nach oben

Erschienen in:

18.08.2020 | Scientific Review

Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infections in Hepatic and Pancreatic Resection

verfasst von: Keno Mentor, Bathiya Ratnayake, Nasreen Akter, Giorgio Alessandri, Gourab Sen, Jeremy J. French, Derek M. Manas, John S. Hammond, Sanjay Pandanaboyana

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 12/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) after HPB surgery are poorly defined. This meta-analysis aimed to quantify the SSI rates and risk factors for SSI after pancreas and liver resection.

Methods

The PUBMED, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were systematically searched using the PRISMA framework. The primary outcome measure was pooled SSI rates. The secondary outcome measure was risk factor profile determination for SSI.

Results

The overall rate of SSI after pancreatic and liver resection was 25.1 and 10.4%, respectively (p < 0.001). 32% of pancreaticoduodenectomies developed SSI vs 23% after distal pancreatectomy (p < 0.001). The rate of incisional SSI in the pancreatic group was 9% and organ/space SSI 16.5%. Biliary resection during liver surgery was a risk factor for SSI (25.0 vs 15.7%, p = 0.002). After liver resection, the incisional SSI rate was 7.6% and the organ space SSI rate was 10.2%. Pancreas-specific SSI risk factors were pre-operative biliary drainage (p < 0.001), chemotherapy (p < 0.001) and radiotherapy (p = 0.007). Liver-specific SSI risk factors were smoking (p = 0.046), low albumin (p < 0.001) and significant blood loss (p < 0.001). The rate of organ/space SSI in patients with POPF was 47.7% and in patients without POPF 7.3% (p < 0.001). Organ/space SSI rate was 43% in patients with bile leak and 10% in those without (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The risk factors for SSI following pancreatic and liver resections are distinct from each other, with higher SSI rates after pancreatic resection. Pancreaticoduodenectomy has increased risk of SSI compared to distal pancreatectomy. Similarly, biliary resections during liver surgery increase the rates of SSI.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Kneuertz PJ, Pitt HA, Bilimoria KY et al (2012) Risk of morbidity and mortality following hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1727–1735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1938-yCrossRef

Csikesz NG, Simons JP, Tseng JF, Shah SA (2008) Surgical specialization and operative mortality in hepato-pancreatico-biliary (HPB) surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1534–1539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0566-zCrossRef

Okano K, Hirao T, Unno M et al (2015) Postoperative infectious complications after pancreatic resection. Br J Surg 102:1551–1560. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9919CrossRef

European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (2019) Healthcare-associated infections-surgical site infections.pdf. In: ECDC. Annual epidemiological report for 2017. ECDC

World Health Organization (2016) Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection

Anderson DJ, Podgorny K, Berríos-Torres SI et al (2014) Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 35:605–627. https://doi.org/10.1086/676022CrossRef

Niitsuma T, Kusachi S, Takesue Y et al (2019) Current status of postoperative infections after digestive surgery in Japan: the Japan postoperative infectious complications survey in 2015. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 3:276–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12236CrossRef

Sadamori H, Yagi T, Shinoura S et al (2013) Risk factors for organ/space surgical site infection after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in 359 recent cases. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20:186–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-011-0503-5CrossRef

Liu Q-Y (2014) Analysis of risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 20:17491. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17491CrossRef

10.

Morikane K (2017) Epidemiology and risk factors associated with surgical site infection after different types of hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. Surg Today 47:1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-017-1503-0CrossRef

11.

Takahashi Y, Takesue Y, Fujiwara M et al (2018) Risk factors for surgical site infection after major hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. J Infect Chemother 24:739–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2018.05.007CrossRef

12.

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 62:e1–e34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006CrossRef

13.

Ranganathan P, Aggarwal R, Pramesh CS (2015) Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: odds versus risk. Perspect Clin Res 6:222–224. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.167092CrossRef

14.

Moons KGM, Wolff RF, Riley RD et al (2019) PROBAST: a tool to assess risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 170:W1–W33. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-1377CrossRef

15.

Heard NA, Rubin-Delanchy P (2018) Choosing between methods of combining p-values. Biometrika 105:239–246. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asx076CrossRef

16.

R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

17.

Dewey M (2020) Metap: meta-analysis of significance values

18.

