nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.02.2014 | Review

Non-invasive Cerebellar Stimulation—a Consensus Paper

verfasst von: G. Grimaldi, G. P. Argyropoulos, A. Boehringer, P. Celnik, M. J. Edwards, R. Ferrucci, J. M. Galea, S. J. Groiss, K. Hiraoka, P. Kassavetis, E. Lesage, M. Manto, R. C. Miall, A. Priori, A. Sadnicka, Y. Ugawa, U. Ziemann

Erschienen in: The Cerebellum | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The field of neurostimulation of the cerebellum either with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS; single pulse or repetitive (rTMS)) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS; anodal or cathodal) is gaining popularity in the scientific community, in particular because these stimulation techniques are non-invasive and provide novel information on cerebellar functions. There is a consensus amongst the panel of experts that both TMS and tDCS can effectively influence cerebellar functions, not only in the motor domain, with effects on visually guided tracking tasks, motor surround inhibition, motor adaptation and learning, but also for the cognitive and affective operations handled by the cerebro-cerebellar circuits. Verbal working memory, semantic associations and predictive language processing are amongst these operations. Both TMS and tDCS modulate the connectivity between the cerebellum and the primary motor cortex, tuning cerebellar excitability. Cerebellar TMS is an effective and valuable method to evaluate the cerebello-thalamo-cortical loop functions and for the study of the pathophysiology of ataxia. In most circumstances, DCS induces a polarity-dependent site-specific modulation of cerebellar activity. Paired associative stimulation of the cerebello-dentato-thalamo-M1 pathway can induce bidirectional long-term spike-timing-dependent plasticity-like changes of corticospinal excitability. However, the panel of experts considers that several important issues still remain unresolved and require further research. In particular, the role of TMS in promoting cerebellar plasticity is not established. Moreover, the exact positioning of electrode stimulation and the duration of the after effects of tDCS remain unclear. Future studies are required to better define how DCS over particular regions of the cerebellum affects individual cerebellar symptoms, given the topographical organization of cerebellar symptoms. The long-term neural consequences of non-invasive cerebellar modulation are also unclear. Although there is an agreement that the clinical applications in cerebellar disorders are likely numerous, it is emphasized that rigorous large-scale clinical trials are missing. Further studies should be encouraged to better clarify the role of using non-invasive neurostimulation techniques over the cerebellum in motor, cognitive and psychiatric rehabilitation strategies.

Stoodley CJ, Schmahmann JD. Functional topography in the human cerebellum: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. NeuroImage. 2009;44:489–501.PubMed

Kelly RM, Strick PL. Cerebellar loops with motor cortex and prefrontal cortex of a nonhuman primate. J Neurosci. 2003;23(23):8432–44.PubMed

Ito M. Cerebellum and neural control. New York: Raven; 1984.

Allen GI, Tsukahara N. Cerebrocerebellar communication systems. Physiol Rev. 1974;54:957–1006.PubMed

Holdefer RN, Miller LE, Chen LL, Houk JC. Functional connectivity between cerebellum and primary motor cortex in the awake monkey. J Neurophysiol. 2000;84(1):585–90.PubMed

Ugawa Y, Day BL, Rothwell JC, Thompson PD, Merton PA, Marsden CD. Modulation of motor cortical excitability by electrical stimulation over the cerebellum in man. J Physiol. 1991;441(1):57–72.PubMed

Ugawa Y, Uesaka Y, Terao Y, Hanajima R, Kanazawa I. Magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum in humans. Ann Neurol. 1995;37(6):703–13.PubMed

Iwata NK, Ugawa Y. The effects of cerebellar stimulation on the motor cortical excitability in neurological disorders: a review. Cerebellum. 2005;4(4):218–23.PubMed

Ugawa Y, Iwata NK. Cerebellar stimulation in normal subjects and ataxic patients. In: Hallett M, Chokroverty S, editors. Magnetic stimulation in clinical neurophysiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2005. p. 197–210.

