Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Dysphagia
Erschienen in: Dysphagia 1/2019

17.07.2018 | Review Article

Psychometric Properties of Visuoperceptual Measures of Videofluoroscopic and Fibre-Endoscopic Evaluations of Swallowing: A Systematic Review

verfasst von: Katina Swan, Reinie Cordier, Ted Brown, Renée Speyer, PhD

Erschienen in: Dysphagia | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Fibreoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) and Videofluoroscopic Swallow Studies (VFSS) are instrumental assessments of dysphagia which provide videos of the internal structures of swallowing. They are commonly regarded as ‘gold-standard’ assessments; however, there is no consensus regarding a gold-standard measure to analyse the video recordings that they produce. Measures require sound psychometric properties to be suitable for clinical or research purposes. To date, no review of psychometric properties of FEES and VFSS measures has been undertaken or formally reported. This review assessed the quality of the psychometric properties of visuoperceptual measures of FEES and VFSS. Electronic databases were searched for studies reporting on psychometric qualities of visuoperceptual measures which are used to analyse recordings from FEES and VFSS. All dates until February 2017 were included. The Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist was used to evaluate the methodical quality of studies. The measures’ overall quality was then assessed by combining COSMIN ratings with quality criteria. Forty-five studies, reporting on 39 measures, met the inclusion criteria for this review. Data about the measures’ psychometric properties were very limited. Twenty-one measures had information available about reliability only, while 18 had information on up to five of the possible nine psychometric properties categorised within the COSMIN framework. The majority of the FEES and VFSS measures’ psychometric properties were rated as ‘indeterminate’ overall, due to the small number of studies, issues with design, statistical analyses, and reporting practices of extant studies. There is insufficient evidence to recommend any individual measure included in this review as valid and reliable to interpret VFSS and FEES recordings. Further research, which utilises robust methodological design and reporting, is needed to examine the psychometric properties of measures for FEES and VFSS.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Dodrill P, Gosa MM. Pediatric dysphagia: physiology, assessment, and management. Ann Nutr Metab. 2015;66(Suppl. 5):24–31.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Kalf J, De Swart B, Bloem B, Munneke M. Prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012;18(4):311–5.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Mercadante S, Aielli F, Adile C, Ferrera P, Valle A, Fusco F, et al. Prevalence of oral mucositis, dry mouth, and dysphagia in advanced cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(11):3249–55.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Takizawa C, Gemmell E, Kenworthy J, Speyer R. A systematic review of the prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in stroke, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, head injury, and pneumonia. Dysphagia. 2016;31(3):434–41.CrossRef
5.
Kertscher B, Speyer R, Fong E, Georgiou AM, Smith M. Prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in the Netherlands: a telephone survey. Dysphagia. 2015;30(2):114–20.CrossRef
6.
Bhattacharyya N. The prevalence of dysphagia among adults in the United States. Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 2014;151(5):765–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Holland G, Jayasekeran V, Pendleton N, Horan M, Jones M, Hamdy S. Prevalence and symptom profiling of oropharyngeal dysphagia in a community dwelling of an elderly population: a self-reporting questionnaire survey. Dis Esophagus. 2011;24(7):476–80.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Park Y-H, Han H-R, Oh B-M, Lee J, Park J-a YuSJ, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of dysphagia in nursing home residents. Geriatr Nurs. 2013;34(3):212–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Cichero JA, Heaton S, Bassett L. Triaging dysphagia: nurse screening for dysphagia in an acute hospital. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(11):1649–59.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Yi S-H, Kim S-J, Huh J, Jun T-G, Cheon HJ, Kwon J-Y. Dysphagia in infants after open heart procedures. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;92(6):496–503.CrossRefPubMed
11.
DiBardino DM, Wunderink RG. Aspiration pneumonia: a review of modern trends. J Crit Care. 2015;30(1):40–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Komiya K, Ishii H, Umeki K, Mizunoe S, Okada F, Johkoh T, et al. Impact of aspiration pneumonia in patients with community-acquired pneumonia and healthcare-associated pneumonia: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Respirology. 2013;18(3):514–21.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Garcia-Peris P, Parón L, Velasco C, De la Cuerda C, Camblor M, Bretón I, et al. Long-term prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients: impact on quality of life. Clin Nutr. 2007;26(6):710–7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Leow LP, Huckabee M-L, Anderson T, Beckert L. The impact of dysphagia on quality of life in ageing and Parkinson’s disease as measured by the swallowing quality of life (SWAL-QOL) questionnaire. Dysphagia. 2010;25(3):216–20.CrossRef
15.
