Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 4/2009

01.03.2009 | Original Article

Phase 0 clinical trials in oncology: a paradigm shift for early drug development?

verfasst von: Chris H. Takimoto

Erschienen in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Ausgabe 4/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To review the potential impact of Phase 0 trials conducted under the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) exploratory IND guidance on oncology drug development.

Methods

The FDA’s exploratory IND guidance document is examined in detail and its practical application to specific first-in-human proof of concept clinical studies called Phase 0 trials is discussed.

Results

Phase 0 trials represent a novel strategy for accelerating the development of the next generation of anticancer treatments. Phase 0 studies are conducted prior to conventional toxicity-defined dose-escalation studies and these trials do not explore maximum toxicity levels and by definition are devoid of any therapeutic or diagnostic intent. They require less extensive formulation and non-clinical toxicity testing than conventional first-in-human Phase I trials. This pathway may be valuable in reducing the time and resources required to initiate clinical testing and it may also be useful in guiding the later stages of drug development. Alternatively, the early termination of a less than promising lead compounds could help in selecting the best agents for later clinical development. Possible disadvantages include the ethical challenge of testing non-therapeutic drug regimens in cancer patients and the need to conduct standard dose-escalation Phase I studies later in development.

Conclusions

The potential of this novel pathway to accelerate drug development makes it worthy of further exploration, and National Cancer Institute has recently completed a Phase 0 trial demonstrating its applicability to targeted anticancer agents.
Literatur
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gutierrez M, Kummar S, Horneffer Y, Juwara L, Chen A, Melillo G, Pickeral O, Tomaszewski J, Murgo AJ, Doroshow JH, Group NPW (2007) Recruitment experience in a Phase 0 trial of ABT-888, an inhibitor of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerse (PARP), in patients (pts) with advanced malignancies. J Clin Oncol 25:14111 Gutierrez M, Kummar S, Horneffer Y, Juwara L, Chen A, Melillo G, Pickeral O, Tomaszewski J, Murgo AJ, Doroshow JH, Group NPW (2007) Recruitment experience in a Phase 0 trial of ABT-888, an inhibitor of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerse (PARP), in patients (pts) with advanced malignancies. J Clin Oncol 25:14111
6.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinders R, Hollingshead M, Parchment R, Khin S, Kaur G, Phillips L, Tomaszewski J, Doroshow J, Group NPW (2007) Preclinical modeling of a Phase 0 clinical trial protocol. J Clin Oncol 25:14058 Kinders R, Hollingshead M, Parchment R, Khin S, Kaur G, Phillips L, Tomaszewski J, Doroshow J, Group NPW (2007) Preclinical modeling of a Phase 0 clinical trial protocol. J Clin Oncol 25:14058
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kummar S, Kinders R, Gutierrez M, Rubinstein L, Parchment R, Phillips L, Low J, Murgo A, Tomaszewski E, Doroshow J, NCI Phase 0 Working Group (2007) Inhibition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) by ABT-888 in patients with advanced malignancies: results of a Phase 0 trial. J Clin Oncol 25:3518CrossRef Kummar S, Kinders R, Gutierrez M, Rubinstein L, Parchment R, Phillips L, Low J, Murgo A, Tomaszewski E, Doroshow J, NCI Phase 0 Working Group (2007) Inhibition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) by ABT-888 in patients with advanced malignancies: results of a Phase 0 trial. J Clin Oncol 25:3518CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kummar S, Kinders R, Rubinstein L, Parchment RE, Murgo AJ, Collins J, Pickeral O, Low J, Steinberg SM, Gutierrez M, Yang S, Helman L, Wiltrout R, Tomaszewski JE, Doroshow JH (2007) Compressing drug development timelines in oncology using phase ‘0’ trials. Nat Rev Cancer 7:131–139PubMedCrossRef Kummar S, Kinders R, Rubinstein L, Parchment RE, Murgo AJ, Collins J, Pickeral O, Low J, Steinberg SM, Gutierrez M, Yang S, Helman L, Wiltrout R, Tomaszewski JE, Doroshow JH (2007) Compressing drug development timelines in oncology using phase ‘0’ trials. Nat Rev Cancer 7:131–139PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lappin G, Garner RC (2003) Big physics, small doses: the use of AMS and PET in human microdosing of development drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2:233–240PubMedCrossRef Lappin G, Garner RC (2003) Big physics, small doses: the use of AMS and PET in human microdosing of development drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2:233–240PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lappin G, Kuhnz W, Jochemsen R, Kneer J, Chaudhary A, Oosterhuis B, Drijfhout WJ, Rowland M, Garner RC (2006) Use of microdosing to predict pharmacokinetics at the therapeutic dose: experience with 5 drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther 80:203–215PubMedCrossRef Lappin G, Kuhnz W, Jochemsen R, Kneer J, Chaudhary A, Oosterhuis B, Drijfhout WJ, Rowland M, Garner RC (2006) Use of microdosing to predict pharmacokinetics at the therapeutic dose: experience with 5 drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther 80:203–215PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Parchment R, Kinders R, Hollingshead M, Dancy J, Tomaszewski J, Doroshow J, Group NPW (2007) Technical criteria of “clinical readiness’ to qualify validated pharmacodynamic (PD) assays for clincial trial use. J Clin Oncol 25:14068 Parchment R, Kinders R, Hollingshead M, Dancy J, Tomaszewski J, Doroshow J, Group NPW (2007) Technical criteria of “clinical readiness’ to qualify validated pharmacodynamic (PD) assays for clincial trial use. J Clin Oncol 25:14068
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JW, Kerbel RS, Kelloff GJ, Barrett JC, Chabner BA, Parkinson DR, Peck J, Ruddon RW, Sigman CC, Slamon DJ (2004) Rationale for biomarkers and surrogate end points in mechanism-driven oncology drug development. Clin Cancer Res 10:3885–3896PubMedCrossRef Park JW, Kerbel RS, Kelloff GJ, Barrett JC, Chabner BA, Parkinson DR, Peck J, Ruddon RW, Sigman CC, Slamon DJ (2004) Rationale for biomarkers and surrogate end points in mechanism-driven oncology drug development. Clin Cancer Res 10:3885–3896PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ratnam K, Low JA (2007) Current development of clinical inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in oncology. Clin Cancer Res 13:1383–1388PubMedCrossRef Ratnam K, Low JA (2007) Current development of clinical inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in oncology. Clin Cancer Res 13:1383–1388PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubinstein L, Steinberg S, Kummar S, Low J, Parchment RE, Kinders R, Gutierrez M, Murgo AJ, Doroshow JH, Tomaszewski J, Group NPW (2007) Statistical considerations for a phase 0 trial. J Clin Oncol 25:14038 Rubinstein L, Steinberg S, Kummar S, Low J, Parchment RE, Kinders R, Gutierrez M, Murgo AJ, Doroshow JH, Tomaszewski J, Group NPW (2007) Statistical considerations for a phase 0 trial. J Clin Oncol 25:14038
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Twombly R (2006) Slow start to Phase 0 as researchers debate value. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:804–806PubMedCrossRef Twombly R (2006) Slow start to Phase 0 as researchers debate value. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:804–806PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Woosley RL, Cossman J (2007) Drug development and the FDA’s critical path initiative. Clin Pharmacol Ther 81:129–133PubMedCrossRef Woosley RL, Cossman J (2007) Drug development and the FDA’s critical path initiative. Clin Pharmacol Ther 81:129–133PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Phase 0 clinical trials in oncology: a paradigm shift for early drug development?
verfasst von
Chris H. Takimoto
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Ausgabe 4/2009
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-008-0789-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2009

