Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2018

02.03.2017 | Original Article

Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?

verfasst von: Fatih Gucer, Selim Misirlioglu, Nuri Ceydeli, Cagatay Taskiran

Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

To present our initial experience on the feasibility of robotic transperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy up to left renal vein via single docking approach by high port insertion technique followed by left shoulder docking as a rescue backup procedure in surgically obstructed patients undergoing surgical staging because of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Prospective observational preliminary study. Canadian Task Force classification II-3. Tertiary-care academic affiliated private hospital. Ten patients with LACC who underwent robotic transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy between January 2012 and December 2014. All patients with pathologically proven cervical cancer underwent a PET/CT scanning in a similar fashion at the department of nuclear medicine. PET/CT scans were evaluated by the nuclear medicine specialist. Following pre-operative work-up, robot-assisted transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed up to left renal vein by the same experienced surgeon. Sections of 5 mm were performed and stained with routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and node count was done separately by experienced gynecopathologist. During the study period, 12 consecutive patients with LACC were counseled for pre-therapeutic robot-assisted transperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Two patients declined the procedure and underwent standardized chemo-radiation therapy whereas remaining ten patients constituted the study group. In the study group, the median age was 46 years (range 33–59 years), and the median body mass index 28.5 kg/m2 (range 18.5–35.1 kg/m2). Clinical staging was stage IIB in four patients, IIIB in four, and IVA in one. Histopathological diagnosis was squamous cell carcinoma in nine patients, and adenocarcinoma in one. On PET/CT scans, seven out of ten patients were positive for pelvic lymph node metastasis. With respect to para-aortic area, only one of the ten patients had suspected metastasis in PET/CT. For nine patients with LACC, the median docking time was 6.5 min (range 4–15 min), and the median operating time for para-aortic lymphadenectomy was 120 min (range 60–165 min). The median trocar time was 14.5 min (range 5–45 min). In two out of ten patients, the surgical removal of whole lymphatic tissue between inferior mesenteric artery and left renal vein was not completely possible by a single docking of robotic column. Therefore, a new optic trocar was placed in the umbilicus and the robotic column was relocated over the left shoulder of the patient and residual lymphatic tissue measuring approximately 2 cm in the long axis immediately below the left renal vein was removed and the surgery was completed up to the left renal vein. All para-aortic lymphadenectomies have been completed by robotic route. There were no intra-operative complications. No patient received a blood transfusion. Early post-operative grade 2 and 3a complications according to Dindo classification occurred in two patients: one symptomatic lymphocyst and one local infection on assistant port site in one patient. The patient with suspected para-aortic lymph node metastasis in PET/CT showed no metastatic disease on histopathologic exam of para-aortic lymph nodes. The patient with recurrent disease and negative para-aortic lymph nodes on frozen section examination underwent robot-assisted total pelvic exenteration. Five of the residual eight patients had histologically proven metastasis in the para-aortic lymph node(s). Treatment modification occurred in six patients related to pre-treatment staging surgery. According to pathological results, extended field radiation therapy has been added in five patients and it was omitted in one patient. The median time interval between surgery and initiation of radiotherapy was 12 days (range 6–23 days). Robotic transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy up to left renal vein by high port insertion technique is a safe and feasible option for staging and treatment planning. However, technically, it is obstructed in a small group of patients and nodal staging surgery up to left renal vein can be completed by consecutive left shoulder docking approach as a backup rescue plan.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Michel G et al (1998) Lymphatic spread in stage Ib and II cervical carcinoma: anatomy and surgical implications. Obstet Gynecol 91(3):360–363CrossRefPubMed Michel G et al (1998) Lymphatic spread in stage Ib and II cervical carcinoma: anatomy and surgical implications. Obstet Gynecol 91(3):360–363CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Vandeperre A et al (2015) Para-aortic lymph node metastases in locally advanced cervical cancer: comparison between surgical staging and imaging. Gynecol Oncol 138(2):299–303CrossRefPubMed Vandeperre A et al (2015) Para-aortic lymph node metastases in locally advanced cervical cancer: comparison between surgical staging and imaging. Gynecol Oncol 138(2):299–303CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gouy S et al (2013) Prospective multicenter study evaluating the survival of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy before chemoradiotherapy in the era of positron emission tomography imaging. J Clin Oncol 31(24):3026–3033CrossRefPubMed Gouy S et al (2013) Prospective multicenter study evaluating the survival of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy before chemoradiotherapy in the era of positron emission tomography imaging. J Clin Oncol 31(24):3026–3033CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Frumovitz M et al (2014) Lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer study (LiLACS): phase III clinical trial comparing surgical with radiologic staging in patients with stages IB2-IVA cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21(1):3–8CrossRefPubMed Frumovitz M et al (2014) Lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer study (LiLACS): phase III clinical trial comparing surgical with radiologic staging in patients with stages IB2-IVA cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21(1):3–8CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Leblanc E et al (2016) Should systematic ınfrarenal para-aortic dissection be the rule in the pretherapeutic staging of primary or recurrent locally advanced cervix cancer patients with a negative preoperative para-aortic pet ımaging? Int J Gynecol Cancer 26(1):169–175CrossRefPubMed Leblanc E et al (2016) Should systematic ınfrarenal para-aortic dissection be the rule in the pretherapeutic staging of primary or recurrent locally advanced cervix cancer patients with a negative preoperative para-aortic pet ımaging? Int J Gynecol Cancer 26(1):169–175CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheidler J et al (1997) Radiological evaluation of lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer. A meta-analysis. JAMA 278(13):1096–1101CrossRefPubMed Scheidler J et al (1997) Radiological evaluation of lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer. A meta-analysis. JAMA 278(13):1096–1101CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Magne N et al (2008) New trends in the evaluation and treatment of cervix cancer: the role of FDG-PET. Cancer Treat Rev 34(8):671–681CrossRefPubMed Magne N et al (2008) New trends in the evaluation and treatment of cervix cancer: the role of FDG-PET. Cancer Treat Rev 34(8):671–681CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramirez PT et al (2011) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a prospective correlation of surgical findings with positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings. Cancer 117(9):1928–1934CrossRefPubMed Ramirez PT et al (2011) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a prospective correlation of surgical findings with positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings. Cancer 117(9):1928–1934CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Uzan C et al (2011) Analysis of morbidity and clinical implications of laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy in a continuous series of 98 patients with advanced-stage cervical cancer and negative PET-CT imaging in the para-aortic area. Oncologist 16(7):1021–1027CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Uzan C et al (2011) Analysis of morbidity and clinical implications of laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy in a continuous series of 98 patients with advanced-stage cervical cancer and negative PET-CT imaging in the para-aortic area. Oncologist 16(7):1021–1027CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Marnitz S et al (2005) Is there a benefit of pretreatment laparoscopic transperitoneal surgical staging in patients with advanced cervical cancer? Gynecol Oncol 99(3):536–544CrossRefPubMed Marnitz S et al (2005) Is there a benefit of pretreatment laparoscopic transperitoneal surgical staging in patients with advanced cervical cancer? Gynecol Oncol 99(3):536–544CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Leblanc E et al (2007) Therapeutic value of pretherapeutic extraperitoneal laparoscopic staging of locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 105(2):304–311CrossRefPubMed Leblanc E et al (2007) Therapeutic value of pretherapeutic extraperitoneal laparoscopic staging of locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 105(2):304–311CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Brockbank E et al (2011) Pre-treatment surgical para-aortic lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:Cd008217 Brockbank E et al (2011) Pre-treatment surgical para-aortic lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:Cd008217