Verdonschot RJ, Baijens LW, Serroyen JL, Leue C, Kremer B. Symptoms of anxiety and depression assessed with the hospital anxiety and depression scale in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. J Psychosom Res. 2013;75(5):451–5.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Luker JA, Wall K, Bernhardt J, Edwards I, Grimmer-Somers K. Measuring the quality of dysphagia management practices following stroke: a systematic review. Int J Stroke. 2010;5(6):466–76.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Carnaby-Mann G, Lenius K. The bedside examination in dysphagia. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2008;19(4):747–68.CrossRefPubMed
18.
McCullough G, Rosenbek J, Wertz R, McCoy S, Mann G, McCullough K. Utility of clinical swallowing examination measures for detecting aspiration post-stroke. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005;48(6):1280–93.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Langmore SE. History of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing for evaluation and management of pharyngeal dysphagia: changes over the years. Dysphagia. 2017;32(1):27–38.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Huckabee M-L, Macrae P, Lamvik K. Expanding instrumental options for dysphagia diagnosis and research: ultrasound and manometry. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2015;67(6):269–84.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Karnell MP, Rogus NM. Comparison of clinician judgments and measurements of swallow response time: a preliminary report. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005;48(6):1269–79.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Dziewas R, Glahn J, Helfer C, Ickenstein G, Keller J, Ledl C, et al. Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) for neurogenic dysphagia: training curriculum of the German Society of Neurology and the German stroke society. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16(1):70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Frowen JJ, Cotton SM, Perry AR. The stability, reliability, and validity of videofluoroscopy measures for patients with head and neck cancer. Dysphagia. 2008;23(4):348–63.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Rommel N, Hamdy S. Oropharyngeal dysphagia: manifestations and diagnosis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13(1):49.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Rosenbek JC, Robbins JA, Roecker EB, Coyle JL, Wood JL. A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 1996;11(2):93–8.CrossRef
26.
McCullough GH, Wertz RT, Rosenbek JC, Mills RH, Webb WG, Ross KB. Inter-and intrajudge reliability for videofluoroscopic swallowing evaluation measures. Dysphagia. 2001;16(2):110–8.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Terwee CB. An overview of systematic reviews of measurement properties of outcome measurement instruments that intend to measure (aspects of) health status or (health- related) quality of life. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands: The COSMIN group. 2014.
29.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Pearson WG, Molfenter SM, Smith ZM, Steele CM. Image-based measurement of post-swallow residue: the normalized residue ratio scale. Dysphagia. 2013;28(2):167–77.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Newman RD, Nightingale J. Improving patient access to videofluoroscopy services: role of the practitioner-led clinic. Radiography. 2011;17(4):280–3.CrossRef
32.
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10(1):22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews for interventions. New York: Wiley; 2008.CrossRef
34.
Centre for Reviews Dissemination. Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. Layerthorpe, York: CRD University of York; 2009.
35.
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. International consensus on taxonomy, terminology and definitions of measurement properties for health related patient reported outcomes: results of the COSMIN study. J Clin Epidemol. 2010;63:737–45.CrossRef
36.
Terwee CB, Bot S, de Boer M, van der Windt D, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Cordier R, Speyer R, Chen YW, Wilkes-Gillan S, Brown T, Bourke-Taylor H. Evaluating the psychometric quality of social skills measures: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(7):e0132299.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Schellingerhout JM, Verhagen AP, Heymans MW, Koes BW, de Vet H, Terwee CB. Measurement properties of disease-specific questionnaires in patients with neck pain: a systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:659–70.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Cordier R, Chen Y, Speyer R, Totino R, Doma K, Leicht A, et al. Child-report measures of occupational performance: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(1):1–24.CrossRef
40.
41.
