Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
Erschienen in: American Journal of Clinical Dermatology 4/2020

11.02.2020 | Review Article

Safety and Effectiveness of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha Biosimilar Agents in the Treatment of Psoriasis

verfasst von: Kelly A. Reynolds, Deeti J. Pithadia, Erica B. Lee, Wilson Liao, Jashin J. Wu

Erschienen in: American Journal of Clinical Dermatology | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Biologic drugs have revolutionized the treatment of psoriasis and other chronic inflammatory diseases. In recent years, many tumor necrosis factor-alpha ‘biosimilar’ agents have been developed. These biosimilars are similar in structure and function to their originator molecules, although they are not identical. Given that the safety and efficacy of the original biologic have already been proven, biosimilars are only required to show bioequivalence, or non-inferiority, to the reference biologic to be approved. Based on extrapolation of these non-inferiority data, biosimilars may be subsequently approved for all indications of the originator biologic, even without being directly studied in these various conditions. These biosimilar agents have been purported as a method to reduce the costs of biologic therapies, thereby increasing the accessibility of these medications and subsequently improving the treatment of psoriasis worldwide. The US Food and Drug Administration and/or the European Medicines Agency have approved biosimilars of adalimumab (Amjevita/Amgevita/Solymbic, Cyltezo, Imraldi/Hadlima, Hyrimoz/Hefiya/Halimatoz, Idacio, Hulio, Abrilada), etanercept (Erelzi, Benepali/Eticovo), and infliximab (Inflectra/Remsima, Renflexis/Flixabi, Ixifi/Zessly) for the treatment of psoriasis, and others are under review. There are many phase III data supporting the bioequivalence of these anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha biosimilar agents in treating psoriasis and rheumatologic disease, which are discussed here. In general, these biosimilar agents have been shown to have equivalent efficacy, tolerability, and immunogenicity profiles compared to their originators in patients with rheumatologic disease, although studies in patients with psoriasis are fairly limited. Additional switching studies and post-marketing safety analyses are needed to assess the interchangeability of biosimilar agents with their reference products.
Literatur
1.
Cohen AD, Wu JJ, Puig L, et al. Biosimilars for psoriasis: worldwide overview of regulatory guidelines, uptake and implications for dermatology clinical practice. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177(6):1495–502.PubMed
2.
Carrascosa J, Jacobs I, Petersel D, Strohal R. Biosimilar drugs for psoriasis: principles, present, and near future. Dermatol Ther. 2018;8(2):173–94.
3.
Radtke MA, Augustin M. Biosimilars in psoriasis: what can we expect? Biosimilars in psoriasis. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2014;12(4):306–12.PubMed
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Papp K, Bachelez H, Costanzo A, et al. Clinical similarity of biosimilar ABP 501 to adalimumab in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase III study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(6):1093–102.PubMed
9.
Gooderham M, Spelman L, Kaliaperumal A, et al. Single transition from adalimumab to ABP 501: evaluation of immunogenicity in a phase 3 study in subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74(5 Suppl. 1):AB275.
10.
Cohen SB, Genovese MC, Choy E, et al. Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar ABP 501 compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase III equivalence study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(10):1679–87.PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Cohen SB, Pablos JL, Muller GA, et al. An open-label extension study to demonstrate long-term safety and efficacy of ABP 501 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21(1):84.PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Cohen SB, Alonso-Ruiz A, Klimiuk PA, et al. Similar efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of adalimumab biosimilar BI 695501 and Humira reference product in patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis: results from the phase III randomised VOLTAIRE-RA equivalence study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(6):914–21.PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Cohen SB, Alonso-Ruiz A, Klimiuk PA, et al. Biosimilar candidate BI 695501 and adalimumab reference product have similar efficacy and safety in patients with moderately-to-severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA): 1-year results from a phase III study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(Suppl. 10):3495–7.
14.
15.
16.
Weinblatt M, Baranauskaite A, Niebrzydowski J, et al. Phase III randomized study of SB5, an adalimumab biosimilar, versus reference adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(1):40–8.PubMed
17.
Weinblatt M, Baranauskaite A, Dokoupilova E, et al. Switching from reference adalimumab to SB5 (adalimumab biosimilar) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: fifty-two-week phase III randomized study results. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(6):832–40.PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Blauvelt A, Lacour JP, Fowler JF. Phase III randomized study of the proposed adalimumab biosimilar GP2017 in psoriasis: impact of multiple switches. Br J Dermatol. 2018;179(3):623–31.PubMed
19.
Wiland P, Jeka S, Dokoupilova E, et al. FRI0087 Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity results of the switch from reference adalimumab (refadl) to Sandoz biosimilar adalimumab (gp2017, sdz-adl) from ADMYRA phase 3 study in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(Suppl. 2):706–7.
20.
Hercogová J, Papp KA, Chyrok V, Ullmann M, Vlachos P, Edwards CJ. AURIEL-PsO: a randomised, double-blind phase III equivalence trial to demonstrate the clinical similarity of the proposed biosimilar MSB11022 to reference adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2019. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​bjd.​18220(Epub ahead of print).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Edwards CJ, Monnet J, Ullmann M, Vlachos P, Chyrok V, Chori V. Safety of adalimumab in patients with moderately-to-severely active rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2019;38(12):3381–90.PubMed
22.
Alten R, Glover J, Matsunaga N, Chisholm D, Genovese M. OP0021: efficacy and safety results of a phase III study comparing FKB327, an adalimumab biosimilar, with the adalimumab reference product in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(Suppl. 2):59.
23.
Fleischmann RM, Alten R, Pileckyte M, et al. A comparative clinical study of PF-06410293, a candidate adalimumab biosimilar, and adalimumab reference product (Humira®) in the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2018;20(1):178.PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Emery P, Vencovsky J, Sylwestrzak A, et al. A phase III randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study comparing SB4 with etanercept reference product in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(1):51–7.PubMed
25.
Emery P, Vencovsky J, Sylwestrzak A, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis continuing on SB4 or switching from reference etanercept to SB4. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(12):1986–91.PubMedCentral
26.
Lund T, Sand C, Gniadecki R, Thomsen SF. Effectiveness and safety of switching to biosimilar infliximab and etanercept in patients with psoriasis. Dermatol Ther. 2019;32(3):e12846.PubMed
