Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology 10/2014

01.10.2014 | Original Article

Prediction of compliance with MRI procedures among children of ages 3 years to 12 years

verfasst von: Glenn D. Cahoon, Tanya E. Davison

Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology | Ausgabe 10/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

A number of children are unable to comply with an MRI procedure and require general anesthetic. However, we lack information about which factors are associated with MRI compliance in young children.

Objective

To determine the strongest predictors of MRI compliance, focusing on variables that can be easily rated by patients’ parents.

Materials and methods

A sample of 205 children ages 3–11 years (mean age 6.6 years) who were at risk of non-compliance were recruited from a children’s hospital. Their parents completed a behavior assessment scale for children as well as a questionnaire that assessed their expectations of compliance and perception of their child’s typical medical compliance. The children subsequently completed a mock MRI with an educational play therapist and a clinical MRI, with the quality of the scan scored by the MRI technologist.

Results

Overall, 88.3% of children complied with the clinical scan and achieved diagnostic images, with age unrelated to compliance in this well-prepared patient group. The strongest predictors of MRI compliance were parental expectations and ratings of how well the child typically copes with medical procedures. Non-compliance was related to child attention problems and to poor adaptability among children. A total of 64 preschool-age children (91.4%) and 110 school-age children (95.7%) were correctly classified as compliant or non-compliant based on these predictor variables.