10.

Groiss SJ, Ugawa Y. Cerebellar stimulation in ataxia. Cerebellum. 2012;11(2):440–2.PubMed

11.

Galea JM, Jayaram G, Ajagbe L, Celnik P. Modulation of cerebellar excitability by polarity-specific noninvasive direct current stimulation. J Neurosci. 2009;29(28):9115–22.PubMedCentralPubMed

12.

Ugawa Y, Genba-Shimizu K, Rothwell JC, Iwata M, Kanazawa I. Suppression of motor cortical excitability by electrical stimulation over the cerebellum in ataxia. Ann Neurol. 1994;36(1):90–6.PubMed

13.

Ugawa Y, Terao Y, Hanajima R, Sakai K, Furubayashi T, Machii K, et al. Magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum in patients with ataxia. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;104(5):453–8.PubMed

14.

Shirota Y, Hamada M, Hanajima R, Terao Y, Matsumoto H, Ohminami S, et al. Cerebellar dysfunction in progressive supranuclear palsy: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Mov Disord Off J Mov Disord Soc. 2010;25(14):2413–9.

15.

Kikuchi S, Mochizuki H, Moriya A, Nakatani-Enomoto S, Nakamura K, Hanajima R, et al. Ataxic hemiparesis: neurophysiological analysis by cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation. Cerebellum. 2012;11(1):259–63.PubMed

16.

Ugawa Y. Can we see the cerebellar activation effect by TMS over the back of the head? Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120(12):2006–7.PubMed

17.

Shirota Y, Hanajima R, Hamada M, Terao Y, Matsumoto H, Tsutsumi R, et al. Inter-individual variation in the efficient stimulation site for magnetic brainstem stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011;122(10):2044–8.PubMed

18.

Mottolese C, Richard N, Harquel S, Szathmari A, Sirigu A, Desmurget M. Mapping motor representations in the human cerebellum. Brain. 2013;136:330–42.PubMed

19.

Ugawa Y, Uesaka Y, Terao Y, Hanajima R, Kanazawa I. Magnetic stimulation of corticospinal pathways at the foramen magnum level in humans. Ann Neurol. 1994;36:618–24.PubMed

20.

Oliveri M, Koch G, Torriero S, Caltagirone C. Increased facilitation of the primary motor cortex following 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralateral cerebellum in normal humans. Neurosci Lett. 2005;376:188–93.PubMed

21.

Koch G, Mori F, Marconi B, Codeca C, Pecchioli C, Salerno S, et al. Changes in intracortical circuits of the human motor cortex following theta burst stimulation of the lateral cerebellum. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119:2559–69.PubMed

22.

Fierro B, Giglia G, Palermo A, Pecoraro C, Scalia S, Brighina F. Modulatory effects of 1 Hz rTMS over the cerebellum on motor cortex excitability. Exp Brain Res. 2007;176:440–7.PubMed

23.

Langguth B, Eichhammer P, Zowe M, Landgrebe M, Binder H, Sand P, et al. Modulating cerebello-thalamocortical pathways by neuronavigated cerebellar repetitive transcranial stimulation (rTMS). Neurophysiol Clin. 2008;38(5):289–95.PubMed

24.

Pinto AD, Chen R. Suppression of the motor cortex by magnetic stimulation of the cerebellum. Exp Brain Res. 2001;140:505–10.PubMed

25.

Carrillo F, Palomar FJ, Conde V, Diaz-Corrales FJ, Porcacchia P, Fernandez-Del-Olmo M, et al. Study of cerebello-thalamocortical pathway by transcranial magnetic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Brain Stimul. 2013;6(4):582–9.PubMed

26.

Hamada M, Strigaro G, Murase N, Sadnicka A, Galea JM, Edwards MJ, et al. Cerebellar modulation of human associative plasticity. J Physiol. 2012;590:2365–74.PubMed

27.

