Early infants’ development of behavioral and physiological regulation depends mainly on the experience in social interaction with their caregivers [
1‐
3]. Especially in stressful situations, infants’ regulatory processes are mainly influenced by the experienced interactions between infant and their caregivers [
4] with mother and father acting as an external regulator of infant arousal. Caregivers are attuned to and act to soothe distress during a period when their infant has not yet developed a sufficient repertoire of regulatory capacities [
5]. Especially sensitive and responsive caregiving, defined by an accurate interpretation and prompt response to infant needs, can protect infants from inordinate stress and support them by developing effective stress regulation strategies [
6]. A number of empirical studies have found maternal interaction quality to be associated with individual differences in infants’ regulatory strategies [
7‐
9]. During the 1st years of infant’s life, infants need to manage the challenging transition from external regulation of affect and internal arousal to rising levels of psychobiological regulation [
10]. The concept of parental sensitivity is grounded in attachment theory: “perception of the child’s signals”, “appropriate interpretation of the signals” and “appropriate and prompt response to child’s signals” [
11]. Caregiver sensitivity is critical for reducing young infants’ distress in situation of emotional arousal and may influence infants’ negative emotions in the way that infants are able to develop and practice the ability to modulate arousal by regulation [
12,
13]. On the other hand, less sensitive and supportive parenting (e.g. like frightening and anxious interaction behavior) might constrain or reduce the ability of physiological and behavioral regulation development [
14,
15]. In attachment theory as well as developmental theory it is suggested that the relationship between infant and parent is an important factor for the development of child’s regulatory strategies [
10,
16,
17]. Numerous findings showed that the quality of parental interacting behavior especially in the 1st years of infant’s life is an essential predictor for infants’ behavioral and/or physiological regulation outcomes [
18‐
21]. Even if it is well evaluated that maternal behavior may compensate for stressful situations, only little is known about the underlying physiological aspects that influence the child’s stress responses [
6]. In recent years, bio-physiological parameters have been used to underline behavioral observations and to obtain the understanding of the interaction between behavioral and physiological systems in infancy. One of the most relevant stress-related bio-physiological measures are that of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) [
22]. The ANS consists of two branches—the parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) and the sympathetic nervous system (SNS)—which demonstrates individual differences in children’s responses to emerging situations and is mainly involved in emotional as well as behavioral regulation activated by social interaction [
23].
Maternal behavior as a predictor of infant’s stress regulation related to ANS
The ANS mainly involved in emotional and behavioral reactions initiated by attachment and therefore has been widely used to investigate emotion regulation during infant development and in different psychopathologies [
24‐
27]. Alterations in ANS are detectable far in advance of the awareness of specific emotions. However, the effects of maternal affective behavior on child’s ANS related stress reactivity have rarely been studied [
28,
29]. The SNS branch is activated in response to an external threat like “fight or flight” by increasing heart rate and respiration [
30]. In contrast the PNS branch has an inhibitory effect on the SNS and mediates “rest and digest” by maintaining homeostasis and regulating recovery following stress by decreasing heart rate and respiration [
31,
32]. The increase in heart rate is thus influenced by both the PNS and SNS reactivity [
33]. The respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), determined using the interbeat intervals of the ECG and the respiratory rates derived from the ICG at a bandwidth range of 0.15–0.080 Hz [
34], reflects the PNS branch of the ANS and is a common index to measure vagal functioning in young infants [
35‐
39]. The left ventricular ejection time (LVET) is a chronotrophic SNS parameter and represents the blood ejection time of the left ventricle which is extracted from a time interval until he closure of the aortic valve in the ICG [
40].
Findings on RSA stress reactivity with regard to a comparable experimental paradigm (e.g. the Still-Face Paradigm (SFP; [
41]) show that lower quality of maternal behavior is associated with higher activation in infants’ RSA [
42]. In detail, Moore et al. revealed associations between lower quality of maternal behavior and a decrease in infants’ RSA [
9,
43‐
46]. Using the same paradigm in younger children shows that lower maternal sensitivity during periods of stress leads to lower PNS activation [
47]. Recent findings identified RSA as suitable PNS marker compared to simple HR measures [
35‐
39].
