Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2014

01.06.2014

Reusable single-port access device shortens operative time and reduces operative costs

verfasst von: Noam Shussman, Asaf Kedar, Ram Elazary, Mahmoud Abu Gazala, Avraham I. Rivkind, Yoav Mintz

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 6/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

In recent years, single-port laparoscopy (SPL) has become an attractive approach for performing surgical procedures. The pitfalls of this approach are technical and financial. Financial concerns are due to the increased cost of dedicated devices and prolonged operating room time. Our aim was to calculate the cost of SPL using a reusable port and instruments in order to evaluate the cost difference between this approach to SPL using the available disposable ports and standard laparoscopy.

Methods

We performed 22 laparoscopic procedures via the SPL approach using a reusable single-port access system and reusable laparoscopic instruments. These included 17 cholecystectomies and five other procedures. Operative time, postoperative length of stay (LOS) and complications were prospectively recorded and were compared with similar data from our SPL database. Student’s t test was used for statistical analysis.

Results

SPL was successfully performed in all cases. Mean operative time for cholecystectomy was 72 min (range 40–116). Postoperative LOS was not changed from our standard protocols and was 1.1 days for cholecystectomy. The postoperative course was within normal limits for all patients and perioperative morbidity was recorded. Both operative time and length of hospital stay were shorter for the 17 patients who underwent cholecystectomy using a reusable port than for the matched previous 17 SPL cholecystectomies we performed (p < 0.001). Prices of disposable SPL instruments and multiport access devices as well as extraction bags from different manufacturers were used to calculate the cost difference. Operating with a reusable port ended up with an average cost savings of US$388 compared with using disposable ports, and US$240 compared with standard laparoscopy.

Conclusion

Single-port laparoscopic surgery is a technically challenging and expensive surgical approach. Financial concerns among others have been advocated against this approach; however, we demonstrate herein that using a reusable port and instruments reduces operative time and overall operative costs, even beyond the cost of standard laparoscopy.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Gadacz TR, Talamini MA, Lillemoe KD, Yeo CJ (1990) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Clin North Am 70:1249–1262PubMed Gadacz TR, Talamini MA, Lillemoe KD, Yeo CJ (1990) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Clin North Am 70:1249–1262PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Cuschieri A, Terblanche J (1990) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: evolution, not revolution. Surg Endosc 4:125–126CrossRef Cuschieri A, Terblanche J (1990) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: evolution, not revolution. Surg Endosc 4:125–126CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips E, Daykhovsky L, Carroll B, Gershman A, Grundfest WS (1990) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: instrumentation and technique. J Laparoendosc Surg 1:3–15PubMedCrossRef Phillips E, Daykhovsky L, Carroll B, Gershman A, Grundfest WS (1990) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: instrumentation and technique. J Laparoendosc Surg 1:3–15PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tagaya N, Kita J, Takagi K, Imada T, Ishikawa K, Kogure H et al (1998) Experience with three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 5:309–311PubMedCrossRef Tagaya N, Kita J, Takagi K, Imada T, Ishikawa K, Kogure H et al (1998) Experience with three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 5:309–311PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Elazary R, Khalaileh A, Zamir G, Har-Lev M, Almogy G, Rivkind AI et al (2009) Single-trocar cholecystectomy using a flexible endoscope and articulating laparoscopic instruments: a bridge to NOTES or the final form? Surg Endosc 23:969–972PubMedCrossRef Elazary R, Khalaileh A, Zamir G, Har-Lev M, Almogy G, Rivkind AI et al (2009) Single-trocar cholecystectomy using a flexible endoscope and articulating laparoscopic instruments: a bridge to NOTES or the final form? Surg Endosc 23:969–972PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirschniak A, Bollmann S, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2009) Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: preliminary experiences. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19:436–438PubMedCrossRef Kirschniak A, Bollmann S, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2009) Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: preliminary experiences. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19:436–438PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts KE, Solomon D, Duffy AJ, Bell RL (2010) Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a surgeon’s initial experience with 56 consecutive cases and a review of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg 14:506–510PubMedCrossRef Roberts KE, Solomon D, Duffy AJ, Bell RL (2010) Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a surgeon’s initial experience with 56 consecutive cases and a review of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg 14:506–510PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Romanelli JR, Roshek TB 3rd, Lynn DC, Earle DB (2010) Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience. Surg Endosc 24:1374–1379PubMedCrossRef Romanelli JR, Roshek TB 3rd, Lynn DC, Earle DB (2010) Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience. Surg Endosc 24:1374–1379PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Shussman N, Schlager A, Elazary R, Khalaileh A, Keidar A, Talamini MA et al (2011) Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: lessons learned for success. Surg Endosc 25:404–407PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Shussman N, Schlager A, Elazary R, Khalaileh A, Keidar A, Talamini MA et al (2011) Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: lessons learned for success. Surg Endosc 25:404–407PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Leung D, Yetasook AK, Carbray J, Butt Z, Hoeger Y, Denham W et al (2012) Single-incision surgery has higher cost with equivalent pain and quality-of-life scores compared with multiple-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized blinded comparison. J Am Coll Surg 215:702–708PubMedCrossRef Leung D, Yetasook AK, Carbray J, Butt Z, Hoeger Y, Denham W et al (2012) Single-incision surgery has higher cost with equivalent pain and quality-of-life scores compared with multiple-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized blinded comparison. J Am Coll Surg 215:702–708PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Beck C, Eakin J, Dettorre R, Renton D (2013) Analysis of perioperative factors and cost comparison of single-incision and traditional multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 27:104–108PubMedCrossRef Beck C, Eakin J, Dettorre R, Renton D (2013) Analysis of perioperative factors and cost comparison of single-incision and traditional multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 27:104–108PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang SK, Tay CW, Bicol RA, Lee YY, Madhavan K (2011) A case-control study of single-incision versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 35:289–293PubMedCrossRef Chang SK, Tay CW, Bicol RA, Lee YY, Madhavan K (2011) A case-control study of single-incision versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 35:289–293PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Philipp SR, Miedema BW, Thaler K (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using conventional instruments: early experience in comparison with the gold standard. J Am Coll Surg 209:632–637PubMedCrossRef Philipp SR, Miedema BW, Thaler K (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using conventional instruments: early experience in comparison with the gold standard. J Am Coll Surg 209:632–637PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Binenbaum SJ, Teixeira JA, Forrester GJ, Harvey EJ, Afthinos J, Kim GJ et al (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a flexible endoscope. Arch Surg 144:734–738PubMedCrossRef Binenbaum SJ, Teixeira JA, Forrester GJ, Harvey EJ, Afthinos J, Kim GJ et al (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a flexible endoscope. Arch Surg 144:734–738PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Livraghi L, Berselli M, Bianchi V, Latham L, Farassino L, Cocozza E (2012) Glove technique in single-port access laparoscopic surgery: results of an initial experience. Minim Invasive Surg. doi:10.1155/2012/415430 Livraghi L, Berselli M, Bianchi V, Latham L, Farassino L, Cocozza E (2012) Glove technique in single-port access laparoscopic surgery: results of an initial experience. Minim Invasive Surg. doi:10.​1155/​2012/​415430
Metadaten
Titel
Reusable single-port access device shortens operative time and reduces operative costs
verfasst von
Noam Shussman
Asaf Kedar
Ram Elazary
Mahmoud Abu Gazala
Avraham I. Rivkind
Yoav Mintz
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3411-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2014

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.