Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2014

01.10.2014 | Original Article

Preoperative Assessment Tool for the Planning of Inframammary Incision and Implant Profile in Breast Augmentation

verfasst von: Bishara S. Atiyeh, Saad A. Dibo, Marie Nader, Nazareth J. Papazian

Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

When using the inframammary access incision for breast augmentation, careful planning is critical to allow the surgeon to set the inframammary fold (IMF) at the most optimal position, minimize scar visibility, and mitigate the main disadvantage of this approach. Current popular evaluation systems for breast augmentation include the High Five and Randquist systems and they base their calculations on inconsistent variables like skin stretch measurements. We propose a simple method that is not dependent on skin stretch measurements to properly determine implant size, profile, and position of the inframammary fold. Excluding digital scans and computer-based systems that are not universally available, the proposed simplified assessment tool was compared to the two most popular manual measuring tools (High Five and Randquist). Twenty-five female volunteers were included in the study. The projected IMF positions over the midsternal line for each measuring tool were recorded on each patient and the sternal notch (SN) to projected IMF distance SN–IMF1 (simplified evaluation system), SN–IMF2 (High Five System), and SN–IMF3 (Randquist system) were compared. The anticipated new IMF position is determined based on the vertical implant dimension and not on breast base width. For most subjects, the differences between the three evaluation systems were minimal. The proposed breast measurement tool constitutes a new, much simpler, and practical method that proved to be successful in our hands.
Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Auclair E, Blondeel P, Del Vecchio DA (2013) Composite breast augmentation: soft-tissue planning using implants and fat. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:558–568PubMedCrossRef Auclair E, Blondeel P, Del Vecchio DA (2013) Composite breast augmentation: soft-tissue planning using implants and fat. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:558–568PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Spear S, Bulan E, Venturi M (2004) Breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(5):73E–81EPubMed Spear S, Bulan E, Venturi M (2004) Breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(5):73E–81EPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tebbetts JB (2002) A system for breast implant selection based on patient tissue characteristics and implant-soft tissue dynamics. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1396–1409PubMedCrossRef Tebbetts JB (2002) A system for breast implant selection based on patient tissue characteristics and implant-soft tissue dynamics. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1396–1409PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Vegas M, Martin del Yerro JL (2013) Stiffness, compliance, resilience, and creep deformation: understanding implant-soft tissue dynamics in the augmented breast: fundamentals based on materials science. Aesthetic Plast Surg 37:922–930PubMedCrossRef Vegas M, Martin del Yerro JL (2013) Stiffness, compliance, resilience, and creep deformation: understanding implant-soft tissue dynamics in the augmented breast: fundamentals based on materials science. Aesthetic Plast Surg 37:922–930PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown T (2013) Patient expectations after breast augmentation: the imperative to audit your sizing system. Aesthetic Plast Surg 37(6):1134–1139PubMedCrossRef Brown T (2013) Patient expectations after breast augmentation: the imperative to audit your sizing system. Aesthetic Plast Surg 37(6):1134–1139PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin del Yerro JL, Vegas MR, Sanz I, Moreno E, Fernandez V, Puga S, Vecino M, Biggs T (2014) Breast augmentation with anatomic implants: a method based on the breast implantation base. Aesthetic Plast Surg 38(2):329–337PubMedCrossRef Martin del Yerro JL, Vegas MR, Sanz I, Moreno E, Fernandez V, Puga S, Vecino M, Biggs T (2014) Breast augmentation with anatomic implants: a method based on the breast implantation base. Aesthetic Plast Surg 38(2):329–337PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Donfrancesco A, Montemurro P, Hedén P (2013) Three-dimensional simulated images in breast augmentation surgery: an investigation of patients satisfaction and the correlation between prediction and actual outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:810–822PubMedCrossRef Donfrancesco A, Montemurro P, Hedén P (2013) Three-dimensional simulated images in breast augmentation surgery: an investigation of patients satisfaction and the correlation between prediction and actual outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:810–822PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Adams WP Jr (2008) The process of breast augmentation: four sequential steps for optimizing outcomes for patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:1892–1900PubMedCrossRef Adams WP Jr (2008) The process of breast augmentation: four sequential steps for optimizing outcomes for patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:1892–1900PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Tebbetts JB, Adams WP (2005) Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:2005–2016PubMed Tebbetts JB, Adams WP (2005) Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:2005–2016PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin del Yerro JL, Vegas M, Fernandez V, Moreno E, Sanz I, Puga S, Vecino MG, Biggs TM (2013) Selecting the implant height in breast augmentation with anatomical prosthesis: the “Number Y”. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:1404–1412CrossRef Martin del Yerro JL, Vegas M, Fernandez V, Moreno E, Sanz I, Puga S, Vecino MG, Biggs TM (2013) Selecting the implant height in breast augmentation with anatomical prosthesis: the “Number Y”. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:1404–1412CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hidalgo D (2013) Discussion: prospective prospective outcome study of 225 cases of breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:1167–1168PubMedCrossRef Hidalgo D (2013) Discussion: prospective prospective outcome study of 225 cases of breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:1167–1168PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gladilin E, Gabrielova B, Montemurro P, Hedén P (2011) Customized planning of augmentation mammaplasty with silicon implants using three-dimensional optical body scans and biomechanical modeling of soft tissue outcome. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35:494–501PubMedCrossRef Gladilin E, Gabrielova B, Montemurro P, Hedén P (2011) Customized planning of augmentation mammaplasty with silicon implants using three-dimensional optical body scans and biomechanical modeling of soft tissue outcome. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35:494–501PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Swanson E (2013) Prospective outcome study of 225 cases of breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:1158–1166PubMedCrossRef Swanson E (2013) Prospective outcome study of 225 cases of breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:1158–1166PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Tepper O, Small K, Unger J, Feldman D, Kumar N, Choi M, Karp N (2009) 3D analysis of breast augmentation defines operative changes and their relationship to implant dimensions. Ann Plast Surg 62:570–575PubMedCrossRef Tepper O, Small K, Unger J, Feldman D, Kumar N, Choi M, Karp N (2009) 3D analysis of breast augmentation defines operative changes and their relationship to implant dimensions. Ann Plast Surg 62:570–575PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Adams WP (2007) The high five process: tissue-based planning for breast augmentation. Plast Surg Nurs 27:197–201PubMedCrossRef Adams WP (2007) The high five process: tissue-based planning for breast augmentation. Plast Surg Nurs 27:197–201PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Zayakova Y (2013) Planning augmentation mammaplasty of breast asymmetries. Khirurgiia (Sofiia) 2:20–25 Zayakova Y (2013) Planning augmentation mammaplasty of breast asymmetries. Khirurgiia (Sofiia) 2:20–25