Marvin S, Gustafson S, Thibeault S. Detecting aspiration and penetration using FEES with and without food dye. Dysphagia. 2016;31(4):498–504.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Pilz W, Vanbelle S, Kremer B, van Hooren MR, van Becelaere T, Roodenburg N, et al. Observers’ agreement on measurements in fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Dysphagia. 2016;31(2):180–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Rodriguez KH, Roth CR, Rees CJ, Belafsky PC. Reliability of the pharyngeal squeeze maneuver. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2007;116(6):399–401.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Susa C, Kagaya H, Saitoh E, Baba M, Kanamori D, Mikushi S, et al. Classification of sequential swallowing types using videoendoscopy with high reproducibility and reliability. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;94(1):38–43.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Tohara H, Nakane A, Murata S, Mikushi S, Ouchi Y, Wakasugi Y, et al. Inter-and intra-rater reliability in fibroptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37(12):884–91.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Warnecke T, Suttrup I, Schröder JB, Osada N, Oelenberg S, Hamacher C, et al. Levodopa responsiveness of dysphagia in advanced Parkinson’s disease and reliability testing of the FEES-Levodopa-test. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016;28:100–6.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Bryant KN, Finnegan E, Berbaum K. VFS interjudge reliability using a free and directed search. Dysphagia. 2012;27(1):53–63.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Gibson E, Phyland D, Marschner I. Rater reliability of the modified barium swallow. Aust J Hum Commun Disord. 1995;23(2):54–60.CrossRef
49.
Gosa MM, Suiter DM, Kahane JC. Reliability for identification of a select set of temporal and physiologic features of infant swallows. Dysphagia. 2015;30(3):365–72.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Hind JA, Gensler G, Brandt DK, Gardner PJM, Blumenthal L, Gramigna GD, et al. Comparison of trained clinician ratings with expert ratings of aspiration on videofluoroscopic images from a randomized clinical trial. Dysphagia. 2009;24(2):211.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Lee JW, Randall DR, Evangelista LM, Kuhn MA, Belafsky PC. Subjective assessment of videofluoroscopic swallow studies. Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 2017;156(5):901–5.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Leonard R, Kendall K. Dysphagia assessment and treatment planning: a team approach. Boston: Cengage Learning; 1997.
53.
Mann G, Hankey GJ, Cameron D. Swallowing disorders following acute stroke: prevalence and diagnostic accuracy. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000;10(5):380–6.CrossRef
54.
McCullough GH, Wertz RT, Rosenbek JC, Dinneen C. Clinicians’ preferences and practices in conducting clinical/bedside and videofluoroscopic swallowing examinations in an adult, neurogenic population. Am J Speech-Lang Pathol. 1999;8(2):149–63.CrossRef
55.
56.
Power ML, Hamdy S, Goulermas JY, Tyrrell PJ, Turnbull I, Thompson DG. Predicting aspiration after hemispheric stroke from timing measures of oropharyngeal bolus flow and laryngeal closure. Dysphagia. 2009;24(3):257–64.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Price GJ, Jones CJ, Charlton RA, Allen C. A combined approach to the assessment of neurological dysphagia. Clin Otolaryngol. 1987;12(3):197–201.CrossRefPubMed
58.
59.
Scott AG. The development of a scale to assess swallowing function in motor neuron disease using videofluoroscopic techniques. Melbourne: La Trobe University; 1999.
60.
Stoeckli SJ, Huisman TA, Seifert BA, Martin-Harris BJ. Interrater reliability of videofluoroscopic swallow evaluation. Dysphagia. 2003;18(1):53–7.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Kelly A, Leslie P, Beale T, Payten C, Drinnan M. Fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and videofluoroscopy: does examination type influence perception of pharyngeal residue severity? Clin Otolaryngol. 2006;31(5):425–32.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Nordin NA, Miles A, Allen J. Measuring competency development in objective evaluation of videofluoroscopic swallowing studies. Dysphagia. 2017;32(3):427–36.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Scott A, Perry A, Bench J. A study of interrater reliability when using videofluoroscopy as an assessment of swallowing. Dysphagia. 1998;13(4):223–7.CrossRefPubMed
64.
Donzelli J, Wesling M, Brady S, Craney M. Predictive value of accumulated oropharyngeal secretions for aspiration during video nasal endoscopic evaluation of the swallow. Annals of Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003;112(5):469–75.CrossRef
65.
Dziewas R, Warnecke T, Ölenberg S, Teismann I, Zimmermann J, Krämer C, et al. Towards a basic endoscopic assessment of swallowing in acute stroke–development and evaluation of a simple dysphagia score. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;26(1):41–7.CrossRefPubMed
66.
Kaneoka AS, Langmore SE, Krisciunas GP, Field K, Scheel R, McNally E, et al. The Boston residue and clearance scale: preliminary reliability and validity testing. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2013;65(6):312–7.CrossRefPubMed
67.
Murray J, Langmore SE, Ginsberg S, Dostie A. The significance of accumulated oropharyngeal secretions and swallowing frequency in predicting aspiration. Dysphagia. 1996;11(2):99–103.CrossRefPubMed
68.
Neubauer PD, Rademaker AW, Leder SB. The Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale: an anatomically defined and image-based tool. Dysphagia. 2015;30(5):521–8.CrossRefPubMed
69.
Daniels SK, Schroeder MF, McClain M, Corey DM. Dysphagia in stroke: development of a standard method to examine swallowing recovery. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43(3):347.CrossRefPubMed
70.
Han TR, Paik N-J, Park JW. Quantifying swallowing function after stroke: a functional dysphagia scale based on videofluoroscopic studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(5):677–82.CrossRefPubMed
71.
Han TR, Paik N-J, Park J-W, Kwon BS. The prediction of persistent dysphagia beyond six months after stroke. Dysphagia. 2008;23(1):59–64.CrossRefPubMed
72.
