nach oben

BMC Primary Care

Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2022 | Research

Screen time increases overweight and obesity risk among adolescents: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis

verfasst von: Purya Haghjoo, Goli Siri, Ensiye Soleimani, Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi, Samira Alesaeidi

Erschienen in: BMC Primary Care | Ausgabe 1/2022

Abstract

Background

Adolescence is a critical period in human life, associated with reduced physical activity and increased sedentary behaviors. In this systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis, we evaluated the association between screen time and risk of overweight/obesity among adolescents.

Methods

A systematic search in electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Scopus was performed up to September 2021. All published studies evaluating the association between screen time and risk of overweight/obesity among adolescents were retrieved. Finally, a total of 44 eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis.

Results

The results of the two-class meta-analysis showed that adolescents at the highest category of screen time were 1.27 times more likely to develop overweight/obesity (OR = 1.273; 95% CI = 1.166–1.390; P < 0.001; I-squared (variation in ES attributable to heterogeneity) = 82.1%). The results of subgrouping showed that continent and setting were the possible sources of heterogeneity. Moreover, no evidence of non-linear association between increased screen time and risk of overweight/obesity among adolescents was observed (P-nonlinearity = 0.311).

Conclusion

For the first time, the current systematic review and meta-analysis revealed a positive association between screen time and overweight/obesity among adolescents without any dose-response evidence.

Trial registration

The protocol of the current work has been registered in the PROSPERO system (Registration number: CRD42021233899).

Additional file 1.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01761-4.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Background

Adolescence is a critical period regarding physical activity-related behaviors since regular physical activity decreases and sedentary behavior increases in this period [1, 2]. Screen-related physical activities like television watching are very common among adolescents particularly in modern societies; it is reported that adolescents spend about 3h per day on screen activities [3]. Screen time constitutes an important part of adolescents’ life, and they are major TV users [4, 5]. In a study, 57% of adolescents reported watching TV every day (average time in a day: 109 minutes) [6]. According to some recent evidence, increased screen-related sedentary behaviors led not only to obesity growth [7], but also to mental problems among adolescents [8‐12].

Sedentary behavior guidelines recommend less than 2h per day of recreational screen time for the youth [13]. However, it has been estimated that more than 50% of adolescents exceed this time [14]. In a report from the Health Behavior in School-Age Children (HBSC), which was performed among adolescents aged 11, 13, and 15 years in 41 European and North American countries, 56–65% of the adolescents spent 2h or more per day watching television [15, 16].

Sedentary behaviors are characterized by activities with low energy expenditure (< 1.5 metabolic equivalents) in a sitting position like television watching or other screen behaviors [17]. Such behaviors are an important risk factor for cardio-metabolic disease in adulthood [18‐21]. In adolescents, obesity is associated with dyslipidemia, glucose intolerance, and hypertension [22]. In several population-based studies [23‐25], high screen time was positively associated with high blood pressure (BP), high low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and triglyceride (TG) (P < 0.05).

Numerous studies have reported the association between screen time and adiposity among adolescents; however, the results are inconsistent. Some studies reported increased odds of obesity by increasing screen time [22, 26, 27]. For example, Cheng [26] included 2201 Chinese adolescents and reported increased odds of obesity for those with more than 2h of screen time per day (1.53; 95%CI = 0.95–2.09; P < 0.001). In contrary, in another population-based study in the school setting, Lopez-Gonzalez evaluated 1,319,293 adolescents aged 12–14 years old and reported no significant association between obesity and screen time [28]. Several other studies also reported no association between obesity and screen time [28‐31]. Meanwhile, in some other studies, only watching television or playing video games for more than 3h per day increased the risk of obesity among adolescents [32‐34]. More surprisingly, in a study by De-Lima et al. [35], a non-significant reduced risk of excess weight was observed by increased screen time of more than 4h per day (P = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.59–1.30).

As mentioned, there is an inconsistency between the results of different studies regarding the association between screen time and overweight/obesity among adolescents. In today’s digital age, screen time is almost unavoidable and it has drastically increased among children and adolescents, especially during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Excessive screen time may have adverse health consequences because it replaces healthy behaviors and habits like physical activity and sleep routine [36, 37]. However, currently, there is no systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the association between screen time and obesity among adolescents. More importantly, no study in this filed has focused on such dimensions as the type of screen (TV, PC, DVD, video games, etc.), duration of screen use, and several other factors affecting the association between overweight/obesity and screen time.

Therefore, in this systematic review and meta-analysis, we systematically searched and analyzed all the available literature evaluating the association between overweight/obesity and screen time among adolescents. We also classified the results according to numerous factors, including geographical distribution, screen type, setting, obesity status, as well as the quality and sample size of studies to identify the possible determinants of these associations.

Methods

The results were reported according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist (Sup. Table 1) [38]. The protocol’s registration code in PROSPERO is CRD42021233899.

Search strategy, selection of studies, inclusion and exclusion criteria

A total of 6291 articles were retrieved through searching electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Scopus up to September 2021 (Fig. 1). The search strategy for PubMed is provided in Sup. Table 2, and it has been adopted for each electronic database. A total of 44 manuscripts were eligible to be included in the final meta-synthesis.

The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) studies with observational designs (case control, cross-sectional or cohort studies with the baseline or cross-sectional measurement of study parameters), 2) studies evaluating the relationship (OR, RR, or HR) between screen time and risk of overweight/obesity, and (3) studies conducted only among adolescents (age ≥ 10–20 years). The studeis that did not provide an OR, RR, or HR or those with adjustment for confounders were excluded from the analysis.

The PICO model (patients, intervention, comparison, outcome), which is one of the most widely used models for formulating clinical questions, was used for selecting the studies (Table 1).

Table 1

The PICO criteria used for the systematic review

PICO criteria	Description
Participants	Adolescents population
Exposure (Interventions)	Highest category of screen time
Comparisons	Lowest category of screen time
Outcome	Overweight/ obesity
Study design	Observational studies with the design of cross-sectional, case control or cohort

Data extraction and quality assessment

Data extraction was done by two authors in a standard EXCELL datasheet. The data sheet included the following information: name of first author and journal, publication year, country, setting, age range, number of participants, study design, adjusted covariate, gender, definition of overweight/obesity and screen time, overweight/obesity status, weight, height, screen time measurement tools, and main results. Any disagreements between reviewers were resolved by discussion. The methodological quality of studies were assessed using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) checklist [54] (Table 2).

Table 2

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) checklist to assess quality of the cross-sectional studies

