nach oben

Current Addiction Reports

Erschienen in:

01.06.2017 | Cannabis (J Cousijn, Section Editor)

Neural Correlates of Social Influence Among Cannabis Users

verfasst von: Jodi M. Gilman

Erschienen in: Current Addiction Reports | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Although peer influence is an important factor in the initiation and maintenance of cannabis use, few studies have investigated the neural correlates of peer influence among cannabis users. The current review summarizes research on the neuroscience of social influence in cannabis users, with the goal of highlighting gaps in the literature and the need for future research.

Recent Findings

Brain regions underlying peer influence may function differently in cannabis users. Compared to non-using controls, regions of the brain underlying reward, such as the striatum, show greater connectivity with frontal regions and also hyperactivity when participants are presented with peer information. Other subcortical regions, such as the insula, show hypoactivation during social exclusion in cannabis users, indicating that neural responses to peer interactions may be altered in cannabis users.

Summary

Although neuroscience is increasingly being used to study social behavior, few studies have specifically focused on cannabis use, and therefore, it is difficult to draw conclusions about social mechanisms that may differentiate cannabis users and controls. This area of research may be a promising avenue in which to explore a critical factor underlying cannabis use and addiction.

van den Bree MB, Pickworth WB. Risk factors predicting changes in marijuana involvement in teenagers. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(3):311–9. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.3.311.CrossRefPubMed

Clayton RR, Lacy WB. Interpersonal influences on male drug use and drug use intentions. Int J Addict. 1982;17(4):655–66.CrossRefPubMed

Khavari KA. Interpersonal influences in college students’ initial use of alcohol and drugs—the role of friends, self, parents, doctors, and dealers. Int J Addict. 1993;28(4):377–88.CrossRefPubMed

Terry-McElrath YM, O'Malley PM, Johnston LD. Reasons for drug use among American youth by consumption level, gender, and race/ethnicity: 1976–2005. J Drug Issues. 2009;39(3):677–714.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bahr SJ, Hoffmann JP, Yang X. Parental and peer influences on the risk of adolescent drug use. J Prim Prev. 2005;26(6):529–51. doi:10.1007/s10935-005-0014-8.CrossRefPubMed

Kandel D. Adolescent marihuana use: role of parents and peers. Science. 1973;181(104):1067–70.CrossRefPubMed

Ong TH. Peers as perceived by drug abusers in their drug-seeking behaviour. Br J Addict. 1989;84(6):631–7.CrossRefPubMed

Allen JP, Porter MR, McFarland FC. Leaders and followers in adolescent close friendships: susceptibility to peer influence as a predictor of risky behavior, friendship instability, and depression. Dev Psychopathol. 2006;18(1):155–72. doi:10.1017/S0954579406060093.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gates P, Copeland J, Swift W, Martin G. Barriers and facilitators to cannabis treatment. Drug and alcohol review. 2012;31(3):311–9. doi:10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00313.x.CrossRefPubMed

10.

•• van der Pol P, Liebregts N, de Graaf R, Korf DJ, van den Brink W, van Laar M. Facilitators and barriers in treatment seeking for cannabis dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;133(2):776–80. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.08.011. Functional impairment, mental health problems and social pressure are important predictors of willingness to seek treatment among people with cannabis dependence. CrossRefPubMed

11.

Polonec LD, Major AM, Atwood LE. Evaluating the believability and effectiveness of the social norms message “most students drink 0 to 4 drinks when they party”. Health Commun. 2006;20(1):23–34. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc2001_3.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Humbert ML, Chad KE, Spink KS, Muhajarine N, Anderson KD, Bruner MW, et al. Factors that influence physical activity participation among high- and low-SES youth. Qual Health Res. 2006;16(4):467–83. doi:10.1177/1049732305286051.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Hermans RC, Larsen JK, Herman CP, Engels RC. How much should I eat? Situational norms affect young women's food intake during meal time. Br J Nutr. 2012;107(4):588–94. doi:10.1017/S0007114511003278.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Pliner P, Mann N. Influence of social norms and palatability on amount consumed and food choice. Appetite. 2004;42(2):227–37. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2003.12.001.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Gilman JM, Curran MT, Calderon V, Stoeckel LE, Evins AE. Impulsive social influence increases impulsive choices on a temporal discounting task in young adults. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e101570. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0101570.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Gilman JM, Treadway MT, Curran MT, Calderon V, Evins AE. Effect of social influence on effort-allocation for monetary rewards. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0126656. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126656.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Miech RA, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use: 1975–2014: overview, key findings on adolescent drug use. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan; 2015.

18.

