Background
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a novel cellular immunotherapy approach based on ex vivo genetic engineering of autologous or allogenic T cells, providing them with a new “artificial” surface receptor able to efficiently target a specific tumor antigen [
1,
2]. The recognition and binding of the CAR to the tumor surface target leads to a potent immune activation, which is major histocompatibility complex -independent [
1,
3]. Over the past years, CAR T-cell therapies have experienced a relevant development in the field of hematological malignancies [
4‐
7]. Currently, four commercial CD19-targeting CAR T cell products are FDA approved for B-cell lymphoma and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah®), axicabtagen ciloleucel (Yescarta®), brexucabtagen autoleucel (Tecartus®) and lisocabtagen maraleucel (Breyanzi®) [
4,
6]. For multiple myeloma (MM), the majority of currently available CAR T-cell products target the B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), also termed TNFRSF17, which is selectively expressed on mature B lymphocytes and has a relevant role for their survival and proliferation [
8]. Two BCMA-targeting CAR T products—idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel, Abecma®) and, more recently, ciltacatagene-autocel (cilta-cel, Carvykti®) – have been to date FDA-approved [
4,
9,
10]. Ide-cel has been FDA approved since March 2021 for RRMM after failure of ≥ 4 treatment lines containing at least one immunomodulatory agent (IMiD), a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and a CD38-targeting antibody. In February 2022 also cilta-cel received FDA approval for patients who progressed after at least 3 treatment lines including an IMiD, a PI and an anti-CD38 antibody. For both products, treating healthcare institutions must be trained and certified on the management of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector-cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). In Switzerland, ide-cel is the only commercial anti-MM CAR T product available since April 2022, approved for triple-class RRMM patients who progressed after a minimum of 3 previous treatment lines.
GC012F is a dual CD19/BCMA-targeting CAR, which demonstrated promising anti-MM activity in an early phase 1 trial [
11]. Multiple further anti-MM CAR T products targeting distinct combinations of MM tumor antigens, such as CD38, CD138, CD56, CS1 or integrin β7, are currently being investigated in early phase clinical trials [
12]. Moreover, other novel CAR approaches for MM include allogenic CAR Ts, as well as CAR-NKs [
12,
13]. In the phase 2 KarMMa (NCT03361748) study, treatment with ide-cel led to an unprecedented overall response rate (ORR) of 73% and a median overall survival of 24.8 months in a heavily pretreated patient population with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) [
14]. The randomized phase 3 KarMMa-3 trial (NCT03651128) recently reported improved progression-free survival (PFS) for ide-cel in RRMM compared to standard of care [
15]. The efficacy of cilta-cel is being currently assessed in two first-line phase 3 trials, for patients with newly diagnosed MM, unfit or unwilling to receive treatment consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) (CARTITUDE-5, NCT04923893), and as alternative to ASCT for first line consolidation (CARTITUDE-6, NCT05257083).
In this work we report one of the first real-life cohorts of RRMM patients treated with ide-cel outside clinical trial. Moreover, since previous ide-cel studies correlated treatment efficacy with CAR T-cell expansion in vivo [
14‐
16] and circulating soluble BCMA (sBCMA) dynamics [
14‐
16], we analyzed these 2 parameters in our patient cohort as part of a translational co-clinical study.
Discussion
We report one of the first real-life cohorts of RRMM patients treated with commercial ide-cel at a single Swiss academic center between June and October 2022, following the administrative approval of ide-cel in April 2022. Our patient population was comparable to the patient population of previously published trial data on ide-cel [
16], with 38% of patients harboring high-risk cytogenetics, 19%, R-ISS stage III, 31%, extramedullary disease, and a median number of previous treatment lines of 6 (r: 3–12). Similarly, safety and primary response results were comparable to previous ide-cel studies [
14‐
16].
In our patient cohort, we performed a first BM response assessment 2 weeks after ide-cel treatment (median: 12 days, r: 10–35), and further assessments at 3 and 6 months. Remarkably, 44% of patients achieved CR (including 25% of sCRs by multiparameter flow cytometry) as early as 2 weeks after ide-cel infusion. Additionally, we observed an increased depth of responses at 3 months follow-up, with 2 additional patients with initial CR and PR, respectively, further improving to an sCR. Moreover, patients showing an early sCR or CR in the first BM biopsy assessment, maintained this response status in the following response assessment 3 months after ide-cel infusion. The reported index clinical case illustrates however that an initial pseudoprogression, in this case of extramedullary lesions, might be observed in the initial weeks following CAR T-cell therapy treatment, followed by subsequent regression of these lesions. Similar experiences have been reported previously for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia with extramedullary disease [
24,
25].
