Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2018

07.12.2017

Single-site robotic-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children and adolescents: a report of 20 cases

verfasst von: Peter Mattei

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Single-site laparoscopy is increasingly popular for straightforward operations like appendectomy. Due to limited triangulation and maneuverability, single-site cholecystectomy is riskier and more difficult. Robotics offer to make it easier and safer.

Methods

Twenty children and adolescents underwent robotic-assisted single-site cholecystectomy at a large academic children’s hospital. Patients were not randomized; patients were offered the option of robotic-assisted single-site (SSR) or standard four-incision laparoscopic (LAP) cholecystectomy. Demographics and perioperative details were compared with those of a comparable cohort who underwent LAP during the same period.

Results

The two groups were similar in physical characteristics and indications for operation. The robotic operations took longer but both groups received similar PRN doses of parenteral opiates. Patients in the SSR group were all discharged on the first postoperative day. There were no major complications in either group but a slightly higher incidence of minor wound complications in the SSR group.

Conclusion

Robotic-assisted single-site cholecystectomy appears to be a safe alternative to standard laparoscopy with a similar postoperative pain profile, short postoperative lengths of stay, and, for some, a superior cosmetic result. Nevertheless, it comes with longer set-up and operative times, a higher incidence of minor wound complications, an unknown but possibly higher risk of incisional hernia, and higher costs.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Clements RH, Holcomb GW 3rd (1998) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Curr Opin Pediatr 10(3):310–314CrossRefPubMed Clements RH, Holcomb GW 3rd (1998) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Curr Opin Pediatr 10(3):310–314CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai SW, Rothenberg SS, Kay SM, Shipman KE, Slater BJ (2017) Outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary dyskinesia in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 27:845–850CrossRefPubMed Lai SW, Rothenberg SS, Kay SM, Shipman KE, Slater BJ (2017) Outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary dyskinesia in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 27:845–850CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Emami CN, Garrett D, Anselmo D, Torres M, Nguyen NX (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children: a feasible alternative to the standard laparoscopic approach. J Pediatr Surg 46(10):1909–1912CrossRefPubMed Emami CN, Garrett D, Anselmo D, Torres M, Nguyen NX (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children: a feasible alternative to the standard laparoscopic approach. J Pediatr Surg 46(10):1909–1912CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Seims AD, Nice TR, Mortellaro VE, Lacher M, Ba’Ath ME, Anderson SA, Beierle EA, Martin CA, Rogers DA, Harmon CM, Chen MK, Russell RT (2015) Routine utilization of single-incision pediatric endosurgery (SIPES): a 5-year institutional experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25(3):252–255CrossRefPubMed Seims AD, Nice TR, Mortellaro VE, Lacher M, Ba’Ath ME, Anderson SA, Beierle EA, Martin CA, Rogers DA, Harmon CM, Chen MK, Russell RT (2015) Routine utilization of single-incision pediatric endosurgery (SIPES): a 5-year institutional experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25(3):252–255CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansen EN, Muensterer OJ, Georgeson KE, Harmon CM (2011) Single-incision pediatric endosurgery: lessons learned from our first 224 laparoendoscopic single-site procedures in children. Pediatr Surg Int 27(6):643–648CrossRefPubMed Hansen EN, Muensterer OJ, Georgeson KE, Harmon CM (2011) Single-incision pediatric endosurgery: lessons learned from our first 224 laparoendoscopic single-site procedures in children. Pediatr Surg Int 27(6):643–648CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Pietrabissa A, Sbrana F, Morelli L, Badessi F, Pugliese L, Vinci A, Klersy C, Spinoglio G (2012) Overcoming the challenges of single-incision cholecystectomy with robotic