Hartwell KJ, Back SE, McRae-Clark AL, Shaftman SR, Brady KT. Motives for using: a comparison of prescription opioid, marijuana and cocaine dependent individuals. Addict Behav. 2012;37(4):373–8. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.11.014.CrossRefPubMed

19.

van Hoorn J, Fuligni AJ, Crone EA, Galva A. Peer influence effects on risk-taking and prosocial decision-making in adolescence: insights from neuroimaging studies. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. 2016;10:59–64.CrossRef

20.

Breiter HC, Gasic GP. A general circuitry processing reward/aversion information and its implications for neuropsychiatric illness. In: Gazzaniga M, editor. The cognitive neurosciences, III. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2004. p. 1043–65.

21.

Ernst M, Paulus MP. Neurobiology of decision making: a selective review from a neurocognitive and clinical perspective. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;58(8):597–604. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.06.004.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Rangel A, Camerer C, Montague PR. A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9(7):545–56. doi:10.1038/nrn2357.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Adolphs R. Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4(3):165–78. doi:10.1038/nrn1056.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Rilling J, Gutman D, Zeh T, Pagnoni G, Berns G, Kilts C. A neural basis for social cooperation. Neuron. 2002;35(2):395–405.CrossRefPubMed

25.

de Quervain DJ, Fischbacher U, Treyer V, Schellhammer M, Schnyder U, Buck A, et al. The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science. 2004;305(5688):1254–8. doi:10.1126/science.1100735.CrossRefPubMed

26.

King-Casas B, Tomlin D, Anen C, Camerer CF, Quartz SR, Montague PR. Getting to know you: reputation and trust in a two-person economic exchange. Science. 2005;308(5718):78–83. doi:10.1126/science.1108062.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Berns GS, Capra CM, Moore S, Noussair C. Neural mechanisms of the influence of popularity on adolescent ratings of music. NeuroImage. 2010;49(3):2687–96. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.070.CrossRefPubMed

28.

•• Berns GS, Chappelow J, Zink CF, Pagnoni G, Martin-Skurski ME, Richards J. Neurobiological correlates of social conformity and independence during mental rotation. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;58(3):245–53. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.04.012. Conformity and independence are associated with differential brain activity, providing evidence for the involvement of perceptual and emotional processes during social conformity. CrossRefPubMed

29.

Klucharev V, Hytonen K, Rijpkema M, Smidts A, Fernandez G. Reinforcement learning signal predicts social conformity. Neuron. 2009;61(1):140–51. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.11.027.CrossRefPubMed

30.

•• Welborn BL, Lieberman MD, Goldenberg D, Fuligni AJ, Galvan A, Telzer EH. Neural mechanisms of social influence in adolescence. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016;11(1):100–9. doi:10.1093/scan/nsv095. Social influence from parents and peers is associated with activation in mentalizing (medial PFC and TPJ), reward-processing (ventral medial PFC) and cognitive control (ventral lateral PFC) regions during adolescence, and suggests that peer and parental influence rely on the same neural mechanisms. CrossRefPubMed

31.

Somerville LH, Jones RM, Ruberry EJ, Dyke JP, Glover G, Casey BJ. The medial prefrontal cortex and the emergence of self-conscious emotion in adolescence. Psychol Sci. 2013;24(8):1554–62. doi:10.1177/0956797613475633.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Van Hoorn J, Van Dijk E, Guroglu B, Crone EA. Neural correlates of prosocial peer influence on public goods game donations during adolescence. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016;11(6):923–33. doi:10.1093/scan/nsw013.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Mason MF, Dyer R, Norton MI. Neural mechanisms of social influence. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2009;110:152–9.CrossRef

34.

Zaki J, Schirmer J, Mitchell JP. Social influence modulates the neural computation of value. Psychol Sci. 2011;22(7):894–900. doi:10.1177/0956797611411057.CrossRefPubMed

35.