Popa T, Velayudhan B, Hubsch C, Pradeep S, Roze E, Vidailhet M, et al. Cerebellar processing of sensory inputs primes motor cortex plasticity. Cereb Cortex. 2013;23:305–14.PubMed

28.

Lu MK, Tsai CH, Ziemann U. Cerebellum to motor cortex paired associative stimulation induces bidirectional STDP-like plasticity in human motor cortex. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6:260.PubMedCentralPubMed

29.

Koch G, Brusa L, Carrillo F, Lo Gerfo E, Torriero S, Oliveri M, et al. Cerebellar magnetic stimulation decreases levodopa-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2009;73:113–9.PubMed

30.

Brusa L, Ceravolo R, Kiferle L, Monteleone F, Iani C, Schillaci O, et al. Metabolic changes induced by theta burst stimulation of the cerebellum in dyskinetic Parkinson’s disease patients. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012;18:59–62.PubMed

31.

Bostan AC, Dum RP, Strick PL. Cerebellar networks with the cerebral cortex and basal ganglia. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013;17(5):241–54.PubMed

32.

Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, Priori A, Lang N, Antal A, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2008;1(3):206–23.PubMed

33.

Foerster A, Rocha S, Wiesiolek C, Chagas AP, Machado G, Silva E, et al. Site-specific effects of mental practice combined with transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning. Eur J Neurosci. 2013;37(5):786–94.PubMed

34.

Block HJ, Celnik P. Can cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation become a valuable neurorehabilitation intervention? Expert Rev Neurother. 2012;12(11):1275–7.PubMed

35.

Wei P, He W, Zhou Y, Wang L. Performance of motor imagery brain-computer interface based on anodal transcranial direct current stimulation modulation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2013; 21:404–415.

36.

Manto M. Cerebellar disorders. A pratical approach to diagnosis and management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 2010.

37.

Márquez-Ruiz J, Leal-Campanario R, Sánchez-Campusano R, Molaee-Ardekani B, Wendling F, Miranda PC, et al. Transcranial direct-current stimulation modulates synaptic mechanisms involved in associative learning in behaving rabbits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:6710–5.PubMedCentralPubMed

38.

Oulad Ben Taib N, Manto M. Trains of transcranial direct current stimulation antagonize motor cortex hypoexcitability induced by acute hemicerebellectomy. J Neurosurg. 2009;111:796–806.

39.

Hore J, Flament D. Changes in motor cortex neural discharge associated with the development of cerebellar limb ataxia. J Neurophysiol. 1988;60(4):1285–302.PubMed

40.

Liepert J, Kucinski T, Tüscher O, Pawlas F, Bäumer T, Weiller C. Motor cortex excitability after cerebellar infarction. Stroke. 2004;35(11):2484–8.PubMed

41.

Wessel K, Tegenthoff M, Vorgerd M, Otto V, Nitschke MF, Malin JP. Enhancement of inhibitory mechanisms in the motor cortex of patients with cerebellar degeneration: a study with transcranial magnetic brain stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996;101(4):273–80.PubMed

42.

Liepert J, Wessel K, Schwenkreis P, Trillenberg P, Otto V, Vorgerd M, et al. Reduced intracortical facilitation in patients with cerebellar degeneration. Acta Neurol Scand. 1998;98(5):318–23.PubMed

43.

Oulad Ben Taib N, Manto M. Trains of epidural DC stimulation of the cerebellum tune corticomotor excitability. Neural Plast 2013; 2013: 1–12. doi: 10.1155/2013/613197

44.

Diener HC, Dichgans J, Bacher M, Guschlbauer B. Characteristic alterations of long-loop “reflexes” in patients with Friedreich’s disease and late atrophy of the cerebellar anterior lobe. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984;47:679–85.PubMed

45.

