Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2020

18.06.2019 | Pancreaticojejunostomy

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors: lessons learned from 500 consecutive patients in a single center

verfasst von: Ki Byung Song, Song Cheol Kim, Woohyung Lee, Dae Wook Hwang, Jae Hoon Lee, Jaewoo Kwon, Yejong Park, Seung Jae Lee, Guisuk Park

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is a feasible option in selected patients. However, its use has not yet been generalized since it is time-consuming, physically demanding, and technically challenging. It might be essential to share the experience of high-volume centers to understand its use.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 500 consecutive patients who underwent LPD at a single institution between January 2007 and December 2017.

Results

The patients included 272 women and 228 men (mean age, 57.1 years). The most common indication for LPD was intraductal papillary neoplasm (n = 104, 20.8%). Overall and major (Clavien–Dindo grades III–V) complication rates were 37.2% and 4.8%, respectively. Fifty-four patients (10.8%) had clinically relevant (grade B/C) pancreatic fistulas. There were 3 (0.6%) 90-day mortalities. The most common late complication was bilioenteric stricture (25, 5%). Two hundred thirty patients were diagnosed with periampullary cancer. The 5-year overall survival rates of pancreatic cancer, common bile duct cancer, ampulla of Vater cancer, and duodenal cancer were 37.4, 63.2, 78, and 88.9%, respectively. We analyzed learning curves of first-generation and second-generation surgeons. A risk-adjusted cumulative sum analysis demonstrated a learning curve of 55 cases for LPD with the first-generation surgeon and earlier competency with the second-generation surgeon.

Conclusions

LPD has the potential to become an alternative surgery to open pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors with acceptable outcomes. We could reduce the steep learning curve with structured training, close supervision, and well-trained operation teams. Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of LPD will be optimized after overcoming the learning curve.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Conrad C et al (2017) Comparable long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma: a propensity score weighting analysis. Surg Endosc 31(10):3970–3978PubMedCrossRef Conrad C et al (2017) Comparable long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma: a propensity score weighting analysis. Surg Endosc 31(10):3970–3978PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Shin SH et al (2015) A comparative study of laparoscopic vs. open distal pancreatectomy for left-sided ductal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Am Coll Surg 220(2):177–185PubMedCrossRef Shin SH et al (2015) A comparative study of laparoscopic vs. open distal pancreatectomy for left-sided ductal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Am Coll Surg 220(2):177–185PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Khaled YS et al (2018) Matched case-control comparative study of laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignant lesions. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 28(1):47–51PubMedCrossRef Khaled YS et al (2018) Matched case-control comparative study of laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignant lesions. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 28(1):47–51PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Maher H et al (2017) The prospective of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer management. Chin Clin Oncol 6(1):8PubMedCrossRef Maher H et al (2017) The prospective of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer management. Chin Clin Oncol 6(1):8PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161(3):584–591PubMedCrossRef Bassi C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161(3):584–591PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wente MN et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142(5):761–768PubMedCrossRef Wente MN et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142(5):761–768PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Forbes TL et al (2004) Cumulative sum failure analysis of the learning curve with endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 39(1):102–108PubMedCrossRef Forbes TL et al (2004) Cumulative sum failure analysis of the learning curve with endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 39(1):102–108PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi DH et al (2009) Learning curves for laparoscopic sigmoidectomy used to manage curable sigmoid colon cancer: single-institute, three-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc 23(3):622–628PubMedCrossRef Choi DH et al (2009) Learning curves for laparoscopic sigmoidectomy used to manage curable sigmoid colon cancer: single-institute, three-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc 23(3):622–628PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Nomi T et al (2015) Learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy. Br J Surg 102(7):796–804PubMedCrossRef Nomi T et al (2015) Learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy. Br J Surg 102(7):796–804PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim CW et al (2015) Learning curve for single-incision laparoscopic anterior resection for sigmoid colon cancer. J Am Coll Surg 221(2):397–403PubMedCrossRef Kim CW et al (2015) Learning curve for single-incision laparoscopic anterior resection for sigmoid colon cancer. J Am Coll Surg 221(2):397–403PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee W et al (2016) Comparison of learning curves for major and minor laparoscopic liver resection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26(6):457–464PubMedCrossRef Lee W et al (2016) Comparison of learning curves for major and minor laparoscopic liver resection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26(6):457–464PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramsay CR et al (2000) Assessment of the learning curve in health technologies. A systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 16(4):1095–1108PubMedCrossRef Ramsay CR et al (2000) Assessment of the learning curve in health technologies. A systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 16(4):1095–1108PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Tomassini F et al (2016) The single surgeon learning curve of laparoscopic liver resection: a continuous evolving process through stepwise difficulties. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(43):e5138CrossRef Tomassini F et al (2016) The single surgeon learning curve of laparoscopic liver resection: a continuous evolving process through stepwise difficulties. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(43):e5138CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin CW et al (2016) The learning curve of laparoscopic liver resection after the Louisville statement 2008: will it be more effective and smooth? Surg Endosc 30(7):2895–2903PubMedCrossRef Lin CW et al (2016) The learning curve of laparoscopic liver resection after the Louisville statement 2008: will it be more effective and smooth? Surg Endosc 30(7):2895–2903PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8(5):408–410PubMedCrossRef Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8(5):408–410PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Gagner M, Pomp A (1997) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: is it worthwhile? J Gastrointest Surg 1(1):20–25 discussion 25–6 PubMedCrossRef Gagner M, Pomp A (1997) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: is it worthwhile? J Gastrointest Surg 1(1):20–25 discussion 25–6 PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Dokmak S et al (2015) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy should not be routine for resection of periampullary tumors. J Am Coll Surg 220(5):831–838PubMedCrossRef Dokmak S et al (2015) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy should not be routine for resection of periampullary tumors. J Am Coll Surg 220(5):831–838PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kendrick ML, Cusati D (2010) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg 145(1):19–23PubMedCrossRef Kendrick ML, Cusati D (2010) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg 145(1):19–23PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Croome KP et al (2014) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg 260(4):633–638 discussion 638–40 PubMedCrossRef Croome KP et al (2014) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg 260(4):633–638 discussion 638–40 PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SC et al (2013) Short-term clinical outcomes for 100 consecutive cases of laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: improvement with surgical experience. Surg Endosc 27(1):95–103PubMedCrossRef Kim SC et al (2013) Short-term clinical outcomes for 100 consecutive cases of laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: improvement with surgical experience. Surg Endosc 27(1):95–103PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Boggi U et al (2015) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review. Surg Endosc 29(1):9–23PubMedCrossRef Boggi U et al (2015) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review. Surg Endosc 29(1):9–23PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu BY et al (2016) Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula: analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 22(34):7797–7805PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hu BY et al (2016) Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula: analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 22(34):7797–7805PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Akamatsu N et al (2010) Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the significance of the ratio of the main pancreatic duct to the pancreas body as a predictor of leakage. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17(3):322–328PubMedCrossRef Akamatsu N et al (2010) Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the significance of the ratio of the main pancreatic duct to the pancreas body as a predictor of leakage. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17(3):322–328PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Callery MP et al (2013) A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216(1):1–14PubMedCrossRef Callery MP et al (2013) A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216(1):1–14PubMedCrossRef