•• Guyer AE, Benson B, Choate VR, Bar-Haim Y, Perez-Edgar K, Jarcho JM, et al. Lasting associations between early-childhood temperament and late-adolescent reward-circuitry response to peer feedback. Dev Psychopathol. 2014;26(1):229–43. doi:10.1017/S0954579413000941. Early-life temperament predicts altered striatal response in both social and nonsocial contexts, and provides support for continuity between temperament measured in childhood and neural response to social signals measured in adolescence and early adulthood. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Masten CL, Eisenberger NI, Borofsky LA, Pfeifer JH, McNealy K, Mazziotta JC, et al. Neural correlates of social exclusion during adolescence: understanding the distress of peer rejection. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2009;4(2):143–57. doi:10.1093/scan/nsp007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Pfeifer JH, Masten CL, Moore 3rd WE, Oswald TM, Mazziotta JC, Iacoboni M, et al. Entering adolescence: resistance to peer influence, risky behavior, and neural changes in emotion reactivity. Neuron. 2011;69(5):1029–36. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.019.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Telzer EH, Fuligni AJ, Lieberman MD, Miernicki ME, Galvan A. The quality of adolescents’ peer relationships modulates neural sensitivity to risk taking. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015;10(3):389–98. doi:10.1093/scan/nsu064.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Chein J, Albert D, O'Brien L, Uckert K, Steinberg L. Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain’s reward circuitry. Dev Sci. 2011;14(2):F1–10. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01035.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Smith AR, Steinberg L, Strang N, Chein J. Age differences in the impact of peers on adolescents’ and adults’ neural response to reward. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2015;11:75–82. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2014.08.010.CrossRefPubMed

41.

•• Knoll LJ, Magis-Weinberg L, Speekenbrink M, Blakemore SJ. Social influence on risk perception during adolescence. Psychol Sci. 2015;26(5):583–92. doi:10.1177/0956797615569578. Social influence on risk preference changes over development; while most age groups (ranging between age 8 and 59) conform more to adult social influence than adolescent social influence, early adolescents (12–14 year olds) are more sensitive to social influence from peers than adults. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Gaoni Y, Mechoulam R. The isolation and structure of delta-1-tetrahydrocannabinol and other neutral cannabinoids from hashish. J Am Chem Soc. 1971;93(1):217–24.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Burns HD, Van Laere K, Sanabria-Bohorquez S, Hamill TG, Bormans G, Eng WS, et al. [18F]MK-9470, a positron emission tomography (PET) tracer for in vivo human PET brain imaging of the cannabinoid-1 receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(23):9800–5. doi:10.1073/pnas.0703472104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

•• Weissman DG, Schriber RA, Fassbender C, Atherton O, Krafft C, Robins RW, et al. Earlier adolescent substance use onset predicts stronger connectivity between reward and cognitive control brain networks. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2015; doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2015.07.002. The earlier that adolescents initiate substance use, the stronger the connectivity between the striatum and various regions involved in cognitive control. The coupling of reward and cognitive control networks may be a mechanism through which earlier onset of substance use is related to brain function over time. PubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Chambers RA, Taylor JR, Potenza MN. Developmental neurocircuitry of motivation in adolescence: a critical period of addiction vulnerability. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160(6):1041–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Asch SE. Effects of group pressure upon the modification distortion of judgments. In: Guetzkow H, editor. Groups, leadership, and men. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Press; 1951. p. 177–90.

47.

Asch SE. Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1952.CrossRef

48.

Gilman JM, Lee S, Kuster JK, Lee MJ, Kim BW, van der Kouwe A, et al. Variable activation in striatal subregions across components of a social influence task in young adult cannabis users. Brain and behavior. 2016;6(5):e00459. doi:10.1002/brb3.459.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

•• Gilman JM, Schuster RM, Curran MT, Calderon V, van der Kouwe A, Evins AE. Neural mechanisms of sensitivity to peer information in young adult cannabis users. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016;16(4):646–61. doi:10.3758/s13415-016-0421-8. This paper showed that cannabis users, compared to controls, had significantly greater activation in the caudate when presented with peer information, indicating that young adults who use cannabis may exhibit increased effort when confronted with opposing peer influence, as well as exhibit greater responsivity of the caudate to social information. CrossRefPubMed

50.

Barch DM, Yarkoni T. Introduction to the special issue on reliability and replication in cognitive and affective neuroscience research. Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience. 2013;13(4):687–9. doi:10.3758/s13415-013-0201-7.CrossRef

51.

Nunez MD, Srinivasan R, Vandekerckhove J. Individual differences in attention influence perceptual decision making. Front Psychol. 2015;8:18. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00018.PubMedPubMedCentral

52.

Ester EF, Ho TC, Brown SD, Serences JT. Variability in visual working memory ability limits the efficiency of perceptual decision making. J Vis. 2014;14(4) doi:10.1167/14.4.2.

53.

Jacobus J, Squeglia LM, Infante MA, Castro N, Brumback T, Meruelo AD, et al. Neuropsychological performance in adolescent marijuana users with co-occurring alcohol use: a three-year longitudinal study. Neuropsychology. 2015; doi:10.1037/neu0000203.PubMedPubMedCentral

54.