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Randquist C, Gribbe O (2010) Highly cohesive textured form stable gel implants: principles and technique. Aesthetic and reconstructive surgery of the breast. Elsevier Ltd, Edinburgh, pp 339–355CrossRef Randquist C, Gribbe O (2010) Highly cohesive textured form stable gel implants: principles and technique. Aesthetic and reconstructive surgery of the breast. Elsevier Ltd, Edinburgh, pp 339–355CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Atiyeh B, Al-Amm C, El-Musa K (2002) The transverse intra-areolar infra-nipple incision for augmentation mammoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 26:151–155PubMedCrossRef Atiyeh B, Al-Amm C, El-Musa K (2002) The transverse intra-areolar infra-nipple incision for augmentation mammoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 26:151–155PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hidalgo D (2000) Breast augmentation: choosing the optimal incision, implant, and pocket plane. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:2202–2216 discussion 2217-2218PubMedCrossRef Hidalgo D (2000) Breast augmentation: choosing the optimal incision, implant, and pocket plane. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:2202–2216 discussion 2217-2218PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Fanous N, Tawilé C, Brousseau V (2008) Minimal inframammary incision for breast augmentation. Can J Plast Surg 16:14–17PubMedPubMedCentral Fanous N, Tawilé C, Brousseau V (2008) Minimal inframammary incision for breast augmentation. Can J Plast Surg 16:14–17PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kovacs L, Eder M, Zimmermann A, Muller D, Schuster T, Papadopulos N, Biemer E, Kloppel M, Machens HG (2012) Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36:879–887PubMedCrossRef Kovacs L, Eder M, Zimmermann A, Muller D, Schuster T, Papadopulos N, Biemer E, Kloppel M, Machens HG (2012) Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36:879–887PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Brody GS (2004) The perfect breast: is it attainable? Does it exist? Plast Reconstr Surg 113:1500–1503PubMedCrossRef Brody GS (2004) The perfect breast: is it attainable? Does it exist? Plast Reconstr Surg 113:1500–1503PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall-Findlay E (2010) The three breast dimensions: analysis and effecting change. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1632–1642PubMedCrossRef Hall-Findlay E (2010) The three breast dimensions: analysis and effecting change. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1632–1642PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hammond D (2013) Discussion: three-dimensional simulated images in breast augmentation surgery: an investigation of patients’ satisfaction and the correlation between prediction and actual outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:823–825PubMedCrossRef Hammond D (2013) Discussion: three-dimensional simulated images in breast augmentation surgery: an investigation of patients’ satisfaction and the correlation between prediction and actual outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:823–825PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Tebbetts JB, Teitelbaum S (2010) High and extra-high-projection breast implants: potential consequences for patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:2150–2159PubMedCrossRef Tebbetts JB, Teitelbaum S (2010) High and extra-high-projection breast implants: potential consequences for patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:2150–2159PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Choudry U, Kim N (2012) Preoperative assessment preferences and reported reoperation rates for size change in primary breast augmentation: a survey of ASPS members. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:1352–1359PubMedCrossRef Choudry U, Kim N (2012) Preoperative assessment preferences and reported reoperation rates for size change in primary breast augmentation: a survey of ASPS members. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:1352–1359PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Creasman CN, Mordaunt D, Liolios T, Chiu C, Gabriel A, Maxwell GP (2011) Four-dimensional breast imaging, part II: clinical implementation and validation of a computer imaging system for breast augmentation planning. Aesthet Surg J 31:925–938PubMedCrossRef Creasman CN, Mordaunt D, Liolios T, Chiu C, Gabriel A, Maxwell GP (2011) Four-dimensional breast imaging, part II: clinical implementation and validation of a computer imaging system for breast augmentation planning. Aesthet Surg J 31:925–938PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobson JM, Gatti ME, Schaffner AD, Hill LM, Spear SL (2012) Effect of incision choice on outcomes in primary breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 32:456–462PubMedCrossRef Jacobson JM, Gatti ME, Schaffner AD, Hill LM, Spear SL (2012) Effect of incision choice on outcomes in primary breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 32:456–462PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Losken A (2011) Commentary on: four-dimensional breast imaging, parts I and II. Aesthet Surg J 31:939–940PubMedCrossRef Losken A (2011) Commentary on: four-dimensional breast imaging, parts I and II. Aesthet Surg J 31:939–940PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Adams W Jr (2012) Commentary on: effect of incision choice on outcomes in primary breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 32:463–464PubMedCrossRef Adams W Jr (2012) Commentary on: effect of incision choice on outcomes in primary breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 32:463–464PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Stutman RL, Codner M, Mahoney A, Amei A (2012) Comparison of breast augmentation incisions and common complications. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36:1096–1104PubMedCrossRef Stutman RL, Codner M, Mahoney A, Amei A (2012) Comparison of breast augmentation incisions and common complications. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36:1096–1104PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Namnoum J, Largent J, Kaplan H, Oefelein M, Brown M (2013) Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66:1165–1172PubMedCrossRef Namnoum J, Largent J, Kaplan H, Oefelein M, Brown M (2013) Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66:1165–1172PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Stevens WG, Nahabedian MY, Calobrace MB, Harrington JL, Capizzi PJ, Cohen R, d’Incelli RC, Beckstrand M (2013) Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture: a five-year Sientra study analysis using round, smooth and textured implants for breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(5):1115–1123PubMedCrossRef Stevens WG, Nahabedian MY, Calobrace MB, Harrington JL, Capizzi PJ, Cohen R, d’Incelli RC, Beckstrand M (2013) Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture: a five-year Sientra study analysis using round, smooth and textured implants for breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(5):1115–1123PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiener TC (2008) Relationship of incision choice to capsular contracture. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32:303–306PubMedCrossRef Wiener TC (2008) Relationship of incision choice to capsular contracture. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32:303–306PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Preoperative Assessment Tool for the Planning of Inframammary Incision and Implant Profile in Breast Augmentation
verfasst von
Bishara S. Atiyeh
Saad A. Dibo
Marie Nader
Nazareth J. Papazian
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-014-0381-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2014

