Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Surgical Endoscopy
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2003

01.11.2003 | Original article

SAGES Appropriateness Conference: a summary

verfasst von: R. E. Glasgow, A. Fingerhut, J. Hunter

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 11/2003

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

This conference was organized to assess the relative appropriateness of laparoscopic vs open techniques for four clinical situations commonly encountered in surgical practice. Four topics were discussed—appendectomy, inguinal hernia repair, colon resection, and operations for gastroesophageal reflux disease. The goal was to determine the appropriateness of these procedures through a program of planned talks and panel discussions featuring internationally recognized experts and based on a review of the clinical evidence. For each subject, specific criteria were established a priori to ensure the accuracy and uniformity of the discussions and conclusions. These criteria included precise definitions, a determination as to how well the clinical evidence and the consensus on these topics could be generalized and communicated to the broader medical community, the description and standardization of traditional surgical endpoints, and the strength of the evidence. …
Literatur
1.
Affleck, DG, Handrahan, DL, Egger, MJ, Price, RR 1999The laparoscopic management of appendicitis and cholelithiasis during pregnancy.Am J Surg178523529CrossRefPubMed
2.
Attwood, SE, Hill, AD, Murphy, PG, Thornton, J, Stephens, RB 1992A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.Surgery112497501PubMed
3.
Krisher, SL, Browne, A, Dibbins, A, Tkacz, N, Curci, M 2001Intraabdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.Arch Surg136438441CrossRefPubMed
4.
Larsson, PG, Henriksson, G, Olsson, M, Boris, J, Stroberg, P, Tronstad, SE, Skullman, S 2001Laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendicectomies and improves diagnosis in fertile women: a randomized study.Surg Endosc15200202CrossRefPubMed
5.
Lintula, H, Kokki, H, Vanamo, K 2001Single-blind randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children.Br J Surg88510514CrossRefPubMed
6.
Long, KH, Bannon, MP, Zietlow, SP, Helgeson, ER, Harmsen, WS, Smith, CD, Ilstrup, DM, Baerga-Varela, Y, Sarr, MG 2001A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses.Surgery129390400CrossRefPubMed
7.
McCall, JL, Sharples, K, Jadallah, F 1997Systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open appendicectomy.Br J Surg8410451050PubMed
8.
Frazee, RC, Roberts, JW, Symmonds, RE, Snyder, SK, Hendricks, JC, Smith, RW, Custer 3rd, MD, Harrison, JB 1994A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy.Ann Surg219725728discussion 728–731PubMed
9.
Garbutt, JM, Soper, NJ, Shannon, WD, Botero, A, Littenberg, B 1999Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy.Surg Laparosc Endosc91726discussion 728–731CrossRefPubMed
10.
Golub, R, Siddiqui, F, Pohl, D 1998Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysis.J Am Coll Surg186545553discussion 728–731PubMed
11.
Hellberg, A, Rudberg, C, Kullman, E, Enochsson, L, Fenyo, G, Graffner, H, Hallerback, B, Johansson, B, Anderberg, B, Wenner, J,  et al. 1999Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy.Br J Surg864853discussion 728–731CrossRefPubMed
12.
Minne, L, Varner, D, Burnell, A, Ratzer, E, Clark, J, Haun, W 1997Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: prospective randomized study of outcomes.Arch Surg132708711discussion 712PubMed
13.
Nguyen, DB, Silen, W, Hodin, RA 1999Appendectomy in the pre- and postlaparoscopic eras.J Gastrointest Surg36773discussion 712
14.
Ortega, AE, Hunter, JG, Peters, JH, Swanstrom, LL, Schirmer, B 1995A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group.Am J Surg169208212discussion 212–203CrossRefPubMed
15.
Pedersen, AG, Petersen, OB, Wara, P, Ronning, H, Qvist, N, Laurberg, S 2001Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy.Br J Surg88200205discussion 212–203PubMed
16.
