doses without the use of other drugs or a placebo. In most studies, a melatonin dose of 3 mg was used (Table 4).
Table 3
Baseline characteristics studies
Authors
Country
Study design
Periods
Mean age (years)
Total participants
Gelfand et al. (2020)
USA
Randomized 1:1
Not blinded
Home-based trial
4 months
11.8
84
Gelfand et al. (2017)
USA
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot
3 months
12–17
26
Alstadhaug et al. (2010)
Norway
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover
2 months
41.9 ± 9.2
48
Ebrahimi-Monfared et al. (2017)
Iran
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial
2 months
38.9 ± 9.2
105
Gonçalves et al. (2016)
Brazil
Randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled
3 months
36.9 ± 10.1
178
Table 4
Results
Authors
Drugs and doses
Statistics
  
Outcomes
   
   
Measurements
Baseline
Melatonin
Placebo
p value
Conclusion
Gelfand et al. (2020)
Melatonin
 Group 1: Low dose 1-2 mg (n = 42)
 Group 2: High dose 4-8 mg (n = 42)
Independent T-test, Fisher exact
•Change in pain intensity in cm, mean (SD)
•Pain-free rate, n (%)
•Pain-relief rate n(%)
•Adverse events
 Napped
 Nausea
Group 1: 5.1(1.8)
Group 2: 5.6(1.8)
NA
NA
NA
NA
•Group 1: 2.3 (2.1)
Group 2: 2.7 (2.1)
•Group 1: 4/15 (27)
Group 2: 7/17 (41)
•Group 1: 12/15 (80)
Group 2: 16/17 (94)
•Group 1: 9/19 (47)
Group 2: 4/21(67)
•Group 1: 1
Group 2: 0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.581
0.415
0.482
0.209
NA
•There is no difference in outcomes between Group 1 and Group 2
Gelfand et al. (2017)
Group 1: melatonin 3 mg (n = 13)
Group 2: placebo (n = 13)
Mann–Whitney, χ2, and Fisher exact
Mean migraine days
NA
3.6 (0.9)
4.9 (1.7)
 > 0.05
•There is no difference in mean migraine days between Group 1 and Group 2
Alstadhaug et al. (2010)
Group 1: melatonin 2 mg (n = 46)
Group 2: placebo (n = 48)
Paired t-test
Migraine attack frequency
Mean PSQI
PSQI at baseline > 6 (n = 16)
Adverse events
4.2 ± 1.2
6.3 ± 3.8
10.5 ± 2.8
NA
2.8 ± 1.6
4.7 ± 3.2
6.8 ± 4.0
Fatigue and dizziness = 2
Nervousness and nightmares = 1
2.9 ± 1.4
5.6 ± 4.1
9.4 ± 4.0
Eczema = 1
Night sweat 1
Abnormally high dream activity = 1
Dry mouth and irritability = 1
0.75
0.09
 < 0.05
NA
•Poorer sleep quality based on PSQI with baseline > 6 was found higher in Group 2 than Group 1
•There is no difference in frequency of migraine attacks and mean PSQI between Group 1 and Group 2
Ebrahimi-monfared et al. (2017)
Group 1: melatonin 3 mg (n = 35)
Group 2: valproate 200 mg (n = 35)
Group 3: placebo (n = 35)
Post hoc test
•Attack frequency
•Attack duration
•Attack severity
•Number of analgesics
•MIDAS score
•Adverse events
4.2 ± 1.2
19.7 ± 18.5
7.4 ± 1.4
7.33 ± 3.2
15.8 ± 5.1
NA
2.5 ± 1.3
8.7 ± 12.4
3.5 ± 2.6
2.1 ± 2
8.9 ± 2.2
Fatigue = 2
Drowsiness = 1
3.8 ± 1.1
14.1 ± 8.1
6.0 ± 3.2
4.1 ± 1.1
12.1 ± 4.2
Dry mouth = 1
 < 0.05
 < 0.05
 < 0.05
 < 0.05
 < 0.05
NA
•There is no difference in outcomes between Group 1 and Group 2
•Group 1 is superior in decrease of frequency, duration, severity, number of analgesics usage, and MIDAS score than Group 3
Gonçalves et al. (2016)
Group 1: melatonin 3 mg (n = 60)
Group 2: amitriptyline 25 mg (n = 25)
Group 3: placebo (n = 59)
ANOVA
•Number of headache days
•Intensity
•Duration
•Number of analgesics
•Improvement > 50% in headache frequency
•Adverse event
 Sleepiness
 Pruritus
 Dizziness
 Epigastralgia
 Weight gain
 Constipation
7.3 ± 2.8
6.9 ± 1.8
17.8 ± 14.5
4.4 ± 1.6
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
4.6 ± 2.3
3.6 ± 3.5
10.9 ± 9.5
2.9 ± 1.7
54.4%
11/60
1/60
0/60
2/60
0/60
1/60
6.2 ± 2.5
4.8 ± 3.3
16.2 ± 15.3
3.6 ± 1.2
20.4%
7/59
0/59
1/59
0/59
1/59
4/59
 < 0.05
 < 0.05
 < 0.05
 < 0.05
 < 0.05
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
•There is no difference in outcomes between Group 1 and Group 2
•Group 1 is superior in decrease of number of headache (days),intensity, duration, number of analgesics usage than Group 3
*NA not available, PSQI Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, MIDAS Migraine Disability Assessment Score
Results
