Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2014

Open Access 01.06.2014 | Original Article

Robotic-assisted tubal anastomosis with one-stitch technique

verfasst von: Shahryar K. Kavoussi, K. M. Kavoussi, Dan I. Lebovic

Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2014

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN

Abstract

The da Vinci® robotic surgical system has been used more often in recent years for tubal anastomosis (TA) and has been reported to have an increased operative time. A one-stitch technique has been used for the reanastomosis step in laparoscopic TA. To date, publications on robotically-assisted TA (RATA) describe an anastomotic step with multiple (usually four) sutures placed. This retrospective case series reports tubal patency data on patients who underwent RATA with the one-stitch technique; tubal patency was the outcome measure. Eighteen women (ages 27–39) underwent RATA with the one-stitch anastomotic technique in tertiary care medical centers between February 2009 and May 2012. Tubal patency was demonstrated in 16/17 patients (94.1 %), as evidenced by postoperative hysterosalpingogram (HSG) and/or subsequent pregnancies. We report the first case series which shows that RATA with a single stitch for the reanastomotic step is effective in achieving tubal patency as evidenced by postoperative HSG and/or pregnancies.

Introduction

Women who have a history of tubal ligation and desire a return to fertility have the options of tubal anastomosis (TA) or in vitro fertilization (IVF). TA has been found to be cost-effective for all women of reproductive age including those over 40 years of age [1]. For appropriate candidates who have proceeded with TA, the surgical approach to this procedure has evolved from an open laparotomy to laparoscopic TA and, most recently, robotically-assisted TA (RATA). The potential advantages of RATA over open laparotomy include the avoidance of a larger incision, shorter hospitalization time, and speedier postoperative recovery for patients, with comparable patency and pregnancy rates [2]. Moreover, the potential advantages of RATA over laparoscopic TA include shorter operative time, less technical difficulty due to enhanced ergonomics, and the minimization or elimination of surgeon fatigue when performing reversal on the second fallopian tube.
Several studies have examined the efficacy of RATA [27]. These studies have described the anastomosis step as using multiple (usually four) interrupted sutures to reapproximate the mucosal and muscular layers of the proximal and distal fallopian tube segments [2]. A one-stitch technique for the anastomosis step has been used effectively in laparoscopic TA [8, 9]. Unlike the aforementioned reports, this study goes further by combining the robotic approach along with the one-stitch technique for tubal anastomosis. Tubal patency, as evidenced by hysterosalpingogram (HSG) and/or subsequent pregnancy, was the primary outcome measure of interest, with operative time a secondary measure.

Materials and methods

Eighteen parous women with a history of tubal ligation who had opted for tubal anastomosis over IVF underwent da Vinci® robotically-assisted TA between February 2009 and May 2012. IRB approval was obtained from the Austin Multi-Institutional Review Board. The study outcome measure was tubal patency as demonstrated by hysterosalpingogram (HSG) and/or subsequent pregnancy.
The positioning of the patient and the robot were similar to methods described by Dharia Patel et al. [2]. Briefly, after general anesthesia was induced, the patient was placed in modified dorsal lithotomy position in steep Trendelenberg, with a Humi™® Harris–Kronner uterine manipulator–injector (CooperSurgical, Trumbull, CT, USA) for uterine mobilization and chromotubation. Peritoneal access was achieved with a 12-mm umbilical trocar. Two lateral 8-mm da Vinci ports (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) were placed in the midaxillary line at the level of the umbilical port, separted by at least 8 cm between port sites. After diagnostic laparoscopy assessed the feasibility of anastomosis, a 10-mm (8-mm for more recent cases) accessory port was placed between the umbilical port and left-sided da Vinci port for irrigation and aspiration as well as for the introduction and removal of suture material. The robot was then positioned and the robotic arms were docked to the ports.
The one-stitch technique of Dubuisson and Swolin, with the modifications described by Bissonnette, was used [8, 9]. Dilute vasopressin (1:60, Pitressin; Fujisawa, Ontario, Canada) was injected into the mesosalpinges in order to facilitate hydrodissection and to maximize hemostasis. The stumps of the occluded proximal fallopian segments were sectioned sharply with EndoWrist® Monopolar Curved Scissors until the lumen was visualized and indigo carmine injection revealed proximal patency. The occluded ends of the distal fallopian tubes were sectioned sharply with EndoWrist Monopolar Curved Scissors and exposure of the distal segments to indigo carmine that had been injected through the proximal segments facilitated the identification of the distal lumen by visualizing the uptake of indigo carmine into the distal lumen. Suture materials were then advanced into the surgical field through the accessory port. In order to align the proximal and distal fallopian tube segments prior to the reanastomotic step, 5–0 polyglactin 910 suture (Vicryl; Ethicon, San Angelo, TX, USA) was used in an anterior-to-posterior fashion at the distal aspect of the mesosalpinx and then in a posterior-to-anterior fashion at the proximal aspect of the mesosalpinx. The robotic instruments used as needle drivers for the mesosalpingeal stitch were two EndoWrist® Black Diamond Micro Forceps.
On both the proximal and distal segments’ lumina, the one-stitch anastomotic step was performed by using a double-needle, 30 cm, 5–0 polyglactin 910 suture into the lumen at the 12 o’clock position from the mucosa, into the muscularis, and out through the serosa (Figs. 1, 2). The robotic instruments used as needle drivers for the anastomotic step were two EndoWrist Black Diamond Micro Forceps. Chromotubation was performed after anastomosis and oxidized regenerated cellulose (Interceed, Ethicon Women’s Health and Urology) was placed over and wrapped around each fallopian tube’s anastomosis (Figs. 3, 4, 5, 6). All patients were discharged to home on the same day.
If a patient had not achieved pregnancy within 4–6 months after RATA, postoperative HSG was performed in order to assess tubal patency. For patients who had HSG performed, HSG reports were obtained and the films were reviewed as well.