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 4/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

29.05.2024 Larynxkarzinom Nachrichten

Fast ein Viertel der Personen mit mäßig dysplastischen Stimmlippenläsionen entwickelt einen Kehlkopftumor. Solche Personen benötigen daher eine besonders enge ärztliche Überwachung.

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

29.05.2024 Urothelkarzinom Nachrichten

Ob Patienten und Patientinnen mit neu diagnostiziertem Blasenkrebs ein Jahr später Bedauern über die Therapieentscheidung empfinden, wird einer Studie aus England zufolge von der Radikalität und dem Erfolg des Eingriffs beeinflusst.

Erhöhtes Risiko fürs Herz unter Checkpointhemmer-Therapie

28.05.2024 Nebenwirkungen der Krebstherapie Nachrichten

Kardiotoxische Nebenwirkungen einer Therapie mit Immuncheckpointhemmern mögen selten sein – wenn sie aber auftreten, wird es für Patienten oft lebensgefährlich. Voruntersuchung und Monitoring sind daher obligat.

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

28.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

„Kalte“ Tumoren werden heiß – CD28-kostimulatorische Antikörper sollen dies ermöglichen. Am besten könnten diese in Kombination mit BiTEs und Checkpointhemmern wirken. Erste klinische Studien laufen bereits.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.