Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics 1/2015

01.01.2015 | Original Article

Modification of treatment strategy after FFR measurement: CVIT-DEFER registry

verfasst von: Masato Nakamura, Masakazu Yamagishi, Takafumi Ueno, Kazuhiro Hara, Sugao Ishiwata, Tomonori Itoh, Ichiro Hamanaka, Tetsuzo Wakatsuki, Teruyasu Sugano, Kazuya Kawai, Takashi Akasaka, Nobuhiro Tanaka, Takeshi Kimura

Erschienen in: Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics | Ausgabe 1/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The impact of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) on clinical decision-making remains unclear in daily practice. The CVIT-DEFER registry is a prospective multicenter registry enrolling consecutive patients with angiographically intermediate coronary stenosis for whom FFR measurement is clinically indicated. The treatment strategy determined from angiographic findings alone and the strategy selected after FFR measurement were compared. Data on the treatment strategy were obtained for 3093 subjects. The average age of these subjects was 69.5 ± 10.2 years and 73.8 % were men. The majority had stable coronary artery disease, including 60.4 % with stable angina pectoris. The treatment strategy based on angiographic findings was medical management in 34.5 %, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in 63.5 %, and coronary artery bypass grafting in 2.1 %. The FFR was ≤0.8 in 1566 lesions (42.2 %). After FFR measurement, medical treatment was changed to revascularization in 19.7 %, while PCI was switched to medical treatment in 57.4 % at the lesion level. As a result, reclassification of the treatment strategy at the patient level was done in 39.0 % of the patients. Revascularization was frequently switched to medical treatment after FFR measurement. These findings support the clinical utility of employing FFR data to guide selection of PCI.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, Mancini GBJ, Hayes SW, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation. 2008;117:1283–91.PubMedCrossRef Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, Mancini GBJ, Hayes SW, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation. 2008;117:1283–91.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Davies RF, Goldberg AD, Forman S, Pepine CJ, Knatterud GL, et al. Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) study two-year follow-up: outcomes of patients randomized to initial strategies of medical therapy versus revascularization. Circulation. 1997;95:2037–43.PubMedCrossRef Davies RF, Goldberg AD, Forman S, Pepine CJ, Knatterud GL, et al. Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) study two-year follow-up: outcomes of patients randomized to initial strategies of medical therapy versus revascularization. Circulation. 1997;95:2037–43.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Yong AS, Ng AC, Brieger D, Lowe HC, Ng MK, Kritharides L. Three-dimensional and two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography, and their prediction of reduced fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:345–53.PubMedCrossRef Yong AS, Ng AC, Brieger D, Lowe HC, Ng MK, Kritharides L. Three-dimensional and two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography, and their prediction of reduced fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:345–53.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Zir LM, Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, Gilbert JP, Harthorne JW. Interobserver variability in coronary angiography. Circulation. 1976;53:627–32.PubMedCrossRef Zir LM, Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, Gilbert JP, Harthorne JW. Interobserver variability in coronary angiography. Circulation. 1976;53:627–32.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pijls NH, van Son JA, Kirkeeide RL, De Bruyne B, Gould KL. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1993;87:1354–67.PubMedCrossRef Pijls NH, van Son JA, Kirkeeide RL, De Bruyne B, Gould KL. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1993;87:1354–67.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Pijls NH, Van Gelder B, Van der Voort P, Peels K, Bracke FA, Bonnier HJ, et al. Fractional flow reserve: a useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation. 1995;92:3183–93.PubMedCrossRef Pijls NH, Van Gelder B, Van der Voort P, Peels K, Bracke FA, Bonnier HJ, et al. Fractional flow reserve: a useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation. 1995;92:3183–93.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat De Bruyne B, Bartunek J, Sys SU, Pijls NHJ, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W. Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans: feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve. Circulation. 1996;94:1842–9.PubMedCrossRef De Bruyne B, Bartunek J, Sys SU, Pijls NHJ, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W. Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans: feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve. Circulation. 1996;94:1842–9.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tonino PAL, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van’t Veer M, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding PCI in patients with multivessel coronary disease (FAME study). N Engl J Med. 2009;360:213–224. Tonino PAL, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van’t Veer M, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding PCI in patients with multivessel coronary disease (FAME study). N Engl J Med. 2009;360:213–224.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, Siebert U, Ikeno F, Bornschein B, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:177–84.PubMedCrossRef Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, Siebert U, Ikeno F, Bornschein B, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:177–84.