27.
Gisondi P, Bianchi L, Calzavara-Pinton P, et al. Etanercept biosimilar SB4 in the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis: data from the Psobiosimilars registry. Br J Dermatol. 2019;180(2):409–10.PubMed
28.
Egeberg A, Ottosen MB, Gniadecki R, et al. Safety, efficacy, and drug survival of biologics and biosimilars for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2018;178(2):509–19.PubMed
29.
Giunta A, Manfreda V, Esposito M, Del Duca E, Bianchi L. Etanercept biosimilar SB4 in the treatment of plaque‐type psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: a single‐centre, observational, retrospective, real‐life study. 2019 May 3. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​bjd.​18090. (Epub ahead of print).
30.
Griffiths CEM, Thaci D, Gerdes S, et al. The EGALITY study: a confirmatory, randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of GP2015, a proposed etanercept biosimilar, vs. the originator product in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176(4):928–38.PubMed
31.
Gerdes S, Thaci D, Griffiths C, et al. Multiple switches between GP2015, an etanercept biosimilar, with originator product do not impact efficacy, safety and immunogenicity in patients with chronic plaque-type psoriasis: 30-week results from the phase 3, confirmatory EGALITY study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32(3):420–7.PubMed
32.
Matucci-Cerinic M, Allanore Y, Kavanaugh A, et al. Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of GP2015, an etanercept biosimilar, compared with the reference etanercept in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis: 24-week results from the comparative phase III, randomised, double-blind EQUIRA study. RMD Open. 2018;4(2):e000757.PubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Yamanaka H, Kamatani N, Tanaka Y, et al. AB0416: a comparative study to assess the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of YLB113 and etanercept reference product for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(Suppl. 2):A1670.
34.
Yoo DH, Racewicz A, Brzezicki J, et al. A phase III randomized study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CT-P13 compared with reference infliximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: 54-week results from the PLANETRA study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016;18:82.PubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Park W, Yoo DH, Jaworski J, et al. Comparable long-term efficacy, as assessed by patient-reported outcomes, safety and pharmacokinetics, of CT-P13 and reference infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: 54-week results from the randomized, parallel-group PLANETAS study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016;18:25.PubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Yoo DH, Prodanovic N, Jaworski J, et al. Efficacy and safety of CT-P13 (biosimilar infliximab) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison between switching from reference infliximab to CT-P13 and continuing CT-P13 in the PLANETRA extension study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(2):355–63.PubMed
37.
Park W, Yoo DH, Miranda P, et al. Efficacy and safety of switching from reference infliximab to CT-P13 compared with maintenance of CT-P13 in ankylosing spondylitis: 102-week data from the PLANETAS extension study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(2):346–54.PubMed
38.
Takeuchi T, Yamanaka H, Tanaka Y, et al. Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic equivalence and 54-week efficacy and safety of CT-P13 and innovator infliximab in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol. 2015;25(6):817–24.PubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Tanaka Y, Yamanaka H, Takeuchi T, et al. Safety and efficacy of CT-P13 in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis in an extension phase or after switching from infliximab. Mod Rheumatol. 2017;27(2):237–45.PubMed
40.
Ye BD, Kim Y, Pesegova M, et al. 814: phase III randomized controlled trial to compare biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13) with innovator infliximab in patients with active Crohn’s disease: 1-year maintenance and switching results. Gastroenterol. 2018;154(6):S167–8.
41.
Jørgensen KK, Olsen IC, Goll GL, et al. Switching from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 compared with maintained treatment with originator infliximab (NOR-SWITCH): a 52-week, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10086):2304–16.PubMed
42.
Dapavo P, Vujic I, Fierro MT, Quaglino P, Sanlorenzo M. The infliximab biosimilar in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;75(4):736–9.PubMed
43.
Ricceri F, Pescitelli L, Lazzeri L, Prignano F. Clinical experience with infliximab biosimilar in psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177(6):e347–8.PubMed
44.
Gisondi P, Bianchi L, Conti A, et al. Infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 in the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis: data from the Psobiosimilars registry. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177(6):e325–6.PubMed
45.
Panagakis P, Rompoti N, Stravodimou A, Papoutsaki M, Rigopoulos D. Efficacy and safety of infliximab biosimilar in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a 52-week clinical study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;81(4):AB198.
46.
Choe JY, Prodanovic N, Niebrzydowski J, et al. A randomised, double-blind, phase III study comparing SB2, an infliximab biosimilar, to the infliximab reference product Remicade in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(1):58–64.PubMed
47.
Smolen JS, Choe J, Prodanovic N, et al. Safety, immunogenicity and efficacy after switching from reference infliximab to biosimilar SB2 compared with continuing reference infliximab and SB2 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results of a randomised, double-blind, phase III transition study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:234–40.PubMed
48.
Cohen SB, Alten R, Kameda H, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing PF-06438179/GP1111 (an infliximab biosimilar) and infliximab reference product for treatment of moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy. Arthritis Res Ther. 2018;20(1):155.PubMedPubMedCentral
49.
Genovese MC, Sanchez-Burson J, Oh M, et al. AB0377: clinical similarity of ABP 710 with infliximab (reference product) in subjects with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(Suppl. 2):A1648.
50.
Shai MZ, Sarpatwari A, Kesselheim AS. Why are biosimilars not living up to their promise in the US? AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(8):E668–78.
51.
Chen BK, Yang YT, Bennett CL. Why biologics and biosimilars remain so expensive: despite two wins for biosimilars, the Supreme Court’s recent rulings do not solve fundamental barriers to competition. Drugs. 2018;78(17):1777–81.PubMed
52.
McKinnon RA, Cook M, Liauw W, Marabani M, Marschner IC, Packer NH, et al. Biosimilarity and interchangeability: principles and evidence: a systematic review. BioDrugs. 2018;32(1):27–52.PubMedPubMedCentral
53.
Metadaten
Titel
Safety and Effectiveness of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha Biosimilar Agents in the Treatment of Psoriasis
verfasst von
Kelly A. Reynolds
Deeti J. Pithadia
Erica B. Lee
Wilson Liao
Jashin J. Wu
Publikationsdatum
11.02.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1175-0561
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1888
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-020-00507-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