Grimaldi G, Manto M. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (t-DCS) of the cerebellum decreases the intensity of long-latency stretch reflexes in cerebellar ataxia. Ann Biomed Eng 2013; doi: 10.1007/s10439-013-0846-y

46.

Jayaram G, Tang B, Pallegadda R, Vasudevan EV, Celnik P, Bastian A. Modulating locomotor adaptation with cerebellar stimulation. J Neurophysiol. 2012;107(11):2950–7.PubMed

47.

Galea JM, Vazquez A, Pasricha N, de Xivry JJ, Celnik P. Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: the motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns. Cereb Cortex. 2011;21(8):1761–70.PubMed

48.

Ferrucci R, Brunoni AR, Parazzini M, Vergari M, Rossi E, Fumagalli M, et al. Modulating human procedural learning by cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation. Cerebellum. 2013;12(4):485–92.PubMed

49.

Ferrucci R, Marceglia S, Vergari M, Cogiamanian F, Mrakic-Sposta S, Mameli F, et al. Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation impairs the practice-dependent proficiency increase in working memory. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008;20(9):1687–97.PubMed

50.

Boehringer A, Macher K, Dukart J, Villringer A, Pleger B. Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation modulates verbal working memory. Brain Stimul. 2012;6(4):649–53.PubMed

51.

Pope PA, Miall RC. Task-specific facilitation of cognition by cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the cerebellum. Brain Stimul. 2012;5(2):84–94.PubMedCentralPubMed

52.

Ferrucci R, Giannicola G, Rosa M, Fumagalli M, Boggio PS, Hallett M, et al. Cerebellum and processing of negative facial emotions: cerebellar transcranial DC stimulation specifically enhances the emotional recognition of facial anger and sadness. Cogn Emot. 2012;26(5):786–99.PubMed

53.

Cooper IS. Twenty-five years of experience with physiological neurosurgery. Neurosurgery. 1981;9:190–200.PubMed

54.

Müller-Dahlhaus F, Ziemann U, Classen J. Plasticity resembling spike-timing dependent synaptic plasticity: the evidence in human cortex. Front Syn Neurosci. 2010;2:1–11.

55.

Bi G, Poo M. Synaptic modification by correlated activity: Hebb’s postulate revisited. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:139–66.PubMed

56.

Stefan K, Kunesch E, Cohen LG, Benecke R, Classen J. Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. Brain. 2000;123:572–84.PubMed

57.

Stefan K, Kunesch E, Benecke R, Cohen LG, Classen J. Mechanisms of enhancement of human motor cortex excitability induced by interventional paired associative stimulation. J Physiol. 2002;543:699–708.PubMed

58.

Wolters A, Sandbrink F, Schlottmann A, Kunesch E, Stefan K, Cohen LG, et al. A temporally asymmetric Hebbian rule governing plasticity in the human motor cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2003;89:2339–45.PubMed

59.

Buch ER, Johnen VM, Nelissen N, O’shea J, Rushworth MF. Noninvasive associative plasticity induction in a corticocortical pathway of the human brain. J Neurosci. 2011;31:17669–79.PubMed

60.

Arai N, Müller-Dahlhaus F, Murakami T, Bliem B, Lu MK, Ugawa Y, et al. State-dependent and timing-dependent bidirectional associative plasticity in the human SMA-M1 network. J Neurosci. 2011;31:15376–83.PubMed

61.

Stanton PK, Sejnowski TJ. Associative long-term depression in the hippocampus induced by Hebbian covariance. Nature. 1989;339:215–8.PubMed

62.

Ziemann U, Paulus W, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Byblow WD, Berardelli A, et al. Consensus: motor cortex plasticity protocols. Brain Stimul. 2008;1:164–82.PubMed

63.

Popa T, Russo M, Meunier S. Long-lasting inhibition of cerebellar output. Brain Stimul. 2009;3:161–9.PubMed

64.