ARHQ Methodology Checklist items for Cross-Sectional study	Zhang Y [39]	De-Lima TR [35]	Zulfiqar T [33]	Kerkadi A [30]	Hu J [99]	De-Jong E [40]	Franceschin MJ [22]		Dalamaria, T [27]	Cheng L [100]
1) Define the source of information (survey, record review)	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕		⊕	⊕
2) List inclusion and exclusion criteria for exposed and unexposed subjects (cases and controls) or refer to previous publications	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕		⊕	⊕
3) Indicate time period used for identifying patients	⊕	⊕	⊕	_	⊕	⊕	⊕		⊕	⊕
4) Indicate whether or not subjects were consecutive if not population-based	⊕	–	–	⊕	–	–	–		–	–
5) Indicate if evaluators of subjective components of study were masked to other aspects of the status of the participants	–	–	–	U	–	–	–		–	–
6) Describe any assessments undertaken for quality assurance purposes (e.g., test/retest of primary outcome measurements)	–	–	U	U	U	U	U		U	⊕
7) Explain any patient exclusions from analysis	⊕	⊕	⊕	_	⊕	–	⊕		–	⊕
8) Describe how confounding was assessed and/or controlled.	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	–		⊕	⊕
9) If applicable, explain how missing data were handled in the analysis	⊕	–	⊕	⊕	⊕	–	⊕		⊕	⊕
10) Summarize patient response rates and completeness of data collection	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	–	⊕		⊕	⊕
11) Clarify what follow-up, if any, was expected and the percentage of patients for which incomplete data or follow-up was obtained	–	–	–	⊕	–	–	–		–	–
Total score	8	6	7	7	7	4	6		6	8
ARHQ Methodology Checklist items for Cross-Sectional study	Lopez-GonzalezD [28]	Pabón D [41]	Haidar A [29]	Saha M [31]	Mansoori M [42]	Godakanda I [43]	Talat MA [44]		Piryani MA [44]	Moradi G [45]
1) Define the source of information (survey, record review)	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕		⊕	⊕
2) List inclusion and exclusion criteria for exposed and unexposed subjects (cases and controls) or refer to previous publications	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕		⊕	⊕
3) Indicate time period used for identifying patients	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕		⊕	⊕
4) Indicate whether or not subjects were consecutive if not population-based	⊕	–	–	–	–	–	⊕		–	–
5) Indicate if evaluators of subjective components of study were masked to other aspects of the status of the participants	U	U	U	–	–	U	U		U	–
6) Describe any assessments undertaken for quality assurance purposes (e.g., test/retest of primary outcome measurements)	U	U	U	–	⊕	U	U		U	–
7) Explain any patient exclusions from analysis	_	_	_	–	⊕	⊕	_		_	–
8) Describe how confounding was assessed and/or controlled.	⊕	⊕	–	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕		⊕	⊕
9) If applicable, explain how missing data were handled in the analysis	⊕	⊕	⊕	–	–	⊕	–		–	–
10) Summarize patient response rates and completeness of data collection	⊕	–	–	–	⊕	–	–		–	–
11) Clarify what follow-up, if any, was expected and the percentage of patients for which incomplete data or follow-up was obtained	⊕	–	–	–	–	⊕	–		–	–
Total score	8	5	4	4	7	7	5		4	4
ARHQ Methodology Checklist items for Cross-Sectional study	Watharkar A [46]	De- Lucena JMS [47]	Velásquez-Rodríguez CM [48]	De Jong E [40]	Ercan S [49]	Collins AE [34]	Drake KM [50]	Sun Y [32]	Adesina AF [51]	El-Gilany AH [52]	Byun W [53]
1) Define the source of information (survey, record review)	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕
2) List inclusion and exclusion criteria for exposed and unexposed subjects (cases and controls) or refer to previous publications	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕
3) Indicate time period used for identifying patients	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕
4) Indicate whether or not subjects were consecutive if not population-based	–	⊕	–	⊕	–	–	⊕	–	–	⊕	⊕
5) Indicate if evaluators of subjective components of study were masked to other aspects of the status of the participants	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
6) Describe any assessments undertaken for quality assurance purposes (e.g., test/retest of primary outcome measurements)	–	U	–	U	–	–	–	U	–	⊕	⊕
7) Explain any patient exclusions from analysis	–	⊕	⊕	⊕	–	–	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕	⊕
8) Describe how confounding was assessed and/or controlled.	U	⊕	–	⊕	U	U	⊕	⊕	U	⊕	⊕
9) If applicable, explain how missing data were handled in the analysis	–	–	⊕	–	–	–	⊕	–	–	⊕	⊕
10) Summarize patient response rates and completeness of data collection	–	⊕	–	⊕	–	–	⊕	⊕	–	⊕	⊕
11) Clarify what follow-up, if any, was expected and the percentage of patients for which incomplete data or follow-up was obtained	–	–	–	–	–	–	⊕	–	–	–	–
Total score	3	7	5	7	3	3	8	6	4	8	8

Definitions

The Oxford English Dictionary defines screen time as “the time spent using a device such as a computer, or games” [55]. In the current meta-analysis, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), screen time was defined as “the time spent passively watching screen-based entertainment (TV, computer, and mobile devices); this does not include active screen-based games where physical activity or movement is required” [56]. Therefore, TV watching, smart phone use, internet and computer use, and video games that are played in sedentary position are considered as screen time. As previously described by the WHO, adolescence is defined as the age range of 10–19 years old [57]. Overweight and obesity were defined as follows: (a) as Z score for the body mass index (BMI) for age with the cut-off points of > 1 to ≤2 standard deviations for overweight and values > 2 standard deviations for obesity [58]; (b) as the international age and sex specific cut-offs of BMI [≥85th percentile and less than 95th percentile for overweight and ≥ 95th for obesity [46]; and (c) as BMI cut-off of overweight 25 ≤ BMI ≤ 30 kg/m² and obesity BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² [59].

Statistical analysis

STATA version 13 (STATA Corp, College Station, TX, USA) was used for data analysis and P-values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant. The studies reporting the odds ratio (OR) of overweight/obesity in people with highest versus lowest screen time were included in the two-class dose-response meta-analysis. In the two-class meta-analysis, the pooled OR with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using a weighted random-effect model (the DerSimonian-Laird approach). If the number of participants in the categories were not provided, equal number of participants in each category was assumed. Cochran’s Q and I-squared tests were used to identify between-study heterogeneity as follows: I² <25%, no heterogeneity; I² = 25–50%, moderate heterogeneity; and I² > 50%, high heterogeneity [60].

The possible sources of heterogeneity were identified using subgrouping approach. For subgrouping, the possible confounders were chosen (e.g., continent, screen type, age group, setting, overweight/obesity status, sample size, and quality of study). Begg’s funnel plot was used to evaluate the publication bias followed by the Egger’s regression asymmetry test and Begg’s adjusted rank correlation for formal statistical assessment of funnel plot asymmetry. Because of an evidence of publication bias, trim-and-fill method was used for estimating potentially missing studies due to publication bias in the funnel plot and adjusting the overall effect estimate. For dose-response meta-analysis, only the studies that reported at least three categories for screen time and the odds of overweight/obesity were included in the dose-response meta-analysis. Accordingly, 13 different studies published in five articles were included [61‐73]. The median point in each screen time category was identified; when medians were not reported, approximate medians were estimated using the midpoint of the lower and upper limits. When the lowest or highest screen time categories were open-ended, the screen time was calculated by assuming the similar interval for those categories and estimating the mid-point. The reference category was the lowest one, assuming OR and CIs of 1 for it. The potential non-linear associations were assessed using random-effects dose-response meta-analysis by defining the restricted cubic splines with three knots at fixed percentiles (10, 50, and 90%) of distribution, and were used to calculate study-specific ORs.

Results

Study characteristics

General characteristics of included studies are represented in Table 3. In the meta-analysis of the odds of overweight/obesity among high screen-user adolescents, a total of 44 studies were included. Also, some of the studies reported the results separately for both genders [28], or reported the separate results for each of the screen types [31, 33, 43, 46, 74], or according to overweight/obesity status [29, 41]. The study by Velásquez-Rodríguez [48] reported separate results for healthy adolescents and adolescents with insulin resistance. Generally, the studies had a cross-sectional design, or cross-sectional data from cohort studies were used for data analysis [32]. The age range of the participants in the included studies was 10–19 years old. The studies had been performed in the United States [29, 41, 43, 74], Brazil [22, 27, 35, 47], Egypt [44, 52], China [26, 39], Iran [45], Indonesia [34], Japan [32], Nigeria [51], Pakistan [42], Nepal [75], Bangladesh [31], Qatar [30], Australia [33], Mexico [28], India [46], Finland [48], Netherland [40], Turkey [49], England [50], and South Korea [53]. The screen time was assessed by validated questionnaires and overweight and obesity definitions were according to (a) as Z score for the BMI for age with the cut-off points of > 1 to ≤2 standard deviations for overweight and values > 2 standard deviations for obesity [58]; (b) as the international age and sex specific cut- offs of BMI [≥ 85th percentile and less than 95th percentile for overweight and ≥ 95th for obesity [46] and (c) as BMI cut-off of overweight 25 ≤ BMI ≤ 30 kg/m² and obesity BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² [59]. All the studies included in the meta-analysis reported an adjusted OR that was adjusted according to the confounders, including age, gender, race, nationality, dietary behaviors, parents’ education, occupation, and socio-economic status.