Hutcheson KA, Barrow MP, Barringer DA, Knott JK, Lin HY, Weber RS, et al. Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST): scale development and validation. Cancer. 2017;123(1):62–70.CrossRefPubMed
73.
Martin-Harris B, Brodsky MB, Michel Y, Castell DO, Schleicher M, Sandidge J, et al. MBS measurement tool for swallow impairment—MBSImp: establishing a standard. Dysphagia. 2008;23(4):392–405.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
74.
Omari TI, Dejaeger E, Van Beckevoort D, Goeleven A, De Cock P, Hoffman I, et al. A novel method for the nonradiological assessment of ineffective swallowing. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106(10):1796–802.CrossRefPubMed
75.
Curtis JA, Laus J, Yung KC, Courey MS. Static endoscopic evaluation of swallowing: transoral endoscopy during clinical swallow evaluations. The Laryngoscope. 2016;126(10):2291–4.CrossRefPubMed
76.
Park WY, Lee TH, Ham NS, Park JW, Lee YG, Cho SJ, et al. Adding endoscopist-directed flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing to the videofluoroscopic swallowing study increased the detection rates of penetration, aspiration, and pharyngeal residue. Gut Liver. 2015;9(5):623.PubMed
77.
Farneti D. Pooling score: an endoscopic model for evaluating severity of dysphagia. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2008;28(3):135.PubMedPubMedCentral
78.
Colodny N. Interjudge and intrajudge reliabilities in fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (Fees®) using the penetration–aspiration Scale: a replication study. Dysphagia. 2002;17(4):308–15.CrossRefPubMed
79.
Farneti D, Fattori B, Nacci A, Mancini V, Simonelli M, Ruoppolo G, et al. The Pooling-score (P-score): inter-and intra-rater reliability in endoscopic assessment of the severity of dysphagia. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2014;34(2):105.PubMedPubMedCentral
80.
Kim DH, Choi KH, Kim HM, Koo JH, Kim BR, Kim TW, et al. Inter-rater reliability of videofluoroscopic dysphagia scale. Ann Rehab Med. 2012;36(6):791–6.CrossRef
81.
Kim J, Oh B-M, Kim JY, Lee GJ, Lee SA, Han TR. Validation of the videofluoroscopic dysphagia scale in various etiologies. Dysphagia. 2014;29(4):438–43.CrossRefPubMed
82.
Kelly AM, Drinnan MJ, Leslie P. Assessing penetration and aspiration: how do videofluoroscopy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing compare? The Laryngoscope. 2007;117(10):1723–7.CrossRefPubMed
83.
Butler SG, Markley L, Sanders B, Stuart A. Reliability of the penetration aspiration scale with flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015;124(6):480–3.CrossRefPubMed
84.
Butler SG, Stuart A, Case LD, Rees C, Vitolins M, Kritchevsky SB. Effects of liquid type, delivery method, and bolus volume on penetration-aspiration scores in healthy older adults during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2011;120(5):288–95.CrossRefPubMed
85.
Pluschinski P, Zaretsky E, Stöver T, Murray J, Sader R, Hey C. Validation of the secretion severity rating scale. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(10):3215–8.CrossRefPubMed
86.
Gullung JL, Hill EG, Castell DO, Martin-Harris B. Oropharyngeal and Esophageal Swallowing Impairments: their association and the predictive value of the modified barium swallow impairment profile and combined multichannel intraluminal impedance—esophageal manometry. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2012;121(11):738–45.CrossRefPubMed
87.
Logemann JA. Manual for the videofluorographic study of swallowing. Austin: Pro ed; 1993.
88.
Ickenstein GW, Höhlig C, Prosiegel M, Koch H, Dziewas R, Bodechtel U, et al. Prediction of outcome in neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia within 72 hours of acute stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovas Dis. 2012;21(7):569–76.CrossRef
89.
van der Maarel-Wierink CD, Vanobbergen JN, Bronkhorst EM, Schols JM, de Baat C. Meta-analysis of dysphagia and aspiration pneumonia in frail elders. J Dent Res. 2011;90(12):1398–404.CrossRefPubMed
90.
Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Item response theory. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
91.
Fan X. Item response theory and classical test theory: an empirical comparison of their item/person statistics. Educ Psychol Measur. 1998;58(3):357.CrossRef
92.
Duong M. Introduction to item response theory and its applications. Michigan: Michigan State University; 2004.
93.
Edelen MO, Reeve BB. Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Qual Life Res. 2007;16:5–18.CrossRefPubMed
94.
Reise SP, Ainsworth AT, Haviland MG. Item response theory: fundamentals, applications, and promise in psychological research. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2005;14(2):95–101.CrossRef
95.
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737–45.CrossRefPubMed
96.
Leonard RJ, Kendall KA, McKenzie S, Gonçalves MI, Walker A. Structural displacements in normal swallowing: a videofluoroscopic study. Dysphagia. 2000;15(3):146–52.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Psychometric Properties of Visuoperceptual Measures of Videofluoroscopic and Fibre-Endoscopic Evaluations of Swallowing: A Systematic Review
verfasst von
Katina Swan
Reinie Cordier
Ted Brown
Renée Speyer, PhD
Publikationsdatum
17.07.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Dysphagia / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0179-051X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0460
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-018-9918-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Dysphagia 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