single-site technology. Arch Surg 147(8):709–714CrossRefPubMed Pietrabissa A, Sbrana F, Morelli L, Badessi F, Pugliese L, Vinci A, Klersy C, Spinoglio G (2012) Overcoming the challenges of single-incision cholecystectomy with robotic single-site technology. Arch Surg 147(8):709–714CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wren SM, Curet MJ (2011) Single-port robotic cholecystectomy: results from a first human use clinical study of the new da Vinci single-site surgical platform. Arch Surg 146(10):1122–1127CrossRefPubMed Wren SM, Curet MJ (2011) Single-port robotic cholecystectomy: results from a first human use clinical study of the new da Vinci single-site surgical platform. Arch Surg 146(10):1122–1127CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Spinoglio G, Lenti LM, Maglione V, Lucido FS, Priora F, Bianchi PP, Grosso F, Quarati R (2012) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC) versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC): comparison of learning curves. First European experience. Surg Endosc 26(6):1648–1655CrossRefPubMed Spinoglio G, Lenti LM, Maglione V, Lucido FS, Priora F, Bianchi PP, Grosso F, Quarati R (2012) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC) versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC): comparison of learning curves. First European experience. Surg Endosc 26(6):1648–1655CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Morel P, Buchs NC, Iranmanesh P, Pugin F, Buehler L, Azagury DE, Jung M, Volonte F, Hagen ME (2014) Robotic single-site cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21(1):18–25CrossRefPubMed Morel P, Buchs NC, Iranmanesh P, Pugin F, Buehler L, Azagury DE, Jung M, Volonte F, Hagen ME (2014) Robotic single-site cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21(1):18–25CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kudsi OY, Castellanos A, Kaza S, McCarty J, Dickens E, Martin D, Tiesenga FM, Konstantinidis K, Hirides P, Mehendale S, Gonzalez A (2016) Cosmesis, patient satisfaction, and quality of life after da Vinci Single-Site cholecystectomy and multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: short-term results from a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5353-4 Kudsi OY, Castellanos A, Kaza S, McCarty J, Dickens E, Martin D, Tiesenga FM, Konstantinidis K, Hirides P, Mehendale S, Gonzalez A (2016) Cosmesis, patient satisfaction, and quality of life after da Vinci Single-Site cholecystectomy and multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: short-term results from a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-016-5353-4
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Vidovszky TJ, Carr AD, Farinholt GN, Ho HS, Smith WH, Ali MR. Single-site robotic cholecystectomy in a broadly inclusive patient population: a prospective study. Ann Surg 260(1):134–141, 2014CrossRefPubMed Vidovszky TJ, Carr AD, Farinholt GN, Ho HS, Smith WH, Ali MR. Single-site robotic cholecystectomy in a broadly inclusive patient population: a prospective study. Ann Surg 260(1):134–141, 2014CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahn N, Signor G, Singh TP, Stain S, Whyte C (2015) Robotic single- and multisite cholecystectomy in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25(12):1033–1035CrossRefPubMed Ahn N, Signor G, Singh TP, Stain S, Whyte C (2015) Robotic single- and multisite cholecystectomy in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25(12):1033–1035CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones VS (2015) Robotic-assisted single-site cholecystectomy in children. J Pediatr Surg 50(11):1842–1845CrossRefPubMed Jones VS (2015) Robotic-assisted single-site cholecystectomy in children. J Pediatr Surg 50(11):1842–1845CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Tasian GE (2015) Casale P.The robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: gateway to advanced reconstruction. Urol Clin North Am 42(1):89–97CrossRefPubMed Tasian GE (2015) Casale P.The robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: gateway to advanced reconstruction. Urol Clin North Am 42(1):89–97CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Cundy TP, Shetty K, Clark J, Chang TP, Sriskandarajah K, Gattas NE, Najmaldin A, Yang GZ, Darzi A (2013) The first decade of robotic surgery in children. J Pediatr Surg 48(4):858–865CrossRefPubMed Cundy TP, Shetty K, Clark