Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 6/2022

24.05.2021 | Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine

Radiological maturation and clinical results of double-bundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A 5-year prospective case-controlled trial

verfasst von: Ramazan Akmeşe, Yener Yoğun, İbrahim Küçükkarapinar, Mehmet Batu Ertan, Mehmet Mesut Çelebi, Zehra Akkaya

Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Ausgabe 6/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of the study was to make a prospective comparison of the radiological and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Method

This prospective, case-controlled study included 65 patients, separated into 2 groups as 33 patients undergoing single bundle (SB), and 32 patients undergoing double bundle (DB) ACL reconstruction. The patients were evaluated clinically using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and the Lysholm knee scores. Stability was evaluated with the KT-1000 Arthrometer Measurement, the Lachman and pivot shift tests. Magnetic resonance images (MRI) at 1 and 5 years postoperatively were evaluated by a musculoskeletal radiologist. All the operations were performed by a single surgeon and the clinical evaluations were made by an independent researcher.

Results

Evaluation was made of a total of 53 patients (SB: 28, DB: 25). No statistically significant difference was determined between the groups regarding the postoperative IKDC and Lysholm scores. The pivot shift tests were negative in the DB group and positive in two patients of the SB group. The Lachman test was negative in all the patients. No significant difference was determined between the groups. No statistically significant difference was determined between the two groups in respect of the arthrometer measurements. In the SB group, revision surgery was performed in two patients due to graft failure. No graft failure findings were determined in the DB group, and no statistically significant difference was determined between the groups in respect of graft failure. On the MRIs taken at 1 year postoperatively, the ACL was seen to be hyperintense in 16 patients in the DB group and 6 patients in the SB group (p = 0.004). On the 5-year MRIs, ACL hypointensity could not be seen in three patients of the SB group and two of the DB group, with no difference determined between the groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