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Kalson B, Barbato E, Tonino PAL, Pireth Z, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:991–1001.PubMedCrossRef De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Kalson B, Barbato E, Tonino PAL, Pireth Z, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:991–1001.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Pijls NHJ, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van’t Veer M, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:2105–2111. Pijls NHJ, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van’t Veer M, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:2105–2111.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Seo MK, Koo BK, Kim JH, Shin DH, Yang HM, Park KW, et al. Comparison of hyperemic efficacy between central and peripheral venous adenosine infusion for fractional flow reserve measurement. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:401–5.PubMedCrossRef Seo MK, Koo BK, Kim JH, Shin DH, Yang HM, Park KW, et al. Comparison of hyperemic efficacy between central and peripheral venous adenosine infusion for fractional flow reserve measurement. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:401–5.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Barbato E, Bartunek J, Bech JW, Wijns W, Heyndrickx GR. Intracoronary and intravenous adenosine 5’-triphosphate, adenosine, papaverine, and contrast medium to assess fractional flow reserve in humans. Circulation. 2003;107:1877–83.PubMedCrossRef De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Barbato E, Bartunek J, Bech JW, Wijns W, Heyndrickx GR. Intracoronary and intravenous adenosine 5’-triphosphate, adenosine, papaverine, and contrast medium to assess fractional flow reserve in humans. Circulation. 2003;107:1877–83.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, Hartigan PM, Maron DJ, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1503–16.PubMedCrossRef Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, Hartigan PM, Maron DJ, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1503–16.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat The BARI. 2D Study Group. A randomized trial of therapies for type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2503–15.CrossRef The BARI. 2D Study Group. A randomized trial of therapies for type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2503–15.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Park SJ, Kang SJ, Ahn JM, Shim EB, PHD, Kim YT, Yun SC, Song H, Lee JY, Kim WJ, MD, Park DW, Lee SW, Kim YH, Lee CW, Mintz GS, Park SW. Visual–functional mismatch between coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol Interv. 2012;5:1029–36. Park SJ, Kang SJ, Ahn JM, Shim EB, PHD, Kim YT, Yun SC, Song H, Lee JY, Kim WJ, MD, Park DW, Lee SW, Kim YH, Lee CW, Mintz GS, Park SW. Visual–functional mismatch between coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol Interv. 2012;5:1029–36.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Tonino PAL, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, van’t Veer M, J. Pijls NH. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2816–21. Tonino PAL, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, van’t Veer M, J. Pijls NH. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2816–21.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Belle EV, Rioufol G, Pouillot C, Cuisset T, Bougrini K, et al. Outcome impact of coronary revascularization strategy reclassification with fractional flow reserve at time of diagnostic angiography insights from a large French Multicenter Fractional Flow Reserve Registry. Circulation. 2014;129:173–85. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006646. Belle EV, Rioufol G, Pouillot C, Cuisset T, Bougrini K, et al. Outcome impact of coronary revascularization strategy reclassification with fractional flow reserve at time of diagnostic angiography insights from a large French Multicenter Fractional Flow Reserve Registry. Circulation. 2014;129:173–85. doi:10.​1161/​CIRCULATIONAHA.​113.​006646.
Metadaten
Titel
Modification of treatment strategy after FFR measurement: CVIT-DEFER registry
verfasst von
Masato Nakamura
Masakazu Yamagishi
Takafumi Ueno
Kazuhiro Hara
Sugao Ishiwata
Tomonori Itoh
Ichiro Hamanaka
Tetsuzo Wakatsuki
Teruyasu Sugano
Kazuya Kawai
Takashi Akasaka
Nobuhiro Tanaka
Takeshi Kimura
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2015
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics / Ausgabe 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1868-4300
Elektronische ISSN: 1868-4297
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-014-0266-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics 1/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Schadet Ärger den Gefäßen?

14.05.2024 Arteriosklerose Nachrichten

In einer Studie aus New York wirkte sich Ärger kurzfristig deutlich negativ auf die Endothelfunktion gesunder Probanden aus. Möglicherweise hat dies Einfluss auf die kardiovaskuläre Gesundheit.

Intervallfasten zur Regeneration des Herzmuskels?

14.05.2024 Herzinfarkt Nachrichten

Die Nahrungsaufnahme auf wenige Stunden am Tag zu beschränken, hat möglicherweise einen günstigen Einfluss auf die Prognose nach akutem ST-Hebungsinfarkt. Darauf deutet eine Studie an der Uniklinik in Halle an der Saale hin.

Shunt-Therapie bei Herzinsuffizienz: Kein Anzug, der allen passt

13.05.2024 Chronische Herzinsuffizienz Nachrichten

Die Anlage eines interatrialen Shunts zur Reduktion des linksatrialen Drucks ist ein neuer Therapieansatz bei Herzinsuffizienz. Viele Patienten sprechen darauf an, andere jedoch nicht. 

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.