Improving the Diagnostic Capability of the Modified Barium Swallow Study Through Standardization of an Esophageal Sweep Protocol

Original Article

Tongue Shape Dynamics in Swallowing Using Sagittal Ultrasound

Original Article

Establishing a Multidisciplinary Head and Neck Clinical Pathway: An Implementation Evaluation and Audit of Dysphagia-Related Services and Outcomes

Original Article

Predictors of Patient-Reported Dysphagia Following IMRT Plus Chemotherapy in Oropharyngeal Cancer

Editorial

To Sweep or Not to Sweep

Original Article

Characterizing the Flow of Thickened Barium and Non-barium Liquid Recipes Using the IDDSI Flow Test

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

25.04.2024 Allergien und Intoleranzreaktionen Nachrichten

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

16.04.2024 HNO-Chirurgie Nachrichten

Mit Blick auf das Risiko für Komplikationen nach elektiven Eingriffen im HNO-Bereich scheint das Alter der Patienten kein ausschlaggebender Faktor zu sein. Entscheidend ist offenbar, wie fit die Betroffenen tatsächlich sind.

Intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie gewinnt an Boden

16.04.2024 Tonsillektomie Nachrichten

Gegenüber der vollständigen Entfernung der Gaumenmandeln hat die intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie einige Vorteile, wie HNO-Fachleute aus den USA hervorheben. Sie haben die aktuelle Literatur zu dem Verfahren gesichtet.

Bilateraler Hörsturz hat eine schlechte Prognose

15.04.2024 Hörsturz Nachrichten

Die Mehrzahl der Menschen mit Hörsturz ist einseitig betroffen, doch auch ein beidseitiger Hörsturz ist möglich. Wie häufig solche Fälle sind und wie sich ihr Verlauf darstellt, hat eine HNO-Expertenrunde aus den USA untersucht.

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise