Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Erschienen in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 1/2015

01.03.2015

Problem-Based Self-care Groups Versus Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Persons on Sick Leave Due to Common Mental Disorders: A Randomised Controlled Study

verfasst von: Inger Jansson, A. Birgitta Gunnarsson, Anita Björklund, Lars Brudin, Kent-Inge Perseius

Erschienen in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Ausgabe 1/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the interventional capacity of problem based method groups (PBM) regarding mental health and work ability compared to cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for persons on sick leave due to common mental disorders. Methods In a randomised controlled design the experimental group received PBM and the control group received CBT. Outcomes were measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Stress and Crisis Inventory 93 (SCI-93) and the Dialogue about Working Ability instrument (DOA). Results Twenty-two participants in the PBM group and 28 in the CBT group completed intervention. Both groups showed significant lower scores on the two HADS subscales. Regarding stress the PBM group showed significant decrease in one (out of three) subscales of SCI-93. The CBT group showed significant decrease on all subscales of SCI-93. Regarding work ability the PBM group showed significant higher scores on one of five subscales of DOA. The CBT group showed significant higher scores on four of five subscales of DOA. Between groups there were significant differences to the favour of CBT on one of two subscales of HADS, all three subscales of SCI-93 and on two of the five subscales of DOA. Conclusion PBM seem to be able to reduce anxiety- and depression symptoms. CBT showed to be superior to PBM in reducing symptoms in all aspects of mental health, except for anxiety, in which they seem equally effective. Regarding work ability CBT showed to be superior, with significant effect on more aspects compared to PBM.
Literatur
1.
2.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Sick on the job?: Myths and realities about mental health and work. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2012.
3.
Heymann J, Rho HJ, Schmitt J, Earle A. Ensuring a healthy and productive workforce: comparing the generosity of paid sick day and sick leave policies in 22 countries. Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(1):1–22.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Hägglund P. Do time limits in the sickness insurance system increase return to work? Empir Econ. 2013;45(1):567–82.CrossRef
5.
6.
Kielhofner G. A model of human occupation: theory and application. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
7.
Wilcock A. An occupational perspective of health. Thorofare: Slack; 2006.
8.
Jensen I, Busch H. English summary of the national evaluation of the Rehabilitation Guarantee. Karolinska Institutet; 2011 [cited 2013 Sept 02]. http://​ki.​se/​.
9.
Sveriges kommuner och landsting [Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions]. Rehabiliteringsgarantin – utveckling och planering i landstingen [The Rehabilitation Guarantee—development and planning in the counties] (in Swedish). Stockholm: SKL; 2011.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Blonk RWB, Brenninkmeijer V, Lagerveld SE, Houtman ILD. Return to work: a comparison of two cognitive behavioural interventions in cases of work-related psychological complaints among the self-employed. Work Stress. 2006;20(2):129–44.CrossRef
14.
Hofmann SG, Asnaani A, Vonk IJJ, Sawyer AT, Fang A. The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Cognit Ther Res. 2012;36(5):427–40.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
15.
Passer MW, Smith RE. Psychology. The science of mind and behaviour. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2004.
16.
Weissman MM, Markowitz JC, Klerman GL. Comprehensive guide to interpersonal psychotherapy. New York: BasicBooks; 2000.
17.
Arneson H, Ekberg K. Evaluation of empowerment processes in a workplace health promotion intervention based on learning in Sweden. Health Promot Int. 2005;20(4):351–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Lindroth Y, Brattstrom M, Bellman I, Ekestaf G, Olofsson Y, Strombeck B, et al. A problem-based education program for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation after three and twelve months. Arthritis Care Res. 1997;10(5):325.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Tingström P, Kamwendo K, Göransson A, Bergdahl B. Validation and feasibility of problem-based learning in rehabilitation of patients with coronary artery disease. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;47(4):337–45.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Kamwendo K, Tingström P, Bergdahl B, Svensson E. Effect of problem-based learning on stages of change for exercise behaviour in patients with coronary artery disease. Physiother Res Int. 2004;9(1):24–32.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Tingström PR, Kamwendo K, Bergdahl B. Effects of a problem-based learning rehabilitation programme on quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2005;4(4):324–30.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Kärner A, Nilsson S, Jaarsma T, Andersson A, Wiréhn A-B, Wodlin P, et al. The effect of problem-based learning in patient education after an event of coronary heart disease—a randomised study in primary health care: design, methodology of the COR-PRIM study. BMC Fam Pract. 2012;13:110.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