Based on our search strategy, the first study was conducted by Alstadhaug et al. in 2010 with randomization, double-blind and crossover. There were 2 groups, namely the group with 2 mg melatonin and the placebo group. Melatonin extended-release (Circadin) 2 mg given 1 h before bedtime. Then after being evaluated in 8 weeks, each group will be washed out. After 6 weeks of washout period, crossover will be carried out. There are 48 total participants with 24 participants in each group, and 2 participants dropped out. There was a decrease in the frequency of migraine attacks in the two groups, 1.4 and 1.3 in the melatonin and placebo groups, respectively, but not statistically significant (p = 0.75). In evaluating sleep quality using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), there were significant differences in participants with baseline PSQI > 6, in the melatonin group 6.8 ± 4.0 and 9.4 ± 4.0 in the placebo group (p < 0.05). However, melatonin did not make a difference in PSQI scores compared to placebo, with the mean PSQI being 4.7 ± 3.2 and 5.6 ± 4.1, respectively (p = 0.09). In the study there were several side effects such as nightmares, nervousness, night sweats, fatigue, and so on but no further analysis was conducted [31].
In 2016, Gonçalves et al., conducted a randomized, double-blind study using placebo as a control and comparing melatonin 3 mg and amitriptyline 25 mg which are often used to treat migraine. Of the 196 participants, it turned out that there were 18 participants who lost to follow-up, so that the total participants analyzed were 178 participants who were followed for 3 months. 60 participants received melatonin, while 59 participants received a placebo and 59 participants received amitriptyline. The main result of this study was that the melatonin and amitriptyline group had fewer migraine attacks than the placebo group and a statistically significant difference with a difference of 2.7 days more in the frequency of migraine attacks on the placebo, compared to the melatonin group and 2.2 days more on the frequency of migraine attacks on the placebo, compared with the amitriptyline group. In addition, Gonçalves et al. also analyzed the mean intensity of attacks, the mean duration of attacks and the amount of analgesics used by the participants. The mean attack intensity in the melatonin group was 3.6 ± 3.5 less than the placebo (4.8 ± 3.3) with differences from the baseline data, 3.5 and 1.8, respectively. In the melatonin group, there was a significant difference in the mean duration of attacks, namely 10.9 ± 9.5 compared to placebo 16.2 ± 15.3. In this study there were some side effects, but no serious side effects. Side effects in the melatonin and placebo groups were almost similar (p > 0.05) but there were more side effects in the amitriptyline group when compared to the placebo and melatonin groups (p > 0.03). The majority of side effects were drowsiness, in addition to epigastralgia and constipation in small amounts, especially in the melatonin group [1].
The next randomized study found in this search was the study conducted in Iran by Ebrahimi-Monfared et al. in 2017 in a double-blind and placebo as a control. In addition to melatonin 3 mg, Ebrahimi-Monfared et al. also analyzed the administration of valproate 200 mg. Each group consisted of 35 participants and was matched by age, sex, and clinical characteristics. Then participants will be evaluated twice, at the end of the first and second months. The mean age of the participants was 38.9 ± 9.2 years of which 51.42% were women. Based on this study, the majority of migraine experienced by participants occurred in the morning with the most characteristic being throbbing. About 65.57% were triggered by stress and pain complaints improved with sleep (70.47%). In the post hoc test analysis, significant results were obtained in terms of attack frequency, duration, severity, and MIDAS (Migraine Disability Assessment Score). In the melatonin group, the frequency of attacks was lower (2.5 ± 1.3) when compared to the placebo group (3.8 ± 1.1) with a difference of 1.7 and 0.4 from the baseline, respectively. In terms of duration and severity of attacks, the placebo group was much higher than the melatonin group (14.1 ± 8.1, 6.0 ± 3.2 and 8.7 ± 12.4, 3.5 ± 2.6). Changes in MIDAS were also found in the melatonin and valproic acid groups with p = 0.005 and p = 0.001, respectively. This change in MIDAS was not found in the placebo group (p = 0.44). In the melatonin group there were 2 participants who experienced side effects, fatigue and confusion, but only 1 participant experienced side effects on the placebo, namely dry mouth. However, there are no analytical data for side effect outcomes in this study [30].