Table 3

The characteristics of studies that evaluated the association between overweight and obesity risk by increased screen time among adolescents

Journal/ Year/ First author	Country	Setting/ num	Design	Age (y)/ gender	Overweight/ obesity status and definition	ST definition	Adjusted variables	Main findings
Revista Paulista de Pediatria/ 2021/ Dalamaria T [27]	Brazil	School/ 1387	Cross-sectional	14–18/ both	Obesity/ ≥85th percentile of age	Internet addiction	None	Increased odds of obesity in internet addicted adolescents [OR = 1.1; CI = 0.9–3.18]. Not adjusted
BMC Public Health/ 2020/ Zhang Y [39]	China	School/ 2264	Cross-sectional	12–15/ both	Obesity/ ≥85th percentile of age	TV, VG, PC	Age, sex, being the single child, ethnic minority, fruit and vegetable intake, sleep time, parents’ Education, fathers’ occupation.	Non-significant association between screen time and odds of obesity.
Nutrients/ 2020/ Lopez-Gonzalez D [28]	Mexico	School/309 girl; 340 boys	Cross-sectional	12–17/ both	Overweight/ obesity defined as ≤95th and ≥ 85th and ≥ 95th percentile of age respectively	TV, electronic games	Stratified by age and sex	Non-significant association between obesity and screen time.
Rev Bras Cineantropometri Desempenho Hum/ 2020/ Franceschin MJ [22]	Brazil	School/ 1015	Cross-sectional	15.3/ both	Overweight/ obesity defined as 1 ≤ BMI Z-score < 2	TV, Video game or PC	Sex, age, type of school attended and dietary energy intake	A significant increased odds of overweight/ obesity in those with more than 2 hours per day TV watching (1.73 (1.24–2.42). The OR for PC and video games was 1.01 (0.71–1.45).
Revista Paulista de Pediatria/ 2020/ De Lima TR [35]	Brazil	School/ 583	Cross-sectional	11–17/ both	Overweight defined as BMI Z-score ≥ 1	TV, Video game or PC	Gender, maternal schooling, alcohol consumption, smoking, screen time-sedentary behavior	Non-significant reduced risk of excess weight by increased screen time of more than 4 hours/day (0.87 CI = 0.59–1.30)
Public Health Nutrition/ 2020/ Cheng L [26]	China	School/ 2201	Cross-sectional	10/ both	Obesity/ ≥95th percentile of age	TV/video games/ PC/iPad/ phone	Sex, age and school location (rural or urban) with school as a random effect	Increased odds of obesity for those with more than 2 hours/ d screen time (1.53; CI = 0.95–2.09)
J Immigrant Minor health/ 2019/ Zulfiqar T [33]	Australia	Community/ 2115 girls and 2000 boys	Cross-sectional	10–11/ both	Overweight/ obesity +BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²	TV, electronic games	Sleep issues, breastfeeding, birth weight, siblings, foreign language spoken at home, maternal work status, family SEP, maternal partnership status	TV watching of more than 3 hours/ day in weekends was associated with odds of obesity in boys (1.4 (1.0,1.9) and girls (1.5 (1.1,1.9) P < 0.05
In J Environ Res Pub Health/ 2019/ Kerkadi A [30]	Qatar	Community/ 1161	Cross-sectional	14–18/ both	Overweight 25 ≤ BMI ≤ 30 kg/m² and obesity BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²	TV, Video game or PC	Age, nationality	No significant association between screen time of more than 2 hours/ day and risk of overweight/ obesity (OR = 1; CI = 0.7–1.4)
Plos One/ 2019/ Pabon et al. [41]	USA	Community/ 2358 + 546	Cross-sectional	13–17/ both	Overweight/ obesity defined as 1 ≤ BMI Z-score < 2	TV, Video game	Age, sex, socioeconomic level, geographic area, ethnic group and exposure to television and / or video games.	No significant association between increased screen time and risk of overweight or obesity.
BMC Public Health/ 2019/ Haidar A [29]	USA	School/ 6716	Cross-sectional	14.88/ both	Overweight/ obesity defined as ≤95th and ≥ 85th and ≥ 95th percentile of age respectively	TV, DVD, movies	Grade, gender, ethnicity, weight, SES, parents’ education level	No significant association between increased screen time and risk of overweight or obesity.
J Nepal Health Res Counc/ 2018/ Saha M [31]	Bangladesh	School/ 288	Cross-sectional	10–14/ both	Obesity defined as ≥95th percentile of age	TV, Video game, PC	None	No significant association between increased screen time and risk of overweight or obesity.
Tropical Doctor/ 2018/ Mansouri N [42]	Pakistan	School/ 887	Cross-sectional	11–15/ both	Overweight defined as ≤95th and ≥ 85th percentile of age	TV	Age, sex, type of school, sleeping soft drink consumption	Watching TV more than 2 hours/ day was associated with increased risk of overweight (6.42 (4.32–9.54) P < 0.0001)
Prev Chronic Dis/ 2018/ Hu EY [74]	USA	School/ 15,624	Cross-sectional	14–18/ both	Obesity defined as ≥95th percentile of age	TV, Video or computer game, PC use	Age, sex, and race/ethnicity	Increased risk of obesity for those with more than 3 hours/ day TV watching (1.38 (1.09–1.76) and more than 3 hours video game or PC use (1.19 (0.98–1.43)
BMC Res Notes/ 2018/ Godakanda I [43]	USA	School/ 880	Cross-sectional	14–15/ both	Overweight defined as BMI Z-score ≥ 1	TV, Video/ DVD	Age, sex, ethnicity, schooling years	Television watching time ≥ 2 h/day (2.6 (1.7–3.8) and Video/DVD watching ≥2 h/day (3.1 (1.8–5.3) were associated with increased risk of overweight.
Egypt Ped Assoc Gazette/ 2016/ Talat MA [44]	Egypt	School/ 900	Cross-sectional	12–15/both	Overweight/ obesity defined as ≤95th and ≥ 85th and ≥ 95th percentile of age respectively	TV	Age, gender, SES	More than 2 hours TV watching was associated with increased risk of obesity (1.36 CI = 0.45–6.8; P = 0.048)
BMJ Open/ 2016/ Piryani S [75]	Nepal	School/ 360	Cross-sectional	16–19/ both	Overweight defined as BMI Z-score ≥ 1	TV	Age, sex, ethnicity, type of school, mother’s educational and occupation, family type, number of siblings, SES, watching TV and fruit consumption	Watching TV more than 2 hours/ day was associated with increased risk of obesity (OR = 8.86 (3.90 to 20.11) < 0.001
Med J Islamic Rep Iran/ 2016/ Moradi G [45]	Iran	School/ 2506	Cross-sectional	10–12/ both	Overweight/ obesity defined as ≤95th and ≥ 85th and ≥ 95th percentile of age respectively	TV, VG	Age, sex, SES	Screen time was associated with increased risk of overweight and obesity (1.41 (1.17–1.69)
Indian J Comm Health/ 2015/ Watharkar A [46]	India	School/ 806	Cross-sectional	12–15/ both	Overweight/ obesity defined as ≤95th and ≥ 85th and ≥ 95th percentile of age respectively	TV, PC, cell phone	None	Increased risk of overweight obesity for those with more than 2 hours TV watching (OR = 3.72; CI = 2.38–5.83) or more than 2 hours computer or mobile phone use (OR = 1.68; CI = 1.09–2.57)
Revista Paulista de Pediatria/ 2015/ De Lucena JMS [47]	Brazil	School/ 2874	Cross-sectional	14–19/ both	Overweight 25 ≤ BMI ≤ 30 kg/m² and obesity BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²	TV, PC, VG	None	Excessive screen time was associated with increased risk of overweight/ obesity (1.25 (0.93–1.67)
BMC Pediatr/ 2014/ Velásquez-Rodríguez CM [48]	Finland	Community/ 120	Cross-sectional	10–18/ both	Overweight defined as ≤95th and ≥ 85th percentile of age	TV	None	Increased risk of overweight in excessive TV watchers among adolescents with insulin resistance (OR = 2.39; CI = 0.94–6.05) but not among healthy adolescents.
Int J Obes/ 2013/ De Jong E [40]	Netherland	School/ 2004 + 2068	Cross-sectional	10–13/ both	Overweight 25 ≤ BMI ≤ 30 kg/m² and obesity BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²	TV, PC	Family characteristics and lifestyle nutrition behaviours	No significant association between TV watching more than 1.5 hours or PC use of more than 30 minutes and overweight/ obesity.
JCRPE/ 2012/ Ercan S [49]	Turkey	School/ 8848	Cross- sectional	11–18/ both	Overweight 25 ≤ BMI ≤ 30 kg/m² and obesity BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²	TV, PC	None	Increased risk of overweight and obesity for those with more than 2 hours TV watching or PC use.
Pediatrics/ 2012/ Drake KM [50]	England	School/ 1718	Cross-sectional	12–18/ both	Overweight/ obesity defined as ≤95th and ≥ 85th and ≥ 95th percentile of age respectively	TV, DVD, video game	Adolescent demographics (gender, grade in school, race [white/nonwhite]);screen time; academic performance; employment status; diet quality (fast food, fruit and vegetable consumption over the past week)	Screen time of 7.1–14 and > 14 hours/week was associated with increased obesity risk of OR = 1.28 CI = 1.06, 1.55; P < 0.05 and OR = 1.37 CI = 1.09, 1.71; P < 0.01 respectively.
J Korean Med Sci/ 2012/ Byun W [53]	Korea	Community/ 1033	Cross-sectional	12–18/ both	Overweight/ obesity defined as ≥95th percentile of age	TV, PC, video game	Age, sex, annual household income, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity	Increased risk of overweight and obesity was observed by increased screen time
Ital J Pediatr / 2012/ Adesina AF [51]	Nigeria	School/ 690	Cross-sectional	10–19/ both	Overweight/ obesity defined as ≤95th and ≥ 85th and ≥ 95th percentile of age respectively	TV	None	Increased risk of overweight and obesity was observed by increased screen time
Childhood Obesity/ 2011/ El-Gilany AH [52]	Egypt	School/ 953	Cross-sectional	14–19/ both	Overweight defined as ≤95th and ≥ 85th percentile of age	TV, PC	Age, sex, socioeconomic level, geographic area, ethnicity	Increased risk of overweight/ obesity for those with more than 2 hours TV watching (2.6 (1.7–3.9) or more than 2 hours computer use (1.8 (1.3–2.5)
J Epidemiol/ 2009/ Sun Y [32]	Japan	School/ 2842	Cross-sectional data of an original cohort	12–13/ both	Overweight 25 ≤ BMI ≤ 30 kg/m²	TV, VG	Age, parental overweight, and other lifestyle variables	Watching TV more than 3 hours/ d was associated with increased risk of overweight in boys (OR = 1.79; CI = 1.21–2.67 and girls OR = 2.37; CI = 1.55–3.62; P < 0.001
Int J Pediatr Obes/ 2008/ Collins AE [34]	Indonesia	School/ 1758	Cross-sectional	12–15/ both	Obesity defined as BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²	PC, PS	None	Increased risk of obesity in those with more than 3 hours/ d PC use (OR = 1.85; CI = 1.04–3.29) or play station use (OR = 1.94; CI = 1.23–3.05)