23.
Schlundt DG, Flannery ME, Davis DL, Kinzer CK, Pichert JW. Evaluation of a multicomponent, behaviorally oriented, problem-based “summer school” program for adolescents with diabetes. Behav Modif. 1999;23(1):79–105.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Medin J, Bendtsen P, Ekberg K. Health promotion and rehabilitation: a case study. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(16):908–15.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Peterson U, Bergström B, Samuelsson M, Åsberg M, Nygren Å. Reflecting peer support groups in the prevention of stress and burnout: randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs. 2008;63(5):506–16.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Arvidsson S, Bergman S, Arvidsson B, Fridlund B, Tingström P. Effects of a self-care promoting problem-based learning programme in people with rheumatic diseases: a randomized controlled study. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(7):1500–14.CrossRefPubMed
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–70.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52(2):69–77.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Saboonchi F, Wennman-Larsen A, Alexanderson K, Petersson L-M. Examination of the construct validity of the Swedish version of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in breast cancer patients. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(10):2849–56.
34.
Nyström C, Nyström O. Skattad stress verifierar autonom dysfunktion [Assessed stress verifies autonom dysfunction]. Läkartidningen 1996; 93(28–29):2583–84 (in Swedish).
35.
Krafft B, Nyström C. Hög stressnivå och omogna försvar ger ond cirkel vid långvarig smärta [High stress levels and immature ego defences lead to a vicious circle in pain]. Läkartidningen. 2002; 99(41):4040–43 (in Swedish).
36.
Linddahl I. Validity and reliability of the instrument DOA; a dialogue about working ability [dissertation]. Jönköping: Hälsohögskolan; 2007.
37.
Linddahl I, Norrby E, Bellner A-L. Construct validity of the instrument DOA: a dialogue about ability related to work. Work. 2003;20(3):215–24.PubMed
38.
Norrby E, Linddahl I. Reliability of the instrument DOA: dialogue about ability related to work. Work. 2006;26(2):131–9.PubMed
39.
Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall; 1991.
40.
Fukui S, Davidson LJ, Holter MC, Rapp CA. Pathways to recovery (PTR): impact of peer-led group participation on mental health recovery outcomes. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2010;34(1):42–8.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Mikkelsen A, Saksvik PO, Landsbergis P. The impact of a participatory organizational intervention on job stress in community health care institutions. Work Stress. 2000;14(2):156–70.CrossRef
42.
Mitte K. Review: cognitive behavioural therapy is more effective than control and similarly effective to pharmacotherapy for generalised anxiety disorder. Evid Based Ment Health. 2006;9(2):43.CrossRef
43.
Dalgren AS, Gard GE. Soft values with hard impact—a review of stress reducing interventions on group and organisational level. Phys Ther Rev. 2009;14(6):369–81.CrossRef
44.
Richardson KM, Rothstein HR. Effects of occupational stress management intervention programs: a meta-analysis. J Occup Health Psychol. 2008;13(1):69–93.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Gardner B, Rose J, Mason O, Tyler P, Cushway D. Cognitive therapy and behavioural coping in the management of work-related stress: an intervention study. Work Stress. 2005;19(2):137–52.CrossRef
46.
van der Klink JJ, Blonk RW, Schene AH, van Dijk FJ. The benefits of interventions for work-related stress. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(2):270–6.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
47.
Granath J, Ingvarsson S, von Thiele U, Lundberg U. Stress management: a randomized study of cognitive behavioural therapy and yoga. Cogn Behav Ther. 2006;35(1):3–10.CrossRefPubMed
48.
de Vente W, Kamphuis JH, Emmelkamp PMG, Blonk RWB. Individual and group cognitive-behavioral treatment for work-related stress complaints and sickness absence: a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Health Psychol. 2008;13(3):214–31.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Karlson B, Jönsson P, Pålsson B, Abjörnsson G, Malmberg B, Larsson B, et al. Return to work after a workplace-oriented intervention for patients on sick-leave for burnout—a prospective controlled study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:301.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
50.
Escorpizo R, Finger M, Glässel A, Gradinger F, Lückenkemper M, Cieza A. A systematic review of functioning in vocational rehabilitation using the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(2):134–46.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Marchington M, Suter J. Where informality really matters: patterns of employee involvement and participation (EIP) in a non-union firm. Ind Relat. 2013;52(S1):284–313.CrossRef
52.