The study conducted by Gelfand et al. was a randomized, double-blind study comparing melatonin and placebo. This study consisted of 31 participants, but 5 participants experienced fewer migraine attacks so that only 26 participants were continued in this study. The first group consisted of 13 people and was given melatonin 3 mg, while the second group consisted of 13 people and was given a placebo. The baseline characteristics in the two groups were almost the same except that headache-related disability was higher in the melatonin group. Headache-related disability was calculated using the Pediatric Migraine Disability Assessment scoring. Of the 26 participants, there were 3 participants who withdrew (2 people from the first group, and 1 person from the second group). The mean migraine attack day by day was 3.6 ± 0.9 in the melatonin group compared with 4.9 ± 1.7 in the placebo group. These results suggest that migraine attacks were fewer in the melatonin group, but not statistically significant (difference 1.3 with 95% KI − 5.1 to 2.6). No serious side effects were found on giving melatonin 3 mg, namely the effect of daytime fatigue in 2 people in the first group [29].
Then there was a more recent randomized study conducted in 2020. However, this study did not compare melatonin with a placebo or other drugs. This study compared high doses of melatonin (4–8 mg) with low doses (1–2 mg). A total of 84 participants were randomized by stratification based on body weight, namely body weight above equal to 40 kg and body weight less than 40 kg. Because the average age of the participants was 11.8 years, and there were children, the melatonin in this study used milk chocolate-based melatonin. In addition to being edible, this formula has a faster onset of action than tablets, so it is hoped that headache relief will occur more quickly. This study was conducted by giving headache diaries to participants so it is a home-based trial. Participants will be observed every 2 weeks with pain improvement if there is a change in the scale ≥ 3 cm. A total of 38 participants were excluded (loss to follow-up = 10; withdrew = 10 in the low-dose melatonin group and loss to follow-up = 12; withdrew = 6 in the high-dose melatonin group). The basic characteristics in both groups were almost the same, both for pain intensity, photophobia, phonophobia, nausea and vomiting. At 2 h of melatonin administration, there was a change in pain intensity of 2.3 ± 2.1 in the low-dose group, and 2.7 ± 2.1 in the high-dose group, with a p value of 0.581. In these two groups there was only a difference of 0.4 cm with a 95% KI value: − 1.17 to 1.92 which was not statistically significant, so there was no significant difference between the administration of low doses of melatonin and high doses. This study also evaluated side effects with the majority of participants sleeping after 2 h of high-dose melatonin (81%) and 68% in the low-dose group (p value = 0.352) [22].
Of the 5 studies, only 2 studies state that melatonin is better for migraine treatment than placebo. In both studies, a dose of melatonin of 3 mg was used and the results obtained that melatonin was superior to placebo in terms of attack frequency, attack duration, intensity and severity of attacks. In addition, based on a study conducted by Ebrahimi-Monfared et al. there was a significant decrease in MIDAS scores with the use of 3 mg melatonin. In addition, in 2 studies comparing melatonin with other drugs, melatonin did not give significantly better results than valproic acid and amitriptyline.
Of the 5 studies, only 3 studies discussed the side effects of giving melatonin and placebo. Side effects that occur vary from drowsiness, nausea, pruritus, dizziness, weight gain and constipation with the majority of side effects being drowsiness. However, only 1 study (Gelfand et al.) analyzed the incidence of drowsiness, but found no significant results (p = 0.209) (Table 4). General view of this systematic review can be seen in Fig. 2.