Results

Eighteen patients underwent RATA (surgery performed by S.K.K.); one patient was lost to follow-up. The mean age of the 18 women was 33.7 years with a range of 27–39. Blood loss was, on average, less than 25 ml per surgical case. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications with the surgical cases. The mean operative time for the 16 bilateral RATAs and one unilateral RATA with the one-stitch technique in this series was 146 min (range 89–203) as compared to 201 min (range 140–263) for 16 bilateral TAs and two unilateral TAs as reported by Dharia Patel [2].
In 16 of 17 patients (94.1 %), tubal patency was confirmed in at least one fallopian tube by postoperative HSG and/or subsequent pregnancy. Nine of the patients had postoperative HSG. Eight of these had bilateral TAs, of which five had bilateral tubal patency, two had unilateral patency, and one had bilateral blockage shown at HSG. One patient underwent unilateral TA and the HSG demonstrated unilateral tubal patency. The pregnancy rate, defined as a positive quantitative beta human chorionic gonadotropin level, was 10/17 (58.8 %). Seven patients had intrauterine pregnancies with fetal cardiac motion (41.2 %), one patient had an ectopic pregnancy (5.9 %), and two patients had spontaneous pregnancy losses (11.8 %), one of which was a blighted ovum and the other a chemical pregnancy. Of the ten women who achieved pregnancy, 8/10 (80.0 %) had sonographic evidence of intrauterine pregnancy (one of which was a blighted ovum), 1/10 (10 %) had an ectopic pregnancy, and 1/10 (10 %) had a chemical pregnancy. The average time from surgery to documented conception was 6 months (range 2–22).

Conclusion

RATA has been shown to be a feasible and cost-effective surgical enhancement; however, it has been shown to entail increased operative times when compared to the open approach [2, 6]. RATA with the one-stitch technique for the reanastomotic step appears to have similar patency rates as RATAs that are performed with multiple sutures placed for the reanastomotic step [2]. Since the tubal anastomotic step in RATA typically is performed with multiple interrupted sutures (usually four), the one-stitch anastomotic step may decrease operative times while achieving comparable patency and pregnancy rates [2]; in addition, the lower number of sutures placed may theoretically decrease the chances of restenosis of the fallopian tube [10]. Further studies with head-to-head comparison would be needed to compare the operative times between the multi-stitch and single-stitch methods.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Austin Fertility and Reproductive Medicine/Westlake IVF (Kate Odenwald, R.N., A.C.N.P.-B.C.), surgical staff at St. David’s South Austin Medical Center in Austin, Texas (Charlie Harlan, C.S.T., Tara Buck, R.N., B.S.N., C.N.O.R., Thomas Butz, R.N.), and surgical staff at the Hospital at Westlake Medical in Austin, Texas (Robert Currie, Jr.).