Reiertsen, O, Larsen, S, Trondsen, E, Edwin, B, Faerden, AE, Rosseland, AR 1997Randomized controlled trial with sequential design of laparoscopic versus conventional appendicectomy.Br J Surg84842847discussion 212–203PubMed
17.
Sauerland, S, Lefering, R, Holthausen, U, Neugebauer, EA 1998Laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy—a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Langenbecks Arch Surg383289295discussion 212–203PubMed
18.
Temple, LK, Litwin, DE, McLeod, RS 1999A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis.Can J Surg42377383discussion 212–203PubMed
19.
Wullstein, C, Barkhausen, S, Gross, E 2001Results of laparoscopic vs. conventional appendectomy in complicated appendicitis.Dis Colon Rectum4417001705discussion 212–203PubMed
20.
MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group 1999Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomised comparison.Lancet354185190discussion 212–203PubMed
21.
Barkun, JS, Wexler, MJ, Hinchey, EJ, Thibeault, D, Meakins, JL 1995Laparoscopic versus open inguinal herniorrhaphy: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial.Surgery118703709discussion 212–203PubMed
22.
Bay-Nielsen, M, Kehlet, H, Strand, L, Malmstrom, J, Andersen, FH, Wara, P, Juul, P, Callesen, T 2001Quality assessment of 26,304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark: a prospective nationwide study.Lancet35811241128Danish Hernia Database CollaborationPubMed
23.
Felix, EL, Michas, CA, Gonzalez Jr, MH 1995Laparoscopic hernioplasty: TAPP vs TEP.Surg Endosc9984989Danish Hernia Database CollaborationPubMed
24.
Ferzli, GS, Frezza, EE, Pecoraro Jr, AM, Ahern, KD 1999Prospective randomized study of stapled versus unstapled mesh in a laparoscopic preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.J Am Coll Surg188461465Danish Hernia Database CollaborationCrossRefPubMed
25.
Fitzgibbons Jr, RJ, Camps, J, Cornet, DA, Nguyen, NX, Litke, BS, Annibali, R, Salerno, GM 1995Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy: results of a multicenter trial.Ann Surg221313Danish Hernia Database CollaborationPubMed
26.
Dirksen, CD, Beets, GL, Go, PM, Geisler, FE, Baeten, CG, Kootstra, G 1998Bassini repair compared with laparoscopic repair for primary inguinal hernia: a randomised controlled trial.Eur J Surg164439447Danish Hernia Database CollaborationPubMed
27.
Johansson, B, Hallerback, B, Glise, H, Anesten, B, Smedberg, S 1999Laparoscopic mesh versus open preperitoneal mesh versus conventional technique for inguinal hernia repair: a randomized multicenter trial (SCUR Hernia Repair Study).Ann Surg230225231Danish Hernia Database CollaborationPubMed
28.
Juul, P, Christensen, K 1999Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair.Br J Surg86316319Danish Hernia Database CollaborationCrossRefPubMed
29.
Korman, JE, Hiatt, JR, Feldmar, D, Phillips, EH 1997Mesh configurations in laparoscopic extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy: a comparison of techniques.Surg Endosc1111021105Danish Hernia Database CollaborationCrossRefPubMed
30.
Liem, MS, Halsema, JA, van der Graaf, Y, Schrijvers, AJ, van Vroonhoven, TJ 1997Cost-effectiveness of extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison with conventional herniorrhaphy: Coala Trial Group.Ann Surg226668675discussion 675–676PubMed
31.
Liem, MS, van der Graaf, Y, van Steensel, CJ, Boelhouwer, RU, Clevers, GJ, Meijer, WS, Stassen, LP, Vente, JP, Weidema, WF, Schrijvers, AJ,  et al. 1997Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal-hernia repair.N Engl J Med33615411547discussion 675–676PubMed
32.
Paganini, AM, Lezoche, E, Carle, F, Carlei, F, Favretti, F, Feliciotti, F, Gesuita, R, Guerrieri, M, Lomanto, D, Nardovino, M,  et al. 1998A randomized, controlled, clinical study of laparoscopic vs open tension-free inguinal hernia repair.Surg Endosc12979986discussion 675–676PubMed
33.
Payne Jr, JH, Grininger, LM, Izawa, MT, Podoll, EF, Lindahl, PJ, Balfour, J 1994Laparoscopic or open inguinal herniorrhaphy? A randomized prospective trial.Arch Surg129973979discussion 675–676PubMed
34.
Sarli, L, Iusco, DR, Sansebastiano, G, Costi, R 2001Simultaneous repair of bilateral inguinal hernias: a prospective, randomized study of open, tension-free versus laparoscopic approach.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech11262267discussion 675–676PubMed