Abbreviations: BMI Body mass index, TV Television, ST Screen time, SBP Systolic blood pressure, DBP Diastolic blood pressure, PC Personal computer, DVD Digital video discs, VCDs Video compact disc digital, SEP Socioeconomic position, SES Socioeconomic status, ST Measurement in all of the studies was performed by questionnaire. All of the included participants were apparently healthy

The results of the meta-analysis

In the current meta-analysis, after searching the electronic databases, a total of 6291 articles were retrieved (Fig. 1). After removing 2600 duplicated studies and 1535 records according to title/abstarct irrelevancy, 2156 artciles remained for final full-text screening. Then, 2112 manuscripts were removed due to not meeting the inclusion criteria. Finally, 44 manuscripts with a total number of 112,489 participants were included in the final meta-analysis. The included stdueis had a cross-sectional design and recruitted both genders.

The results of the two-class meta-analysis is presented in Fig. 2. As can be seen, adolescents in the highest category of screen time were 1.27 times more likely to develop overweight/obesity compared to those in the lowest category (OR = 1.273; 95%CI = 1.166–1.390; P < 0.001; I-squared = 82.1%).

The results of subgrouping is shown in Table 4. Subgrouping according to continent reduced heterogeneity to some degree. For example, in the studies carried out in the United States, the heterogeneity reduced to 39.9%. Similarly, setting also was a possible source of heterogenity since subgropuing by setting reduced the heterogenity of community-based studies to 21.2%. However, other parameters were not potent sources of heterogeneity.

Table 4

Subgroup analysis for the odds of overweight/ obesity in highest versus lowest screen-user adolescents

Group	No. of studies^*	OR (95% CI)	P _{within group}	P _{between group *}	P _{heterogeneity}	I², %
Total	44	1.273 1.166 1.390	< 0.001		< 0.001	82.1
Continent				< 0.001
America	11	1.115 1.002 1.241	0.046		0.083	39.9
Europe	10	1.080 0.966 1.208	0.276		0.002	66.2
Asia	11	2.014 1.450 2.798	< 0.001		< 0.001	90.9
Oceania	8	1.099 0.927 1.304	0.278		0.056	49.1
Africa	4	1.646 1.018 2.660	0.042		< 0.001	86.9
Screen type				< 0.001
TV	16	1.813 1.420 2.315	< 0.001		< 0.001	86.7
PC	3	1.467 0.950 2.265	0.509		0.159	45.7
VG	5	1.114 0.808 1.536	0.084		0.014	67.9
TV + VG	5	1.094 0.959 1.248	0.184		0.107	47.5
VG + PC	2	1.106 1.030 1.187	0.005		0.612	0
TV + VG + PC	13	1.068 0.974 1.172	0.163		0.002	60.7
Age group				< 0.001
< 15	23	1.375 1.131 1.672	0.001		< 0.001	81.9
≥ 15	6	1.470 1.076 2.008	0.016		< 0.001	82.8
Both	15	1.126 1.032 1.228	0.008		< 0.001	76.4
Setting				< 0.001
School	31	1.405 1.228 1.608	< 0.001		< 0.001	86.6
Community	13	1.109 1.040 1.182	0.002		0.229	21.2
Obesity status				< 0.001
Obesity	11	1.109 0.964 1.275	0.150		0.001	67.0
Overweight	9	1.567 1.282 1.916	< 0.001		< 0.001	84.1
Overweight/ obesity	24	1.271 1.105 1.463	0.001		< 0.001	87
Sample size				< 0.001
1000 >	11	2.024 1.303 3.144	0.002		< 0.001	90.9
1000–5000	27	1.121 1.049 1.198	0.001		< 0.001	59.9
≥ 5000	6	1.323 1.017 1.722	0.037		0.001	75.7
Study quality *				< 0.001
Low	0	–		–	–	–
Moderate	31	1.259 1.085 1.461	< 0.001		< 0.001	80.3
High	13	1.282 1.146 1.435	0.002		< 0.001	84.4
Adjusted covariates				< 0.001
Age, sex, nationality, SES	7	1.239 1.116 1.377	< 0.001		0.586	0
Age, sex, nationality, SES, other demographic variables	14	1.454 1.251 1.690	< 0.001		< 0.001	87.3
Age, sex, nationality, SES, other demographic variables, dietary habits	23	1.091 0.982 1.212	0.107		< 0.001	64.8

*low quality = 0–3; moderate quality = 4–7; high quality ≥8; all of the included studies were in moderate quality group therefore, subgrouping was not performed

The results of dose-response relationship between screen time and overweight/obesity is presented in Fig. 3. There was no evidence of non-linear association between increased screen time and risk of overweight/obesity (P-nonlinearity = 0.311).

Funnel plots indicating publication bias are presented in Fig. 4. The results of Begg’s and Egger’s tests showed some evidence of publication bias (Egger’s P-value = 0.001; Begg’s P-value = 0.001). Therefore, trim-and-fill analysis was performed (Fig. 5) and the obtained results were reported (95%OR = 1.472; 95% CI = 1.083–2.068; P < 0.001).

Discussion

In the current meta-analysis, for the first time, we summarized the results of studies that evaluated the association between screen time and overweight/obesity risk among adolescents. In addition, in a large sample size (n = 112,489), we witnessed that high screen time was associated with 1.27-time higher chance of overweight/obesity among adolescents. No evidence of non-linear association was observed in the dose-response analysis.

Previous population-based studies have revealed the obesity-promoting effects of high screen time. Lopez-Gonzalez [28] evaluated more than 7511 registered schools and reported that high screen time was considered as an obesogenic factor. Several other studies also revealed that screen time more than two or 3h per day increased the risk of obesity [26, 33]. Internet addicted adolescents had also elevated risk of obesity in one study [27]. However, several other studies reported no significant association between obesity and screen time [30, 35, 41]. The possible strong reason for this inconsistency might be attributed to the type of screen (e.g., TV, video games, PCs, etc.) used in different studies.

In this study, we also performed subgroup analysis. According to the results, the studies that defined video games as their screen failed to reveal a positive association between screen time and obesity [31, 39, 41]. In our meta-analysis, video games alone or in combination with other screen types failed to show a positive obesity-promoting effect. In the study by Sun et al. [32], the positive association between video game playing and risk of obesity was only observed among girls and not boys. Zulfiqar et al. [33], also reported the positive association between obesity and TV watching, but not for video games. Several studies even showed the negative association between active video games and obesity. In the study by Strahan et al. [76], active video games reduced the chance of obesity among adolescents. This is possibly because some video games can increase physical activity and physical health. In a meta-analysis by Primack et al., video games were associated with 69% improve in psychological therapy outcomes and 50% improve in physical activity outcomes [77]. In another study by Williams, active video games were introduced as effective tools to improve physical activity among adolescents and were considered as a more acceptable and sustainable approach than many conventional methods [78].

In our meta-analysis, the most important obesogenic screen was TV (OR = 1.813; 95%CI: 1.420–2.315, P < 0.001). In the study by Franceschin et al. [22], adolescents watching TV for more than 2h per day had almost doubled chance of being obese compared to those watching TV for less than 2h per day (OR = 1.73; 95% CI = 1.24–2.42); but the association was not significant for playing video games or using the PC. Therefore, it seems that TV watching is a stronger motivator of obesity among adolescents. Also, the age group is a determinant of screen type use and the consequent obesity. In our study, most of the included studies had been performed in adolescents less than 15 years old and the association between screen time and overweight/obesity in this age group was stronger (P < 0.001) because at lower ages, children and adolescents have less structured time than older adolescents and most of this unstructured time is filled by watching TV [51, 79]. Another important finding in our subgrouping was the role of setting. In school-based studies, the association between screen time and overweight/obesity was more pronounced than other study types (OR = 1.405; 95% CI: 1.228–1.608; P < 0.001) because adolescents usually have more tendency to eat calorie foods in restaurants. Most of the adolescents buy lunch at school canteen and restaurants and are more likely to develop overweight and obesity [80].

High screen time, as a sedentary behavior, reduces lipoprotein lipase activity (LPL) and leads to reduced plasma triglycerides’ absorption by skeletal muscles, reduced HDL level and postprandial increase in serum lipids, that consequently results in fat deposition in vessels or adipose tissue [81‐83]. Moreover, increased screen time increases food intake. Previous studies revealed that television watching increases motivated response to food intake and snacking behavior among children and adolescents [4, 84‐87]; this is also true for video games [88‐90] and personal computer use [91, 92]. More importantly, several TV food advertisements promote the consumption of junk food and fast foods and increase the risk of obesity [93‐98]. Therefore, the association between obesity and screen use is a multi-dimensional factor. Also, the results of included studies in our meta-analysis were reported for both genders; therefore, it was not possible to give gender-specific results.

This study had some limitations. First, this study had a cross-sectional design, which precludes causal inference. Second, the data collection method for screen time measurement was self-reported questionnaires that might be biased. Third, we were not able to perform subgroup analysis for some important confounders, such as eating food while watching screen, type of video games (active or non-active), and gender because the articles had not mentioned such information.

However, this is the first meta-analysis reporting the association between screen time and overweight/obesity among adolescents. We raised concerns among parents, health care professionals, educators, and researchers about the effects of screen time on the health of adolescents. Our study has some important clinical and health implications for policy makers to develop strategies to encourage adolescents to be more physically active and to apply some restrictions for school-based meal servings. They can also improve access of adolescents to opportunities for physical activity, as is the case with state laws related to the quantity and quality of physical education. Also, parents should pay more attention to the adolescents’ screen-based behaviors and apply some at-home restrictions. Setting restrictions on screen use at certain times is a great way to protect adolescents from potentially harmful online activities and encourages them to use their time appropriately.

Conclusion

The current meta-analysis is the first study providing quantitative results for the association between different screen types and overweight/obesity among adolescents. Further studies are warranted to focus on the effects of gender, different screen types and video games to better explain the discrepancies in the obtained results.

Acknowledgements

The research protocol was approved and supported by Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (Grant Number: 68712).

Declarations

The protocol of the current work has been registered in the PROSPERO system (Registration number: CRD42021233899). Also, the research has been approved by the ethics committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (Code: IR.TBZMED.VCR.REC.1400.374; Grant number: 68712).

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Suchert V, Hanewinkel R, Isensee B. Screen time, weight status and the self-concept of physical attractiveness in adolescents. J Adolesc. 2016;48:11–7.PubMedCrossRef

Pate RR, Mitchell J, Byun W, Dowda M. Sedentary behaviour in youth. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(11):906e913.CrossRef

Hardy LL, Dobbins T, Booth ML, Denney-Wilson E, Okely AD. Sedentary behaviours among Australian adolescents. Aust New Zealand. J Public Health. 2006;30(6):534e540.

Domoff SE, Sutherland E, Yokum S, Gearhardt AN. The association of adolescents’ television viewing with body mass index percentile, food addiction, and addictive phone use. Appetite. 2021:157;104990.

Fairman RT, Weaver SR, Akani BC, Dixon K, Popova L. “You have to vape to make it through”: E-cigarette outcome expectancies among youth and parents. Am J Health Behav. 2021;45(5):933–46.PubMedCrossRef

Rideout V, Robb M. The common sense census: media use by tweens and teens: Common Sense; 2021. p. 1–104.

Throuvala MA, Griffiths MD, Rennoldson M, Kuss DJ. The role of recreational online activities in school-based screen time sedentary behaviour interventions for adolescents: a systematic and critical literature review. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2021;19:1065–115.

Twenge JM, Martin GN, Campbell WK. Decreases in psychological well-being among American adolescents after 2012 and links to screen time during the rise of smartphone technology. Emotion. 2018;18(6):765–80.PubMedCrossRef

Zhou J, Li Z, Meng H, Chang Y-C, Peng N-H, Wei B. Chinese parental awareness of Children's COVID-19 protective measures. Am J Health Behav. 2021;45(4):657–64.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Schroeder K, Kubik MY, Sirard JR, Lee J, Fulkerson JA. Sleep is inversely associated with sedentary time among youth with obesity. Am J Health Behav. 2020;44(6):756–64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

11.

Kamolthip R, Fung XC, Lin C-Y, Latner JD, O'Brien KS. Relationships among physical activity, health-related quality of life, and weight stigma in children in Hong Kong. Am J Health Behav. 2021;45(5):828–42.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Lutz M, Vargas C, Stojanova J, Arancibia M. Diet and depressive disorders. Arch Clin Psychiatry (São Paulo). 2021;48:117–22.

13.

Tremblay MS, LeBlanc AG, Janssen I, Kho ME, Hicks A, Murumets K, et al. Canadian sedentary behaviour guidelines for children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011;36(1):59–64.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Sisson SB, Church TS, Martin CK, Tudor-Locke C, Smith SR, Bouchard C, et al. Profiles of sedentary behavior in children and adolescents: the US National Health and nutrition examination survey, 20012006. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2009;4(4):353–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

15.

Currie C, Zanotti C, Morgan A. Social determinants of health and well-being among young people health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC): international report from the 2009/2010 survey. In: Health policy for children and adolescents: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2012. p. 1–252.

16.

Tang D, Bu T, Feng Q, Liu Y, Dong X. Differences in overweight and obesity between the north and south of China. Am J Health Behav. 2020;44(6):780–93.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Coombs NA, Stamatakis E. Associations between objectively assessed and questionnaire-based sedentary behaviour with BMI-defined obesity among general population children and adolescents living in England. BMJ Open. 2015;5(6):e007172.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

18.

Guillaume M, Lapidus L, Björntorp P, Lambert A. Physical activity, obesity, and cardiovascular risk factors in children. The Belgian Luxembourg child study II. Obes Res. 1997;5(6):549–56.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Burke V, Beilin LJ, Simmer K, Oddy WH, Blake KV, Doherty D, et al. Predictors of body mass index and associations with cardiovascular risk factors in Australian children: a prospective cohort study. Int J Obes. 2005;29(1):15–23.CrossRef

20.

Martinez-Gomez D, Rey-López JP, Chillón P, Gómez-Martínez S, Vicente-Rodríguez G, Martín-Matillas M, et al. Excessive TV viewing and cardiovascular disease risk factors in adolescents. The AVENA cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:274.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

21.

Mota J, Ribeiro JC, Carvalho J, Santos MP, Martins J. Television viewing and changes in body mass index and cardiorespiratory fitness over a two-year period in schoolchildren. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2010;22(2):245–53.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Franceschin MJ, da Veiga GV. Association of cardiorespiratory fitness, physical activity level, and sedentary behaviour with overweight in adolescents. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano. 2020;22:1–12.CrossRef

23.

Safiri S, Kelishadi R, Qorbani M, Abbasi-Ghah-Ramanloo A, Motlagh ME, Ardalan G, et al. Screen time and its relation to cardiometabolic risk among children and adolescents: the CASPIAN-III study. Iran J Public Health. 2015;44(1):35–44.

24.

Ulaganathan V, Kandiah M, Shariff ZM. A case–control study on the association of abdominal obesity and hypercholesterolemia with the risk of colorectal cancer. J Carcinogenesis. 2018;17.

25.

Putrawan HA, Antariksa B, Yunus F, Basalamah MA, Nurwidya F. Prevalence of pulmonary hypertension in indonesian patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2019;10(1):49.

26.

Cheng L, Li Q, Hebestreit A, Song Y, Wang D, Cheng Y, et al. The associations of specific school-and individual-level characteristics with obesity among primary school children in Beijing, China. Public Health Nutrition. 2020;23(10):1838–45.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Dalamaria T, De Jesus Pinto W, Dos Santos Farias E, De Souza OF. Internet addiction among adolescents in a western brazilian amazonian city. Revista Paulista de. Pediatria. 2021;39.

28.

Lopez-Gonzalez D, Partida-Gaytán A, Wells JC, Reyes-Delpech P, Avila-Rosano F, Ortiz-Obregon M, et al. Obesogenic lifestyle and its influence on adiposity in children and adolescents, evidence from mexico. Nutrients. 2020;12(3).

29.

Haidar A, Ranjit N, Archer N, Hoelscher DM. Parental and peer social support is associated with healthier physical activity behaviors in adolescents: a cross-sectional analysis of Texas school physical activity and nutrition (TX SPAN) data. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1).

30.

Kerkadi A, Sadig AH, Bawadi H, Thani AAMA, Chetachi WA, Akram H, et al. The relationship between lifestyle factors and obesity indices among adolescents in Qatar. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(22).

31.

Saha M, Adhikary DK, Parvin I, Sharma YR, Akhter F, Majumder M. Obesity and its risk factors of among school children in Sylhet, Bangladesh. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2018;16(2):205–8.PubMed

32.

Sun Y, Sekine M, Kagamimori S. Lifestyle and overweight among Japanese adolescents: the Toyama birth cohort study. J Epidemiol. 2009;19(6):303–10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

33.

Zulfiqar T, Strazdins L, Dinh H, Banwell C, D'Este C. Drivers of overweight/obesity in 4-11 year old children of Australians and immigrants; evidence from growing up in Australia. J Immigr Minor Health. 2019;21(4):737–50.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Collins AE, Pakiz B, Rock CL. Factors associated with obesity in Indonesian adolescents. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2008;3(1):58–64.PubMedCrossRef

35.

De Lima TR, Moraes MS, Andrade JHC, De Farias JM, Silva DAS. Associated factors with the isolated and simultaneous presence of overweight and abdominal obesity in adolescents. Revista Paulista de Pediatria. 2020;38.

36.

Alyoubi RA, Kobeisy SA, Souror HN, Alkhaldi FA, Aldajam MA, Allebdi KS, et al. Active screen time habits and headache features among adolescents and young adults in Saudi Arabia. Int J Pharm Res Allied Sci. 2020;9(4):81–6.

37.

Amigo I, Peña E, Errasti JM, Busto R. Sedentary versus active leisure activities and their relationship with sleeping habits and body mass index in children of 9 and 10 years of age. J Health Psychol. 2016;21(7):1472–80.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Zhang Y, Zhang X, Li J, Zhong H, Pan CW. Associations of outdoor activity and screen time with adiposity: findings from rural Chinese adolescents with relatively low adiposity risks. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1).

40.

De Jong E, Visscher TLS, Hirasing RA, Heymans MW, Seidell JC, Renders CM. Association between TV viewing, computer use and overweight, determinants and competing activities of screen time in 4- to 13-year-old children. Int J Obes. 2013;37(1):47–53.CrossRef

41.

Rincón-Pabón D, Urazán-Hernández Y, González-Santamaría J. Association between the time spent watching television and the sociodemographic characteristics with the presence of overweight and obesity in Colombian adolescents (secondary analysis of the ENSIN 2010). Plos One. 2019;14(5):e0216455.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

42.