Elliott IA, Chan C, Russell TA et al (2017) Distinction of risk factors for superficial vs organ-space surgical site infections after pancreatic surgery. JAMA Surg 152:1023. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2155CrossRef

19.

Joliat G-R, Sauvain M-O, Petermann D et al (2018) Surgical site infections after pancreatic surgery in the era of enhanced recovery protocols. Medicine (Baltimore) 97:e11728. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011728CrossRef

20.

Sugiura T, Uesaka K, Ohmagari N et al (2012) Risk factor of surgical site infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg 36:2888–2894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1742-6CrossRef

21.

Poruk KE, Lin JA, Cooper MA et al (2016) A novel, validated risk score to predict surgical site infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB 18:893–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2016.07.011CrossRef

22.

Kelly KJ, Greenblatt DY, Wan Y et al (2011) Risk stratification for distal pancreatectomy utilizing ACS-NSQIP: preoperative factors predict morbidity and mortality. J Gastrointest Surg 15:250–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1390-9CrossRef

23.

Fadayomi AB, Kasumova GG, Tabatabaie O et al (2018) Unique predictors and economic burden of superficial and deep/organ space surgical site infections following pancreatectomy. HPB 20:658–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2018.01.008CrossRef

24.

McCracken EKE, Mureebe L, Blazer DG (2019) Minimally invasive surgical site infection in procedure-targeted ACS NSQIP pancreaticoduodenectomies. J Surg Res 233:183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.07.041CrossRef

25.

Okabayashi T, Nishimori I, Yamashita K et al (2009) Risk factors and predictors for surgical site infection after hepatic resection. J Hosp Infect 73:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2009.04.022CrossRef

26.

Moreno Elola-Olaso A, Davenport DL, Hundley JC et al (2012) Predictors of surgical site infection after liver resection: a multicentre analysis using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. HPB 14:136–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00417.xCrossRef

27.

Togo S, Matsuo K, Tanaka K et al (2007) Perioperative infection control and its effectiveness in hepatectomy patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22:1942–1948. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04761.xCrossRef

28.

Tang T-Y, Zong Y, Shen Y-N et al (2019) Predicting surgical site infections using a novel nomogram in patients with hepatocelluar carcinoma undergoing hepatectomy. World J Clin Cases 7:2176–2188. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i16.2176CrossRef

29.

Karavokyros I, Orfanos S, Angelou A et al (2017) Incidence and risk factors for organ/space infection after radiofrequency-assisted hepatectomy or ablation of liver tumors in a single center: more than meets the eye. Front Surg. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2017.00017CrossRef

30.

Nanashima A, Arai J, Oyama S et al (2014) Associated factors with surgical site infections after hepatectomy: predictions and countermeasures by a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 12:310–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.01.018CrossRef

31.

Isik O, Kaya E, Sarkut P, Dundar HZ (2015) Factors affecting surgical site infection rates in hepatobiliary surgery. Surg Infect 16:281–286. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2013.195CrossRef

32.

Magill SS, O’Leary E, Janelle SJ et al (2018) Changes in prevalence of health care-associated infections in U.S. Hospitals. N Engl J Med 379:1732–1744. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1801550CrossRef

33.

Bhangu A, Ademuyiwa AO, Aguilera ML et al (2018) Surgical site infection after gastrointestinal surgery in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: a prospective, international, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 18:516–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30101-4CrossRef

34.

Wu CC, Yeh DC, Lin MC et al (1998) Prospective randomized trial of systemic antibiotics in patients undergoing liver resection. Br J Surg 85:489–493. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00606.xCrossRef

35.

Kondo K, Chijiiwa K, Ohuchida J et al (2013) Selection of prophylactic antibiotics according to the microorganisms isolated from surgical site infections (SSIs) in a previous series of surgeries reduces SSI incidence after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20:286–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-012-0515-9CrossRef

36.

de Lissovoy G, Fraeman K, Hutchins V et al (2009) Surgical site infection: incidence and impact on hospital utilization and treatment costs. Am J Infect Control 37:387–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2008.12.010CrossRef

37.

Schweizer ML, Cullen JJ, Perencevich EN, Vaughan Sarrazin MS (2014) Costs associated with surgical site infections in veterans affairs hospitals. JAMA Surg 149:575. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.4663CrossRef

38.

