Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Virchows Archiv 1/2010

01.07.2010 | Original Article

Quantitative assessment of DNA methylation for the detection of cervical neoplasia in liquid-based cytology specimens

verfasst von: Jo-Heon Kim, Yoo Duk Choi, Ji Shin Lee, Jae Hyuk Lee, Jong Hee Nam, Chan Choi, Sun-Seog Kweon, Mary Jo Fackler, Saraswati Sukumar

Erschienen in: Virchows Archiv | Ausgabe 1/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Previously, we have shown that methylation-specific PCR (MSP) analysis of a key panel of genes may be useful as an ancillary tool for diagnosing squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in cervical scrapings. Because quantitative MSP (QMSP) is more suitable as a screening tool than conventional MSP, we investigated the diagnostic role of QMSP for the detection of SCC and HSIL in cervical scrapings. A quantitative multiplex-MSP approach was used to examine promoter methylation of five genes (APC, HIN-1, RAR-β, RASSF1A, and Twist) in biopsy-confirmed SCC (n = 63), HSIL (n = 45), low-grade SIL (LSIL, n = 26), and negative (n = 28) liquid-based cytology samples. For four genes (HIN-1, RAR-β, RASSF1A, and Twist), the methylation levels among four groups were significantly different (p < 0.001 for each). Methylation levels of HIN-1, RAR-β, RASSF1A, and Twist were increased in HSIL and SCC samples, compared with either negative or LSIL samples. However, methylation levels were not significantly different between SCC and HSIL, with the exception of RASSF1A. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that HIN-1, RAR-β, RASSF1A, and Twist had the ability to distinguish HSIL/SCC from LSIL/negative samples. The two-gene combination (RASSF1A/Twist) showed the best performance in distinguishing HSIL/SCC from LSIL/negative samples. The estimated specificity of this two-gene panel for detecting HSIL/SCC was 90.7%, and its sensitivity was 74.1%. These results suggest that quantitative detection of aberrant DNA methylation in cervical scrapings may be a promising high-throughput approach for the diagnosis of HSIL/SCC.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Shin HR, Jung KW, Won YJ et al (2007) National cancer incidence for the year 2002 in Korea. Cancer Res Treat 39:139–149CrossRefPubMed Shin HR, Jung KW, Won YJ et al (2007) National cancer incidence for the year 2002 in Korea. Cancer Res Treat 39:139–149CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Pisani P, Bray F, Parkin DM (2002) Estimates of the world-wide prevalence of cancer for 25 sites in the adult population. Int J Cancer 97:72–81CrossRefPubMed Pisani P, Bray F, Parkin DM (2002) Estimates of the world-wide prevalence of cancer for 25 sites in the adult population. Int J Cancer 97:72–81CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nanda K, McCrory DC, Myers ER et al (2000) Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 132:810–819PubMed Nanda K, McCrory DC, Myers ER et al (2000) Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 132:810–819PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kulasingam SL, Hughes JP, Kiviat NB et al (2002) Evaluation of human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for cervical abnormalities: comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and frequency of referral. JAMA 288:1749–1757CrossRefPubMed Kulasingam SL, Hughes JP, Kiviat NB et al (2002) Evaluation of human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for cervical abnormalities: comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and frequency of referral. JAMA 288:1749–1757CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel A, Groopman JD, Umar A (2003) DNA methylation as a cancer-specific biomarker: from molecules to populations. Ann N Y Acad Sci 983:286–297CrossRefPubMed Patel A, Groopman JD, Umar A (2003) DNA methylation as a cancer-specific biomarker: from molecules to populations. Ann N Y Acad Sci 983:286–297CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dong SM, Kim HS, Rha SH, Sidransky D (2001) Promoter hypermethylation of multiple genes in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Clin Cancer Res 7:1982–1986PubMed Dong SM, Kim HS, Rha SH, Sidransky D (2001) Promoter hypermethylation of multiple genes in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Clin Cancer Res 7:1982–1986PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Virmani AK, Muller C, Rathi A, Zoechbauer-Mueller S, Mathis M, Gazdar AF (2001) Aberrant methylation during cervical carcinogenesis. Clin Cancer Res 7:584–589PubMed Virmani AK, Muller C, Rathi A, Zoechbauer-Mueller S, Mathis M, Gazdar AF (2001) Aberrant methylation during cervical carcinogenesis. Clin Cancer Res 7:584–589PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Widschwendter A, Gattringer C, Ivarsson L et al (2004) Analysis of aberrant DNA methylation and human papillomavirus DNA in cervicovaginal specimens to detect invasive cervical cancer and its precursors. Clin Cancer Res 10:3396–3400CrossRefPubMed Widschwendter A, Gattringer C, Ivarsson L et al (2004) Analysis of aberrant DNA methylation and human papillomavirus DNA in cervicovaginal specimens to detect invasive cervical cancer and its precursors. Clin Cancer Res 10:3396–3400CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gustafson KS, Furth EE, Heitjan DF, Fansler ZB, Clark DP (2004) DNA methylation profiling of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions using liquid-based cytology specimens: an approach that utilizes receiver-operating characteristic analysis. Cancer 102:259–268CrossRefPubMed Gustafson KS, Furth EE, Heitjan DF, Fansler ZB, Clark DP (2004) DNA methylation profiling of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions using liquid-based cytology specimens: an approach that utilizes receiver-operating characteristic analysis. Cancer 102:259–268CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Reesink-Peters N, Wisman GB, Jéronimo C et al (2004) Detecting cervical cancer by quantitative promoter hypermethylation assay on cervical scrapings: a feasibility study. Mol Cancer Res 2:289–295PubMed Reesink-Peters N, Wisman GB, Jéronimo C et al (2004) Detecting cervical cancer by quantitative promoter hypermethylation assay on cervical scrapings: a feasibility study. Mol Cancer