In line with ide-cel trial data, peak CAR T expansion in the peripheral blood occurred between week + 1 and + 3 after ide-cel infusion [
9]. Similar CAR T expansion dynamics have been observed for CD19-targeting CAR T-cell agents in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) studies [
26‐
29]. Interestingly, in our cohort, we observed sCR and CR more frequently in patients with a CAR T expansion in the peripheral blood > 10
5 copies/μg cfDNA as documented by ddPCR, and all patients with PD expanded < 10
5 copies/μg cfDNA.
Additionally, we performed longitudinal monitoring of circulating sBCMA levels in peripheral blood, and found lack of progressive decrease or plateau levels in patients with PD. In contrast, responders showed constantly decreasing sBCMA levels with a nadir between week + 8 and + 12 following ide-cel infusion. This suggests that circulating sBCMA levels can be potentially used as additional biomarker to monitor MM responses following CAR T-cell therapy.
In this cohort, CAR T-associated toxicity was manageable. However, we observed expected adverse events frequently, requiring complex and timely multidisciplinary management [
29‐
31]. Similarly to previous reports, the vast majority of patients (94%) presented CRS, mainly grade 1 (88%), and required the administration of at least one dose of tocilizumab. Thus, albeit neurotoxic adverse events presented less frequently in our cohort than previously described in patients receiving ide-cel [
9], with only one (6%) patient presenting an ICANS grade 2, adequate and timely management of CAR T patients in experienced centers is essential. For instance, one patient developed refractory CRS and ICANS grade 2 requiring the administration of tocilizumab, dexamethasone and siltuximab [
21]. The same patient presented the highest CAR T expansion in the peripheral blood observed in our cohort, reaching a peak of 757′927 copies /μg cfDNA 2 weeks after ide-cel infusion, which also correlated with CR and MRD negativity in the early BM assessment.
Hematologic toxicity of any grade presented in all patients, and most patients presented grade 3 or higher events. Relevantly, 25% of patients presented prolonged grade 3 or higher hematologic toxicity, persisting at 3 months follow-up after ide-cel treatment. No clear correlation with age was observed. This prolonged toxicity, especially in patients with severe pancytopenia, may represent a major clinical challenge. Prolonged hematologic toxicities persisting at > 90 days post-CAR T-cell therapy, mainly thrombocytopenia and neutropenia, have been reported in 7–38% and 0–33%, respectively, in DLBCL and B-ALL studies with tisagenlecleucel [
26,
27], axicabtagene ciloleucel [
32] and lisocabtagene maraleucel [
33]. In the KarMMa trial, 41% of patients showed at least grade 3 persistent neutropenia, and 49% thrombocytopenia, with a median time to recovery of 1.9 and 2.1 months, respectively [
9,
34]. Moreover, in the KarMMa trial 3/127 (0.2%) of patients required stem cell support due to prolonged pancytopenia [
9]. The physiopathology of this post CAR-T persistent cytopenia is incompletely understood, and the clinical management relies on supportive measures, mainly transfusions, use of hematopoietic growth factors and hematopoietic stem cell boost [
35].
Regarding the ide-cel manufacturing process, the median time from lymphapheresis to ide-cel infusion was 7 (7–11) weeks. This seemed acceptable, since most patients (68.8%) were able to receive a bridging therapy, while patients with lower tumor burden did not require bridging. Manufacturing success rate was 88%, which is clearly lower as compared to previously published data [
17]. In the KarMMa phase 2 trial, only one case of production failure out of 140 included patients was reported (99.3% production success rate) [
17]. In this trial, the number of previous treatment lines, as well as the proportion of patients with a history of HDCT with ASCT, was comparable to our cohort. Thus, we hypothesized that the lower real-life manufacturing success rate was not related to a more heavily pretreated patient population. For tisagenlecleucel, the latest reported manufacturing success rates were around 96%, with less than 3% of patients receiving OOS products [
36]. Further reports from real-life cohorts could clarify the maximal expected production success rate for MM CAR-Ts and the possible underlying factors.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.