Fukami Y, Maeda A, Takayama Y et al (2019) Adverse oncological outcome of surgical site infection after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. Surg Today 49:170–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-018-1715-yCrossRef

39.

Chikhladze S, Lederer A-K, Kousoulas L et al (2019) Adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: retrospective real-life data. World J Surg Oncol 17:185. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1732-3CrossRef

40.

Eckhauser F, Azoury S, Farrow N et al (2015) Postoperative abdominal wound infection-epidemiology, risk factors, identification, and management. Chronic Wound Care Manag Res. https://doi.org/10.2147/CWCMR.S62514CrossRef

41.

Watanabe A, Kohnoe S, Shimabukuro R et al (2008) Risk factors associated with surgical site infection in upper and lower gastrointestinal surgery. Surg Today 38:404–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-007-3637-yCrossRef

42.

Degrate L, Garancini M, Misani M et al (2011) Right colon, left colon, and rectal surgeries are not similar for surgical site infection development. Analysis of 277 elective and urgent colorectal resections. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:61–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-1057-8CrossRef

43.

Dessie W, Mulugeta G, Fentaw S et al (2016) Pattern of bacterial pathogens and their susceptibility isolated from surgical site infections at selected referral hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Int J Microbiol 2016:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2418902CrossRef

44.

Schoellhammer HF, Fong Y, Gagandeep S (2014) Techniques for prevention of pancreatic leak after pancreatectomy. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 3:276–287. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2014.08.08CrossRef

45.

Roberts KJ, Prasad P, Steele Y et al (2017) A reduced time to surgery within a ‘fast track’ pathway for periampullary malignancy is associated with an increased rate of pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB 19:713–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.04.011CrossRef

46.

van der Gaag NA, Rauws EAJ, van Eijck CHJ et al (2010) Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. N Engl J Med 362:129–137. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0903230CrossRef

47.

Sugimachi K, Iguchi T, Mano Y et al (2019) Significance of bile culture surveillance for postoperative management of pancreatoduodenectomy. World J Surg Oncol 17:232. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1773-7CrossRef

48.

Hu QL, Liu JB, Ellis RJ et al (2020) Association of preoperative biliary drainage technique with postoperative outcomes among patients with resectable hepatobiliary malignancy. HPB 22:249–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2019.06.011CrossRef

49.

Wells CI, Ratnayake CBB, Perrin J, Pandanaboyana S (2019) Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in closed abdominal incisions: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. World J Surg 43:2779–2788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05116-6CrossRef

50.

Javed AA, Teinor J, Wright M et al (2019) Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical-site infections: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 269:1034–1040. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003056CrossRef

51.

Pastena MD, Marchegiani G, Paiella S et al (2020) Use of an intraoperative wound protector to prevent surgical-site infection after pancreatoduodenectomy: randomized clinical trial. BJS Br J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11527CrossRef

52.

Capussotti L, Ferrero A, Viganò L et al (2006) Bile leakage and liver resection: where is the risk? Arch Surg 141:690–694. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.141.7.690CrossRef

53.

Erdogan D, Busch ORC, Gouma DJ, van Gulik TM (2007) Prevention of biliary leakage after partial liver resection using topical hemostatic agents. Dig Surg 24:294–299. https://doi.org/10.1159/000103661CrossRef

Titel: Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infections in Hepatic and Pancreatic Resection
verfasst von: Keno Mentor
Bathiya Ratnayake
Nasreen Akter
Giorgio Alessandri
Gourab Sen
Jeremy J. French
Derek M. Manas
John S. Hammond
Sanjay Pandanaboyana
Publikationsdatum: 18.08.2020
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 12/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05741-6

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2020

Preoperative Risk Assessment: A Poor Predictor of Outcome in Critically ill Elderly with Sepsis After Abdominal Surgery

Authors’ Reply: Bile Leak Reduction with Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection: A Multi-institutional Propensity Score-Adjusted Multivariable Regression Analysis

Port Site Hernias Following Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair

A Novel Breast-Conserving Surgical Technique in the Management of Phyllodes Tumours of the Breast

Open Abdomen and Fluid Instillation in the Septic Abdomen: Results from the IROA Study

Damage Control Laparotomy: High-Volume Centers Display Similar Mortality Rates Despite Differences in Country Income Level

Update Chirurgie