Sakihara K, Yorifuji S, Ihara A, Izumi H, Kono K, Takahashi Y, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum evokes late potential in the soleus muscle. Neurosci Res. 2003;46(2):257–62.PubMed

65.

Sakihara K, Hirata M, Nakagawa S, Fujiwara N, Sekino M, Ueno S, et al. Late response evoked by cerebellar stimuli: effect of optokinetic stimulation. Neuroreport. 2007;18(9):891–4.PubMed

66.

Hiraoka K, Horino K, Yagura A, Matsugi A. Cerebellar TMS evokes a long latency motor response in the hand during a visually-guided manual tracking task. Cerebellum. 2010;9(3):454–60.PubMed

67.

Matsugi A, Iwata Y, Mori N, Horino H, Hiraoka K. Long latency electromyographic response induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum preferentially appears during continuous visually-guided manual tracking task. Cerebellum. 2013;12(2):147–54.PubMed

68.

Miall RC, Imamizu H, Miyauchi S. Activation of the cerebellum in co-ordinated eye and hand tracking movements: an fMRI study. Exp Brain Res. 2000;135(1):22–33.PubMed

69.

Vercher JL, Gauthier GM. Cerebellar involvement in the coordination control of the oculo-manual tracking system: effects of cerebellar dentate nucleus lesion. Exp Brain Res. 1988;73(1):155–66.PubMed

70.

Werhahn KJ, Taylor J, Ridding M, Meyer BU, Rothwell JC. Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum on the excitability of human motor cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996;101(1):58–66.PubMed

71.

Mink JW. The basal ganglia: focused selection and inhibition of competing motor programs. Prog Neurobiol. 1996;50(4):381–425.PubMed

72.

Sohn YH, Hallett M. Surround inhibition in human motor system. Exp Brain Res. 2004;158(4):397–404.PubMed

73.

Kassavetis P, Hoffland BS, Saifee TA. Cerebellar brain inhibition is decreased in active and surround muscles at the onset of voluntary movement. Exp Brain Res. 2011;209(3):437–42.PubMed

74.

Sadnicka A, Kassavetis P, Saifee TA, Parees I, Rothwell JC, Edwards MJ. Cerebellar transcranical direct current stimulation does not alter motor surround inhibition. Int J Neurosci. 2013;123(6):425–32.PubMed

75.

Beck S, Hallett M. Surround inhibition in the motor system. Exp Brain Res. 2011;210(2):165–72.PubMed

76.

Beck S, Houdayer E, Richardson SP, Hallett M. The role of inhibition from the left dorsal premotor cortex in right-sided focal hand dystonia. Brain Stimul. 2009;2(4):208–14.PubMedCentralPubMed

77.

Houdayer E, Beck S, Karabanov A. The differential modulation of the ventral premotor–motor interaction during movement initiation is deficient in patients with focal hand dystonia. Eur J Neurosci. 2012;35(3):478–85.PubMedCentralPubMed

78.

Manto M, Bower JM, Conforto AB. Consensus paper: roles of the cerebellum in motor control—the diversity of ideas on cerebellar involvement in movement. Cerebellum. 2011;11(2):457–87.

79.

Saito Y, Yokota T, Yuasa T. Suppression of motor cortical excitability by magnetic stimulation of the cerebellum. Brain Res. 1995;694(1–2):200–6.PubMed

80.

Wolpert DM, Miall RC, Kawato M. Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends Cogn Sci. 1998;2(9):338–47.PubMed

81.

Kassavetis P, Saifee TA, Sadnicka A. Adaptation of surround inhibition in the human motor system. Exp Brain Res. 2012;222(3):211–7.PubMed

82.

Mazzoni P, Krakauer J. An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation. J Neurosci. 2006;26(14):3642–5.PubMed

83.

Tseng Y, Diedrichsen J, Krakauer JW, Shadmehr R, Bastian AJ. Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching. J Neurophysiol. 2007;98(1):54–62.PubMed

84.