Several studies demonstrated increasing stability in baseline PNS during infant growth with significant associations to temperament, behavior, and health [
48,
49]. PNS activity has been shown to be related preliminary to social engagement and that tonic PNS control stabilizes around 12 months of infant’s age whereas PNS stress reactivity showed high variability until older age. The mode of autonomic imbalance in response to stressful situations depends on the age of the infant as well as on its social interaction and attachment quality [
27,
35,
50,
51]. In contrast to the understanding of the PNS in this context, there is limited knowledge about the SNS and its stability over time in relation to maternal attachment behavior and child’s development. The role of the SNS mediated ‘fight or flight’ response [
52] in relation to attachment behavior as well as the integrated function of SNS and PNS in this context are rarely investigated [
35,
53‐
55]. However, Oosterman and Schluengel [
54,
55] used SNS measures in attachment research and emotional as well as cognitive related measurements [
54,
55]. Hinnant investigated PEP in young infants and revealed significant stability over time [
56] furthermore Oosterman and Schuengel [
54] showed findings of differences in child’s SNS response measured by PEP from the age of 3 years [
54]. Infant’s LVET during mother–child-interaction is rarely investigated. Recently, Roder et al. [
57] have been identified LVET as a suitable marker to measure SNS in a 1-year-old child, since the LVET measure is frequency-related which is essential for the detection of SNS in young children.
Maternal behavior and child’s vagal regulation
Numerous empirical studies identified a direct association between the quality of caregiving behavior and the child’s vagal regulation. For example, Moore and Calkins [
45] demonstrated that infants of less sensitive and responsive mothers showed less adaptive patterns of vagal regulation resulting in higher vagal withdrawal during normal play episodes, less vagal withdrawal during stressful situations and more difficulty returning to a level of baseline vagal tone after distress [
45]. Furthermore, Perry and colleagues [
10] reported that maternal emotional support predicts child’s trajectory of vagal regulation. Infants of mothers with more responsiveness and sensitivity in interactive situations were found to have greater vagal withdrawal at age 3 to 4 compared to infants of mothers with lower levels of responsiveness and sensitivity [
10].
Results of Calkins and colleagues revealed that negative and controlling maternal interacting behavior was also associated with a reduction of child’s vagal withdrawal [
1]. In contrast to that, maternal positive touch has been shown to reduce the child’s physiological reactivity in stressful situations [
58]. Further studies confirmed the association between caregiving interacting behavior and child’s vagal withdrawal. Calkins and colleagues investigated the quality of mother–child-relationships at age 2 in relation to the degree of infants’ vagal withdrawal 3 years later. They detected that with increasing quality of the mother–child-relationship child’s vagal withdrawal was significantly accentuated at later age. They found that the quality of maternal-child relationship at age 2 predicted the degree of infants’ vagal withdrawal at age 5 even after controlling for behavioral problems and vagal withdrawal at age 2, such that infants with poorer early maternal-child relationships displayed significantly less vagal withdrawal at a later age [
59]. Oosterman and Schuengel [
54,
55] measured infants’ autonomic reactivity in foster children and a control group and elicited less variability RSA reactivity in foster children across the episodes of the SSP [
54].
Taken together, the child’s development of effective vagal regulation is predicted by the quality of maternal interacting behavior [
10,
60‐
62].
The aim of our study was to determine the relation between child’s ANS reactivity, measured via RSA und LVET and maternal interacting quality, both based on the SSP. We hypothesize that (1) infants of mothers with disruptive behavior show higher HR during SSP, especially during episodes of maternal separation and contact with the stranger, compared to children of non-disruptive mothers. These children reveal (2) an aggravation of RSA withdrawal compared to infants of non-disruptive mothers. Concerning the SNS, we hypothesize (3) that LVET can serve as a suitable marker of SNS stress induced changes in children of disruptive mothers. Based on the LVET measures, SNS activity is hypothesized (4) to be significantly increased in children of disruptive mothers due to an increase in ANS stress response, especially in contact with the stranger, compared to the SNS activity measured in children of non-disruptive mothers.