Price JS, McQueeny T, Shollenbarger S, Browning EL, Wieser J, Lisdahl KM. Effects of marijuana use on prefrontal and parietal volumes and cognition in emerging adults. Psychopharmacology. 2015; doi:10.1007/s00213-015-3931-0.PubMedPubMedCentral

55.

Colizzi M, Fazio L, Ferranti L, Porcelli A, Masellis R, Marvulli D, et al. Functional genetic variation of the cannabinoid receptor 1 and cannabis use interact on prefrontal connectivity and related working memory behavior. Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015;40(3):640–9. doi:10.1038/npp.2014.213.CrossRef

56.

Jones RM, Somerville LH, Li J, Ruberry EJ, Libby V, Glover G, et al. Behavioral and neural properties of social reinforcement learning. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2011;31(37):13039–45. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2972-11.2011.CrossRef

57.

Sescousse G, Li Y, Dreher, JC. A common currency for the computation of motivational values in the human striatum. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014.

58.

Gilman J, Kuster, JK, Lee, S, Lee, MJ, Kim, BW, Makris, N, van der Kouwe, A, Blood, AJ, and Breiter, HC. Cannabis use is quantitatively associated with nucleus accumbens and amygdala abnormalities in young adult recreational users. J Neurosci. 2014;34(16):5529–38.

59.

Pagliaccio D, Barch DM, Bogdan R, Wood PK, Lynskey MT, Heath AC, et al. Shared predisposition in the association between cannabis use and subcortical brain structure. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(10):994–1001. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.1054.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

60.

Cousijn J, Goudriaan AE, Ridderinkhof KR, van den Brink W, Veltman DJ, Wiers RW. Neural responses associated with cue-reactivity in frequent cannabis users. Addict Biol. 2013;18(3):570–80. doi:10.1111/j.1369-1600.2011.00417.x.CrossRefPubMed

61.

Nestor L, Hester R, Garavan H. Increased ventral striatal BOLD activity during non-drug reward anticipation in cannabis users. NeuroImage. 2010;49(1):1133–43. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.022.CrossRefPubMed

62.

van Hell HH, Vink M, Ossewaarde L, Jager G, Kahn RS, Ramsey NF. Chronic effects of cannabis use on the human reward system: an fMRI study. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010;20(3):153–63. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2009.11.010.CrossRefPubMed

63.

Goodman J, Packard MG. The influence of cannabinoids on learning and memory processes of the dorsal striatum. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2015;125:1–14. doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2015.06.008.CrossRefPubMed

64.

Robinson TE, Berridge KC. The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1993;18(3):247–91.CrossRefPubMed

65.

Bailey SL, Ennett ST, Ringwalt CL. Potential mediators, moderators, or independent effects in the relationship between parents’ former and current cigarette use and their children’s cigarette use. Addict Behav. 1993;18(6):601–21.CrossRefPubMed

66.

Ennett ST, Bauman KE. Peer group structure and adolescent cigarette smoking: a social network analysis. J Health Soc Behav. 1993;34(3):226–36.CrossRefPubMed

67.

Pearson M, Michell L. Smoke rings: social network analysis of friendship groups, smoking and drug-taking. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy. 2000;7(1):21–37. doi:10.1080/dep.7.1.21.37.

68.

Williams KD, Cheung CK, Choi W. Cyberostracism: effects of being ignored over the Internet. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000;79(5):748–62.CrossRefPubMed

69.

Cacioppo S, Frum C, Asp E, Weiss RM, Lewis JW, Cacioppo JT. A quantitative meta-analysis of functional imaging studies of social rejection. Sci Rep. 2013;3:2027. doi:10.1038/srep02027.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

70.

Craig AD. How do you feel—now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10(1):59–70. doi:10.1038/nrn2555.CrossRefPubMed

71.

Critchley HD, Mathias CJ, Dolan RJ. Neural activity in the human brain relating to uncertainty and arousal during anticipation. Neuron. 2001;29(2):537–45.CrossRefPubMed

72.

Critchley HD, Rotshtein P, Nagai Y, O'Doherty J, Mathias CJ, Dolan RJ. Activity in the human brain predicting differential heart rate responses to emotional facial expressions. NeuroImage. 2005;24(3):751–62. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.10.013.CrossRefPubMed

73.

Hennenlotter A, Schroeder U, Erhard P, Castrop F, Haslinger B, Stoecker D, et al. A common neural basis for receptive and expressive communication of pleasant facial affect. NeuroImage. 2005;26(2):581–91. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.057.CrossRefPubMed

74.

Naqvi NH, Gaznick N, Tranel D, Bechara A. The insula: a critical neural substrate for craving and drug seeking under conflict and risk. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014;1316:53–70. doi:10.1111/nyas.12415.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

75.

