Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery 1/2009

01.02.2009 | Original Paper

Reduced painful facial infiltration with mixture of lignocaine–bupivacaine in comparison to individual agents

verfasst von: W. H. C. Tiong, T. S. Ismael, J. C. Y. Chan, J. McCann, P. J. Regan, J. L. Kelly

Erschienen in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The anecdotal use of lignocaine and bupivacaine mixture as local anaesthetics (LA) in minor surgical operations is increasingly popular, despite a lack of evidence to support this practice. The infiltration of LA is frequently identified as the most unpleasant aspect of the whole surgical procedure. This study compared the level of infiltration associated pain when 1% lignocaine, 0.25% bupivacaine and their 1:1 (v:v) mixture were used in patients undergoing minor facial procedure. A prospective, randomised study was carried out on patients undergoing minor facial procedure at the day surgery unit. The Visual Analogue Score (VAS) at the time of infiltration, injected volume and number of injections were recorded and analysed between groups. A total of 94 patients were recruited. The average volume of LA injected was 2.5 ± 1.9 ml and the average number of injections was 2.3 ± 1.5. The lignocaine–bupivacaine mixture (VAS = 3.1 ± 0.4) was identified as the least painful agent (p < 0.05), when compared to 1% lignocaine (VAS = 4.6 ± 0.4) and 0.25% bupivacaine (VAS = 6.4 ± 0.5). In this cohort, female patients consistently reported a lower VAS score for all groups, but this observation was not statistically significant (p > 0.05) when compared to male patients. The mixture of lignocaine and bupivacaine was associated with less pain during skin infiltration when compared to individual agents. Thus, we recommend its use in facial surgical procedures involving LA as this practice allows us to improve patients comfort during their surgery.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller R. Anaesthesia. In 3rd ed.: Churchill Livingstone, 1990:437–470 Miller R. Anaesthesia. In 3rd ed.: Churchill Livingstone, 1990:437–470
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Masters JE (1998) Randomised control trial of pH buffered lignocaine with adrenaline in outpatient operations. Br J Plast Surg 51:385–387PubMed Masters JE (1998) Randomised control trial of pH buffered lignocaine with adrenaline in outpatient operations. Br J Plast Surg 51:385–387PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Quaba O, Huntley JS, Bahia H, McKeown DW (2005) A users guide for reducing the pain of local anaesthetic administration. Emerg Med J 22:188–189PubMedCrossRef Quaba O, Huntley JS, Bahia H, McKeown DW (2005) A users guide for reducing the pain of local anaesthetic administration. Emerg Med J 22:188–189PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Morris R, McKay W, Mushlin P (1987) Comparison of pain associated with intradermal and subcutaneous infiltration with various local anesthetic solutions. Anesth Analg 66:1180–1182PubMed Morris R, McKay W, Mushlin P (1987) Comparison of pain associated with intradermal and subcutaneous infiltration with various local anesthetic solutions. Anesth Analg 66:1180–1182PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Howe NR, Williams JM (1994) Pain of injection and duration of anesthesia for intradermal infiltration of lidocaine, bupivacaine, and etidocaine. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 20:459–464PubMed Howe NR, Williams JM (1994) Pain of injection and duration of anesthesia for intradermal infiltration of lidocaine, bupivacaine, and etidocaine. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 20:459–464PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Tarsia V, Singer AJ, Cassara GA, Hein MT (2005) Percutaneous regional compared with local anaesthesia for facial lacerations: a randomised controlled trial. Emerg Med J 22:37–40PubMedCrossRef Tarsia V, Singer AJ, Cassara GA, Hein MT (2005) Percutaneous regional compared with local anaesthesia for facial lacerations: a randomised controlled trial. Emerg Med J 22:37–40PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wahlgren CF, Quiding H (2000) Depth of cutaneous analgesia after application of a eutectic mixture of the local anesthetics lidocaine and prilocaine (EMLA cream). J Am Acad Dermatol 42:584–588PubMedCrossRef Wahlgren CF, Quiding H (2000) Depth of cutaneous analgesia after application of a eutectic mixture of the local anesthetics lidocaine and prilocaine (EMLA cream). J Am Acad Dermatol 42:584–588PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Vossinakis IC, Stavroulaki P, Paleochorlidis I, Badras LS (2004) Reducing the pain associated with local anaesthetic infiltration for open carpal tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg [Br] 29:399–401 Vossinakis IC, Stavroulaki P, Paleochorlidis I, Badras LS (2004) Reducing the pain associated with local anaesthetic infiltration for open carpal tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg [Br] 29:399–401
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Fitton AR, Ragbir M, Milling MA (1996) The use of pH adjusted lignocaine in controlling operative pain in the day surgery unit: a prospective, randomised trial. Br J Plast Surg 49:404–408PubMedCrossRef Fitton AR, Ragbir M, Milling MA (1996) The use of pH adjusted lignocaine in controlling operative pain in the day surgery unit: a prospective, randomised trial. Br J Plast Surg 49:404–408PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Xia Y, Chen E, Tibbits DL, Reilley TE, McSweeney TD (2002) Comparison of effects of lidocaine hydrochloride, buffered lidocaine, diphenhydramine, and normal saline after intradermal injection. J Clin Anesth 14:339–343PubMedCrossRef Xia Y, Chen E, Tibbits DL, Reilley TE, McSweeney TD (2002) Comparison of effects of lidocaine hydrochloride, buffered lidocaine, diphenhydramine, and normal saline after intradermal injection. J Clin Anesth 14:339–343PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Porter CJ, Frizelle FA (2000) Use of local anaesthetic agents among New Zealand plastic surgeons—their practices and philosophies. Med Sci Monit 6:194–197PubMed Porter CJ, Frizelle FA (2000) Use of local anaesthetic agents among New Zealand plastic surgeons—their practices and philosophies. Med Sci Monit 6:194–197PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson HA (1980) Comparison of 0.25% Marcaine with 0.50% Xylocaine as local anesthetic agents (both with 1:200,000 epinephrine). Plast Reconstr Surg 65:375PubMedCrossRef Johnson HA (1980) Comparison of 0.25% Marcaine with 0.50% Xylocaine as local anesthetic agents (both with 1:200,000 epinephrine). Plast Reconstr Surg 65:375PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Averbuch M, Katzper M (2004) Assessment of visual analog versus categorical scale for measurement of osteoarthritis pain. J Clin Pharmacol 44:368–372PubMedCrossRef Averbuch M, Katzper M (2004) Assessment of visual analog versus categorical scale for measurement of osteoarthritis pain. J Clin Pharmacol 44:368–372PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomson CE, Morrow L, Martin DJ (1998) A randomised double blind trial to compare pain on digital injection of warm and cold anaesthetic. Foot 8:89–92CrossRef Thomson CE, Morrow L, Martin DJ (1998) A randomised double blind trial to compare pain on digital injection of warm and cold anaesthetic. Foot 8:89–92CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fatovich DM, Jacobs IG (1995) A randomized, controlled trial of oral midazolam and buffered lidocaine for suturing lacerations in children (the SLIC Trial). Ann Emerg Med 25:209–214PubMedCrossRef Fatovich DM, Jacobs IG (1995) A randomized, controlled trial of oral midazolam and buffered lidocaine for suturing lacerations in children (the SLIC Trial). Ann Emerg Med 25:209–214PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Reduced painful facial infiltration with mixture of lignocaine–bupivacaine in comparison to individual agents
verfasst von
W. H. C. Tiong
T. S. Ismael
J. C. Y. Chan
J. McCann
P. J. Regan
J. L. Kelly
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-008-0312-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2009

European Journal of Plastic Surgery 1/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.