nach oben

European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience

Erschienen in:

02.09.2020 | Original Paper

Prefrontal resting-state connectivity and antidepressant response: no associations in the ELECT-TDCS trial

verfasst von: Lucia Bulubas, Frank Padberg, Eva Mezger, Paulo Suen, Priscila V. Bueno, Fabio Duran, Geraldo Busatto, Edson Amaro Jr, Isabela M. Benseñor, Paulo A. Lotufo, Stephan Goerigk, Wagner Gattaz, Daniel Keeser, Andre R. Brunoni

Erschienen in: European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Functional and structural MRI of prefrontal cortex (PFC) may provide putative biomarkers for predicting the treatment response to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in depression. A recent MRI study from ELECT-TDCS (Escitalopram versus Electrical Direct-Current Theror Depression Study) showed that depression improvement after tDCS was associated with gray matter volumes of PFC subregions. Based thereon, we investigated whether antidepressant effects of tDCS are similarly associated with baseline resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC). A subgroup of 51 patients underwent baseline rsFC-MRI. All patients of ELECT-TDCS were randomized to three treatment arms for 10 weeks (anodal-left, cathodal-right PFC tDCS plus placebo medication; escitalopram 10 mg/day for 3 weeks and 20 mg/day thereafter plus sham tDCS; and placebo medication plus sham tDCS). RsFC was calculated for various PFC regions and analyzed in relation to the individual antidepressant response. There was no significant association between baseline PFC connectivity of essential structural regions, nor any other PFC regions (after correction for multiple comparisons) and patients’ individual antidepressant response. This study did not reveal an association between antidepressants effects of tDCS and baseline rsFC, unlike the gray matter volume findings. Thus, the antidepressant effects of tDCS may be differentially related to structural and functional MRI measurements.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Ivleva EI, Turkozer HB, Sweeney JA (2020) Imaging-based subtyping for psychiatric syndromes. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 30(1):35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2019.09.005CrossRefPubMed

Palmer SM, Crewther SG, Carey LM, Team SP (2014) A meta-analysis of changes in brain activity in clinical depression. Front Human Neurosci 8:1045. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.01045CrossRef

Iwabuchi SJ, Krishnadas R, Li C, Auer DP, Radua J, Palaniyappan L (2015) Localized connectivity in depression: a meta-analysis of resting state functional imaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 51:77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.01.006CrossRefPubMed

Fu CH, Steiner H, Costafreda SG (2013) Predictive neural biomarkers of clinical response in depression: a meta-analysis of functional and structural neuroimaging studies of pharmacological and psychological therapies. Neurobiol Dis 52:75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2012.05.008CrossRefPubMed

Fonseka TM, MacQueen GM, Kennedy SH (2018) Neuroimaging biomarkers as predictors of treatment outcome in major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord 233:21–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.10.049CrossRefPubMed

Phillips ML, Chase HW, Sheline YI, Etkin A, Almeida JR, Deckersbach T et al (2015) Identifying predictors, moderators, and mediators of antidepressant response in major depressive disorder: neuroimaging approaches. Am J psychiatry 172(2):124–138. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14010076CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Dunlop K, Talishinsky A, Liston C (2019) Intrinsic brain network biomarkers of antidepressant response: a review. Curr Psychiatry Rep 21(9):87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-019-1072-6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Greicius MD, Krasnow B, Reiss AL, Menon V (2003) Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(1):253–258. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0135058100CrossRefPubMed

Raichle ME (2015) The brain's default mode network. Annu Rev Neurosci 38:433–447. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014030CrossRefPubMed

10.

Raichle ME, MacLeod AM, Snyder AZ, Powers WJ, Gusnard DA, Shulman GL (2001) A default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98(2):676–682. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.676CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Kaiser RH, Andrews-Hanna JR, Wager TD, Pizzagalli DA (2015) Large-scale network dysfunction in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of resting-state functional connectivity. JAMA Psychiatry 72(6):603–611. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.0071CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Goldstein-Piekarski AN, Staveland BR, Ball TM, Yesavage J, Korgaonkar MS, Williams LM (2018) Intrinsic functional connectivity predicts remission on antidepressants: a randomized controlled trial to identify clinically applicable imaging biomarkers. Transl Psychiatry 8(1):57. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-018-0100-3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Dunlop BW, Rajendra JK, Craighead WE, Kelley ME, McGrath CL, Choi KS et al (2017) Functional connectivity of the subcallosal cingulate cortex and differential outcomes to treatment with cognitive-behavioral therapy or antidepressant medication for major depressive disorder. Am J Psychiatry 174(6):533–545. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16050518CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Li B, Liu L, Friston KJ, Shen H, Wang L, Zeng LL et al (2013) A treatment-resistant default mode subnetwork in major depression. Biol Psychiatry 74(1):48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.11.007CrossRefPubMed

15.

