Skip to main content
main-content

08.05.2020 | Musculoskeletal

Speed of sound ultrasound: comparison with proton density fat fraction assessed with Dixon MRI for fat content quantification of the lower extremity

Zeitschrift:
European Radiology
Autoren:
Lisa Ruby, Ahmet Kunut, Dominik N. Nakhostin, Florian A. Huber, Tim Finkenstaedt, Thomas Frauenfelder, Sergio J. Sanabria, Marga B. Rominger
Wichtige Hinweise
Sergio J. Sanabria and Marga B. Rominger share senior authorship

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

Objectives

To compare speed of sound (SoS) ultrasound (US) of the calves with Dixon magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for fat content quantification.

Materials and methods

The study was approved by the local ethics committee. Fifty calf muscles of 35 women (age range 22–81 years) prospectively underwent an US and subsequent MRI (Dixon sequence) examination as well as body weight and impedance fat measurements. SoS (in m/s) was calculated positioning a reflector on the opposite side of a conventional US machine probe with the calf in between. Fiducial nitroglycerin markers were placed on the calf at the reflector and US probe end positions for later registration of the US sonification volumetric section. An automatic segmentation algorithm separated MRI adipose tissue, muscle and bone regions. MRI fat fraction of the entire leg slice (total) and intramuscular and adipose tissue fat fraction were calculated and correlation analysis and correlation coefficient comparison were performed.

Results

Median SoS demonstrated a very strong (r = − 0.83 (95% CI − 0.90; − 0.72); p < 0.001) correlation with MRI total fat fraction, a strong (r = − 0.61 (95% CI − 0.76; − 0.40); p < 0.001) correlation with MRI adipose tissue fat fraction and a moderate (r = − 0.54 (95% CI − 0.71; − 0.31); p < 0.001) correlation with MRI intramuscular fat fraction. Impedance body fat percentage correlated strongly with SoS (r = − 0.72 (95% CI − 0.85; − 0.51); p < 0.001) and MRI total fat fraction (r = 0.61 (95% CI 0.34; 0.78); p < 0.001). For electrical impedance, significantly lower correlations (p = 0.033) were found for MRI total fat fraction compared with SoS.

Conclusions

Correlations of SoS with Dixon MRI fat fraction measurements were very strong to moderate.

Key Points

• Correlations of speed of sound with Dixon MRI fat fraction measurements of the same body location were very strong to moderate.
• Speed of sound measurements showed a high repeatability.
• Speed of sound provides a sufficient discrimination range for fat fraction estimates.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

★ PREMIUM-INHALT
e.Med Interdisziplinär

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel
  1. Sie können e.Med Radiologie 14 Tage kostenlos testen (keine Print-Zeitschrift enthalten). Der Test läuft automatisch und formlos aus. Es kann nur einmal getestet werden.

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Meistgelesene Bücher aus der Radiologie

2016 | Buch

Medizinische Fremdkörper in der Bildgebung

Thorax, Abdomen, Gefäße und Kinder

Dieses einzigartige Buch enthält ca. 1.600 hochwertige radiologische Abbildungen und Fotos iatrogen eingebrachter Fremdmaterialien im Röntgenbild und CT.

Herausgeber:
Dr. med. Daniela Kildal

2011 | Buch

Atlas Klinische Neuroradiologie des Gehirns

Radiologie lebt von Bildern! Der vorliegende Atlas trägt dieser Tatsache Rechnung. Sie finden zu jedem Krankheitsbild des Gehirns Referenzbilder zum Abgleichen mit eigenen Befunden.

Autoren:
Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Jennifer Linn, Prof. Dr. med. Martin Wiesmann, Prof. Dr. med. Hartmut Brückmann

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Radiologie und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Bildnachweise