Res 2:289–295PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Feng Q, Balasubramanian A, Hawes SE et al (2005) Detection of hypermethylated genes in women with and without cervical neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:273–282CrossRefPubMed Feng Q, Balasubramanian A, Hawes SE et al (2005) Detection of hypermethylated genes in women with and without cervical neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:273–282CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Wisman GB, Nijhuis ER, Hoque MO et al (2006) Assessment of gene promoter hypermethylation for detection of cervical neoplasia. Int J Cancer 119:1908–1914CrossRefPubMed Wisman GB, Nijhuis ER, Hoque MO et al (2006) Assessment of gene promoter hypermethylation for detection of cervical neoplasia. Int J Cancer 119:1908–1914CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Shivapurkar N, Sherman ME, Stastny V et al (2007) Evaluation of candidate methylation markers to detect cervical neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol 107:549–553CrossRefPubMed Shivapurkar N, Sherman ME, Stastny V et al (2007) Evaluation of candidate methylation markers to detect cervical neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol 107:549–553CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kahn SL, Ronnett BM, Gravitt PE, Gustafson KS (2008) Quantitative methylation-specific PCR for the detection of aberrant DNA methylation in liquid-based Pap tests. Cancer 114:57–64CrossRefPubMed Kahn SL, Ronnett BM, Gravitt PE, Gustafson KS (2008) Quantitative methylation-specific PCR for the detection of aberrant DNA methylation in liquid-based Pap tests. Cancer 114:57–64CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai HC, Lin YW, Huang TH et al (2008) Identification of novel DNA methylation markers in cervical cancer. Int J Cancer 123:161–167CrossRefPubMed Lai HC, Lin YW, Huang TH et al (2008) Identification of novel DNA methylation markers in cervical cancer. Int J Cancer 123:161–167CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Apostolidou S, Hadwin R, Burnell M et al (2009) DNA methylation analysis in liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer screening. Int J Cancer 125:2995–3002CrossRefPubMed Apostolidou S, Hadwin R, Burnell M et al (2009) DNA methylation analysis in liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer screening. Int J Cancer 125:2995–3002CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Widschwendter M, Jones PA (2002) The potential prognostic, predictive, and therapeutic values of DNA methylation in cancer. Commentary re: J. Kwong et al., Promoter hypermethylation of multiple genes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res., 8: 131–137, 2002, and H-Z. Zou et al., Detection of aberrant p16 methylation in the serum of colorectal cancer patients. Clin. Cancer Res., 8: 188–191, 2002. Clin Cancer Res 8:17–21 Widschwendter M, Jones PA (2002) The potential prognostic, predictive, and therapeutic values of DNA methylation in cancer. Commentary re: J. Kwong et al., Promoter hypermethylation of multiple genes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res., 8: 131–137, 2002, and H-Z. Zou et al., Detection of aberrant p16 methylation in the serum of colorectal cancer patients. Clin. Cancer Res., 8: 188–191, 2002. Clin Cancer Res 8:17–21
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JH, Choi YD, Lee JS, Lee JH, Nam JH, Choi C (2010) Assessment of DNA methylation for the detection of cervical neoplasia in liquid-based cytology specimens. Gynecol Oncol 116:99–104CrossRefPubMed Kim JH, Choi YD, Lee JS, Lee JH, Nam JH, Choi C (2010) Assessment of DNA methylation for the detection of cervical neoplasia in liquid-based cytology specimens. Gynecol Oncol 116:99–104CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Jerónimo C, Usadel H, Henrique R et al (2001) Quantitation of GSTP1 methylation in non-neoplastic prostatic tissue and organ-confined prostate adenocarcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1747–1752CrossRefPubMed Jerónimo C, Usadel H, Henrique R et al (2001) Quantitation of GSTP1 methylation in non-neoplastic prostatic tissue and organ-confined prostate adenocarcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1747–1752CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Cottrell SE, Laird PW (2003) Sensitive detection of DNA methylation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 983:120–130CrossRefPubMed Cottrell SE, Laird PW (2003) Sensitive detection of DNA methylation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 983:120–130CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Fackler MJ, Malone K, Zhang Z et al (2006) Quantitative multiplex methylation-specific PCR analysis doubles detection of tumor cells in breast ductal fluid. Clin Cancer Res 12:3306–3310CrossRefPubMed Fackler MJ, Malone K, Zhang Z et al (2006) Quantitative multiplex methylation-specific PCR analysis doubles detection of tumor cells in breast ductal fluid. Clin Cancer Res 12:3306–3310CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Swift-Scanlan T, Blackford A, Argani P, Sukumar S (2006) Fackler MJ (2006) Two-color quantitative multiplex methylation-specific PCR. Biotechniques 40:210–219CrossRefPubMed Swift-Scanlan T, Blackford A, Argani P, Sukumar S (2006) Fackler MJ (2006) Two-color quantitative multiplex methylation-specific PCR. Biotechniques 40:210–219CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Baylin SB (2005) DNA methylation and gene silencing in cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol Suppl 1:4–11CrossRef Baylin SB (2005) DNA methylation and gene silencing in cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol Suppl 1:4–11CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Quantitative assessment of DNA methylation for the detection of cervical neoplasia in liquid-based cytology specimens
verfasst von
Jo-Heon Kim
Yoo Duk Choi
Ji Shin Lee
Jae Hyuk Lee
Jong Hee Nam
Chan Choi
Sun-Seog Kweon
Mary Jo Fackler
Saraswati Sukumar
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Virchows Archiv / Ausgabe 1/2010
Print ISSN: 0945-6317
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2307
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-010-0936-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2010