35.
Stoker, DL, Spiegelhalter, DJ, Singh, R, Wellwood, JM 1994Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: randomised prospective trial.Lancet34312431245discussion 675–676PubMed
36.
Thumbe, VK, Evans, DS 2001To repair or not to repair incidental defects found on laparoscopic repair of groin hernia: early results of a randomized control trial.Surg Endosc154749discussion 675–676
37.
Wellwood, J, Sculpher, MJ, Stoker, D, Nicholls, GJ, Geddes, C, Whitehead, A, Singh, R, Spiegelhalter, D 1998Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost.BMJ317103110discussion 675–676PubMed
38.
Zieren, J, Zieren, HU, Jacobi, CA, Wenger, FA, Muller, JM 1998Prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic and open tension-free inguinal hernia repair with Shouldice’s operation.Am J Surg175330333discussion 675–676PubMed
39.
Bouvet, M, Mansfield, PF, Skibber, JM, Curley, SA, Ellis, LM, Giacco, GG, Madary, AR, Ota, DM, Feig, BW 1998Clinical, pathologic, and economic parameters of laparoscopic colon resection for cancer.Am J Surg176554558discussion 675–676CrossRefPubMed
40.
Curet, MJ, Putrakul, K, Pitcher, DE, Josloff, RK, Zucker, KA 2000Laparoscopically assisted colon resection for colon carcinoma: perioperative results and long-term outcome.Surg Endosc1410621066discussion 675–676CrossRefPubMed
41.
Fleshman, JW, Nelson, H, Peters, WR, Kim, HC, Larach, S, Boorse, RR, Ambroze, W, Leggett, P, Bleday, R, Stryker, S,  et al. 1996Early results of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis of 372 patients treated by Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group.Dis Colon Rectum39S5358discussion 675–676PubMed
42.
Fleshman, JW, Wexner, SD, Anvari, M, LaTulippe, JF, Birnbaum, EH, Kodner, IJ, Read, TE, Nogueras, JJ, Weiss, EG 1999Laparoscopic vs. open abdominoperineal resection for cancer.Dis Colon Rectum42930939discussion 675–676PubMed
43.
Franklin Jr, ME, Rosenthal, D, Abrego-Medina, D, Dorman, JP, Glass, JL, Norem, R, Diaz, A 1996Prospective comparison of open vs. laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma: five-year results.Dis Colon Rectum39S3546discussion 675–676PubMed
44.
Hoffman, GC, Baker, JW, Doxey, JB, Hubbard, GW, Ruffin, WK, Wishner, JA 1996Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer: initial follow-up.Ann Surg223790796discussion 796–798CrossRefPubMed
45.
Khalili, TM, Fleshner, PR, Hiatt, JR, Sokol, TP, Manookian, C, Tsushima, G, Phillips, EH 1998Colorectal cancer: comparison of laparoscopic with open approaches.Dis Colon Rectum41832838discussion 796–798PubMed
46.
Lacy, AM, Garcia-Valdecasas, JC, Pique, JM, Delgado, S, Campo, E, Bordas, JM, Taura, P, Grande, L, Fuster, J, Pacheco, JL,  et al. 1995Short-term outcome analysis of a randomized study comparing laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer.Surg Endosc911011105discussion 796–798
47.
Lacy, AM, Delgado, S, Garcia-Valdecasas, JC, Castells, A, Pique, JM, Grande, L, Fuster, J, Targarona, EM, Pera, M, Visa, J 1998Port site metastases and recurrence after laparoscopic colectomy: a randomized trial.Surg Endosc1210391042discussion 796–798
48.
Leung, KL, Kwok, SP, Lau, WY, Meng, WC, Lam, TY, Kwong, KH, Chung, CC, Li, AK 1997Laparoscopic-assisted resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: immediate and medium-term results.Arch Surg132761764discussion 765PubMed
49.
Leung, KL, Yiu, RY, Lai, PB, Lee, JF, Thung, KH, Lau, WY 1999Laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: five-year audit.Dis Colon Rectum42327332discussion 332–333PubMed
50.
Lezoche, E, Feliciotti, F, Paganini, AM, Guerrieri, M, Campagnacci, R, De Sanctis, A 2000Laparoscopic colonic resections versus open surgery: a prospective non-randomized study on 310 unselected cases.Hepatogastroenterology47697708discussion 332–333
51.
Liberman, MA, Phillips, EH, Carroll, BJ, Fallas, M, Rosenthal, R 1996Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis: outcome and costs.Surg Endosc101518discussion 332–333
52.
Marcello, PW, Milsom, JW, Wong, SK, Brady, K, Goormastic, M, Fazio, VW 2001Laparoscopic total colectomy for acute colitis: a case-control study.Dis Colon Rectum4414411445discussion 332–333PubMed