Morales AM, Ghahremani D, Kohno M, Hellemann GS, London ED. Cigarette exposure, dependence, and craving are related to insula thickness in young adult smokers. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014;39(8):1816–22. doi:10.1038/npp.2014.48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

76.

Moran-Santa Maria MM, Hartwell KJ, Hanlon CA, Canterberry M, Lematty T, Owens M, et al. Right anterior insula connectivity is important for cue-induced craving in nicotine-dependent smokers. Addict Biol. 2015;20(2):407–14. doi:10.1111/adb.12124.CrossRefPubMed

77.

Contreras M, Ceric F, Torrealba F. Inactivation of the interoceptive insula disrupts drug craving and malaise induced by lithium. Science. 2007;318(5850):655–8. doi:10.1126/science.1145590.CrossRefPubMed

78.

Hoglund WLG, Lalonde CE, Leadbeater BJ. Social-cognitive competence, peer rejection and neglect, and behavioral and emotional problems in middle childhood. Soc Dev. 2008;17(3):528–53. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00449.x.CrossRef

79.

Bovasso GB. Cannabis abuse as a risk factor for depressive symptoms. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158(12):2033–7.CrossRefPubMed

80.

Allman JM, Hakeem A, Erwin JM, Nimchinsky E, Hof P. The anterior cingulate cortex. The evolution of an interface between emotion and cognition. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001;935:107–17.CrossRefPubMed

81.

Ichikawa N, Siegle GJ, Jones NP, Kamishima K, Thompson WK, Gross JJ, et al. Feeling bad about screwing up: emotion regulation and action monitoring in the anterior cingulate cortex. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011;11(3):354–71. doi:10.3758/s13415-011-0028-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

82.

Lane RD, Reiman EM, Axelrod B, Yun LS, Holmes A, Schwartz GE. Neural correlates of levels of emotional awareness. Evidence of an interaction between emotion and attention in the anterior cingulate cortex. J Cogn Neurosci. 1998;10(4):525–35.CrossRefPubMed

83.

Bolling DZ, Pitskel NB, Deen B, Crowley MJ, McPartland JC, Mayes LC, et al. Dissociable brain mechanisms for processing social exclusion and rule violation. NeuroImage. 2011;54(3):2462–71. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.049.CrossRefPubMed

84.

Greicius MD, Flores BH, Menon V, Glover GH, Solvason HB, Kenna H, et al. Resting-state functional connectivity in major depression: abnormally increased contributions from subgenual cingulate cortex and thalamus. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;62(5):429–37. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.09.020.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

85.

Gilman JM, Bjork JM, Wilens TE. Brain signaling in psychiatric disorders: what can they tell us in the absence of behavioral differences? Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science. 2015;05(08):333–7. doi:10.4236/jbbs.2015.58033.CrossRef

86.

Silva K, Shulman, E., Chein, J., Steinberg, L. Peers increase adolescents’ exploratory behavior and sensitivity to positive and negative feedback. J Res Adolesc. 2015;1.

87.

•• Lorenzetti V, Solowij N, Fornito A, Lubman DI, Yucel M. The association between regular cannabis exposure and alterations of human brain morphology: an updated review of the literature. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20(13):2138–67. This review discusses morphological alterations in cannabinoid receptor-rich brain regions, concluding that greater cannabis exposure and earlier initiation of cannabis use are associated with such alterations. CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Neural Correlates of Social Influence Among Cannabis Users
verfasst von: Jodi M. Gilman
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2017
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Current Addiction Reports / Ausgabe 2/2017
Elektronische ISSN: 2196-2952
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-017-0141-3

Update Psychiatrie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Springer Medizin

Neural Correlates of Social Influence Among Cannabis Users

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

„Psychotherapie ist auch bei sehr alten Menschen hochwirksam!“

Update Psychiatrie

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

Cannabis Withdrawal: a Review of Neurobiological Mechanisms and Sex Differences

The Clinical Significance of Craving Across the Addictive Behaviors: a Review

Mindfulness Reduces Reactivity to Food Cues: Underlying Mechanisms and Applications in Daily Life

Cross-Cultural Effects of Cannabis Use Disorder: Evidence to Support a Cultural Neuroscience Approach

Overview of Current State-of-the-Art Treatments for Cannabis Use Disorders, and Future Directions

Does Cannabis Composition Matter? Differential Effects of Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol on Human Cognition

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

„Psychotherapie ist auch bei sehr alten Menschen hochwirksam!“

Update Psychiatrie