Huang VS, Haith A, Mazzoni P, Krakauer JW. Rethinking motor learning and savings in adaptation paradigms: model-free memory for successful actions combines with internal models. Neuron. 2011;70(4):787–801.PubMedCentralPubMed

85.

Izawa J, Shadmehr R. Learning from sensory and reward prediction errors during motor adaptation. Plos Comput Biol. 2011;7(3):e1002012.PubMedCentralPubMed

86.

Bastian AJ. Moving, sensing and learning with cerebellar damage. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011;21(4):596–601.PubMedCentralPubMed

87.

Martin T, Keating J, Goodkin H, Bastian A, Thach W. Throwing while looking through prisms. 1. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation. Brain. 1996;119:1183–98.PubMed

88.

Smith MA, Shadmehr R. Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in Huntington’s disease but not cerebellar degeneration. J Neurophysiol. 2005;93(5):2809–21.PubMed

89.

Morton SM, Bastian AJ. Cerebellar contributions to locomotor adaptations during splitbelt treadmill walking. J Neurosci. 2006;26(36):9107–16.PubMed

90.

Gilbert PFC, Thach WT. Purkinje-cell activity during motor learning. Brain Res. 1977;128(2):309–28.PubMed

91.

Medina J, Nores W, Ohyama T, Mauk M. Mechanisms of cerebellar learning suggested by eyelid conditioning. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2000;10(6):717–24.PubMed

92.

Jayaram G, Galea JM, Bastian AJ, Celnik P. Human locomotor adaptive learning is proportional to depression of cerebellar excitability. Cereb Cortex. 2011;21(8):1901–9.PubMed

93.

Schlerf JE, Galea JM, Bastian AJ, Celnik PA. Dynamic modulation of cerebellar excitability for abrupt, but not gradual, visuomotor adaptation. J Neurosci. 2012;32(34):11610–7.PubMedCentralPubMed

94.

Block H, Celnik P. Stimulating the cerebellum affects visuomotor adaptation but not intermanual transfer of learning. Cerebellum. 2013; doi: 10.1007/s12311-013-0486-7

95.

KH E, Chen SH, Ho MH, Desmond JE. A meta-analysis of cerebellar contributions to higher cognition from PET and fMRI studies. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012. doi:10.1002/hbm.22194.

96.

Tedesco AM, Chiricozzi FR, Clausi S, Lupo M, Molinari M, Leggio MG. The cerebellar cognitive profile. Brain. 2011;134(Pt 12):3672–86.PubMed

97.

O’Halloran CJ, Kinsella GJ, Storey E. The cerebellum and neuropsychological functioning: a critical review. Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2012;34(1):35–56.

98.

Ferrucci R, Priori A. Transcranial cerebellar direct current stimulation (tcDCS): motor control, cognition, learning and emotions. Neuroimage. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.122.PubMed

99.

Torriero S, Oliveri M, Koch G, Caltagirone C, Petrosini L. Interference of left and right cerebellar rTMS with procedural learning. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004;16(9):1605–11.PubMed

100.

Hoffland BS, Bologna M, Kassavetis P, Teo JT, Rothwell JC, Yeo CH, et al. Cerebellar theta burst stimulation impairs eyeblink classical conditioning. J Physiol. 2012;590:887–97.PubMed

101.

D’Esposito M. From cognitive to neural models of working memory. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007;362(1481):761–72.PubMed

102.

Schmahmann JD, Sherman JC. The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. Brain. 1998;121(4):561–79.PubMed

103.

Baddeley A. Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:1–29.PubMed

104.

Sternberg S. Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. Am Sci. 1969;57:421–57.PubMed

105.

Chen SH, Desmond JE. Cerebrocerebellar networks during articulatory rehearsal and verbal working memory tasks. NeuroImage. 2005;24:332–8.PubMed

106.