Fettes PW, Moayedi M, Dunlop K, Mansouri F, Vila-Rodriguez F, Giacobbe P et al (2018) Abnormal functional connectivity of frontopolar subregions in treatment-nonresponsive major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging 3(4):337–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.12.003CrossRefPubMed

16.

Dandekar MP, Fenoy AJ, Carvalho AF, Soares JC, Quevedo J (2018) Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: an integrative review of preclinical and clinical findings and translational implications. Mol Psychiatry 23(5):1094–1112. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2018.2CrossRefPubMed

17.

Levy A, Taib S, Arbus C, Peran P, Sauvaget A, Schmitt L et al (2019) Neuroimaging biomarkers at baseline predict electroconvulsive therapy overall clinical response in depression: a systematic review. J ECT 35(2):77–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000000570CrossRefPubMed

18.

Moreno-Ortega M, Prudic J, Rowny S, Patel GH, Kangarlu A, Lee S et al (2019) Resting state functional connectivity predictors of treatment response to electroconvulsive therapy in depression. Sci Rep 9(1):5071. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41175-4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

van Waarde JA, Scholte HS, van Oudheusden LJ, Verwey B, Denys D, van Wingen GA (2015) A functional MRI marker may predict the outcome of electroconvulsive therapy in severe and treatment-resistant depression. Mol Psychiatry 20(5):609–614. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2014.78CrossRefPubMed

20.

Weigand A, Horn A, Caballero R, Cooke D, Stern AP, Taylor SF et al (2018) Prospective validation that subgenual connectivity predicts antidepressant efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation sites. Biol Psychiatry 84(1):28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.10.028CrossRefPubMed

21.

Ge R, Blumberger DM, Downar J, Daskalakis ZJ, Dipinto AA, Tham JCW et al (2017) Abnormal functional connectivity within resting-state networks is related to rTMS-based therapy effects of treatment resistant depression: a pilot study. J Affect Disord 218:75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.04.060CrossRefPubMed

22.

Fox MD, Halko MA, Eldaief MC, Pascual-Leone A (2012) Measuring and manipulating brain connectivity with resting state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (fcMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Neuroimage 62(4):2232–2243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.035CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Ge R, Downar J, Blumberger DM, Daskalakis ZJ, Vila-Rodriguez F (2020) Functional connectivity of the anterior cingulate cortex predicts treatment outcome for rTMS in treatment-resistant depression at 3-month follow-up. Brain Stimul 13(1):206–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2019.10.012CrossRefPubMed

24.

Fox MD, Buckner RL, White MP, Greicius MD, Pascual-Leone A (2012) Efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation targets for depression is related to intrinsic functional connectivity with the subgenual cingulate. Biol Psychiatry 72(7):595–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.04.028CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Nitsche MA, Paulus W (2000) Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol 527(Pt 3):633–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Lefaucheur JP, Antal A, Ayache SS, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Cogiamanian F et al (2017) Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clin Neurophysiol 128(1):56–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.087CrossRefPubMed

27.

Brunoni AR, Moffa AH, Sampaio-Junior B, Borrione L, Moreno ML, Fernandes RA et al (2017) Trial of electrical direct-current therapy versus escitalopram for depression. N Engl J Med 376(26):2523–2533. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1612999CrossRefPubMed

28.

Brunoni AR, Valiengo L, Baccaro A, Zanao TA, de Oliveira JF, Goulart A et al (2013) The sertraline vs. electrical current therapy for treating depression clinical study: results from a factorial, randomized, controlled trial. JAMA Psychiatry 70(4):383–391. https://doi.org/10.1001/2013.jamapsychiatry.32CrossRefPubMed

29.

Loo CK, Husain MM, McDonald WM, Aaronson S, O'Reardon JP, Alonzo A et al (2018) International randomized-controlled trial of transcranial direct current stimulation in depression. Brain Stimul 11(1):125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2017.10.011CrossRefPubMed

30.

Boggio PS, Rigonatti SP, Ribeiro RB, Myczkowski ML, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A et al (2008) A randomized, double-blind clinical trial on the efficacy of cortical direct current stimulation for the treatment of major depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 11(2):249–254. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1461145707007833CrossRefPubMed

31.