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Echinokokkose medikamentös behandeln oder operieren?

06.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Therapie von Echinokokkosen sollte immer in spezialisierten Zentren erfolgen. Eine symptomlose Echinokokkose kann – egal ob von Hunde- oder Fuchsbandwurm ausgelöst – konservativ erfolgen. Wenn eine Op. nötig ist, kann es sinnvoll sein, vorher Zysten zu leeren und zu desinfizieren. 

Recycling im OP – möglich, aber teuer

05.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Auch wenn sich Krankenhäuser nachhaltig und grün geben – sie tragen aktuell erheblich zu den CO2-Emissionen bei und produzieren jede Menge Müll. Ein Pilotprojekt aus Bonn zeigt, dass viele Op.-Abfälle wiederverwertet werden können.

Im OP der Zukunft läuft nichts mehr ohne Kollege Roboter

04.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Der OP in der Zukunft wird mit weniger Personal auskommen – nicht, weil die Technik das medizinische Fachpersonal verdrängt, sondern weil der Personalmangel es nötig macht.

Nur selten Nachblutungen nach Abszesstonsillektomie

03.05.2024 Tonsillektomie Nachrichten

In einer Metaanalyse von 18 Studien war die Rate von Nachblutungen nach einer Abszesstonsillektomie mit weniger als 7% recht niedrig. Nur rund 2% der Behandelten mussten nachoperiert werden. Die Therapie scheint damit recht sicher zu sein.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.