Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Surgery 1/2023

Open Access 01.12.2023 | Research article

Significance of cholecystectomy in cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer

verfasst von: Joo-Hyuk Son, Su Ryeon Dong, Jisoo Kim, Jeeyeon Kim, Tae-Wook Kong, Suk-Joon Chang

Erschienen in: BMC Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2023

Abstract

Background

There have been no studies concerning the complications or benefits of cholecystectomy in ovarian cancer. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the outcomes of cholecystectomy performed during various time periods of the disease course and suggest a management strategy for cholecystectomy in ovarian cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent cholecystectomy during the cytoreductive surgery from 2009 to 2020. Cholecystectomy was primarily indicated when the gallbladder and surrounding structures were considered to have metastatic tumor invasion. If the final pathologic results showed free of malignant tumor, patients were placed into the no-infiltration group. Clinical outcomes including the recurrence rate and complications were analyzed.

Results

A total of 62 patients underwent cholecystectomy, 48 of whom (77.4%) underwent cholecystectomy during primary or interval debulking surgery, whereas 14 (22.6%) underwent cholecystectomy during the follow-up period (five with benign disease and 9 with disease recurrence). Among the patients, 32 (51.6%) patients were included in the no-infiltration group in the final pathology. There were no complications observed in the no-infiltration group (n = 32). Seven (78%) of the nine patients who received cholecystectomy for disease recurrence had metastatic disease in the porta-hepatis or lesser sac at the time of primary surgery. However, no recurrent lesions were observed around the porta-hepatis in patients who received cholecystectomy during primary treatment.

Conclusion

Considering the safety of the procedure, as well as the risk of disease recurrence or cholecystitis, a cholecystectomy can be offered to patients with ovarian cancer who have metastatic lesions around the gallbladder and porta-hepatis at the time of primary surgery.
Hinweise

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
FIGO
International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics
PDS
Primary debulking surgery
IDS
Interval debulking surgery

Introduction

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of gynecological cancer-related deaths worldwide [1]. Most patients with ovarian cancer are diagnosed at advanced stages because of inadequate screening tools and a lack of clinical symptoms. Cytoreductive surgery with platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy has been the most effective therapeutic strategy in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer [24]. Over the past few decades, the surgical approach has evolved toward radical surgeries because residual disease is the most important prognostic factor in ovarian cancer [2]. The main route in the spread of ovarian cancer is intraperitoneal seeding. Sometimes, the intraoperative judgment for tumor involvement of the gallbladder is very challenging. If it is after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (interval cytoreductive surgery), the lesions are more difficult to judge if it has definite tumor invasions [5, 6]. Despite upper abdominal surgeries being widely performed in patients with ovarian cancer, there are few studies describing the approach for gallbladder lesions and cholecystectomy in these patients.
Cholecystectomy performed at the time of primary surgery may be beneficial considering that subsequent cholecystectomy is more challenging after upper abdominal surgery and has an increased risk for bile duct injuries and a longer operation time [7, 8]. Further, concomitant cholecystectomy might reduce the risk of disease recurrence around the gallbladder. However, the potential benefits of prophylactic cholecystectomy performed concomitantly with non-biliary abdominal surgery, especially without definite cancer invasion, are debatable.
Prophylactic cholecystectomy has been evaluated in several different diseases, including gastrointestinal tract diseases and hematologic diseases [914]. Most studies report these prophylactic procedures as feasible and safe. In some studies, the overall mortality of cholecystectomy is reported as minimal or even zero [10, 15]. However, morbidity is variable, ranging from simple complications to bile duct injuries with varying degrees of complexity [16]. Moreover, there have been no studies concerning the complications or benefits of cholecystectomy in ovarian cancer.
In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of cholecystectomy performed during various time periods of the disease course and suggest a management strategy for cholecystectomy in advanced ovarian cancer.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study included patients with ovarian cancer who underwent cholecystectomy as a part of cytoreductive surgery from May 2009 to April 2020 in Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, South Korea. A total of 62 patients were identified as having undergone cholecystectomy during their disease course. Patients were included consecutively regardless of the timing of the cholecystectomy (primary debulking surgery, interval debulking surgery, or at the time of disease recurrence). Informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of this study. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Ajou University Hospital (AJIRB-MED-MDB-21-116).
Cholecystectomy was primarily indicated when the gallbladder and its surrounding structures were considered to have metastatic tumor invasion during the primary, interval, or secondary cytoreductive surgery. In cases where benign disease of the gallbladder was noted in preoperative computed tomography (CT), cholecystectomy was performed concomitantly. In cases of benign disease during the follow-up times, the cholecystectomy was performed laparoscopically. All the procedures were performed by biliary surgeons or an experienced gynecologic oncologic surgeon during the study period. If final pathologic results showed free of malignant tumor, patients were placed into the no-infiltration group.
Patients were classified into two groups according to the timing of the cholecystectomy: at the time of primary disease or during follow-up (benign cause or recurrent disease). Complications related to cholecystectomy were analyzed in all patients. A subgroup analysis of patients who experienced disease recurrence was performed, and its relation to the initial lesion was reviewed. Also, the disease recurrence patterns of the patients who underwent cholecystectomy during the primary treatment were analyzed.
Clinical characteristics included age, FIGO stage, timing of the surgery, pathologic results, complications, and residual disease status. The reason for the surgery and the initial porta-hepatis surgery were analyzed in patients with disease recurrence (the follow-up group). Lastly, recurrence patterns of patients who underwent cholecystectomy during the initial surgery were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the patient population and the type of intestinal surgery. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (version 25.0, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