Mansoori N, Nisar N, Shahid N, Mubeen SM, Ahsan S. Prevalence of obesity and its risk factors among school children in Karachi, Pakistan. Trop Doct. 2018;48(4):266–9.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Godakanda I, Abeysena C, Lokubalasooriya A. Sedentary behavior during leisure time, physical activity and dietary habits as risk factors of overweight among school children aged 14-15 years: case control study. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11(1):186.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

44.

Talat MA, El Shahat E. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among preparatory school adolescents in urban Sharkia governorate, Egypt. Egypt Pediatr Assoc Gaz. 2016;64(1):20–5.

45.

Moradi G, Mostafavi F, Azadi N, Esmaeilnasab N, Nouri B. Evaluation of screen time activities and their relationship with physical activity, overweight and socioeconomic status in children 10-12 years of age in Sanandaj, Iran: a cross-sectional study in 2015. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016;30(1).

46.

Watharkar A, Nigam S, Martolia DS, Varma P, Barman SK, Sharma RP. Assessment of risk factors for overweight and obesity among school going children in Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh. Indian J Community Health. 2015;27(2):216–22.

47.

De Lucena JMS, Cheng LA, Cavalcante TLM, Da Silva VA, De Farias JC. Prevalence of excessive screen time and associated factors in adolescents. Revista Paulista de Pediatria. 2015;33(4):407–14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

48.

Velásquez-Rodríguez CM, Velásquez-Villa M, Gómez-Ocampo L, Bermúdez-Cardona J. Abdominal obesity and low physical activity are associated with insulin resistance in overweight adolescents: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:258.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

49.

Ercan S, Dallar YB, Önen S, Engiz O. Prevalence of obesity and associated risk factors among adolescents in Ankara, Turkey. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2012;4(4):204–7.PubMedPubMedCentral

50.

Drake KM, Beach ML, Longacre MR, MacKenzie T, Titus LJ, Rundle AG, et al. Influence of sports, physical education, and active commuting to school on adolescent weight status. Pediatrics. 2012;130(2):e296–304.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

51.

Adesina AF, Peterside O, Anochie I, Akani NA. Weight status of adolescents in secondary schools in port Harcourt using body mass index (BMI). Ital J Pediatr. 2012;38:31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

52.

El-Gilany AH, El-Masry R. Overweight and obesity among adolescent school students in Mansoura, Egypt. Child Obes. 2011;7(3):215–22.CrossRef

53.

Byun W, Dowda M, Pate RR. Associations between screen-based sedentary behavior and cardiovascular disease risk factors in Korean youth. J Korean Med Sci. 2012;27(4):388–94.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

54.

Cho CE, Taesuwan S, Malysheva OV, Bender E, Tulchinsky NF, Yan J. Trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) response to animal source foods varies among healthy young men and is influenced by their gut microbiota composition: a randomized controlled trial. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2017;61:1600324.CrossRef

55.

Oxford University Press. Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2020.

56.

World Health Organization. Guidelines on physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep for children under 5 years of age. 2020; Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/311664.

57.

Organization, W.H. Adolescent health in the South-East Asia region. 2020; Available from: https://www.who.int/southeastasia/health-topics/adolescent-health.

58.

DO., M. The new WHO child growth standards. Paediatr Croat Suppl. 2008;52(SUPP.1):13–7.

59.

Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ. 2000;320:1240–3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

60.

Anandam A, Akinnusi M, Kufel T, Porhomayon J, El-Solh AA. Effects of dietary weight loss on obstructive sleep apnea: a meta-analysis. Sleep Breath. 2013;17:227–34.PubMedCrossRef

61.

Li L, Shen T, Wen LM, Wu M, He P, Wang Y, et al. Lifestyle factors associated with childhood obesity: a cross-sectional study in Shanghai, China. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8(1).

62.

Bhadoria AS, Kapil U, Kaur S. Association of duration of time spent on television, computer and video games with obesity amongst children in national capital territory of Delhi. Int J Prev Med. 2015.

63.

Bingham DD, Varela-Silva MI, Ferrão MM, Augusta G, Mourão MI, Nogueira H, et al. Socio-demographic and behavioral risk factors associated with the high prevalence of overweight and obesity in portuguese children. Am J Hum Biol. 2013;25(6):733–42.PubMedCrossRef

64.

Koleilat M, Harrison GG, Whaley S, McGregor S, Jenks E, Afifi A. Preschool enrollment is associated with lower odds of childhood obesity among WIC participants in LA County. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16(3):706–12.PubMedCrossRef

65.

Taylor AW, Winefield H, Kettler L, Roberts R, Gill TK. A population study of 5 to 15 year olds: full time maternal employment not associated with high BMI. The importance of screen-based activity, reading for pleasure and sleep duration in children's BMI. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16(3):587–99.PubMedCrossRef

66.

Balaban G, Motta ME, Silva GA. Early weaning and other potential risk factors for overweight among preschool children. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2010;65(2):181–7.CrossRef

67.

Fulton JE, Wang X, Yore MM, Carlson SA, Galuska DA, Caspersen CJ. Television viewing, computer use, and BMI among U.S. children and adolescents. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6(Suppl 1):S28–35.PubMedCrossRef

68.

Khader Y, Irshaidat O, Khasawneh M, Amarin Z, Alomari M, Batieha A. Overweight and obesity among school children in Jordan: prevalence and associated factors. Matern Child Health J. 2009;13(3):424–31.PubMedCrossRef

69.

Steele RM, Van Sluijs EMF, Cassidy A, Griffin SJ, Ekelund U. Targeting sedentary time or moderate- and vigorous-intensity activity: independent relations with adiposity in a population-based sample of 10-y-old British children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(5):1185–92.PubMedCrossRef

70.

Da Costa Ribeiro I, Taddei JAAC, Colugnatti F. Obesity among children attending elementary public schools in Sao Paulo, Brazil: a case-control study. Public Health Nutr. 2003;6(7):659–63.CrossRef

71.

Lagiou A, Parava M. Correlates of childhood obesity in Athens, Greece. Public Health Nutr. 2008;11(9):940–5.PubMedCrossRef

72.

Stettler N, Signer TM, Suter PM. Electronic games and environmental factors associated with childhood obesity in Switzerland. Obes Res. 2004;12(6):896–903.PubMedCrossRef

73.

Utter J, Scragg R, Schaaf D. Associations between television viewing and consumption of commonly advertised foods among New Zealand children and young adolescents. Public Health Nutr. 2006;9(5):606–12.PubMedCrossRef

74.

Hu EY, Ramachandran S, Bhattacharya K, Nunna S. Obesity among high school students in the United States: risk factors and their population attributable fraction. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018;15:E137.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

75.

Piryani S, Baral KP, Pradhan B, Poudyal AK, Piryani RM. Overweight and its associated risk factors among urban school adolescents in Nepal: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(5):e010335.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

76.

Strahan BE, Elder JH. Video game playing effects on obesity in an adolescent with autism spectrum disorder: a case study. Autism Res Treat. 2015;2015.

77.

Primack BA, Carroll MV, McNamara M, Klem ML, King B, Rich M, et al. Role of video games in improving health-related outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(6):630–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

78.

Williams WM, Ayres CG. Can active video games improve physical activity in adolescents? A review of RCT. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(2):669.PubMedCentralCrossRef

79.

Rivera IR, Silva MA, Silva RD, Oliveira BA, Carvalho AC. Physical inactivity, TV-watching hours and body composition in children and adolescents. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2010;95(2):159–65.PubMedCrossRef

80.

Goyal JP, Kumar N, Parmar I, Shah VB, Patel B. Determinants of overweight and obesity in affluent adolescent in Surat city, South Gujarat region, India. Indian J Commun Med. 2011;36(4):296–300.CrossRef

81.