26.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Blanc T et al (2007) Hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: when is surgery still indicated? Am J Surg 194(1):3–9PubMedCrossRef Blanc T et al (2007) Hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: when is surgery still indicated? Am J Surg 194(1):3–9PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ding X et al (2011) Therapeutic management of hemorrhage from visceral artery pseudoaneurysms after pancreatic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 15(8):1417–1425PubMedCrossRef Ding X et al (2011) Therapeutic management of hemorrhage from visceral artery pseudoaneurysms after pancreatic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 15(8):1417–1425PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Treckmann J et al (2008) Sentinel bleeding after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a disregarded sign. J Gastrointest Surg 12(2):313–318PubMedCrossRef Treckmann J et al (2008) Sentinel bleeding after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a disregarded sign. J Gastrointest Surg 12(2):313–318PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Imamura M et al (2016) Effects of antecolic versus retrocolic reconstruction for gastro/duodenojejunostomy on delayed gastric emptying after pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Res 200(1):147–157PubMedCrossRef Imamura M et al (2016) Effects of antecolic versus retrocolic reconstruction for gastro/duodenojejunostomy on delayed gastric emptying after pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Res 200(1):147–157PubMedCrossRef
31.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Reid-Lombardo KM et al (2007) Long-term anastomotic complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign diseases. J Gastrointest Surg 11(12):1704–1711PubMedCrossRef Reid-Lombardo KM et al (2007) Long-term anastomotic complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign diseases. J Gastrointest Surg 11(12):1704–1711PubMedCrossRef
33.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu JQ et al (2017) Bilioenteric anastomotic stricture in patients with benign and malignant tumors: prevalence, risk factors and treatment. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 16(4):412–417PubMedCrossRef Zhu JQ et al (2017) Bilioenteric anastomotic stricture in patients with benign and malignant tumors: prevalence, risk factors and treatment. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 16(4):412–417PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Malgras B et al (2016) Early biliary complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy: prevalence and risk factors. HPB (Oxford) 18(4):367–374CrossRef Malgras B et al (2016) Early biliary complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy: prevalence and risk factors. HPB (Oxford) 18(4):367–374CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Mauri G et al (2013) Biodegradable biliary stent implantation in the treatment of benign bilioplastic-refractory biliary strictures: preliminary experience. Eur Radiol 23(12):3304–3310PubMedCrossRef Mauri G et al (2013) Biodegradable biliary stent implantation in the treatment of benign bilioplastic-refractory biliary strictures: preliminary experience. Eur Radiol 23(12):3304–3310PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaffes A et al (2014) A randomized trial of a fully covered self-expandable metallic stent versus plastic stents in anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 7(2):64–71PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kaffes A et al (2014) A randomized trial of a fully covered self-expandable metallic stent versus plastic stents in anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 7(2):64–71PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Cioffi JL et al (2016) Pancreaticojejunostomy stricture after pancreatoduodenectomy: outcomes after operative revision. J Gastrointest Surg 20(2):293–299PubMedCrossRef Cioffi JL et al (2016) Pancreaticojejunostomy stricture after pancreatoduodenectomy: outcomes after operative revision. J Gastrointest Surg 20(2):293–299PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Demirjian AN et al (2010) The inconsistent nature of symptomatic pancreatico-jejunostomy anastomotic strictures. HPB (Oxford) 12(7):482–487CrossRef Demirjian AN et al (2010) The inconsistent nature of symptomatic pancreatico-jejunostomy anastomotic strictures. HPB (Oxford) 12(7):482–487CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Bai MD et al (2008) Experimental study on operative methods of pancreaticojejunostomy with reference to anastomotic patency and postoperative pancreatic exocrine function. World J Gastroenterol 14(3):441–447PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bai MD et al (2008) Experimental study on operative methods of pancreaticojejunostomy with reference to anastomotic patency and postoperative pancreatic exocrine function. World J Gastroenterol 14(3):441–447PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Senthilnathan P et al (2015) Long-term results of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary cancer-experience of 130 cases from a tertiary-care center in South India. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25(4):295–300PubMedCrossRef Senthilnathan P et al (2015) Long-term results of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary cancer-experience of 130 cases from a tertiary-care center in South India. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25(4):295–300PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Stauffer JA et al (2017) Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: long-term results at a single institution. Surg Endosc 31(5):2233–2241PubMedCrossRef Stauffer JA et al (2017) Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: long-term results at a single institution. Surg Endosc 31(5):2233–2241PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang M et al (2016) Learning curve for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a CUSUM analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 20(5):924–935PubMedCrossRef Wang M et al (2016) Learning curve for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a CUSUM analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 20(5):924–935PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Chedid AD et al (2015) Achieving good perioperative outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a low-volume setting: a 25-year experience. Int Surg 100(4):705–711PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Chedid AD et al (2015) Achieving good perioperative outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a low-volume setting: a 25-year experience. Int Surg 100(4):705–711PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors: lessons learned from 500 consecutive patients in a single center
verfasst von
Ki Byung Song
Song Cheol Kim
Woohyung Lee
Dae Wook Hwang
Jae Hoon Lee
Jaewoo Kwon
Yejong Park
Seung Jae Lee
Guisuk Park
Publikationsdatum
18.06.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06913-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.