A total of 62 patients with ovarian cancer underwent cholecystectomy during the study period. The patients’ median age was 52 years old (range, 24–78 years). Most patients had FIGO stage IIIC-IV disease. Forty eight (77.4%) patients underwent cholecystectomy at the time of primary debulking surgery (PDS = 32) or the interval debulking surgery (IDS = 16), and 14 (22.6%) patients underwent cholecystectomy during the follow-up period. Although suggestive of metastatic lesions, pathologic lesions were not confirmed in 32 (51.6%) patients in the final pathology and they were categorized into the no-infiltration group. Of all patients, procedural complications occurred in one (1.6%) patient with gallbladder bed bleeding. There were no cases with re-admission in 30 days after the surgery. Time to the initiation of chemotherapy was median 22 (18–51) days. There was no surgical morbidity throughout the follow-up period in the no-infiltration group (n = 32; Table 1).
Table 1
Characteristics of patients with ovarian cancer who underwent cholecystectomy during the course of the disease (n = 62)
Age (years)
52 (24–78)
Initial FIGO stage
 
 I
3 (4.8%)
 II
0 (0%)
 III
43 (69.4%)
 IV
16 (25.8%)
Time of the cholecystectomy
 
 Primary debulking surgery
32 (51.6%)
 Interval debulking surgery
16 (25.8%)
 Secondary debulking surgery
9 (14.5%)
 Follow-up (only cholecystectomy)
5 (8.1%)
Final pathology
 
 No lesion (no infiltration group)
32 (51.6%)
 Cancer invasion
18 (29.0%)
 Chronic cholecystitis
12 (19.4%)
Complication after cholecystectomy
 
 GB bed bleeding
1 (1.6%)
 Drain placement in 30 days
1 (1.6%)
 Readmission in 30 days
0 (0.0%)
Time to chemotherapy (days)
22 (18–51)
Residual disease after primary surgery
 
 NGR
45 (72.6%)
 GR-1
16 (25.8%)
 GR-B
1 (1.6%)
Follow-up duration, month
18 (2–107)
Data are presented as median (range) or n (%)
FIGO The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, GB gall bladder, NGR no gross residual disease, GR-1 gross residual disease size < 1 cm in maximal diameter, GR-B gross residual-bulky for residual disease size > 1 cm in maximal diameter
There were 14 patients who underwent cholecystectomy during follow-up, five of whom (35.7%) underwent cholecystectomy due to benign disease (cholecystitis) of the gallbladder and nine (64.3%) due to disease recurrence. Although all procedures were attempted laparoscopically in patients with cholecystitis (n = 5), one patient underwent open surgery because of severe adhesions. Among the patients with recurrent disease (n = 9), most patients (7/9, 78%) had metastatic disease in the porta-hepatis or ligamentous attachments around the gallbladder at the time of primary surgery (Table 2).
Table 2
Analysis of cholecystectomy during follow-up (n = 14)
Age, years
53 (39–66)
Initial FIGO stage
 
 I
2 (14.3%)
 III
10 (71.4%)
 IV
2 (14.3%)
Reason for the surgery
 
 Disease recurrence
9 (64.3%)
 Benign disease of GB
5 (35.7%)
Existence of metastatic lesion in the porta- hepatis at the time of primary surgery in cases with disease recurrence (n = 9)
 