Conflict of interest

Author Shahryar K. Kavoussi declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author K. M. Kavoussi declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Dan I. Lebovic has received research grants from AbbVie Pharmaceutical, Inc.
No animals were used in this study. Informed consent was not obtained due to the retrospective (chart review) nature of the study; IRB approval was obtained.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( https://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

Die Chirurgie

Print-Titel

Das Abo mit mehr Tiefe

Mit der Zeitschrift Die Chirurgie erhalten Sie zusätzlich Online-Zugriff auf weitere 43 chirurgische Fachzeitschriften, CME-Fortbildungen, Webinare, Vorbereitungskursen zur Facharztprüfung und die digitale Enzyklopädie e.Medpedia.

Bis 30. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr nur 199 € zahlen!

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

e.Med Urologie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Urologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu den urologischen CME-Fortbildungen und Premium-Inhalten der urologischen Fachzeitschriften.

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirshfeld-Cytron J, Winter J (2008) Laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis versus in vitro fertilization: cost-based decision analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 209:56.e1–56.e6CrossRef Hirshfeld-Cytron J, Winter J (2008) Laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis versus in vitro fertilization: cost-based decision analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 209:56.e1–56.e6CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Dharia Patel SP, Steinkampf MP, Whitten SJ, Malizia BA (2008) Robotic tubal anastomosis: surgical technique and cost effectiveness. Fertil Steril 90(4):1175–1179PubMedCrossRef Dharia Patel SP, Steinkampf MP, Whitten SJ, Malizia BA (2008) Robotic tubal anastomosis: surgical technique and cost effectiveness. Fertil Steril 90(4):1175–1179PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Huong PT, Cadière GB (2000) Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a feasibility study. Fertil Steril 74(5):1020–1023PubMedCrossRef Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Huong PT, Cadière GB (2000) Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a feasibility study. Fertil Steril 74(5):1020–1023PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldberg JM, Falcone T (2003) Laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis with and without robotic assistance. Hum Reprod 18(1):145–147PubMedCrossRef Goldberg JM, Falcone T (2003) Laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis with and without robotic assistance. Hum Reprod 18(1):145–147PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Vlahos NF, Bankowski BJ, King JA, Shiller DA (2007) Laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis using robotics: experience from a teaching institution. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 17(2):180–185PubMedCrossRef Vlahos NF, Bankowski BJ, King JA, Shiller DA (2007) Laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis using robotics: experience from a teaching institution. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 17(2):180–185PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodgers AK, Goldberg JM, Hammel JP, Falcone T (2007) Tubal anastomosis by robotic compared with outpatient minilaparotomy. Obstet Gynecol 109(6):1375–1380PubMedCrossRef Rodgers AK, Goldberg JM, Hammel JP, Falcone T (2007) Tubal anastomosis by robotic compared with outpatient minilaparotomy. Obstet Gynecol 109(6):1375–1380PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Caillet M, Vandromme J, Rozenberg S, Paesmans M, Germay O, Degueldre M (2010) Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a retrospective study. Fertil Steril 94(5):1844–1847PubMedCrossRef Caillet M, Vandromme J, Rozenberg S, Paesmans M, Germay O, Degueldre M (2010) Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a retrospective study. Fertil Steril 94(5):1844–1847PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Dubuisson JB, Swolin K (1995) Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis (the one stitch technique): preliminary results. Hum Reprod 10(8):2044–2046PubMed Dubuisson JB, Swolin K (1995) Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis (the one stitch technique): preliminary results. Hum Reprod 10(8):2044–2046PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bissonnette F, Lapensée L, Bouzayen R (1999) Outpatient laparoscopic tubal anastomosis and subsequent fertility. Fertil Steril 72(3):549–552PubMedCrossRef Bissonnette F, Lapensée L, Bouzayen R (1999) Outpatient laparoscopic tubal anastomosis and subsequent fertility. Fertil Steril 72(3):549–552PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Tusheva OA, Gargiulo AR, Einarsson JI (2013) Application of robotics in adnexal surgery. Rev Obstet Gynecol 6(1):e28–e34PubMedCentralPubMed Tusheva OA, Gargiulo AR, Einarsson JI (2013) Application of robotics in adnexal surgery. Rev Obstet Gynecol 6(1):e28–e34PubMedCentralPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Robotic-assisted tubal anastomosis with one-stitch technique
verfasst von
Shahryar K. Kavoussi
K. M. Kavoussi
Dan I. Lebovic
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2014
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-013-0442-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.