Pitanga FJG, Alves CFA, Pamponet ML, Medina MG, Aquino R. Screen time as discriminator for overweight, obesity and abdominal obesity in adolescents. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano. 2016;18(5):539–47.CrossRef

82.

Edwardson CL, Gorely T, Davies MJ, Gray LJ, Khunti K, Wilmot EG. Association of sedentary behaviour with metabolic syndrome: a meta-analysis. Plos One. 2012;7(4):e34916.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

83.

Storz MA. The role of vegan diets in lipotoxicity-induced beta-cell dysfunction in type-2-diabetes. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2020;27(SP2):e22–38.PubMedCrossRef

84.

Temple JL, Giacomelli AM, Kent KM, Roemmich JN, Epstein LH. Television watching increases motivated responding for food and energy intake in children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85(2):355–61.PubMedCrossRef

85.

Borghese M, Tremblay M, Leduc G, Boyer C, Belanger P, LeBlanc A, et al. Television viewing and food intake pattern of normal weight, overweight, and obese 9-11 year-old Canadian children. Obes Rev. 2014;15:232.

86.

Taveras EM, Sandora TJ, Shih MC, Ross-Degnan D, Goldmann DA, Gillman MW. The association of television and video viewing with fast food intake by preschool-age children. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006;14(11):2034–41.CrossRef

87.

Mariona P, Roy A. Survey on lifestyle and food habits of patients with PCOS and obesity. J Complement Med Res. 2021;11(5):93.

88.

Chaput JP, Visby T, Nyby S, Klingenberg L, Gregersen NT, Tremblay A, et al. Video game playing increases food intake in adolescents: a randomized crossover study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;93(6):1196–203.PubMedCrossRef

89.

Cessna T, Raudenbush B, Reed A, Hunker R. Effects of video game play on snacking behavior. Appetite. 2007;49(1):282.CrossRef

90.

Chaput JP, Tremblay A, Pereira B, Boirie Y, Duclos M, Thivel D. Food intake response to exercise and active video gaming in adolescents: effect of weight status. Br J Nutr. 2015;115(3):547–53.PubMedCrossRef

91.

Shi L, Mao Y. Excessive recreational computer use and food consumption behaviour among adolescents. Ital J Pediatr. 2010;36(1):1–4.CrossRef

92.

Fulton JE, Wang X, Yore MM, Carlson SA, Galuska DA, Caspersen CJ. Television viewing, computer use, and BMI among US children and adolescents. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6(s1):S28–35.PubMedCrossRef

93.

Gilbert-Diamond D, Emond JA, Lansigan RK, Rapuano KM, Kelley WM, Heatherton TF, et al. Television food advertisement exposure and FTO rs9939609 genotype in relation to excess consumption in children. Int J Obes. 2017;41(1):23–9.CrossRef

94.

Ustjanauskas AE, Harris JL, Schwartz MB. Food and beverage advertising on children's web sites. Pediatr Obes. 2014;9(5):362–72.PubMedCrossRef

95.

Lee B, Kim H, Lee SK, Yoon J, Chung SJ. Effects of exposure to television advertising for energy-dense/nutrient-poor food on children's food intake and obesity in South Korea. Appetite. 2014;81:305–11.PubMedCrossRef

96.

Dibildox J. Analysis of TV, advertising and other behavioral determinants of overweight and obesity in childhood. Salud Publica Mex. 2014;56(Suppl 2):s162–6.PubMed

97.

Kar S, Khandelwal B. Fast foods and physical inactivity are risk factors for obesity and hypertension among adolescent school children in east district of Sikkim, India. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2015;6(2):356.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

98.

Leman MA, Claramita M, Rahayu GR. Predicting factors on modeling health behavior: a systematic review. Am J Health Behav. 2021;45(2):268–78.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Screen time increases overweight and obesity risk among adolescents: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
verfasst von: Purya Haghjoo
Goli Siri
Ensiye Soleimani
Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi
Samira Alesaeidi
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2022
Verlag: BioMed Central
Erschienen in: BMC Primary Care / Ausgabe 1/2022
Elektronische ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01761-4

Leitlinien kompakt für die Allgemeinmedizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Facharzt-Training Allgemeinmedizin

Die ideale Vorbereitung zur anstehenden Prüfung mit den ersten 49 von 100 klinischen Fallbeispielen verschiedener Themenfelder

Mehr erfahren

Neu im Fachgebiet Allgemeinmedizin

Bei Herzinsuffizienz muss „Eisenmangel“ neu definiert werden

16.05.2024 Herzinsuffizienz Nachrichten

Bei chronischer Herzinsuffizienz macht es einem internationalen Expertenteam zufolge wenig Sinn, die Diagnose „Eisenmangel“ am Serumferritin festzumachen. Das Team schlägt vor, sich lieber an die Transferrinsättigung zu halten.

ADHS-Medikation erhöht das kardiovaskuläre Risiko

16.05.2024 Herzinsuffizienz Nachrichten

Erwachsene, die Medikamente gegen das Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-Hyperaktivitätssyndrom einnehmen, laufen offenbar erhöhte Gefahr, an Herzschwäche zu erkranken oder einen Schlaganfall zu erleiden. Es scheint eine Dosis-Wirkungs-Beziehung zu bestehen.

Betalaktam-Allergie: praxisnahes Vorgehen beim Delabeling

16.05.2024 Pädiatrische Allergologie Nachrichten

Die große Mehrheit der vermeintlichen Penicillinallergien sind keine. Da das „Etikett“ Betalaktam-Allergie oft schon in der Kindheit erworben wird, kann ein frühzeitiges Delabeling lebenslange Vorteile bringen. Ein Team von Pädiaterinnen und Pädiatern aus Kanada stellt vor, wie sie dabei vorgehen.

Diabetestechnologie für alle?

15.05.2024 DDG-Jahrestagung 2024 Kongressbericht

Eine verbesserte Stoffwechseleinstellung und höhere Lebensqualität – Diabetestechnologien sollen den Alltag der Patienten erleichtern. Dass CGM, AID & Co. bei Typ-1-Diabetes helfen, ist belegt. Bei Typ-2 gestaltet sich die Sache komplizierter.

Update Allgemeinmedizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Trial registration

Supplementary Information

Publisher’s Note

Background

Methods

Search strategy, selection of studies, inclusion and exclusion criteria

Data extraction and quality assessment

Definitions

Statistical analysis

Results

Study characteristics

The results of the meta-analysis

Discussion

Conclusion

Acknowledgements

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Consent for publication

Competing interests

Publisher’s Note

Supplementary Information

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

The effect of intensive family-centered health education on the awareness rate, diagnosis, and treatment of post-stroke depression in community families

Antibiotic prescribing patterns at children’s outpatient departments of primary care institutions in Southwest China

Perception of providers on use of the WHO mental health Gap Action Programme-Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG) electronic version and smartphone-based clinical guidance in Nigerian primary care settings

How do nurses support chronically ill clients’ participation and self-management in primary care? A cross-country qualitative study

The role of socio-demographic and health factors during COVID-19 in remote access to GP care in low-income neighbourhoods: a cross-sectional survey of GP patients

The effects of family-centered empowerment model on depression, anxiety, and stress of the family caregivers of patients with COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial

Leitlinien kompakt für die Allgemeinmedizin

Facharzt-Training Allgemeinmedizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Allgemeinmedizin

Bei Herzinsuffizienz muss „Eisenmangel“ neu definiert werden

ADHS-Medikation erhöht das kardiovaskuläre Risiko

Betalaktam-Allergie: praxisnahes Vorgehen beim Delabeling

Diabetestechnologie für alle?

Update Allgemeinmedizin