In the 5-year follow-up period, no difference was determined between patients undergoing SB ACL reconstruction and those undergoing DB ACL reconstruction regarding clinical scores, knee stability, and MRI findings, but graft maturation occurs later the patients undergoing DB reconstruction.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Calvert ND, Smith A, Ackland T et al (2020) Kneeling difficulty is common following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft and correlates with outcome measures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140:913–921CrossRef Calvert ND, Smith A, Ackland T et al (2020) Kneeling difficulty is common following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft and correlates with outcome measures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140:913–921CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bierke S, Abdelativ Y, Hees T et al (2020) Risk of arthrofibrosis in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the role of timing and meniscus suture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141(5):743–750CrossRef Bierke S, Abdelativ Y, Hees T et al (2020) Risk of arthrofibrosis in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the role of timing and meniscus suture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141(5):743–750CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujita N, Kuroda R, Matsumoto T et al (2011) Comparison of the clinical outcome of double-bundle, anteromedial single-bundle, and posterolateral single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon graft with minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 27:906–913CrossRef Fujita N, Kuroda R, Matsumoto T et al (2011) Comparison of the clinical outcome of double-bundle, anteromedial single-bundle, and posterolateral single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon graft with minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 27:906–913CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y et al (2004) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: single-versus double-bundle multistranded hamstring tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:515–520CrossRef Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y et al (2004) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: single-versus double-bundle multistranded hamstring tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:515–520CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hemmerich A, van der Merwe W, Batterham M, Vaughan CL (2011) Knee rotational laxity in a randomized comparison of single-versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 39:48–56CrossRef Hemmerich A, van der Merwe W, Batterham M, Vaughan CL (2011) Knee rotational laxity in a randomized comparison of single-versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 39:48–56CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Tashman S, Collon D, Anderson K et al (2004) Abnormal rotational knee motion during running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:975–983CrossRef Tashman S, Collon D, Anderson K et al (2004) Abnormal rotational knee motion during running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:975–983CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Morey VM, Nag HL, Chowdhury B et al (2015) A prospective comparative study of clinical and functional outcomes between anatomic double bundle and single bundle hamstring grafts for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int J Surg 21:162–167CrossRef Morey VM, Nag HL, Chowdhury B et al (2015) A prospective comparative study of clinical and functional outcomes between anatomic double bundle and single bundle hamstring grafts for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int J Surg 21:162–167CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Siebold R, Dehler C, Ellert T (2008) Prospective randomized comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 24:137–145CrossRef Siebold R, Dehler C, Ellert T (2008) Prospective randomized comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 24:137–145CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hussein M, van Eck CF, Cretnik A et al (2012) Prospective randomized clinical evaluation of conventional single-bundle, anatomic single-bundle, and anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 281 cases with 3-to 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 40:512–520CrossRef Hussein M, van Eck CF, Cretnik A et al (2012) Prospective randomized clinical evaluation of conventional single-bundle, anatomic single-bundle, and anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 281 cases with 3-to 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 40:512–520CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ra HJ, Kim J-H, Lee D-H (2020) Comparative clinical outcomes of anterolateral ligament reconstruction versus lateral extra-articular tenodesis in combination with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140:923–931CrossRef Ra HJ, Kim J-H, Lee D-H (2020) Comparative clinical outcomes of anterolateral ligament reconstruction versus lateral extra-articular tenodesis in combination with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140:923–931CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Devgan A, Rohilla R, Singh A et al (2016) A prospective study to evaluate the clinico-radiological outcomes of arthroscopic single bundle versus double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Clin Orthop trauma 7:236–242CrossRef Devgan A, Rohilla R, Singh A et al (2016) A prospective study to evaluate the clinico-radiological outcomes of arthroscopic single bundle versus double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Clin Orthop trauma 7:236–242CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang Z, Gu B, Zhu W, Zhu L (2014) Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24:559–565CrossRef Zhang Z, Gu B, Zhu W, Zhu L (2014) Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24:559–565CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Koken M, Akan B, Kaya A, Armangil M (2014) Comparing the anatomic single-bundle versus the anatomic double-bundle for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized, single blind, clinical study. Eur Orthop Traumatol 5:247–252CrossRef Koken M, Akan B, Kaya A, Armangil M (2014) Comparing the anatomic single-bundle versus the anatomic double-bundle for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized, single blind, clinical study. Eur Orthop Traumatol 5:247–252CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Y, Cui G, Yan H et al (2016) Comparison between single-and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 6-to 8-stranded hamstring autograft: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med 44:2314–2322CrossRef Liu Y, Cui G, Yan H et al (2016) Comparison between single-and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 6-to 8-stranded hamstring autograft: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med 44:2314–2322CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sasaki S, Tsuda E, Hiraga Y et al (2016) Prospective randomized study of objective and subjective clinical results between double-bundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 44:855–864CrossRef Sasaki S, Tsuda E, Hiraga Y et al (2016) Prospective randomized study of objective and subjective clinical results between double-bundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 44:855–864CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Casagranda BC, Maxwell NJ, Kavanagh EC et al (2009) Normal appearance and complications of double-bundle and selective-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using optimal MRI techniques. Am J Roentgenol 192:1407–1415CrossRef Casagranda BC, Maxwell NJ, Kavanagh EC et al (2009) Normal appearance and complications of double-bundle and selective-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using optimal MRI techniques. Am J Roentgenol 192:1407–1415CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Min BH, Chung WY, Cho JH (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging of reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 393:237–243CrossRef Min BH, Chung WY, Cho JH (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging of reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 393:237–243CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller TT (2009) MR imaging of the knee. Sports Med Arthrosc 17:56–67CrossRef Miller TT (2009) MR imaging of the knee. Sports Med Arthrosc 17:56–67CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Stöckle U, Hoffmann R, Schwedke J et al (1998) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the diagnostic value of MRI. Int