53.
Nelson, H 2001Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer—a trial update.Swiss Surg7248251discussion 332–333PubMed
54.
Santoro, E, Carlini, M, Carboni, F, Feroce, A 1999Colorectal carcinoma: laparoscopic versus traditional open surgery: a clinical trial.Hepatogastroenterology46900904discussion 332–333
55.
Weeks, JC, Nelson, H, Gelber, S, Sargent, D, Schroeder, G 2002Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial.JAMA287321328discussion 332–333PubMed
56.
Wu, JS, Birnbaum, EH, Kodner, IJ, Fry, RD, Read, TE, Fleshman, JW 1997Laparoscopic-assisted ileocolic resections in patients with Crohn’s disease: are abscesses, phlegmons, or recurrent disease contraindications?Surgery122682688discussion 688–689PubMed
57.
Young-Fadok, TM, Radice, E, Nelson, H, Harmsen, WS 2000Benefits of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for colon polyps: a case-matched series.Mayo Clin Proc75344348discussion 688–689PubMed
58.
Young-Fadok, TM, Hall Long , K, McConnell, EJ, Gomez Rey, G, Cabanela, RL 2001Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn’s disease: improved outcomes and reduced costs.Surg Endosc15450454discussion 688–689CrossRefPubMed
59.
Bais, JE, Samsom, M, Boudesteijn, EA, van Rijk, PP, Akkermans, LM, Gooszen, HG 2001Impact of delayed gastric emptying on the outcome of antireflux surgery.Ann Surg234139146discussion 688–689CrossRefPubMed
60.
Bais, JE, Bartelsman, JF, Bonjer, HJ, Cuesta, MA, Go, PM, Klinkenberg-Knol, EC, van Lanschot, JJ, Nadorp, JH, Smout, AJ, van der Graaf, Y,  et al. 2000Laparoscopic or conventional Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: randomised clinical trial. The Netherlands Antireflux Surgery Study Group.Lancet355170174discussion 688–689CrossRefPubMed
61.
Eubanks, TR, Omelanczuk, P, Richards, C, Pohl, D, Pellegrini, CA 2000Outcomes of laparoscopic antireflux procedures.Am J Surg179391395discussion 688–689CrossRefPubMed
62.
Farrell, TM, Richardson, WS, Trus, TL, Smith, CD, Hunter, JG 2001Response of atypical symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux to antireflux surgery.Br J Surg8816491652discussion 688–689CrossRefPubMed
63.
Heikkinen, TJ, Haukipuro, K, Bringman, S, Ramel, S, Sorasto, A, Hulkko, A 2000Comparison of laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication 2 years after operation: a prospective randomized trial.Surg Endosc1410191023discussion 688–689CrossRefPubMed
64.
Hinder, RA, Filipi, CJ, Wetscher, G, Neary, P, DeMeester, TR, Perdikis, G 1994Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is an effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease.Ann Surg220472481discussion 481–83PubMed
65.
Hofstetter, WL, Peters, JH, DeMeester, TR, Hagen, JA, DeMeester, SR, Crookes, PF, Tsai, P, Banki, F, Bremner, CG 2001Long-term outcome of antireflux surgery in patients with Barrett’s esophagus.Ann Surg234532538discussion 538–539CrossRefPubMed
66.
Hunter, JG, Smith, CD, Branum, GD, Waring, JP, Trus, TL, Cornwell, M, Galloway, K 1999Laparoscopic fundoplication failures: patterns of failure and response to fundoplication revision.Ann Surg230595604discussion 604–596PubMed
67.
Jobe, BA, Horvath, KD, Swanstrom, LL 1998Postoperative function following laparoscopic collis gastroplasty for shortened esophagus.Arch Surg133867874discussion 604–596CrossRefPubMed
68.
Laine, S, Rantala, A, Gullichsen, R, Ovaska, J 1997Laparoscopic vs conventional Nissen fundoplication: a prospective randomized study.Surg Endosc11441444discussion 604–596CrossRefPubMed
69.
Lundell, L, Miettinen, P, Myrvold, HE, Pedersen, SA, Thor, K, Lamm, M, Blomqvist, A, Hatlebakk, JG, Janatuinen, E, Levander, K,  et al. 2000Long-term management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease with omeprazole or open antireflux surgery: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. The Nordic GORD Study Group.Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol12879887discussion 604–596PubMed
70.
Lundell, L, Miettinen, P, Myrvold, HE, Pedersen, SA, Liedman, B, Hatlebakk, JG, Julkonen, R, Levander, K, Carlsson, J, Lamm, M,  et al. 2001Continued (5-year) followup of a randomized clinical study comparing antireflux surgery and omeprazole in gastroesophageal reflux disease.J Am Coll Surg192172179discussion 179–181CrossRefPubMed
71.
Luostarinen, ME, Isolauri, JO 1999Randomized trial to study the effect of fundic mobilization on long-term results of Nissen fundoplication.Br J Surg86614618discussion 179–181CrossRefPubMed
72.
Myrvold, HE, Lundell, L, Miettinen, P, Pedersen, SA, Liedman, B, Hatlebakk, J, Julkunen, R, Levander, K, Lamm, M, Mattson, C,  et al. 2001The cost of long term therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a randomised trial comparing omeprazole and open antireflux surgery.Gut49488494discussion 179–181CrossRefPubMed
73.
Nilsson, G, Larsson, S, Johnsson, F 2000Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open fundoplication: blind evaluation of recovery and discharge period.Br J Surg87873878discussion 179–181CrossRefPubMed
74.
Ortiz, A, Martinez de Haro, LF, Parrilla, P, Morales, G, Molina, J, Bermejo, J, Liron, R, Aguilar, L 1996Conservative treatment versus antireflux surgery in Barrett’s oesophagus: long-term results of a prospective study.Br J Surg83274278discussion 179–181PubMed
75.
Pessaux, P, Arnaud, JP, Ghavami, B, Flament, JB, Trebuchet, G, Meyer, C, Huten, N, Champault, G 2000Laparoscopic antireflux surgery: comparative study of Nissen, Nissen-Rossetti, and Toupet fundoplication. Societe Francaise de Chirurgie Laparoscopique.Surg Endosc1410241027discussion 179–181PubMed
76.
Rantanen, TK, Salo, JA, Salminen, JT, Kellokumpu, IH 1999Functional outcome after laparoscopic or open Nissen fundoplication: a follow-up study.Arch Surg134240244discussion 179–181CrossRefPubMed
77.
Rydberg, L, Ruth, M, Abrahamsson, H, Lundell, L 1999Tailoring antireflux surgery: a randomized clinical trial.World J Surg23612618discussion 179–181PubMed
78.
Spechler, SJ 1992Comparison of medical and surgical therapy for complicated gastroesophageal reflux disease in veterans. The Department of Veterans Affairs Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Study Group.N Engl J Med326786792discussion 179–181PubMed
79.
Spechler, SJ, Lee, E, Ahnen, D, Goyal, RK, Hirano, I, Ramirez, F, Raufman, JP, Sampliner, R, Schnell, T, Sontag, S,  et al. 2001Long-term outcome of medical and surgical therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.JAMA28523312338discussion 179–181PubMed
80.
Wenner, J, Nilsson, G, Oberg, S, Melin, T, Larsson, S, Johnsson, F 2001Short-term outcome after laparoscopic and open 360 degrees fundoplication: a prospective randomized trial.Surg Endosc1511241128discussion 179–181PubMed
81.
Wetscher, GJ, Gadenstaetter, M, Klingler, PJ, Weiss, H, Obrist, P, Wykypiel, H, Klaus, A, Profanter, C 2001Efficacy of medical therapy and antireflux surgery to prevent Barrett’s metaplasia in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.Ann Surg234627632discussion 179–181PubMed
82.
Park, RE, Fink, A, Brook, RH, Chassin, MR, Kahn, KL, Merrick, NJ, Kosecoff, J, Solomon, DH 1986Physician ratings of appropriate indications for six medical and surgical procedures.Am J Public Health76766772PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
SAGES Appropriateness Conference: a summary
verfasst von
R. E. Glasgow
A. Fingerhut
J. Hunter
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2003
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 11/2003
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8125-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2003

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2003 Zur Ausgabe

Technique

Laparoscopic sutured anastomosis of the bowel

Original article

A prospective randomized study of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Case report

Anastomotic recurrence of rectal adenoma after anterior resection

Original article

Risk for laparoscopic fenestration of liver cysts

Original article

The laparoscopic experience of surgical graduates in the United States

Original article

Early postnatal behavior deficits after maternal carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum during pregnancy

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.
Bildnachweise