Conclusion

A child’s temperament, medical experiences and parental expectations provide important information in predicting which children successfully comply with an MRI procedure and which require general anesthesia. Further study is needed to explore the utility of these variables in predicting compliance at sites that do not have access to an MRI simulator.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Marshall SP, Smith MS, Weinberger E (1995) Perceived anxiety of pediatric patients to magnetic resonance. Clin Pediatr 34:59–60 Marshall SP, Smith MS, Weinberger E (1995) Perceived anxiety of pediatric patients to magnetic resonance. Clin Pediatr 34:59–60
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tyc VL, Fairclough D, Fletcher B et al (1995) Children’s distress during magnetic resonance imaging procedures. Child Health Care 24:5–19PubMedCrossRef Tyc VL, Fairclough D, Fletcher B et al (1995) Children’s distress during magnetic resonance imaging procedures. Child Health Care 24:5–19PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hallowell LM, Stewart SE, de Amorim E et al (2007) Reviewing the process of preparing children for MRI. Pediatr Radiol 38:271–279PubMedCrossRef Hallowell LM, Stewart SE, de Amorim E et al (2007) Reviewing the process of preparing children for MRI. Pediatr Radiol 38:271–279PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Murat I, Constant I, Maud’huy H (2004) Perioperative anaesthetic morbidity in children: a database of 24,165 anaesthetics over a 30-month period. Paediatr Anaesth 14:158–166PubMedCrossRef Murat I, Constant I, Maud’huy H (2004) Perioperative anaesthetic morbidity in children: a database of 24,165 anaesthetics over a 30-month period. Paediatr Anaesth 14:158–166PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat De Amorim E, Silva CJT, Mackenzie A et al (2006) Practice MRI: reducing the need for sedation and general anaesthesia in children undergoing MRI. Australas Radiol 50:319–323CrossRef De Amorim E, Silva CJT, Mackenzie A et al (2006) Practice MRI: reducing the need for sedation and general anaesthesia in children undergoing MRI. Australas Radiol 50:319–323CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Carter AJ, Greer M-LC, Gray SE et al (2010) Mock MRI: reducing the need for anaesthesia in children. Pediatr Radiol 40:1368–1374PubMedCrossRef Carter AJ, Greer M-LC, Gray SE et al (2010) Mock MRI: reducing the need for anaesthesia in children. Pediatr Radiol 40:1368–1374PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Davidson AJ, Shrivastava PP, Jamsen K et al (2006) Risk factors for anxiety at induction of anesthesia in children: a prospective cohort study. Pediatr Anesth 16:919–927CrossRef Davidson AJ, Shrivastava PP, Jamsen K et al (2006) Risk factors for anxiety at induction of anesthesia in children: a prospective cohort study. Pediatr Anesth 16:919–927CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kain ZN, Mayes LC, Caldwell-Andrews AA et al (2006) Predicting which children benefit most from parental presence during induction of anesthesia. Pediatr Anesth 16:627–634CrossRef Kain ZN, Mayes LC, Caldwell-Andrews AA et al (2006) Predicting which children benefit most from parental presence during induction of anesthesia. Pediatr Anesth 16:627–634CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Klosky JL, Tyc VL, Tong X et al (2007) Predicting pediatric distress during radiation therapy procedures: the role of medical, psychosocial, and demographic factors. Pediatrics 119:e1159–e1166PubMedCrossRef Klosky JL, Tyc VL, Tong X et al (2007) Predicting pediatric distress during radiation therapy procedures: the role of medical, psychosocial, and demographic factors. Pediatrics 119:e1159–e1166PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bijttebier P, Vertommen H (1998) The impact of previous experience on children’s reactions to venepunctures. J Health Psychol 3:39–46PubMedCrossRef Bijttebier P, Vertommen H (1998) The impact of previous experience on children’s reactions to venepunctures. J Health Psychol 3:39–46PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Proczkowska-Björklund M, Svedin CG (2004) Child related background factors affecting compliance with induction of anaesthesia. Pediatr Anesth 14:225–234 Proczkowska-Björklund M, Svedin CG (2004) Child related background factors affecting compliance with induction of anaesthesia. Pediatr Anesth 14:225–234
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards AD, Arthurs OJ (2011) Paediatric MRI under sedation: is it necessary? What is the evidence for the alternatives? Pediatr Radiol 41:1353–1364PubMedCrossRef Edwards AD, Arthurs OJ (2011) Paediatric MRI under sedation: is it necessary? What is the evidence for the alternatives? Pediatr Radiol 41:1353–1364PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Reynolds CR, Kamphaus RW (2004) Behavior assessment system for children second edition manual. Pearson, Minneapolis Reynolds CR, Kamphaus RW (2004) Behavior assessment system for children second edition manual. Pearson, Minneapolis
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (1996) Using multivariate statistics, 3rd edn. Harper Collins, New York Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (1996) Using multivariate statistics, 3rd edn. Harper Collins, New York
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Comrey AL, Lee HB (1992) A first course in factor analysis, 2nd edn. Hillsdale, New York Comrey AL, Lee HB (1992) A first course in factor analysis, 2nd edn. Hillsdale, New York
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Pressdee D, May L, Eastman E et al (1997) The use of play therapy in the preparation of children undergoing MR imaging. Clin Radiol 52:945–947PubMedCrossRef Pressdee D, May L, Eastman E et al (1997) The use of play therapy in the preparation of children undergoing MR imaging. Clin Radiol 52:945–947PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenberg DR, Sweeney JA, Gillen JS et al (1997) Magnetic resonance imaging of children without sedation: preparation with simulation. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36:853–859PubMedCrossRef Rosenberg DR, Sweeney JA, Gillen JS et al (1997) Magnetic resonance imaging of children without sedation: preparation with simulation. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36:853–859PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein JN, Casey BJ, Tonev ST et al (2007) Assessment and prevention of head motion during imaging of patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry Res 155:75–82PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Epstein JN, Casey BJ, Tonev ST et al (2007) Assessment and prevention of head motion during imaging of patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry Res 155:75–82PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat De Bie HMA, Boersma M, Wattjes MP et al (2010) Preparing children with a mock scanner training protocol results in high quality structural and functional MRI scans. Eur J Pediatr 169:1079–1085PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral De Bie HMA, Boersma M, Wattjes MP et al (2010) Preparing children with a mock scanner training protocol results in high quality structural and functional MRI scans. Eur J Pediatr 169:1079–1085PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Prediction of compliance with MRI procedures among children of ages 3 years to 12 years
verfasst von
Glenn D. Cahoon
Tanya E. Davison
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Pediatric Radiology / Ausgabe 10/2014
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-2996-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2014

Pediatric Radiology 10/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.