J, Chang TP, Sriskandarajah K, Gattas NE, Najmaldin A, Yang GZ, Darzi A (2013) The first decade of robotic surgery in children. J Pediatr Surg 48(4):858–865CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee YL, Kilic GS, Phelps JY (2011) Medicolegal review of liability risks for gynecologists stemming from lack of training in robot-assisted surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18(4):512–515CrossRefPubMed Lee YL, Kilic GS, Phelps JY (2011) Medicolegal review of liability risks for gynecologists stemming from lack of training in robot-assisted surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18(4):512–515CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Marks JM, Phillips MS, Tacchino R, Roberts K, Onders R, DeNoto G, Gecelter G, Rubach E, Rivas H, Islam A, Soper N, Paraskeva P, Rosemurgy A, Ross S, Shah S (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216(6):1037–1047CrossRefPubMed Marks JM, Phillips MS, Tacchino R, Roberts K, Onders R, DeNoto G, Gecelter G, Rubach E, Rivas H, Islam A, Soper N, Paraskeva P, Rosemurgy A, Ross S, Shah S (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216(6):1037–1047CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Geiger JD, Hirschl RB (2015) Innovation in surgical technology and techniques: challenges and ethical issues. Semin Pediatr Surg 24(3):115–121CrossRefPubMed Geiger JD, Hirschl RB (2015) Innovation in surgical technology and techniques: challenges and ethical issues. Semin Pediatr Surg 24(3):115–121CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Larson JA, Johnson MH, Bhayani SB (2014) Application of surgical safety standards to robotic surgery: five principles of ethics for nonmaleficence. J Am Coll Surg 218(2):290–293CrossRefPubMed Larson JA, Johnson MH, Bhayani SB (2014) Application of surgical safety standards to robotic surgery: five principles of ethics for nonmaleficence. J Am Coll Surg 218(2):290–293CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat St Peter SD, Ostlie D (2011) The necessity for prospective evidence for single-site umbilical laparoscopic surgery. Semin Pediatr Surg 20(4):232–236CrossRefPubMed St Peter SD, Ostlie D (2011) The necessity for prospective evidence for single-site umbilical laparoscopic surgery. Semin Pediatr Surg 20(4):232–236CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Dalton BG, Gonzalez KW, Knott EM, St Peter SD, Aguayo P (2015) Same day discharge after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children. J Surg Res 195(2):418–421CrossRefPubMed Dalton BG, Gonzalez KW, Knott EM, St Peter SD, Aguayo P (2015) Same day discharge after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children. J Surg Res 195(2):418–421CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel SV, Van Koughnett JA, Howe B, Wexner SD (2015) Spin is common in studies assessing robotic colorectal surgery: an assessment of reporting and interpretation of study results. Dis Colon Rectum 58(9):878–884CrossRefPubMed Patel SV, Van Koughnett JA, Howe B, Wexner SD (2015) Spin is common in studies assessing robotic colorectal surgery: an assessment of reporting and interpretation of study results. Dis Colon Rectum 58(9):878–884CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Boys JA, Alicuben ET, DeMeester MJ, Worrell SG, Oh DS, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR (2016) Public perceptions on robotic surgery, hospitals with robots, and surgeons that use them. Surg Endosc 30(4):1310–1316CrossRefPubMed Boys JA, Alicuben ET, DeMeester MJ, Worrell SG, Oh DS, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR (2016) Public perceptions on robotic surgery, hospitals with robots, and surgeons that use them. Surg Endosc 30(4):1310–1316CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmad A, Ahmad ZF, Carleton JD, Agarwala A (2017) Robotic surgery: current perceptions and the clinical evidence. Surg Endosc 31(1):255–263CrossRefPubMed Ahmad A, Ahmad ZF, Carleton JD, Agarwala A (2017) Robotic surgery: current perceptions and the clinical evidence. Surg Endosc 31(1):255–263CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Single-site robotic-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children and adolescents: a report of 20 cases
verfasst von
Peter Mattei
Publikationsdatum
07.12.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5939-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.