Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 4/2013

01.03.2013 | Miscellaneous

Multicenter evaluation of Neurelec Digisonic® SP cochlear implant reliability

verfasst von: Luminiţa Rădulescu, Sebastian Cozma, Casimir Niemczyk, Nicolas Guevara, Ivan Gahide, John Economides, Jean-Pierre Lavieille, Renaud Meller, Jean-Pierre Bébéar, Emilien Radafy, Philippe Bordure, Djamel Djennaoui, Eric Truy

Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Ausgabe 4/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Over the past decade, the adoption of universal hearing screening in newborns has led to earlier detection of hearing problems and significant lowering of the age of first cochlear implantation. As a consequence, recipients are now expected to keep their cochlear implants (CIs) for a longer period of time. Comprehensive longitudinal information on CI reliability is essential for device choice. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability (in children and adults) of the latest generation of the Digisonic® SP CI launched in 2006 by Neurelec. Failure rate (FR) and cumulative survival rate (CSR) for a 5-year period were calculated. This survey is a multicenter retrospective study. A questionnaire was sent to nine CI centers requesting information about patients implanted with Neurelec Digisonic® SP CIs. FR and CSR over a 5-year period were calculated on this group. Collaborating centers collected data on 672 patients (362 children and 310 adults) implanted between March 2006 and March 2011. The overall rate of explantation was 2.23 % (15 cases): six devices were explanted due to device failure (0.89 %) and nine were explanted for medical reasons (1.34 %). Four patients were lost to follow-up. The CSR at 5 years was 98.51 % on all patients, 98.48 % for children and 98.57 % for adults. FR was 0.97 % for adults and 0.83 % for children. This first independent study that assesses FR and CSR on the current generation of Digisonic® SP CI represents an important resource that can help clinicians and patients during their device choice.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Leigh J, Dettman S, Dowell R, Sarant J (2011) Evidence-based approach for making cochlear implant recommendations for infants with residual hearing. Ear Hear 32(3):313–322PubMedCrossRef Leigh J, Dettman S, Dowell R, Sarant J (2011) Evidence-based approach for making cochlear implant recommendations for infants with residual hearing. Ear Hear 32(3):313–322PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat ISO_Standard (2000) Implants for surgery—cardiac pacemakers—Part2: reporting of the clinical performance of populations of pulse generators. In: Standard I (ed) 5841/2 ISO_Standard (2000) Implants for surgery—cardiac pacemakers—Part2: reporting of the clinical performance of populations of pulse generators. In: Standard I (ed) 5841/2
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Battmer RD, Linz B, Lenarz T (2009) A review of device failure in more than 23 years of clinical experience of a cochlear implant program with more than 3,400 implantees. Otol Neurotol 30(4):455–463PubMedCrossRef Battmer RD, Linz B, Lenarz T (2009) A review of device failure in more than 23 years of clinical experience of a cochlear implant program with more than 3,400 implantees. Otol Neurotol 30(4):455–463PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown KD, Connell SS, Balkany TJ, Eshraghi AE, Telischi FF, Angeli SA (2009) Incidence and indications for revision cochlear implant surgery in adults and children. Laryngoscope 119(1):152–157PubMedCrossRef Brown KD, Connell SS, Balkany TJ, Eshraghi AE, Telischi FF, Angeli SA (2009) Incidence and indications for revision cochlear implant surgery in adults and children. Laryngoscope 119(1):152–157PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Maurer J, Marangos N, Ziegler E (2005) Reliability of cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132(5):746–750PubMedCrossRef Maurer J, Marangos N, Ziegler E (2005) Reliability of cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132(5):746–750PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Soli SD, Zheng Y (2010) Long-term reliability of pediatric cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 31(6):899–901PubMedCrossRef Soli SD, Zheng Y (2010) Long-term reliability of pediatric cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 31(6):899–901PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Battmer RD, O’Donoghue GM, Lenarz T (2007) A multicenter study of device failure in European cochlear implant centers. Ear Hear 28(2 Suppl):95S–99SPubMedCrossRef Battmer RD, O’Donoghue GM, Lenarz T (2007) A multicenter study of device failure in European cochlear implant centers. Ear Hear 28(2 Suppl):95S–99SPubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Venail F, Sicard M, Piron JP et al (2008) Reliability and complications of 500 consecutive cochlear implantations. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134(12):1276–1281PubMedCrossRef Venail F, Sicard M, Piron JP et al (2008) Reliability and complications of 500 consecutive cochlear implantations. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134(12):1276–1281PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Battmer RD, Backous DD, Balkany TJ et al (2010) International classification of reliability for implanted cochlear implant receiver stimulators. Otol Neurotol 31(8):1190–1193PubMedCrossRef Battmer RD, Backous DD, Balkany TJ et al (2010) International classification of reliability for implanted cochlear implant receiver stimulators. Otol Neurotol 31(8):1190–1193PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Balkany TJ, Hodges AV, Buchman CA et al (2005) Cochlear implant soft failures consensus development conference statement. Cochlear Implant Int 6(3):105–122CrossRef Balkany TJ, Hodges AV, Buchman CA et al (2005) Cochlear implant soft failures consensus development conference statement. Cochlear Implant Int 6(3):105–122CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Balkany TJ, Hodges AV, Buchman CA et al (2005) Cochlear implant soft failures consensus development conference statement. Otol Neurotol 26(4):815–818PubMedCrossRef Balkany TJ, Hodges AV, Buchman CA et al (2005) Cochlear implant soft failures consensus development conference statement. Otol Neurotol 26(4):815–818PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung D, Kim AH, Parisier S et al (2010) Revision cochlear implant surgery in patients with suspected soft failures. Otol Neurotol 31(8):1194–1198PubMedCrossRef Chung D, Kim AH, Parisier S et al (2010) Revision cochlear implant surgery in patients with suspected soft failures. Otol Neurotol 31(8):1194–1198PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kane JK, Mann EA (2007) ENT devices: cochlear implants. In: Brown LS, Bright RA, Tavris DR (eds) Medical device epidemiology and surveillance, Wiley, NY, pp 395–405 Kane JK, Mann EA (2007) ENT devices: cochlear implants. In: Brown LS, Bright RA, Tavris DR (eds) Medical device epidemiology and surveillance, Wiley, NY, pp 395–405
14.
Zurück zum Zitat McJunkin J, Jeyakumar A (2010) Complications in pediatric cochlear implants. Am J Otolaryngol 31(2):110–113PubMedCrossRef McJunkin J, Jeyakumar A (2010) Complications in pediatric cochlear implants. Am J Otolaryngol 31(2):110–113PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Guevara N, Sterkers O, Bebear JP et al (2010) Multicenter evaluation of the Digisonic SP cochlear implant fixation system with titanium screws in 156 patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 119(8):501–505PubMed Guevara N, Sterkers O, Bebear JP et al (2010) Multicenter evaluation of the Digisonic SP cochlear implant fixation system with titanium screws in 156 patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 119(8):501–505PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Cote M, Ferron P, Bergeron F, Bussieres R (2007) Cochlear reimplantation: causes of failure, outcomes, and audiologic performance. Laryngoscope 117(7):1225–1235PubMedCrossRef Cote M, Ferron P, Bergeron F, Bussieres R (2007) Cochlear reimplantation: causes of failure, outcomes, and audiologic performance. Laryngoscope 117(7):1225–1235PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cullen RD, Fayad JN, Luxford WM, Buchman CA (2008) Revision cochlear implant surgery in children. Otol Neurotol 29(2):214–220PubMedCrossRef Cullen RD, Fayad JN, Luxford WM, Buchman CA (2008) Revision cochlear implant surgery in children. Otol Neurotol 29(2):214–220PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu KC, Hegarty JL, Gantz BJ, Lalwani AK (2001) Conservative management of infections in cochlear implant recipients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125(1):66–70PubMedCrossRef Yu KC, Hegarty JL, Gantz BJ, Lalwani AK (2001) Conservative management of infections in cochlear implant recipients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125(1):66–70PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ray J, Gibson W, Sanli H (2004) Surgical complications of 844 consecutive cochlear implantations and observations on large versus small incisions. Cochlear Implants Int 5(3):87–95PubMedCrossRef Ray J, Gibson W, Sanli H (2004) Surgical complications of 844 consecutive cochlear implantations and observations on large versus small incisions. Cochlear Implants Int 5(3):87–95PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen NL (1995) Medical and surgical perspectives: issues in treatment and management of severe and profound hearing impairment. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 166:149–150PubMed Cohen NL (1995) Medical and surgical perspectives: issues in treatment and management of severe and profound hearing impairment. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 166:149–150PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Multicenter evaluation of Neurelec Digisonic® SP cochlear implant reliability
verfasst von
Luminiţa Rădulescu
Sebastian Cozma
Casimir Niemczyk
Nicolas Guevara
Ivan Gahide
John Economides
Jean-Pierre Lavieille
Renaud Meller
Jean-Pierre Bébéar
Emilien Radafy
Philippe Bordure
Djamel Djennaoui
Eric Truy
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Ausgabe 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2266-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2013

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 4/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

16.04.2024 HNO-Chirurgie Nachrichten

Mit Blick auf das Risiko für Komplikationen nach elektiven Eingriffen im HNO-Bereich scheint das Alter der Patienten kein ausschlaggebender Faktor zu sein. Entscheidend ist offenbar, wie fit die Betroffenen tatsächlich sind.

Intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie gewinnt an Boden

16.04.2024 Tonsillektomie Nachrichten

Gegenüber der vollständigen Entfernung der Gaumenmandeln hat die intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie einige Vorteile, wie HNO-Fachleute aus den USA hervorheben. Sie haben die aktuelle Literatur zu dem Verfahren gesichtet.

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.