Orthop 22:288–292CrossRef Stöckle U, Hoffmann R, Schwedke J et al (1998) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the diagnostic value of MRI. Int Orthop 22:288–292CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hefti E, Müller W, Jakob RP, Stäubli H-U (1993) Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 1:226–234CrossRef Hefti E, Müller W, Jakob RP, Stäubli H-U (1993) Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 1:226–234CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Howell SM, Clark JA, Blasier RD (1991) Serial magnetic resonance imaging of hamstring anterior cruciate ligament autografts during the first year of implantation: a preliminary study. Am J Sports Med 19:42–47CrossRef Howell SM, Clark JA, Blasier RD (1991) Serial magnetic resonance imaging of hamstring anterior cruciate ligament autografts during the first year of implantation: a preliminary study. Am J Sports Med 19:42–47CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kondo E, Yasuda K, Azuma H et al (2008) Prospective clinical comparisons of anatomic double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures in 328 consecutive patients. Am J Sports Med 36:1675–1687CrossRef Kondo E, Yasuda K, Azuma H et al (2008) Prospective clinical comparisons of anatomic double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures in 328 consecutive patients. Am J Sports Med 36:1675–1687CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ventura A, Iori S, Legnani C et al (2013) Single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: assessment with vertical jump test. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 29:1201–1210CrossRef Ventura A, Iori S, Legnani C et al (2013) Single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: assessment with vertical jump test. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 29:1201–1210CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen H, Chen B, Tie K et al (2018) Single-bundle versus double-bundle autologous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials at 5-year minimum follow-up. J Orthop Surg Res 13:50CrossRef Chen H, Chen B, Tie K et al (2018) Single-bundle versus double-bundle autologous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials at 5-year minimum follow-up. J Orthop Surg Res 13:50CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Järvelä S, Kiekara T, Suomalainen P, Järvelä T (2017) Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized study with 10-year results. Am J Sports Med 45:2578–2585CrossRef Järvelä S, Kiekara T, Suomalainen P, Järvelä T (2017) Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized study with 10-year results. Am J Sports Med 45:2578–2585CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Sernert N, Hansson E (2018) Similar cost-utility for double-and single-bundle techniques in ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 26:634–647CrossRef Sernert N, Hansson E (2018) Similar cost-utility for double-and single-bundle techniques in ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 26:634–647CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Siebold R, Ellert T, Metz S, Metz J (2008) Femoral insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry and arthroscopic orientation models for double-bundle bone tunnel placement—a cadaver study. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 24:585–592CrossRef Siebold R, Ellert T, Metz S, Metz J (2008) Femoral insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry and arthroscopic orientation models for double-bundle bone tunnel placement—a cadaver study. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 24:585–592CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Sonoda M, Morikawa T, Tsuchiya K, Moriya H (2007) Correlation between knee laxity and graft appearance on magnetic resonance imaging after double-bundle hamstring graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 35:936–942CrossRef Sonoda M, Morikawa T, Tsuchiya K, Moriya H (2007) Correlation between knee laxity and graft appearance on magnetic resonance imaging after double-bundle hamstring graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 35:936–942CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Biercevicz AM, Akelman MR, Fadale PD et al (2015) MRI volume and signal intensity of ACL graft predict clinical, functional, and patient-oriented outcome measures after ACL reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 43:693–699CrossRef Biercevicz AM, Akelman MR, Fadale PD et al (2015) MRI volume and signal intensity of ACL graft predict clinical, functional, and patient-oriented outcome measures after ACL reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 43:693–699CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiekara T, Järvelä T, Huhtala H et al (2014) Tunnel communication and increased graft signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 30:1595–1601CrossRef Kiekara T, Järvelä T, Huhtala H et al (2014) Tunnel communication and increased graft signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 30:1595–1601CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Suomalainen P, Moisala A-S, Paakkala A et al (2011) Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: randomized clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study with 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 39:1615–1623CrossRef Suomalainen P, Moisala A-S, Paakkala A et al (2011) Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: randomized clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study with 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 39:1615–1623CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Farshad-Amacker NA, Potter HG (2013) MRI of knee ligament injury and reconstruction. J Magn Reson Imaging 38:757–773CrossRef Farshad-Amacker NA, Potter HG (2013) MRI of knee ligament injury and reconstruction. J Magn Reson Imaging 38:757–773CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Yonetani Y, Toritsuka Y, Yamada Y et al (2005) Graft length changes in the bi-socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between isometric and anatomic femoral tunnel placement. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 21:1317–1322CrossRef Yonetani Y, Toritsuka Y, Yamada Y et al (2005) Graft length changes in the bi-socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between isometric and anatomic femoral tunnel placement. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 21:1317–1322CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Zavras TD, Race A, Bull AMJ, Amis AA (2001) A comparative study of’isometric’points for anterior cruciate ligament graft attachment. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 9:28–33CrossRef Zavras TD, Race A, Bull AMJ, Amis AA (2001) A comparative study of’isometric’points for anterior cruciate ligament graft attachment. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 9:28–33CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Yanagisawa S, Kimura M, Hagiwara K et al (2018) Patient age as a preoperative factor associated with tunnel enlargement following double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 26:1230–1236CrossRef Yanagisawa S, Kimura M, Hagiwara K et al (2018) Patient age as a preoperative factor associated with tunnel enlargement following double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 26:1230–1236CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Radiological maturation and clinical results of double-bundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A 5-year prospective case-controlled trial
verfasst von
Ramazan Akmeşe
Yener Yoğun
İbrahim Küçükkarapinar
Mehmet Batu Ertan
Mehmet Mesut Çelebi
Zehra Akkaya
Publikationsdatum
24.05.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Ausgabe 6/2022
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03971-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2022

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 6/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

TEP mit Roboterhilfe führt nicht zu größerer Zufriedenheit

15.05.2024 Knie-TEP Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Operationsrobotern für den Einbau von Totalendoprothesen des Kniegelenks hat die Präzision der Eingriffe erhöht. Für die postoperative Zufriedenheit der Patienten scheint das aber unerheblich zu sein, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Lever-Sign-Test hilft beim Verdacht auf Kreuzbandriss

15.05.2024 Vordere Kreuzbandruptur Nachrichten

Mit dem Hebelzeichen-Test lässt sich offenbar recht zuverlässig feststellen, ob ein vorderes Kreuzband gerissen ist. In einer Metaanalyse war die Vorhersagekraft vor allem bei positivem Testergebnis hoch.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.