Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Neurosurgical Review 2/2019

14.11.2017 | Review

Multiple high-grade gliomas: epidemiology, management, and outcome. A systematic review and meta-analysis

verfasst von: Davide Tiziano Di Carlo, Federico Cagnazzo, Nicola Benedetto, Riccardo Morganti, Paolo Perrini

Erschienen in: Neurosurgical Review | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Multiple high-grade gliomas (M-HGGs) are well--separated tumors, differentiated as multifocal (MF) and multicentric (MC) by their MRI features. The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature examining epidemiology, clinical and radiological characteristics, management, and the overall survival from M-HGGs. According to PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive review of studies published between January 1990 and January 2017 was carried out. The authors identified studies that examined the prevalence rate, clinical and radiological characteristics, treatment, and overall survival from M-HGGs in patients with HGG. Data were analyzed using a random-effects meta-analysis model. Finally, we systematically reviewed demographic characteristics, lesion location, and surgical and adjuvant treatments. Twenty-three studies were included in this systematic review. The M-HGGs prevalence rate was 19% (95% CI 13–26%) and the hazard ratio of death from M-HGGs in the HGGs population was 1.71 (95% CI 1.49–1.95, p < 0.0001). The MC prevalence rate was 6% (CI 95% 4–10%), whereas MF prevalence rate was 11% (CI 95% 6–20%) (p < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences between MF and MC HGGs in gender, lesion location, histological type, and surgical treatment. Survival analysis of MC tumors showed that surgical resection (gross total resection or subtotal resection) is an independent predictor of improved outcome (HR 7.61 for biopsy subgroup, 95% CI 1.94–29.78, p = 0.004). The prevalence of M-HGGs is approximately 20% of HGGs. The clinical relevance of separating M-HGGs in MF and MC tumors remains questionable and its prognostic significance is unclear. When patient status and lesion characteristics make it safe and feasible, cytoreduction should be attempted in patients with M-HGGs because it improves overall survival.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Arvold ND, Tanguturi SK, Aizer AA, Wen PY, Reardon DA, Lee EQ, Nayak L, Christianson LW, Horvath MC, Dunn IF, Golby AJ, Johnson MD, Claus EB, Chiocca EA, Ligon KL, Alexander BM (2015) Hypofractionated versus standard radiation therapy with or without temozolomide for older glioblastoma patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 92:384–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.01.017 CrossRefPubMed Arvold ND, Tanguturi SK, Aizer AA, Wen PY, Reardon DA, Lee EQ, Nayak L, Christianson LW, Horvath MC, Dunn IF, Golby AJ, Johnson MD, Claus EB, Chiocca EA, Ligon KL, Alexander BM (2015) Hypofractionated versus standard radiation therapy with or without temozolomide for older glioblastoma patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 92:384–389. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ijrobp.​2015.​01.​017 CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bradley W (1880) Case of gliosarcomatous tumors of the brain. Proc Conn Med Soc Bradley W (1880) Case of gliosarcomatous tumors of the brain. Proc Conn Med Soc
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Fares Y, Younes M, Kanj A, Ruiz Barnes P, Muñiz J (2009) Multicentric glioma. P R Health Sci J 28:75–79PubMed Fares Y, Younes M, Kanj A, Ruiz Barnes P, Muñiz J (2009) Multicentric glioma. P R Health Sci J 28:75–79PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Globus J, Kuhlenbeck H (1944) The subependymal cell plate (matrix) and its relationship to brain tumors of the ependymal type. J. Neuropathol Globus J, Kuhlenbeck H (1944) The subependymal cell plate (matrix) and its relationship to brain tumors of the ependymal type. J. Neuropathol
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hassaneen W, Levine NB, Suki D, Salaskar AL, de Moura LA, McCutcheon IE, Prabhu SS, Lang FF, DeMonte F, Rao G, Weinberg JS, Wildrick DM, Aldape KD, Sawaya R (2011) Multiple craniotomies in the management of multifocal and multicentric glioblastoma. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 114:576–584. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.6.JNS091326 CrossRefPubMed Hassaneen W, Levine NB, Suki D, Salaskar AL, de Moura LA, McCutcheon IE, Prabhu SS, Lang FF, DeMonte F, Rao G, Weinberg JS, Wildrick DM, Aldape KD, Sawaya R (2011) Multiple craniotomies in the management of multifocal and multicentric glioblastoma. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 114:576–584. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3171/​2010.​6.​JNS091326 CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hefti M, Von Campe G, Schneider C, Roelcke U, Landolt H, Article O, Hefti M, Von Campe G, Schneider C, Roelcke U, Landolt H (2010) Multicentric tumor manifestations of high grade gliomas: Independent proliferation or hallmark of extensive disease? Zentralbl Neurochir 71:103. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1241190 CrossRef Hefti M, Von Campe G, Schneider C, Roelcke U, Landolt H, Article O, Hefti M, Von Campe G, Schneider C, Roelcke U, Landolt H (2010) Multicentric tumor manifestations of high grade gliomas: Independent proliferation or hallmark of extensive disease? Zentralbl Neurochir 71:103. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1055/​s-0029-1241190 CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Karlowee V, Amatya VJ, Hirano H, Takayasu T, Nosaka R, Kolakshyapati M, Yoshihiro M, Takeshima Y, Sugiyama K, Arita K, Kurisu K, Yamasaki F (2016) Multicentric glioma develops via a mutant IDH1-independent pathway: immunohistochemical study of multicentric glioma. Pathobiology:4–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000447951 Karlowee V, Amatya VJ, Hirano H, Takayasu T, Nosaka R, Kolakshyapati M, Yoshihiro M, Takeshima Y, Sugiyama K, Arita K, Kurisu K, Yamasaki F (2016) Multicentric glioma develops via a mutant IDH1-independent pathway: immunohistochemical study of multicentric glioma. Pathobiology:4–8. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1159/​000447951
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kato T, Aida T, Abe H, Ogata A, Nakamura N, Nagashima K, Kitaoka K (1990) Clinicopathological study of multiple gliomas—report of three cases. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 30:604–609CrossRef Kato T, Aida T, Abe H, Ogata A, Nakamura N, Nagashima K, Kitaoka K (1990) Clinicopathological study of multiple gliomas—report of three cases. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 30:604–609CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney DR, Gokaslan ZL, Shi W, DeMonte F, Lang FF, McCutcheon IE, Hassenbusch SJ, Holland E, Hess K, Michael C, Miller D, Sawaya R (2001) A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg 95:190–198. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2001.95.2.0190 CrossRef Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney DR, Gokaslan ZL, Shi W, DeMonte F, Lang FF, McCutcheon IE, Hassenbusch SJ, Holland E, Hess K, Michael C, Miller D, Sawaya R (2001) A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg 95:190–198. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3171/​jns.​2001.​95.​2.​0190 CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5:649–655CrossRefPubMed Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5:649–655CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Paulsson AK, Holmes JA, Peiffer AM, Miller LD, Liu W, Xu J, Hinson WH, Lesser GJ, Laxton AW, Tatter SB, Debinski W, Chan MD (2014) Comparison of clinical outcomes and genomic characteristics of single focus and multifocal glioblastoma. J Neuro-Oncol 119:429–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-014-1515-1 CrossRef Paulsson AK, Holmes JA, Peiffer AM, Miller LD, Liu W, Xu J, Hinson WH, Lesser GJ, Laxton AW, Tatter SB, Debinski W, Chan MD (2014) Comparison of clinical outcomes and genomic characteristics of single focus and multifocal glioblastoma. J Neuro-Oncol 119:429–435. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11060-014-1515-1 CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat R. Stupp, W. P. Mason MJ van den B et al. (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma, N Engl J Med vol 352, no 10 987–996. R. Stupp, W. P. Mason MJ van den B et al. (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma, N Engl J Med vol 352, no 10 987–996.
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P (2013) The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hosp Res Inst 1–4. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/632432 Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P (2013) The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hosp Res Inst 1–4. doi: https://​doi.​org/​10.​2307/​632432
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, Cloughesy TF, Sorensen AG, Galanis E, DeGroot J, Wick W, Gilbert MR, Lassman AB, Tsien C, Mikkelsen T, Wong ET, Chamberlain MC, Stupp R, Lamborn KR, Vogelbaum MA, Van Den Bent MJ, Chang SM (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: Response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28:1963–1972. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3541 CrossRefPubMed Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, Cloughesy TF, Sorensen AG, Galanis E, DeGroot J, Wick W, Gilbert MR, Lassman AB, Tsien C, Mikkelsen T, Wong ET, Chamberlain MC, Stupp R, Lamborn KR, Vogelbaum MA, Van Den Bent MJ, Chang SM (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: Response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28:1963–1972. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2009.​26.​3541 CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Multiple high-grade gliomas: epidemiology, management, and outcome. A systematic review and meta-analysis
verfasst von
Davide Tiziano Di Carlo
Federico Cagnazzo
Nicola Benedetto
Riccardo Morganti
Paolo Perrini
Publikationsdatum
14.11.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Neurosurgical Review / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0344-5607
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-2320
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-017-0928-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Neurosurgical Review 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.