 Yes
7 (77.8%)
 No
2 (22.2%)
Data are presented as median (range) or n (%)
FIGO The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, GB gall bladder
Recurrence patterns were analyzed in patients who underwent cholecystectomy during primary treatment (PDS or IDS, n = 48). Twelve patients experienced disease recurrence during follow-up. There were no recurrent lesions observed around the gallbladder bed and porta-hepatis in patients who received cholecystectomy during primary treatment (Table 3).
Table 3
Recurrence patterns of patients who underwent cholecystectomy during the primary treatment (PDS or IDS, n = 48)
Age
53 (24–78)
FIGO stage
 
 I
1 (2.0%)
 II
0 (0.0%)
 III
33 (68.8%)
 IV
14 (29.2%)
Residual disease status after primary treatment
 
 NGR
33 (68.8%)
 GR-1
14 (29.2%)
 GR-B
1 (2.1%)
Number of recurrences
12 (25%)
Location of recurrence
 
 Lymph node
5 (10.4%)
 Peritoneum
3 (6.3%)
 Bowel mesentery
2 (4.2%)
 Liver
2 (4.2%)
 Lung
1 (2.4%)
 Bone
1 (2.4%)
 Porta-hepatis
0 (0%)
Data are presented as median (range) or n (%)
FIGO The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, NGR no gross residual disease, GR-1 gross residual disease size < 1 cm in maximal diameter, GR-B gross residual-bulky for residual disease size > 1 cm in maximal diameter

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report on significance of cholecystectomy in patients with ovarian cancer. The hepatobiliary involvement in ovarian cancer is often associated with high tumor load and could require high complex multi-visceral surgery [17]. Also, the tumor lesions in gall bladder fossa or porta hepatis is considered as the second most common sites as the missed recurrence sites [18]. Since these lesions are one of the main obstacles in complete resection in primary cytoreductive surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is frequently adopted. However, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been reported to cause observable microscopic or macroscopic changes such as tumor necrosis, fibrosis, and tumor-induced inflammation. Notably, these lesions can interfere with the evaluation of tumor extent more difficult [5, 6]. In this study, cholecystectomy was mainly performed if a gallbladder and its surrounding structures were considered to have metastatic tumor invasion. The complication rate related to the procedures was relatively low; there were no complications, especially in the no- infiltration group. Most patients who experienced cancer recurrence in the gallbladder had metastatic lesions around the porta-hepatis or ligamentous attachments around the gallbladder at the time of primary surgery. Considering patients are exposed to a concomitant risk for developing cholecystitis or disease recurrence with increased subsequent surgical difficulty, a cholecystectomy might be offered to patients who have metastatic disease around the gallbladder at the time of primary surgery.
Although upper abdominal surgeries are widely performed in patients with ovarian cancer, there are few studies concerning cholecystectomy in patients with ovarian cancer. Thomsen et al. reported the risk for cholecystitis in patients with cancer [19]. They evaluated 51,228 patients with incident cancer compared with 512,280 age‐matched people in the general population. In that study, patients with cancer generally had a higher risk of developing cholecystitis than the general population throughout the follow‐up period. The relative risk (RR) for cholecystitis among patients with ovarian cancer compared with the general population cohort was 1.38 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19–9.87). The RR for cholecystitis doubled during the first 6 months after cancer diagnosis (RR = 1.95; 95% CI, 1.50–2.54), after which the RR declined but remained > 1 throughout the follow‐up period (RR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.05–1.45). Moreover, patients between the ages of 51 and 70 years had the highest risk for cholecystitis compared with other age groups. Although evidence for this association is lacking, cancer might increase the risk for cholecystitis due to several mechanisms, including malnutrition and rapid weight loss, chemotherapy‐induced neutropenic episodes, and radical surgeries (including bowel resection) [2022]. As all of these factors may occur in patients with ovarian cancer, there may be significant clinical implications for the increased risk of cholecystitis in patients with ovarian cancer.
Cholecystectomy is considered a safe procedure, and the overall mortality is reported as minimal or even zero in many studies [10, 15]. Prophylactic cholecystectomy has been evaluated among other disease entities, including gastrointestinal tract diseases (gastric cancers, colorectal surgery, short bowel syndrome, and gastric bypass surgery) and hematologic diseases (sickle cell anemia) [914, 19, 23]. Most studies report prophylactic procedures as feasible and safe. Marco et al. performed a randomized controlled trial comparing the preoperative complications or costs of prophylactic cholecystectomy [10]. A total of 130 patients were randomized (prophylactic cholecystectomy, n = 65 vs. standard surgery, n = 65); patients who underwent prophylactic cholecystectomy did not experience any additional perioperative complications related to the biliary surgery. There were no additional mortality risks in the prophylactic cholecystectomy group. After a median follow-up of 62 months, long-term follow-up results of patients confirmed the safety of prophylactic cholecystectomy, although there was no significant impact on the natural course of the patients [9]. In our study, although one patient experienced perioperative complications, there were no complications related to the procedure in the no-infiltration group.
The potential benefit of prophylactic cholecystectomy performed concomitantly with non-biliary abdominal surgery, especially without definite cancer invasion, are debatable. However, abdominal surgeries are reported to be a risk factor for the development of gallstones or related complications [23]. Numerous factors might increase the risk for cholecystitis, especially in ovarian cancers, including prolonged parenteral nutrition with decreased diet; blood transfusions during postoperative or chemotherapeutic periods; opiate medications, which decrease gall bladder motility and increase the risk of bile stasis; and bowel resection, which might affect alteration of the enter-hepatic circulation of bilirubin. Additionally, our data showed a high risk of cancer invasion in patients with lesions around the gallbladder at the time of primary surgery. Considering the low complication rates of preventive group and subsequent surgical exploratory difficulty, cholecystectomy can be offered in patients with advanced ovarian cancer presenting with metastatic lesions around the gallbladder.
Some limitations of the present study should be acknowledged. First, the retrospective nature of the study might inherently induce patient or treatment selection bias. Second, our study had a small sample size with no comparative patients for the preventive group, and therefore our findings should be confirmed in a larger patient cohort. Third, long-term follow-up data and risk factors for the recurrence or subsequent cholecystitis could not be confirmed. However, our study recruited consecutive patients in a single institution with the same treatment indications during the study period. Furthermore, these data can be a practical reference for upper abdominal cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer when cholecystectomy is considered.

Conclusion

Cholecystectomy has a minimal surgical complication risk in patients with ovarian cancer. Considering the risk of recurrence or benign disease of the gallbladder, a cholecystectomy might be indicated in patients with cancerous lesions around the gallbladder at the time of primary surgery.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank J. LEE and S.H. yum for assisting with data acquisition. Also, we thank H.S. Ryu for his advice on the study design.

Declarations

The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Ajou University Hospital (AJIRB-MED-MDB-21-116). Informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

All the authors declare no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang SJ, Bristow RE, Chi DS, Cliby WA. Role of aggressive surgical cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. 2015;26(4):336–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chang SJ, Bristow RE, Chi DS, Cliby WA. Role of aggressive surgical cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. 2015;26(4):336–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang SJ, Bristow RE, Ryu HS. Impact of complete cytoreduction leaving no gross residual disease associated with radical cytoreductive surgical procedures on survival in advanced ovarian cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(13):4059–67.CrossRefPubMed Chang SJ, Bristow RE, Ryu HS. Impact of complete cytoreduction leaving no gross residual disease associated with radical cytoreductive surgical procedures on survival in advanced ovarian cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(13):4059–67.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang SJ, Hodeib M, Chang J, Bristow RE. Survival impact of complete cytoreduction to no gross residual disease for advanced-stage ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;130(3):493–8.CrossRefPubMed Chang SJ, Hodeib M, Chang J, Bristow RE. Survival impact of complete cytoreduction to no gross residual disease for advanced-stage ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;130(3):493–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hynninen J, Lavonius M, Oksa S, Grénman S, Carpén O, Auranen A. Is perioperative visual estimation of intra-abdominal tumor spread reliable in ovarian cancer surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Gynecol Oncol. 2013;128(2):229–32.CrossRefPubMed Hynninen J, Lavonius M, Oksa S, Grénman S, Carpén O, Auranen A. Is perioperative visual estimation of intra-abdominal tumor spread reliable in ovarian cancer surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Gynecol Oncol. 2013;128(2):229–32.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Tate S, Nishikimi K, Kato K, Matsuoka A, Kambe M, Kiyokawa T, Shozu M. Microscopic diseases remain in initial disseminated sites after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal, and primary peritoneal cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. 2020;31(3): e34.CrossRefPubMed Tate S, Nishikimi K, Kato K, Matsuoka A, Kambe M, Kiyokawa T, Shozu M. Microscopic diseases remain in initial disseminated sites after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal, and primary peritoneal cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. 2020;31(3): e34.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee J, Jeong J, Kim D, Kim J, Ryu T. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after upper abdominal surgery: is it feasible even after gastrectomy? J Minim Invasive Surg. 2017;20(1):22–8.CrossRef Lee J, Jeong J, Kim D, Kim J, Ryu T. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after upper abdominal surgery: is it feasible even after gastrectomy? J Minim Invasive Surg. 2017;20(1):22–8.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Akyurek N, Salman B, Irkorucu O, Tascilar O, Yuksel O, Sare M, Tatlicioglu E. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous abdominal surgery. Jsls. 2005;9(2):178–83.PubMedPubMedCentral Akyurek N, Salman B, Irkorucu O, Tascilar O, Yuksel O, Sare M, Tatlicioglu E. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous abdominal surgery. Jsls. 2005;9(2):178–83.PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bencini L, Marchet A, Alfieri S, Rosa F, Verlato G, Marrelli D, Roviello F, Pacelli F, Cristadoro L, Taddei A, et al. The Cholegas trial: long-term results of prophylactic cholecystectomy during gastrectomy for cancer—a randomized-controlled trial. Gastric Cancer. 2019;22(3):632–9.CrossRefPubMed Bencini L, Marchet A, Alfieri S, Rosa F, Verlato G, Marrelli D, Roviello F, Pacelli F, Cristadoro L, Taddei A, et al. The Cholegas trial: long-term results of prophylactic cholecystectomy during gastrectomy for cancer—a randomized-controlled trial. Gastric Cancer. 2019;22(3):632–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bernini M, Bencini L, Sacchetti R, Marchet A, Cristadoro L, Pacelli F, Berardi S, Doglietto GB, Rosa F, Verlato G, et al. The Cholegas Study: safety of prophylactic cholecystectomy during gastrectomy for cancer: preliminary results of a multicentric randomized clinical trial. Gastric Cancer. 2013;16(3):370–6.CrossRefPubMed Bernini M, Bencini L, Sacchetti R, Marchet A, Cristadoro L, Pacelli F, Berardi S, Doglietto GB, Rosa F, Verlato G, et al. The Cholegas Study: safety of prophylactic cholecystectomy during gastrectomy for cancer: preliminary results of a multicentric randomized clinical trial. Gastric Cancer. 2013;16(3):370–6.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Guadalajara H, Sanz Baro R, Pascual I, Blesa I, Rotundo GS, López JMG, Corripio R, Vesperinas G, Sancho LG, Montes JAR. Is prophylactic cholecystectomy useful in obese patients undergoing gastric bypass? Obes Surg. 2006;16(7):883–5.CrossRefPubMed Guadalajara H, Sanz Baro R, Pascual I, Blesa I, Rotundo GS, López JMG, Corripio R, Vesperinas G, Sancho LG, Montes JAR. Is prophylactic cholecystectomy useful in obese patients undergoing gastric bypass? Obes Surg. 2006;16(7):883–5.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Miftode SV, Troja A, El-Sourani N, Raab H-R, Antolovic D. Simultaneous cholecystectomy during gastric and oesophageal resection: a retrospective analysis and critical review of literature. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1357–9.CrossRefPubMed Miftode SV, Troja A, El-Sourani N, Raab H-R, Antolovic D. Simultaneous cholecystectomy during gastric and oesophageal resection: a retrospective analysis and critical review of literature. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1357–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan Z, Xie P, Qian H, Yao X. Clinical analysis of prophylactic cholecystectomy during gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients: a retrospective study of 1753 patients. BMC Surg. 2019;19(1):48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tan Z, Xie P, Qian H, Yao X. Clinical analysis of prophylactic cholecystectomy during gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients: a retrospective study of 1753 patients. BMC Surg. 2019;19(1):48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson JS. The role of prophylactic cholecystectomy in the short-bowel syndrome. JAMA Surg. 1996;131(5):556–60. Thompson JS. The role of prophylactic cholecystectomy in the short-bowel syndrome. JAMA Surg. 1996;131(5):556–60.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Peters JH, Ellison EC, Innes JT, Liss JL, Nichols KE, Lomano JM, Roby SR, Front ME, Carey LC. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective analysis of 100 initial patients. Ann Surg. 1991;213(1):3–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Peters JH, Ellison EC, Innes JT, Liss JL, Nichols KE, Lomano JM, Roby SR, Front ME, Carey LC. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective analysis of 100 initial patients. Ann Surg. 1991;213(1):3–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Strasberg SM. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180:101–25.PubMed Strasberg SM. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180:101–25.PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Donato V, Giannini A, D’Oria O, Schiavi MC, Di Pinto A, Fischetti M, Lecce F, Perniola G, Battaglia F, Berloco P, et al. Hepatobiliary disease resection in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: prognostic role and optimal cytoreduction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(1):222–30.CrossRefPubMed Di Donato V, Giannini A, D’Oria O, Schiavi MC, Di Pinto A, Fischetti M, Lecce F, Perniola G, Battaglia F, Berloco P, et al. Hepatobiliary disease resection in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: prognostic role and optimal cytoreduction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(1):222–30.