Erschienen in:
20.03.2019 | Reports of Original Investigations
Prevalence and predictors of exposure to disruptive behaviour in the operating room
verfasst von:
Alexander Villafranca, MSc, Brett Hiebert, MSc, Colin Hamlin, MA, Amy Young, MD, Divya Parveen, BSc, Rakesh C. Arora, MD, PhD, Michael Avidan, MBBCh, Eric Jacobsohn, MD, FRCPC
Erschienen in:
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
|
Ausgabe 7/2019
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Purpose
Disruptive intraoperative behaviour ranges from incivility to abuse. This behaviour can have deleterious effects on clinicians, students, institutions, and patients. Previous investigations of this behaviour used underdeveloped tools or small sampling frames. We therefore examined the prevalence and predictors of perceived exposure to disruptive behaviour in a multinational sample of operating room clinicians.
Methods
A total of 134 perioperative associations in seven countries were asked to distribute a survey examining five types of exposure to disruptive behaviour: personal, directed toward patients, directed toward colleagues, directed toward others, or undirected. To compare the average amount of exposure with each type, we used a Friedman’s test with select post hoc Wilcoxon tests. A negative binomial regression model identified socio-demographic predictors of personal exposure.
Results
Of the 134 organizations approached, 23 (17%) complied. The total response rate was estimated to be 7.6% (7465/101,624). Almost all (97.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 96.6 to 97.4) of the respondents reported exposure to disruptive behaviour in the past year, with the average respondent experiencing 61 incidents per year (95% CI, 57 to 65). Groups reporting higher personal exposure included clinicians who were young, inexperienced, female, non-heterosexual, working as nurses, or working in clinics with private funding (all P < 0.05).
Conclusion
Perceived exposure to disruptive behaviour was prevalent and frequent, with the most common behaviours involving speaking ill of clinicians and patients. These perceptions, whether accurate or not, can result in detrimental consequences. Greater efforts are required to eliminate disruptive intraoperative behaviour, with recognition that specific groups are more likely to report experiencing such behaviours.