Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 6/2020

26.08.2019 | Kidneys, Ureters, Bladder, Retroperitoneum

Quantitative enhancement thresholds and machine learning algorithms for the evaluation of renal lesions using single-phase split-filter dual-energy CT

verfasst von: Markus M. Obmann, Aurelio Cosentino, Joshy Cyriac, Verena Hofmann, Bram Stieltjes, Daniel T. Boll, Benjamin M. Yeh, Matthias R. Benz

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 6/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To establish thresholds for contrast enhancement-based attenuation (CM) and iodine concentration (IOD) for the quantitative evaluation of enhancement in renal lesions on single-phase split-filter dual-energy CT (tbDECT) and combine measurements in a machine learning algorithm to potentially improve performance.

Material

126 patients with incidental renal cysts (both hypo- and hyperdense cysts) or high suspicion for renal cell carcinoma (312 total lesions) undergoing abdominal, portal venous phase tbDECT were initially included in this retrospective study. Gold standard was pathological confirmation or follow-up imaging (MRI or multiphasic CT). CM, IOD, and ROI size were recorded. Thresholds for CM and IOD were identified using Youden-Index of the empirical ROC curves. Decision tree (DTC) and random forest classifier (RFC) were trained. Sensitivities, specificities, and AUCs were compared using McNemar and DeLong test.

Results

The final study cohort comprised 40 enhancing and 113 non-enhancing renal lesions. Optimal thresholds for quantitative iodine measurements and contrast enhancement-based attenuation were 1.0 ± 0.0 mg/ml and 23.6 ± 0.3 HU, respectively. Single DECT parameters (IOD, CM) showed similar overall performance with an AUC of 0.894 and 0.858 (p = 0.541) (sensitivity 90 and 80%, specificity 88 and 92%, respectively). While overall performance for the DTC (AUC 0.944) was higher than RFC (AUC 0.886), this difference (p = 0.409) and comparison to CM (p = 0.243) and IOD (p = 0.353) was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Enhancement in incidental renal lesions on single-phase tbDECT can be classified with up to 87.5% sensitivity and 94.6% specificity. Algorithms combining DECT parameters did not increase overall performance.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Cyriac J, Nesic I, Re TJ, Mader K (2018) Meta - Make a PACS searchable Cyriac J, Nesic I, Re TJ, Mader K (2018) Meta - Make a PACS searchable
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Menzel H-G, Schibilla H, Teunen D (2000) EUROPEAN GUIDELINES ON QUALITY CRITERIA FOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY. Brussels Menzel H-G, Schibilla H, Teunen D (2000) EUROPEAN GUIDELINES ON QUALITY CRITERIA FOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY. Brussels
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Dunn M (2003) NRPB-W67 Doses from Computed Tomography (CT) Examinations in the UK-2003 Review Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Dunn M (2003) NRPB-W67 Doses from Computed Tomography (CT) Examinations in the UK-2003 Review
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Pedregosa F, Michel V, Grisel O, et al (2011) Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python Pedregosa F, Michel V, Grisel O, et al (2011) Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Stevenson M, Nunes T, Heuer C, et al (2018) epiR: Tools for the Analysis of Epidemiological Data Stevenson M, Nunes T, Heuer C, et al (2018) epiR: Tools for the Analysis of Epidemiological Data
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Team RC (2018) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing Team RC (2018) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
Metadaten
Titel
Quantitative enhancement thresholds and machine learning algorithms for the evaluation of renal lesions using single-phase split-filter dual-energy CT
verfasst von
Markus M. Obmann
Aurelio Cosentino
Joshy Cyriac
Verena Hofmann
Bram Stieltjes
Daniel T. Boll
Benjamin M. Yeh
Matthias R. Benz
Publikationsdatum
26.08.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 6/2020
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02195-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2020

Abdominal Radiology 6/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.