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bae H, Jung DC, Lee J-Y, Nam EJ, Kang WJ, Oh YT. Patterns of initially overlooked recurrence of peritoneal lesions in patients with advanced ovarian cancer on postoperative multi-detector row CT. Acta Radiol. 2019;60(12):1713–20.CrossRefPubMed Bae H, Jung DC, Lee J-Y, Nam EJ, Kang WJ, Oh YT. Patterns of initially overlooked recurrence of peritoneal lesions in patients with advanced ovarian cancer on postoperative multi-detector row CT. Acta Radiol. 2019;60(12):1713–20.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomsen RW, Thomsen HF, Nørgaard M, Cetin K, McLaughlin JK, Tarone RE, Fryzek JP, Sørensen HT. Risk of cholecystitis in patients with cancer. Cancer. 2008;113(12):3410–9.CrossRefPubMed Thomsen RW, Thomsen HF, Nørgaard M, Cetin K, McLaughlin JK, Tarone RE, Fryzek JP, Sørensen HT. Risk of cholecystitis in patients with cancer. Cancer. 2008;113(12):3410–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Buyukasik Y, Kosar A, Demiroglu H, Altinok G, Ozcebe OI, Dundar S. Acalculous acute cholecystitis in leukemia. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1998;27(2):146–8.CrossRefPubMed Buyukasik Y, Kosar A, Demiroglu H, Altinok G, Ozcebe OI, Dundar S. Acalculous acute cholecystitis in leukemia. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1998;27(2):146–8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Gorschluter M, Marklein G, Hofling K, Clarenbach R, Baumgartner S, Hahn C, Ziske C, Mey U, Heller R, Eis-Hubinger AM, et al. Abdominal infections in patients with acute leukaemia: a prospective study applying ultrasonography and microbiology. Br J Haematol. 2002;117(2):351–8.CrossRefPubMed Gorschluter M, Marklein G, Hofling K, Clarenbach R, Baumgartner S, Hahn C, Ziske C, Mey U, Heller R, Eis-Hubinger AM, et al. Abdominal infections in patients with acute leukaemia: a prospective study applying ultrasonography and microbiology. Br J Haematol. 2002;117(2):351–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Gorschluter M, Mey U, Strehl J, Schepke M, Lamberti C, Sauerbruch T, Glasmacher A. Cholecystitis in neutropenic patients: retrospective study and systematic review. Leuk Res. 2006;30(5):521–8.CrossRefPubMed Gorschluter M, Mey U, Strehl J, Schepke M, Lamberti C, Sauerbruch T, Glasmacher A. Cholecystitis in neutropenic patients: retrospective study and systematic review. Leuk Res. 2006;30(5):521–8.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Cabarrou P, Portier G, Rieu CDM. Prophylactic cholecystectomy during abdominal surgery. J Vis Surg. 2013;150(4):229–35.CrossRef Cabarrou P, Portier G, Rieu CDM. Prophylactic cholecystectomy during abdominal surgery. J Vis Surg. 2013;150(4):229–35.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Significance of cholecystectomy in cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer
verfasst von
Joo-Hyuk Son
Su Ryeon Dong
Jisoo Kim
Jeeyeon Kim
Tae-Wook Kong
Suk-Joon Chang
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2023
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2023
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-01956-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

BMC Surgery 1/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Deutlich weniger Infektionen: Wundprotektoren schützen!

08.05.2024 Postoperative Wundinfektion Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Wundprotektoren bei offenen Eingriffen am unteren Gastrointestinaltrakt schützt vor Infektionen im Op.-Gebiet – und dient darüber hinaus der besseren Sicht. Das bestätigt mit großer Robustheit eine randomisierte Studie im Fachblatt JAMA Surgery.

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

07.05.2024 Suizid Nachrichten

Der belastende Arbeitsalltag wirkt sich negativ auf die psychische Gesundheit der Angehörigen ärztlicher Berufsgruppen aus. Chirurginnen und Chirurgen bilden da keine Ausnahme, im Gegenteil.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.