Blumberger DM, Tran LC, Fitzgerald PB, Hoy KE, Daskalakis ZJ (2012) A randomized double-blind sham-controlled study of transcranial direct current stimulation for treatment-resistant major depression. Front Psychiatry 3:74. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00074CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Palm U, Schiller C, Fintescu Z, Obermeier M, Keeser D, Reisinger E et al (2012) Transcranial direct current stimulation in treatment resistant depression: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Brain Stimul 5(3):242–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2011.08.005CrossRefPubMed

33.

Brunoni AR, Moffa AH, Fregni F, Palm U, Padberg F, Blumberger DM et al (2016) Transcranial direct current stimulation for acute major depressive episodes: meta-analysis of individual patient data. Br J Psychiatry 208(6):522–531. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.115.164715CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Bulubas L, Padberg F, Bueno PV, Duran F, Busatto G, Amaro E Jr et al (2019) Antidepressant effects of tDCS are associated with prefrontal gray matter volumes at baseline: evidence from the ELECT-TDCS trial. Brain Stimul 12(5):1197–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2019.05.006CrossRefPubMed

35.

Filmer HL, Ehrhardt SE, Shaw TB, Mattingley JB, Dux PE (2019) The efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation to prefrontal areas is related to underlying cortical morphology. Neuroimage 196:41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.026CrossRefPubMed

36.

Antonenko D, Thielscher A, Saturnino GB, Aydin S, Ittermann B, Grittner U et al (2019) Towards precise brain stimulation: Is electric field simulation related to neuromodulation? Brain Stimul. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2019.03.072CrossRefPubMed

37.

Opitz A, Paulus W, Will S, Antunes A, Thielscher A (2015) Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroimage 109:140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.033CrossRefPubMed

38.

Keeser D, Meindl T, Bor J, Palm U, Pogarell O, Mulert C et al (2011) Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation changes connectivity of resting-state networks during fMRI. J Neurosci 31(43):15284–15293. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0542-11.2011CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Pena-Gomez C, Sala-Lonch R, Junque C, Clemente IC, Vidal D, Bargallo N et al (2012) Modulation of large-scale brain networks by transcranial direct current stimulation evidenced by resting-state functional MRI. Brain Stimul 5(3):252–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2011.08.006CrossRefPubMed

40.

Ironside M, Browning M, Ansari TL, Harvey CJ, Sekyi-Djan MN, Bishop SJ et al (2018) Effect of prefrontal cortex stimulation on regulation of amygdala response to threat in individuals with trait anxiety: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.2172CrossRefPubMedCentral

41.

Nord CL, Chamith Halahakoon D, Limbachya T, Charpentier C, Lally N, Walsh V et al (2019) Neural predictors of treatment response to brain stimulation and psychological therapy in depression: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Neuropsychopharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-019-0401-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Worsching J, Padberg F, Helbich K, Hasan A, Koch L, Goerigk S et al (2017) Test-retest reliability of prefrontal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) effects on functional MRI connectivity in healthy subjects. Neuroimage 155:187–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.052CrossRefPubMed

43.

Brunoni AR, Sampaio-Junior B, Moffa AH, Borrione L, Nogueira BS, Aparicio LV et al (2015) The Escitalopram versus Electric Current Therapy for Treating Depression Clinical Study (ELECT-TDCS): rationale and study design of a non-inferiority, triple-arm, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Sao Paulo Med J 133(3):252–263. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2014.00351712CrossRefPubMed

44.

Kambeitz J, Goerigk S, Gattaz W, Falkai P, Bensenor IM, Lotufo PA et al (2020) Clinical patterns differentially predict response to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and escitalopram in major depression: a machine learning analysis of the ELECT-TDCS study. J Affect Disord 265:460–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.118CrossRefPubMed

45.

Seibt O, Brunoni AR, Huang Y, Bikson M (2015) The pursuit of DLPFC: non-neuronavigated methods to target the left dorsolateral pre-frontal cortex with symmetric bicephalic transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Brain Stimul 8(3):590–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.401CrossRefPubMed

46.

Cipriani A, Furukawa TA, Salanti G, Chaimani A, Atkinson LZ, Ogawa Y et al (2018) Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. The Lancet 391(10128):1357–1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32802-7CrossRef

47.

Karali T, Kirsch V, Padberg F, Ertl-Wagner B, Keeser D. LMU Scripts: Ready-Made HPC-Applicable Pipeline for Structural and Functional Data Analyses. 23rd Annual Meeting of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping. Vancouver, CA; 2017.

48.

Worsching J, Padberg F, Goerigk S, Heinz I, Bauer C, Plewnia C et al (2018) Testing assumptions on prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation: comparison of electrode montages using multimodal fMRI. Brain Stimul 11(5):998–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2018.05.001CrossRefPubMed

49.