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Gil-Moreno A et al (2011) Pretherapeutic extraperitoneal laparoscopic staging of bulky or locally advanced cervical cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 18(2):482–489CrossRefPubMed Gil-Moreno A et al (2011) Pretherapeutic extraperitoneal laparoscopic staging of bulky or locally advanced cervical cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 18(2):482–489CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Vidaurreta J et al (1999) Laparoscopic staging in locally advanced cervical carcinoma: a new possible philosophy? Gynecol Oncol 75(3):366–371CrossRefPubMed Vidaurreta J et al (1999) Laparoscopic staging in locally advanced cervical carcinoma: a new possible philosophy? Gynecol Oncol 75(3):366–371CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lowe MP et al (2006) Feasibility of laparoscopic extraperitoneal surgical staging for locally advanced cervical carcinoma in a gynecologic oncology fellowship training program. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13(5):391–397CrossRefPubMed Lowe MP et al (2006) Feasibility of laparoscopic extraperitoneal surgical staging for locally advanced cervical carcinoma in a gynecologic oncology fellowship training program. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13(5):391–397CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramirez PT, Milam MR (2007) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 104(2 Suppl. 1):9–12CrossRefPubMed Ramirez PT, Milam MR (2007) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 104(2 Suppl. 1):9–12CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Tillmanns T, Lowe MP (2007) Safety, feasibility, and costs of outpatient laparoscopic extraperitoneal aortic nodal dissection for locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 106(2):370–374CrossRefPubMed Tillmanns T, Lowe MP (2007) Safety, feasibility, and costs of outpatient laparoscopic extraperitoneal aortic nodal dissection for locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 106(2):370–374CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Chong GO et al (2009) Learning curve of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the early and locally advanced cervical cancer: comparison of the first 50 and second 50 cases. Int J Gynecol Cancer 19(8):1459–1464CrossRefPubMed Chong GO et al (2009) Learning curve of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the early and locally advanced cervical cancer: comparison of the first 50 and second 50 cases. Int J Gynecol Cancer 19(8):1459–1464CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Gouy S et al (2011) Single-port laparoscopy and extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy: about fourteen consecutive cases. Gynecol Oncol 123(2):329–332CrossRefPubMed Gouy S et al (2011) Single-port laparoscopy and extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy: about fourteen consecutive cases. Gynecol Oncol 123(2):329–332CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Benito V et al (2012) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the staging of locally advanced cervical cancer: is it a feasible procedure at a peripheral center? Int J Gynecol Cancer 22(2):332–336CrossRefPubMed Benito V et al (2012) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the staging of locally advanced cervical cancer: is it a feasible procedure at a peripheral center? Int J Gynecol Cancer 22(2):332–336CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hong DG et al (2012) Laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with FIGO stage IB1-II B cervical carcinoma. Jsls 16(2):229–235CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hong DG et al (2012) Laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with FIGO stage IB1-II B cervical carcinoma. Jsls 16(2):229–235CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hudry D et al (2015) Robotically assisted para-aortic lymphadenectomy: surgical results: a cohort study of 487 patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25(3):504–511CrossRefPubMed Hudry D et al (2015) Robotically assisted para-aortic lymphadenectomy: surgical results: a cohort study of 487 patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25(3):504–511CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Diaz-Feijoo B et al (2014) Comparison of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopy for extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 132(1):98–101CrossRefPubMed Diaz-Feijoo B et al (2014) Comparison of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopy for extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 132(1):98–101CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Fastrez M et al (2013) Multi-center experience of robot-assisted laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging of locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92(8):895–901CrossRefPubMed Fastrez M et al (2013) Multi-center experience of robot-assisted laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging of locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92(8):895–901CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Narducci F et al (2009) Early experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopy for extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy up to the left renal vein. Gynecol Oncol 115(1):172–174CrossRefPubMed Narducci F et al (2009) Early experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopy for extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy up to the left renal vein. Gynecol Oncol 115(1):172–174CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Vergote I et al (2008) Robotic retroperitoneal lower para-aortic lymphadenectomy in cervical carcinoma: first report on the technique used in 5 patients. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87(7):783–787CrossRefPubMed Vergote I et al (2008) Robotic retroperitoneal lower para-aortic lymphadenectomy in cervical carcinoma: first report on the technique used in 5 patients. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87(7):783–787CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Fastrez M et al (2009) Robot assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the management of advanced cervical carcinoma. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 147(2):226–229CrossRefPubMed Fastrez M et al (2009) Robot assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the management of advanced cervical carcinoma. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 147(2):226–229CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Gouy S et al (2012) Nodal-staging surgery for locally advanced cervical cancer in the era of PET. Lancet Oncol 13(5):e212–e220CrossRefPubMed Gouy S et al (2012) Nodal-staging surgery for locally advanced cervical cancer in the era of PET. Lancet Oncol 13(5):e212–e220CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Leblanc E et al (2011) Accuracy of 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in the pretherapeutic detection of occult para-aortic node involvement in patients with a locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 18(8):2302–2309CrossRefPubMed Leblanc E et al (2011) Accuracy of 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in the pretherapeutic detection of occult para-aortic node involvement in patients with a locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 18(8):2302–2309CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Gold MA et al (2008) Surgical versus radiographic determination of para-aortic lymph node metastases before chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer 112(9):1954–1963CrossRefPubMed Gold MA et al (2008) Surgical versus radiographic determination of para-aortic lymph node metastases before chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer 112(9):1954–1963CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Magrina JF et al (2010) Robotic transperitoneal infrarenal aortic lymphadenectomy: technique and results. Int J Gynecol Cancer 20(1):184–187CrossRefPubMed Magrina JF et al (2010) Robotic transperitoneal infrarenal aortic lymphadenectomy: technique and results. Int J Gynecol Cancer 20(1):184–187CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Coronado PJ et al (2014) Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy (TIPAL). J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21(4):674–681CrossRefPubMed Coronado PJ et al (2014) Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy (TIPAL). J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21(4):674–681CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Tinelli R et al (2011) Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 18(9):2622–2628CrossRefPubMed Tinelli R et al (2011) Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 18(9):2622–2628CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Vizza E et al (2012) Robotic transperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancer: a new robotic surgical technique and review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol 19(12):3832–3838CrossRefPubMed Vizza E et al (2012) Robotic transperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancer: a new robotic surgical technique and review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol 19(12):3832–3838CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Magrina JF et al (2009) Robotic extraperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy: development of a technique. Gynecol Oncol 113(1):32–35CrossRefPubMed Magrina JF et al (2009) Robotic extraperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy: development of a technique. Gynecol Oncol 113(1):32–35CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Zanagnolo V et al (2013) Robotic-assisted transperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy as part of staging procedure for gynaecological malignancies: single institution experience. Obstet Gynecol Int 2013:931318CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zanagnolo V et al (2013) Robotic-assisted transperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy as part of staging procedure for gynaecological malignancies: single institution experience. Obstet Gynecol Int 2013:931318CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Lambaudie E et al (2012) Robotically assisted laparoscopy for paraaortic lymphadenectomy: technical description and results of an initial experience. Surg Endosc 26(9):2430–2435CrossRefPubMed Lambaudie E et al (2012) Robotically assisted laparoscopy for paraaortic lymphadenectomy: technical description and results of an initial experience. Surg Endosc 26(9):2430–2435CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Geppert B, Persson J (2015) Robotic infrarenal paraaortic and pelvic nodal staging for endometrial cancer: feasibility and lymphatic complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 94(10):1074–1081CrossRefPubMed Geppert B, Persson J (2015) Robotic infrarenal paraaortic and pelvic nodal staging for endometrial cancer: feasibility and lymphatic complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 94(10):1074–1081CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?
verfasst von
Fatih Gucer
Selim Misirlioglu
Nuri Ceydeli
Cagatay Taskiran
Publikationsdatum
02.03.2017
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0685-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.