Virchows Archiv 1/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Pathologie

Molekularpathologische Untersuchungen im Wandel der Zeit

Open Access Biomarker Leitthema

Um auch an kleinen Gewebeproben zuverlässige und reproduzierbare Ergebnisse zu gewährleisten ist eine strenge Qualitätskontrolle in jedem Schritt des Arbeitsablaufs erforderlich. Eine nicht ordnungsgemäße Prüfung oder Behandlung des …

Vergleichende Pathologie in der onkologischen Forschung

Pathologie Leitthema

Die vergleichende experimentelle Pathologie („comparative experimental pathology“) ist ein Fachbereich an der Schnittstelle von Human- und Veterinärmedizin. Sie widmet sich der vergleichenden Erforschung von Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschieden von …

Gastrointestinale Stromatumoren

Open Access GIST CME-Artikel

Gastrointestinale Stromatumoren (GIST) stellen seit über 20 Jahren ein Paradigma für die zielgerichtete Therapie mit Tyrosinkinaseinhibitoren dar. Eine elementare Voraussetzung für eine mögliche neoadjuvante oder adjuvante Behandlung bei …

Personalisierte Medizin in der Onkologie

Aufgrund des erheblichen technologischen Fortschritts in der molekularen und genetischen Diagnostik sowie zunehmender Erkenntnisse über die molekulare Pathogenese von Krankheiten hat in den letzten zwei Jahrzehnten ein grundlegender …