Discussion

The aim of this study is to provide a systematic review of melatonin as a treatment for migraine sufferers. One of the strengths of this systematic review study is that all five articles analyzed were randomized studies. Of the five studies, there were studies that only compared melatonin doses but did not compare placebo or other therapies. In this study, it appears that the group given high doses of melatonin (4–8 mg) had more changes in pain intensity, pain free, pain relief than the group with low doses of melatonin (1–2 mg). However, based on statistical analysis, the results were not significant with p = 0.581, 0.415, and 0.482, respectively. This is probably due to the high drop-out rate from participants, which is around 50% of the initial participants [22].
Based on studies, melatonin in animal models can modulate trigeminal activation after the cortical spreading depression stage in migraine pathogenesis through melatonin receptors 1 and 2. In addition, melatonin receptors are also present on retinoid Z receptors. Melatonin modifies cyclooxygenase 2 and opioid transmission so that it can reduce pain through the modulation stage [22].
Melatonin dose in 3 out of 5 studies were 3 mg, 1 study with melatonin 2 mg, and 1 study with variations of low (1–2 mg) and high (4–8 mg) doses. After statistical analysis, no significant results were found in either the 2 mg melatonin dose study or the low and high-dose variations, but in 2 studies using the 3 mg melatonin dose there were significant results compared to placebo. This is in accordance with several previous studies that melatonin at a dose of 3 mg given before bedtime has the best improvement in the frequency of migraine attacks so that it can be given as prophylaxis in episodic migraine. Melatonin has several biologic effects in the management of migraines, namely as an anti-inflammatory by reducing free radicals, as an anti-nociceptive by modulating descending pathways in the brainstem via MT2 receptors, modulating neurotransmitters including dopamine, serotonin and glutamine and also directly modulating circadian rhythms [19].
Among these studies only 1 study did not provide information about the side effects of melatonin. However, from these 4 studies, no serious side effects were obtained from giving melatonin. The side effects of melatonin from these studies varied from nausea, fatigue, dizziness, pruritus, constipation, and so on with the majority mentioned being sleepy. Melatonin that binds to the MT1 receptor in the suprachiasmatic nucleus causes the opening of the nocturnal sleepiness canal and inhibits the circadian wakefulness mechanism that will stimulate sleep, especially at higher doses of melatonin with an immediate-release formulation, so that the patient will be sleepy. The desensitization of the MT1 receptor coupled G protein can reduce cAMP levels in the brain. So giving melatonin at night before going to bed is the most appropriate because melatonin can stimulate sleep, where sleep disturbances are one of the precipitating factors for migraines. However, in these studies no further analysis was carried out so that the safety of the use of melatonin as migraine therapy still needs to be investigated further [4, 19, 27, 32].
In addition, based on other studies, the side effects of giving melatonin were only mild and minimal [17, 21] In the study by Lyon and Langner, the side effects of giving melatonin were less than that of amitriptyline (18% vs 41%). However, there was no significant difference in side effects between melatonin and placebo [11]. The administration of melatonin doses, either larger or smaller doses, still needs to be investigated further.

Conclusions

In this systematic review, it was found that there are still very few studies on melatonin and migraine with a randomized-controlled trial design, so there is not enough evidence to support the administration of melatonin as a therapy in migraine sufferers. Further studies are still needed including the safety and side effects of giving melatonin as migraine therapy, especially for a long period of time.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Declarations

Not applicable.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

None (the authors declare that they have no competing interests).
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonçalves AL, Ferreira AM, Ribeiro RT, Zukerman E, Cipolla-Neto J, Peres MFP. Randomised clinical trial comparing melatonin 3 mg, amitriptyline 25 mg and placebo for migraine prevention. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87(10):1127–32.CrossRef Gonçalves AL, Ferreira AM, Ribeiro RT, Zukerman E, Cipolla-Neto J, Peres MFP. Randomised clinical trial comparing melatonin 3 mg, amitriptyline 25 mg and placebo for migraine prevention. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87(10):1127–32.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamanaka G, Kanou K, Takamatsu T, Takeshita M, Morichi S, Suzuki S, et al. Complementary and integrative medicines as prophylactic agents for pediatric migraine: a narrative literature review. J Clin Med. 2021;10(1):1–16.CrossRef Yamanaka G, Kanou K, Takamatsu T, Takeshita M, Morichi S, Suzuki S, et al. Complementary and integrative medicines as prophylactic agents for pediatric migraine: a narrative literature review. J Clin Med. 2021;10(1):1–16.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Alkhaffaf WH, Almahdawi AM. Efficacy and tolerability of melatonin versus topiramate in migraine prevention. Arch Venez Farmacol y Ter. 2021;40(1):27–32. Alkhaffaf WH, Almahdawi AM. Efficacy and tolerability of melatonin versus topiramate in migraine prevention. Arch Venez Farmacol y Ter. 2021;40(1):27–32.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Waliszewska-Prosół M, Nowakowska-Kotas M, Chojdak-łukasiewicz J, Budrewicz S. Migraine and sleep—an unexplained association? Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(11). Waliszewska-Prosół M, Nowakowska-Kotas M, Chojdak-łukasiewicz J, Budrewicz S. Migraine and sleep—an unexplained association? Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(11).
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ha H, Gonzalez A. Migraine headache prophylaxis. Am Fam Physician. 2019;99(1):17–24.PubMed Ha H, Gonzalez A. Migraine headache prophylaxis. Am Fam Physician. 2019;99(1):17–24.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gasparini CF, Smith RA, Griffiths LR. Genetic and biochemical changes of the serotonergic system in migraine pathobiology. J Headache Pain. 2017;18(1). Gasparini CF, Smith RA, Griffiths LR. Genetic and biochemical changes of the serotonergic system in migraine pathobiology. J Headache Pain. 2017;18(1).
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ashina M, Buse DC, Ashina H, Pozo-Rosich P, Peres MFP, Lee MJ, et al. Migraine: integrated approaches to clinical management and emerging treatments. Lancet. 2021;397(10283):1505–18.CrossRef Ashina M, Buse DC, Ashina H, Pozo-Rosich P, Peres MFP, Lee MJ, et al. Migraine: integrated approaches to clinical management and emerging treatments. Lancet. 2021;397(10283):1505–18.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Edvinsson L, Haanes KA. Views on migraine pathophysiology: where does it start? Neurol Clin Neurosci. 2020;8(3):120–7.CrossRef Edvinsson L, Haanes KA. Views on migraine pathophysiology: where does it start? Neurol Clin Neurosci. 2020;8(3):120–7.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Victor T, Hu X, Campbell J, Buse D, Lipton R. Migraine prevalence by age and sex in the United States: a life-span study. Cephalalgia. 2010;30(9):1065–72.CrossRef Victor T, Hu X, Campbell J, Buse D, Lipton R. Migraine prevalence by age and sex in the United States: a life-span study. Cephalalgia. 2010;30(9):1065–72.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonçalves AL, Martini Ferreira A, Ribeiro RT, et al. Randomised clinical trial comparing melatonin 3 mg, amitriptyline 25 mg and placebo for migraine prevention. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87:1127–32.CrossRef Gonçalves AL, Martini Ferreira A, Ribeiro RT, et al. Randomised clinical trial comparing melatonin 3 mg, amitriptyline 25 mg and placebo for migraine prevention. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87:1127–32.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Leonard L, Phillips WJ. Near-complete migraine prophylaxis with amlodipine: a case report. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007;34(6):571–3.CrossRef Leonard L, Phillips WJ. Near-complete migraine prophylaxis with amlodipine: a case report. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007;34(6):571–3.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Couch JR. Amitriptyline in the prophylactic treatment of migraine and chronic daily headache. Headache. 2011;51(1):33–51.CrossRef Couch JR. Amitriptyline in the prophylactic treatment of migraine and chronic daily headache. Headache. 2011;51(1):33–51.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kacperski J, Hershey AD. Newly approved agents for the treatment and prevention of pediatric migraine. CNS Drugs. 2016;30(9):837–44.CrossRef Kacperski J, Hershey AD. Newly approved agents for the treatment and prevention of pediatric migraine. CNS Drugs. 2016;30(9):837–44.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Liampas I, Siokas V, Brotis A, Vikelis M, Dardiotis E. Endogenous melatonin levels and therapeutic use of exogenous melatonin in migraine: systematic review and meta-analysis. Headache. 2020;60(7):1273–99.CrossRef Liampas I, Siokas V, Brotis A, Vikelis M, Dardiotis E. Endogenous melatonin levels and therapeutic use of exogenous melatonin in migraine: systematic review and meta-analysis. Headache. 2020;60(7):1273–99.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Long R, Zhu Y, Zhou S. Therapeutic role of melatonin in migraine prophylaxis: a systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(3): e14099.CrossRef Long R, Zhu Y, Zhou S. Therapeutic role of melatonin in migraine prophylaxis: a systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(3): e14099.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Falla D, Jull G, Russell T, Vicenzino B, Hodges P. Effect of neck exercise on sitting posture in patients with chronic neck pain. Phys Ther. 2007;87(4):408–17.CrossRef Falla D, Jull G, Russell T, Vicenzino B, Hodges P. Effect of neck exercise on sitting posture in patients with chronic neck pain. Phys Ther. 2007;87(4):408–17.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tseng PT, Yang CP, Su KP, Chen TY, Wu YC, Tu YK, et al. The association between melatonin and episodic migraine: a pilot network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare the prophylactic effects with exogenous melatonin supplementation and pharmacotherapy. J Pineal Res. 2020;69(2):1–13.CrossRef Tseng PT, Yang CP, Su KP, Chen TY, Wu YC, Tu YK, et al. The association between melatonin and episodic migraine: a pilot network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare the prophylactic effects with exogenous melatonin supplementation and pharmacotherapy. J Pineal Res. 2020;69(2):1–13.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen WW, Zhang X, Huang WJ. Pain control by melatonin: physiological and pharmacological effects. Exp Ther Med. 2016;12(4):1963–8.CrossRef Chen WW, Zhang X, Huang WJ. Pain control by melatonin: physiological and pharmacological effects. Exp Ther Med. 2016;12(4):1963–8.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Miano S, Parisi P, Pelliccia A, Luchetti A, Paolino MC, Villa MP. Melatonin to prevent migraine or tension-type headache in children. Neurol Sci. 2008;29(4):285–7.CrossRef Miano S, Parisi P, Pelliccia A, Luchetti A, Paolino MC, Villa MP. Melatonin to prevent migraine or tension-type headache in children. Neurol Sci. 2008;29(4):285–7.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Gelfand AA, Ross AC, Irwin SL, Greene KA, Qubty WF, Allen IE. Melatonin for acute treatment of migraine in children and adolescents: a pilot randomized trial. Headache. 2020;60(8):1712–21.CrossRef Gelfand AA, Ross AC, Irwin SL, Greene KA, Qubty WF, Allen IE. Melatonin for acute treatment of migraine in children and adolescents: a pilot randomized trial. Headache. 2020;60(8):1712–21.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Vogler B, Rapoport AM, Tepper SJ, Sheftell F, Bigal ME, Song TJ, et al. Role of melatonin in the pathophysiology of migraine: implications for treatment. CNS Drugs. 2006;255(5):343–50.CrossRef Vogler B, Rapoport AM, Tepper SJ, Sheftell F, Bigal ME, Song TJ, et al. Role of melatonin in the pathophysiology of migraine: implications for treatment. CNS Drugs. 2006;255(5):343–50.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Fallah R, Fazelishoroki F, Sekhavat L. A randomized clinical trial of efficacy of melatonin and amitriptyline in migraine prophylaxis of children. Iran J Child Neurol Winter. 2018;12(1):47–54. Fallah R, Fazelishoroki F, Sekhavat L. A randomized clinical trial of efficacy of melatonin and amitriptyline in migraine prophylaxis of children. Iran J Child Neurol Winter. 2018;12(1):47–54.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Song TJ, Kim BS, Chu MK. Therapeutic role of melatonin in migraine prophylaxis: is there a link between sleep and migraine? Prog Brain Res. 2020;255:343–69.CrossRef Song TJ, Kim BS, Chu MK. Therapeutic role of melatonin in migraine prophylaxis: is there a link between sleep and migraine? Prog Brain Res. 2020;255:343–69.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferini-strambi L, Galbiati A, Combi R. Sleep disorder-related headaches. 2019. Ferini-strambi L, Galbiati A, Combi R. Sleep disorder-related headaches. 2019.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Leite Pacheco R, de Oliveira Cruz Latorraca C, Adriano Leal Freitas da Costa A, Luiza Cabrera Martimbianco A, Vianna Pachito D, Riera R. Melatonin for preventing primary headache: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pract. 2018;72(7):1–10.CrossRef Leite Pacheco R, de Oliveira Cruz Latorraca C, Adriano Leal Freitas da Costa A, Luiza Cabrera Martimbianco A, Vianna Pachito D, Riera R. Melatonin for preventing primary headache: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pract. 2018;72(7):1–10.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Peres MFP. Melatonin for migraine prevention. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2011;15(5):334–5.CrossRef Peres MFP. Melatonin for migraine prevention. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2011;15(5):334–5.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Gelfand AA, Qubty W, Patniyot I, Grimes B, Pletcher MJ, Goadsby PJ, et al. Home-based trials in adolescent migraine: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74(6):744–5.CrossRef Gelfand AA, Qubty W, Patniyot I, Grimes B, Pletcher MJ, Goadsby PJ, et al. Home-based trials in adolescent migraine: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74(6):744–5.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Ebrahimi-Monfared M, Sharafkhah M, Abdolrazaghnejad A, Mohammadbeigi A, Faraji F. Use of melatonin versus valproic acid in prophylaxis of migraine patients: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2017;35(4):385–93.PubMed Ebrahimi-Monfared M, Sharafkhah M, Abdolrazaghnejad A, Mohammadbeigi A, Faraji F. Use of melatonin versus valproic acid in prophylaxis of migraine patients: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2017;35(4):385–93.PubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Alstadhaug KB, Odeh F, Salvesen R, Bekkelund SI. Prophylaxis of migraine with melatonin: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2010;75(17):1527–32.CrossRef Alstadhaug KB, Odeh F, Salvesen R, Bekkelund SI. Prophylaxis of migraine with melatonin: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2010;75(17):1527–32.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Pandi-Perumal SR, Srinivasan V, Spence DW, Cardinali DP. Role of the melatonin system in the control of sleep: therapeutic implications. CNS Drugs. 2007;21(12):995–1018.CrossRef Pandi-Perumal SR, Srinivasan V, Spence DW, Cardinali DP. Role of the melatonin system in the control of sleep: therapeutic implications. CNS Drugs. 2007;21(12):995–1018.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Melatonin as a treatment for migraine sufferers: a systematic review
verfasst von
I Made Oka Adnyana
Clarissa Tertia
I Putu Eka Widyadharma
Ni Putu Ayu Putri Mahadewi
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2022
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-022-00524-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery 1/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

Demenz Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Antipsychotika gegen psychische und Verhaltenssymptome in Zusammenhang mit Demenzerkrankungen erfordert eine sorgfältige Nutzen-Risiken-Abwägung. Neuen Erkenntnissen zufolge sind auf der Risikoseite weitere schwerwiegende Ereignisse zu berücksichtigen.

Nicht Creutzfeldt Jakob, sondern Abführtee-Vergiftung

29.05.2024 Hyponatriämie Nachrichten

Eine ältere Frau trinkt regelmäßig Sennesblättertee gegen ihre Verstopfung. Der scheint plötzlich gut zu wirken. Auf Durchfall und Erbrechen folgt allerdings eine Hyponatriämie. Nach deren Korrektur kommt es plötzlich zu progredienten Kognitions- und Verhaltensstörungen.

Schutz der Synapsen bei Alzheimer

29.05.2024 Morbus Alzheimer Nachrichten

Mit einem Neurotrophin-Rezeptor-Modulator lässt sich möglicherweise eine bestehende Alzheimerdemenz etwas abschwächen: Erste Phase-2-Daten deuten auf einen verbesserten Synapsenschutz.

Sozialer Aufstieg verringert Demenzgefahr

24.05.2024 Demenz Nachrichten

Ein hohes soziales Niveau ist mit die beste Versicherung gegen eine Demenz. Noch geringer ist das Demenzrisiko für Menschen, die sozial aufsteigen: Sie gewinnen fast zwei demenzfreie Lebensjahre. Umgekehrt steigt die Demenzgefahr beim sozialen Abstieg.

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.