Chen SH, Desmond JE. Temporal dynamics of cerebro-cerebellar network recruitment during a cognitive task. Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(9):1227–37.PubMed

107.

Timmann D, Daum I. How consistent are cognitive impairments in patients with cerebellar disorders? Behav Neurol. 2010;23:81–100.PubMed

108.

Wechsler D. WMS-R: Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised: manual. San Antonio: Psychological Corp.: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1987.

109.

Ravizza SM, McCormick CA, Schlerf JE, Justus T, Ivry RB, Fiez JA. Cerebellar damage produces selective deficits in verbal working memory. Brain. 2006;129(Pt 2):306–20.PubMed

110.

Middleton FA, Strick PL. Cerebellar projections to the prefrontal cortex of the primate. J Neurosci. 2001;21:700–12.PubMed

111.

Desmond JE, Chen SH, Shieh PB. Cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation impairs verbal working memory. Ann Neurol. 2005;58:553–60.PubMed

112.

Ramnani N. The primate cortico-cerebellar system: anatomy and function. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:511–22.PubMed

113.

Molinari M, Restuccia D, Leggio MG. State estimation, response prediction, and cerebellar sensory processing for behavioral control. Cerebellum. 2009;8:399–402.PubMed

114.

Jones LL, Estes Z. Lexical priming: associative, semantic, and thematic influences on word recognition. In: Adelman J (ed) Visual word recognition, Vol II: meaning and context, individuals and development. Psychology, New York; 2012. pp. 44–72.

115.

Fiez JA, Petersen SE, Cheney MK, Raichle ME. Impaired nonmotor learning and error detection associated with cerebellar damage. A single case study. Brain. 1992;115:155–78.PubMed

116.

Gebhart AL, Petersen SE, Thach WT. Role of the posterolateral cerebellum in language. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002;978:318–33.PubMed

117.

Petersen SE, Fox PT, Posner ML, Mintun M, Raichle ME. Positron emission tomographic studies of the processing of single words. J Cogn Neurosci. 1989;1:153–70.PubMed

118.

Frings M, Dimitrova A, Schorn CF, Elles H-G, Hein-Kropp C, Gizewski ER, et al. Cerebellar involvement in verb generation: an fMRI study. Neurosci Lett. 2006;409:19–23.PubMed

119.

Argyropoulos GP, Muggleton N. Effects of posterolateral cerebellar TMS on processing semantic associations. Cerebellum. 2012;12(1):83–96.

120.

Argyropoulos GP. Cerebellar theta-burst stimulation selectively enhances lexical associative priming. Cerebellum. 2011;10(3):540–50.PubMed

121.

Argyropoulos GP, Kimiskidis VK, Papagiannopoulos S. Theta-burst stimulation of the right neocerebellar vermis selectively disrupts the practice-induced acceleration of lexical decisions. Behav Neurosci. 2011;125(5):724–34.PubMed

122.

Leggio MG, Silveri MC, Petrosini L, Molinari M. Phonological grouping is specifically affected in cerebellar patients: a verbal fluency study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000;69:102–6.PubMed

123.

Arasanz CP, Staines WR, Roy EA, Schweizer TA. The cerebellum and its role in word generation: a cTBS study. Cortex 2012; 48:718–724.

124.

Lesage E, Morgan BE, Olson AC, Meyer AS, Miall RC. Cerebellar rTMS disrupts predictive language processing. Curr Biol. 2012;22(18):794–5.

125.

Leggio M, Tedesco AM, Chiricozzi FR, Clausi S, Orsini A, Molinari M. Cognitive sequencing impairment in patients with focal or atrophic cerebellar damage. Brain. 2008;131:1332–43.PubMed

126.

Richter S, Kaiser O, Hein-Kropp C, Dimitrova A, Gizewski E, Beck A, et al. Preserved verb generation in patients with cerebellar atrophy. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42:1235–46.PubMed

127.

Oliveri M, Torriero S, Koch G, Salerno S, Petrosini L, Caltagirone C. The role of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the study of cerebellar cognitive function. Cerebellum. 2007;6:95–101.PubMed

128.

De Smet HJ, Paquier P, Verhoeven J, Mariën P. The cerebellum: its role in language and related cognitive and affective functions. Brain and language. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2012.11.001.PubMed

129.

Bloedel JR. Functional heterogeneity with structural homogeneity—how does the cerebellum operate? Behav Brain Sci. 1992;15(4):666–78.

130.

Miall RC. The cerebellum, predictive control and motor coordination. Novartis Found Symp. 1998;218:272–84.PubMed

131.

Buckner RL, Krienen FM, Castellanos A, Diaz JC, Yeo BTT. The organization of the human cerebellum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol. 2011;106(5):2322–45.PubMed

132.

Booth JR, Wood L, Lu D, Houk JC, Bitan T. The role of the basal ganglia and cerebellum in language processing. Brain Res. 2008;1133(1):136–44.

133.

Rae C, Harasty JA, Dzendrowskyj TE, Talcott JB, Simpson JM, Blamire AM, et al. Cerebellar morphology in developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(8):1285–92.PubMed

134.

Price CJ. A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading. NeuroImage. 2012;62(2):816–47.PubMedCentralPubMed

135.

Fedorenko E, Hsieh P-J, Nieto-Castañón A, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Kanwisher N. New method for fMRI investigations of language: defining ROIs functionally in individual subjects. J Neurophysiol. 2010;104(2):1177–94.PubMed

Titel: Non-invasive Cerebellar Stimulation—a Consensus Paper
verfasst von: G. Grimaldi
G. P. Argyropoulos
A. Boehringer
P. Celnik
M. J. Edwards
R. Ferrucci
J. M. Galea
S. J. Groiss
K. Hiraoka
P. Kassavetis
E. Lesage
M. Manto
R. C. Miall
A. Priori
A. Sadnicka
Y. Ugawa
U. Ziemann
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2014
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: The Cerebellum / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 1473-4222
Elektronische ISSN: 1473-4230
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-013-0514-7

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

Sozialer Aufstieg verringert Demenzgefahr

24.05.2024 Demenz Nachrichten

Hirnblutung unter DOAK und VKA ähnlich bedrohlich

17.05.2024 Direkte orale Antikoagulanzien Nachrichten

Kommt es zu einer nichttraumatischen Hirnblutung, spielt es keine große Rolle, ob die Betroffenen zuvor direkt wirksame orale Antikoagulanzien oder Marcumar bekommen haben: Die Prognose ist ähnlich schlecht.

Was nützt die Kraniektomie bei schwerer tiefer Hirnblutung?

17.05.2024 Hirnblutung Nachrichten

Eine Studie zum Nutzen der druckentlastenden Kraniektomie nach schwerer tiefer supratentorieller Hirnblutung deutet einen Nutzen der Operation an. Für überlebende Patienten ist das dennoch nur eine bedingt gute Nachricht.

Thrombektomie auch bei großen Infarkten von Vorteil

16.05.2024 Ischämischer Schlaganfall Nachrichten

Auch ein sehr ausgedehnter ischämischer Schlaganfall scheint an sich kein Grund zu sein, von einer mechanischen Thrombektomie abzusehen. Dafür spricht die LASTE-Studie, an der Patienten und Patientinnen mit einem ASPECTS von maximal 5 beteiligt waren.

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

Cerebellar Contributions to Different Phases of Visceral Aversive Extinction Learning

Does the Cerebellum Initiate Movement?

Friedreich Ataxia: Executive Control Is Related to Disease Onset and GAA Repeat Length

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) of the Cortical Motor Areas in Three Cases of Cerebellar Ataxia

Spinocerebellar Ataxias in Brazil—Frequencies and Modulating Effects of Related Genes