Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Der Urologe 5/2017

19.04.2017 | Prostatakarzinom | CME

MRT der Prostata

verfasst von: Dr. med. D. Nörenberg, O. Solyanik, B. Schlenker, G. Magistro, B. Ertl-Wagner, D. A. Clevert, C. Stief, M. F. Reiser, M. D’Anastasi

Erschienen in: Die Urologie | Ausgabe 5/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Neue klinische und technische Entwicklungen auf dem Gebiet der Magnetresonanztomographie (MRT) und gezielter bildgestützter Biopsietechniken haben die Detektion, die Lokalisation, das Staging sowie die aktive Überwachung des Prostatakarzinoms in den letzten Jahren stark verbessert. Die multiparametrische MRT (mpMRT) ist die aktuell führende bildgebende Methode zur Detektion, Charakterisierung und Ausbreitungsdiagnostik von Prostatatumoren und genießt somit im Rahmen der Prostatakrebserkennung und im Rahmen von Staging-Untersuchungen einen hohen diagnostischen Stellenwert.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Baras NBB, Bertz J et al (2013) Übersicht zu den Krebssterbefällen. In: Krebs in Deutschland. Robert Koch Institut, Berlin, S 17 Baras NBB, Bertz J et al (2013) Übersicht zu den Krebssterbefällen. In: Krebs in Deutschland. Robert Koch Institut, Berlin, S 17
2.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Graham J, Kirkbride P, Cann K et al (2014) Prostate cancer: summary of updated NICE guidance. BMJ 7524:348 Graham J, Kirkbride P, Cann K et al (2014) Prostate cancer: summary of updated NICE guidance. BMJ 7524:348
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenkrantz AB, Verma S, Turkbey B (2015) Prostate cancer: top places where tumors hide on multiparametric MRI. AJR 204(4):W449–W456CrossRefPubMed Rosenkrantz AB, Verma S, Turkbey B (2015) Prostate cancer: top places where tumors hide on multiparametric MRI. AJR 204(4):W449–W456CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Fütterer JJ, Briganti A, De Visschere P et al (2015) Can clinically significant prostate cancer be detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging ? A systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 68:1045–1053CrossRefPubMed Fütterer JJ, Briganti A, De Visschere P et al (2015) Can clinically significant prostate cancer be detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging ? A systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 68:1045–1053CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dickinson L, Ahmed H, Clare A et al (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting. Eur Urol 59(4):477–494CrossRefPubMed Dickinson L, Ahmed H, Clare A et al (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting. Eur Urol 59(4):477–494CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta RT, Spilseth B, Patel N et al (2016) Multiparametric prostate MRI: focus on T2-weighted imaging and role in staging of prostate cancer. Abdom Radiol 41(5):831–843CrossRef Gupta RT, Spilseth B, Patel N et al (2016) Multiparametric prostate MRI: focus on T2-weighted imaging and role in staging of prostate cancer. Abdom Radiol 41(5):831–843CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Koksal IT, Ozcan F, Kadioglu TC et al (2000) Discrepancy between Gleason scores of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. Eur Urol 37(6):670–674CrossRefPubMed Koksal IT, Ozcan F, Kadioglu TC et al (2000) Discrepancy between Gleason scores of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. Eur Urol 37(6):670–674CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee H, Kim CK, Park BK et al (2016) Accuracy of preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of unfavorable pathology in patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. World J Urol. doi:10.1007/s00345-016-1948-6 Lee H, Kim CK, Park BK et al (2016) Accuracy of preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of unfavorable pathology in patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. World J Urol. doi:10.​1007/​s00345-016-1948-6
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen M, Dang HD, Wang JY et al (2008) Prostate cancer detection: comparison of T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and the three techniques combined. Acta Radiol 49(5):602–610CrossRefPubMed Chen M, Dang HD, Wang JY et al (2008) Prostate cancer detection: comparison of T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and the three techniques combined. Acta Radiol 49(5):602–610CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitajima K, Kaji Y, Fukabori Y et al (2010) Prostate cancer detection with 3 T MRI: comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in combination with T2-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 31(3):625–631CrossRefPubMed Kitajima K, Kaji Y, Fukabori Y et al (2010) Prostate cancer detection with 3 T MRI: comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in combination with T2-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 31(3):625–631CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Vargas HA, Akin O, Franiel T et al (2011) Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3 T for prostate cancer: tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness. Radiology 259(3):775–784CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vargas HA, Akin O, Franiel T et al (2011) Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3 T for prostate cancer: tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness. Radiology 259(3):775–784CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim CK, Park BK, Kim B (2010) High-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging at 3T to detect prostate cancer: comparisons between b values of 1,000 and 2,000 s/mm2. AJR Am J Roentgeno 194:W33–W37CrossRef Kim CK, Park BK, Kim B (2010) High-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging at 3T to detect prostate cancer: comparisons between b values of 1,000 and 2,000 s/mm2. AJR Am J Roentgeno 194:W33–W37CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kasel-Seibert M, Lehmann T, Aschenbach R (2016) Assessment of PI-RADS v2 for the detection of prostate cancer. Eur J Radiol 85(4):726–731CrossRefPubMed Kasel-Seibert M, Lehmann T, Aschenbach R (2016) Assessment of PI-RADS v2 for the detection of prostate cancer. Eur J Radiol 85(4):726–731CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Katahira K, Takahara T, Kwee TC et al (2011) Ultra-high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the detection of prostate cancer: evaluation in 201 cases with histopathological correlation. Eur Radiol 21:188–196CrossRefPubMed Katahira K, Takahara T, Kwee TC et al (2011) Ultra-high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the detection of prostate cancer: evaluation in 201 cases with histopathological correlation. Eur Radiol 21:188–196CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Fehr D, Veeraraghavan H, Wibmer A et al (2015) Automatic classification of prostate cancer Gleason scores from multiparametric magnetic resonance images. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(46):E6265–E6273CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fehr D, Veeraraghavan H, Wibmer A et al (2015) Automatic classification of prostate cancer Gleason scores from multiparametric magnetic resonance images. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(46):E6265–E6273CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bjurlin MA, Meng X, Le Nobin J et al (2014) Optimization of prostate biopsy: the role of magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy in detection, localization and risk assessment. J Urol 192:648–658CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bjurlin MA, Meng X, Le Nobin J et al (2014) Optimization of prostate biopsy: the role of magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy in detection, localization and risk assessment. J Urol 192:648–658CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Akin O, Sala E, Moskowitz CS et al (2006) Transition zone prostate cancers: features, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging. Radiology 239:784–792CrossRefPubMed Akin O, Sala E, Moskowitz CS et al (2006) Transition zone prostate cancers: features, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging. Radiology 239:784–792CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Radtke JP, Boxler S, Kuru TH et al (2015) Improved detection of anterior fibromuscular stroma and transition zone prostate cancer using biparametric an multiparametric MRI with MRI-Targeted biopsy and MRI-US fusion guidance. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 18(3):288–296CrossRefPubMed Radtke JP, Boxler S, Kuru TH et al (2015) Improved detection of anterior fibromuscular stroma and transition zone prostate cancer using biparametric an multiparametric MRI with MRI-Targeted biopsy and MRI-US fusion guidance. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 18(3):288–296CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Vargas HA, Akin O, Shukla-Dave A et al (2012) Performance characteristics of MR imaging in the evaluation of clinically low-risk prostate cancer: a prospective study. Radiology 265(2):478–487CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vargas HA, Akin O, Shukla-Dave A et al (2012) Performance characteristics of MR imaging in the evaluation of clinically low-risk prostate cancer: a prospective study. Radiology 265(2):478–487CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson JE, Moses D, Shnier R et al (2014) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: a prospective study. J Urol 192:67–74CrossRefPubMed Thompson JE, Moses D, Shnier R et al (2014) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: a prospective study. J Urol 192:67–74CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Berglund RK, Masterson TA, Vora KC et al (2008) Pathological upgrading and up staging with immediate repeat biopsy in patients eligible for active surveillance. J Urol 180(5):1964–1967CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Berglund RK, Masterson TA, Vora KC et al (2008) Pathological upgrading and up staging with immediate repeat biopsy in patients eligible for active surveillance. J Urol 180(5):1964–1967CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hashimoto T, Rahul K, Takkeda T et al (2016) Prostate magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients treated for testosterone deficiency while on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 34(12):530.e9–530.e14CrossRef Hashimoto T, Rahul K, Takkeda T et al (2016) Prostate magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients treated for testosterone deficiency while on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 34(12):530.e9–530.e14CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Maxeiner A, Stephan C, Fischer T et al (2015) Die Echtzeit-MRT/US-Fusionsbiopsie in Patienten mit und ohne Vorbiopsie mit Verdacht auf ein Prostatakarzinom. Akt Urol 46:34–38 Maxeiner A, Stephan C, Fischer T et al (2015) Die Echtzeit-MRT/US-Fusionsbiopsie in Patienten mit und ohne Vorbiopsie mit Verdacht auf ein Prostatakarzinom. Akt Urol 46:34–38
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim W, Kim CK, Park JJ et al (2016) Evaluation of extracapsular extension in prostate cancer using qualitative and quantitative multiparametric MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. doi:10.1002/jmri.25515 Kim W, Kim CK, Park JJ et al (2016) Evaluation of extracapsular extension in prostate cancer using qualitative and quantitative multiparametric MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. doi:10.​1002/​jmri.​25515
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamrava M, Kishan AU, Margolis DJ et al (2015) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer improves Gleason score assessment in favorable risk prostate cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol 5(6):411–416CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kamrava M, Kishan AU, Margolis DJ et al (2015) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer improves Gleason score assessment in favorable risk prostate cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol 5(6):411–416CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Wibmer A, Hricak H, Gondo T et al (2015) Haralick texture analysis of prostate MRI: utility for differentiating non-cancerous prostate from prostate cancer and differentiating prostate cancers with different Gleason scores. Eur Radiol 25(10):2840–2850CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wibmer A, Hricak H, Gondo T et al (2015) Haralick texture analysis of prostate MRI: utility for differentiating non-cancerous prostate from prostate cancer and differentiating prostate cancers with different Gleason scores. Eur Radiol 25(10):2840–2850CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Aerts HJ, Velazquez ER, Leijenaar RT et al (2014) Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun 5:2014 Aerts HJ, Velazquez ER, Leijenaar RT et al (2014) Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun 5:2014
Metadaten
Titel
MRT der Prostata
verfasst von
Dr. med. D. Nörenberg
O. Solyanik
B. Schlenker
G. Magistro
B. Ertl-Wagner
D. A. Clevert
C. Stief
M. F. Reiser
M. D’Anastasi
Publikationsdatum
19.04.2017
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Die Urologie / Ausgabe 5/2017
Print ISSN: 2731-7064
Elektronische ISSN: 2731-7072
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-017-0378-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2017

Der Urologe 5/2017 Zur Ausgabe

URO-Telegramm

URO-Telegramm

BDU Journal – Berufspolitik

BDU Journal – Berufspolitik