Blautzik J, Vetter C, Peres I, Gutyrchik E, Keeser D, Berman A et al (2013) Classifying fMRI-derived resting-state connectivity patterns according to their daily rhythmicity. Neuroimage 71:298–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.010CrossRefPubMed

50.

Sallet J, Mars RB, Noonan MP, Neubert FX, Jbabdi S, O'Reilly JX et al (2013) The organization of dorsal frontal cortex in humans and macaques. J Neurosci 33(30):12255–12274. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5108-12.2013CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Brodmann K. Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde in ihren Prinzipien dargestellt auf Grund des Zellenbaues. Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth; 1909.

52.

Petrides M, Pandya DN (1999) Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: comparative cytoarchitectonic analysis in the human and the macaque brain and corticocortical connection patterns. Eur J Neurosci 11(3):1011–1036CrossRef

53.

R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017.

54.

RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R}. Boston, MA: RStudio, Inc.; 2016.

55.

Wickham H (2009) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag, New YorkCrossRef

56.

Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models Usinglme4. J Stat Softw. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01CrossRef

57.

Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB (2017) lmertest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13CrossRef

58.

Rorden C, Brett M (2000) Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behav Neurol 12(4):191–200CrossRef

59.

Hedges LV (2016) Effect sizes in cluster-randomized designs. J Educ Behav Stat 32(4):341–370. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998606298043CrossRef

60.

Vazquez-Rodriguez B, Suarez LE, Markello RD, Shafiei G, Paquola C, Hagmann P et al (2019) Gradients of structure-function tethering across neocortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116(42):21219–21227. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1903403116CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

61.

Suarez LE, Markello RD, Betzel RF, Misic B (2020) Linking structure and function in macroscale brain networks. Trends Cogn Sci 24(4):302–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.008CrossRefPubMed

62.

Keeser D, Padberg F, Reisinger E, Pogarell O, Kirsch V, Palm U et al (2011) Prefrontal direct current stimulation modulates resting EEG and event-related potentials in healthy subjects: a standardized low resolution tomography (sLORETA) study. Neuroimage 55(2):644–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.004CrossRefPubMed

63.

Drysdale AT, Grosenick L, Downar J, Dunlop K, Mansouri F, Meng Y et al (2017) Resting-state connectivity biomarkers define neurophysiological subtypes of depression. Nat Med 23(1):28–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4246CrossRefPubMed

64.

Lefaucheur JP, Andre-Obadia N, Antal A, Ayache SS, Baeken C, Benninger DH et al (2014) Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol 125(11):2150–2206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Prefrontal resting-state connectivity and antidepressant response: no associations in the ELECT-TDCS trial
verfasst von: Lucia Bulubas
Frank Padberg
Eva Mezger
Paulo Suen
Priscila V. Bueno
Fabio Duran
Geraldo Busatto
Edson Amaro Jr
Isabela M. Benseñor
Paulo A. Lotufo
Stephan Goerigk
Wagner Gattaz
Daniel Keeser
Andre R. Brunoni
Publikationsdatum: 02.09.2020
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0940-1334
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8491
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-020-01187-y

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

23.04.2024 Demenz Nachrichten

Wenn Demenzkranke aufgrund von Symptomen wie Agitation oder Aggressivität mit Antipsychotika behandelt werden, sind damit offenbar noch mehr Risiken verbunden als bislang angenommen.

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

23.04.2024 Depression antepartal oder postpartal Nachrichten

Bislang gibt es kein Medikament zur Prävention von Wochenbettdepressionen. Das Injektionsanästhetikum Esketamin könnte womöglich diese Lücke füllen.

„Psychotherapie ist auch bei sehr alten Menschen hochwirksam!“

22.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Kombination aus Medikamenten und Psychotherapie gilt als effektivster Ansatz bei Depressionen. Das ist bei betagten Menschen nicht anders, trotz Besonderheiten.

Auf diese Krankheiten bei Geflüchteten sollten Sie vorbereitet sein

22.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Um Menschen nach der Flucht aus einem Krisengebiet bestmöglich medizinisch betreuen zu können, ist es gut zu wissen, welche Erkrankungen im jeweiligen Herkunftsland häufig sind. Dabei hilft eine Internetseite der CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).

Update Psychiatrie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Transcranial direct current stimulation and emotion processing deficits in psychosis and depression

Non-invasive brain stimulation: the next frontier in psychiatry

Current clinical practice of electroconvulsive therapy and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in psychiatry, a German sample

Frontal–striatal connectivity and positive symptoms of schizophrenia: implications for the mechanistic basis of prefrontal rTMS