Smith E, Comyn P. The development of employability skills in novice workers. National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER); 2003.
53.
Biesma RG, Pavlova M, Vaatstra R, van Merode GG, Czabanowska K, Smith T, et al. Generic versus specific competencies of entry-level public health graduates: employers’ perceptions in Poland, the UK, and the Netherlands. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008;13(3):325–43.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Lynøe N, Wessel M, Olsson D, Alexanderson K, Tännsjö T, Juth N. Duelling with doctors, restoring honour and avoiding shame? A cross-sectional study of sick-listed patients’ experiences of negative healthcare encounters with special reference to feeling wronged and shame. J Med Ethics. 2013;39:654–7.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Jansson I, Björklund A. The experience of returning to work. Work. 2007;28(2):121–34.PubMed
56.
Tjulin A, Maceachen E, Ekberg K. Exploring workplace actors experiences of the social organization of return-to-work. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(3):311–21.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Finger M, Glässel A, Erhart P, Gradinger F, Klipstein A, Rivier G, et al. Identification of relevant ICF categories in vocational rehabilitation: a cross sectional study evaluating the clinical perspective. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(2):156–66.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Saltychev M, Kinnunen A, Laimi K. Vocational rehabilitation evaluation and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(1):106–14.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Gard G, Larsson A. Focus on motivation in the work rehabilitation planning process: a qualitative study from the employer’s perspective. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(3):159–67.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Nieuwenhuijsen K, Noordik E, van Dijk FJH, van der Klink JJ. Return to work perceptions and actual return to work in workers with common mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(2):290–9.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Cheng SK. Life stress, problem solving, perfectionism, and depressive symptoms in Chinese. Cogn Therapy Res. 2001;25(3):303.CrossRef
62.
Dixon WA. Problem-solving appraisal and depression: evidence for a recovery model. J Couns Dev. 2000;78(1):87–91.CrossRef
63.
Ju S, Zhang D, Pacha J. Employability skills valued by employers as important for entry-level employees with and without disabilities. Career Dev Except Individ. 2012;35(1):29–38.CrossRef
64.
Downing K, Kwong T, Chan S-W, Lam T-F, Downing W-K. Problem-based learning and the development of metacognition. High Educ. 2009;57:609–21.CrossRef
65.
Wells A. Emotional disorders and metacognition: innovative cognitive therapy. Chichester: Wiley; 2000.
66.
Bottomley A. To randomise or not to randomise: methodological pitfalls of the RCT design in psychosocial intervention studies. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 1997;6(3):222–30.CrossRef
67.
Sharp DM, Power KG, Swanson V. A comparison of the efficacy and acceptability of group versus individual cognitive behaviour therapy in the treatment of panic disorder and agoraphobia in primary care. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2004;11(2):73–82.CrossRef
68.
Lally P, Wardle J, Gardner B. Experiences of habit formation: a qualitative study. Psychol Health Med. 2011;16(4):484–9.CrossRefPubMed
69.
70.
Mastekaasa A, Dale-Olsen H. Do women or men have the less healthy jobs? An analysis of gender differences in sickness absence. Eur Sociol Rev. 2000;16(3):267–86.CrossRef
71.
Bratberg E, Dahl S-Å, Risa AE. ‘The double burden’: do combinations of career and family obligations increase sickness absence among women? Eur Sociol Rev. 2002;18(2):233–49.CrossRef
72.
Sveriges kommuner och landsting [Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions]. Rehabiliteringsgarantin 2011 – Resultat 2011 [The rehabilitation guarantee 2011—results 2011] (in Swedish). Stockholm: SKL; 2012.
Metadaten
Titel
Problem-Based Self-care Groups Versus Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Persons on Sick Leave Due to Common Mental Disorders: A Randomised Controlled Study
verfasst von
Inger Jansson
A. Birgitta Gunnarsson
Anita Björklund
Lars Brudin
Kent-Inge Perseius
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Ausgabe 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9530-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 1/2015 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Early-Return-to-Work in the Context of an Intensification of Working Life and Changing Employment Relationships

Editorial

Evolving Editorial Processes at the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

Book Review

Palmer, K. T., Brown, I., and Hobson, J. (eds): Fitness for Work: The Medical Aspects (fifth edition)

Review

Interactions Between Injured Workers and Insurers in Workers’ Compensation Systems: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research Literature

Review

Healing or Harming? Healthcare Provider Interactions with Injured Workers and Insurers in Workers’ Compensation Systems

OriginalPaper

Operationalizing a Shared Decision Making Model for Work Rehabilitation Programs: A Consensus Process