American Journal of Clinical Dermatology 4/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Review Article

Long-Term Outcomes in BRAF-Mutated Melanoma Treated with Combined Targeted Therapy or Immune Checkpoint Blockade: Are We Approaching a True Cure?

Review Article

A Review of Noninvasive Techniques for Skin Cancer Detection in Dermatology

Evidence-Based Review Article

Fabric Selection in Atopic Dermatitis: An Evidence-Based Review

Leading Article

New and Emerging Biologics for Atopic Dermatitis

Letter to the Editor

Dermatologists’ Role in the Diagnosis and Management of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Coagulopathy

Original Research Article

Neurological Cancer is a Risk Factor for Bullous Pemphigoid: 11-Year Population-Based Cohort Study

Leitlinien kompakt für die Dermatologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Dermatologie

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Hirsutismus bei PCOS: Laser- und Lichttherapien helfen

26.04.2024 Hirsutismus Nachrichten

Laser- und Lichtbehandlungen können bei Frauen mit polyzystischem Ovarialsyndrom (PCOS) den übermäßigen Haarwuchs verringern und das Wohlbefinden verbessern – bei alleiniger Anwendung oder in Kombination mit Medikamenten.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

25.04.2024 Allergien und Intoleranzreaktionen Nachrichten

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Auf diese Krankheiten bei Geflüchteten sollten Sie vorbereitet sein

22.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Um Menschen nach der Flucht aus einem Krisengebiet bestmöglich medizinisch betreuen zu können, ist es gut zu wissen, welche Erkrankungen im jeweiligen Herkunftsland häufig sind. Dabei hilft eine Internetseite der CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).

Update Dermatologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise