Ausgabe Sonderheft 1/2013
British Society of Breast Radiology Annual Scientific Meeting 2013
Inhalt (55 Artikel)
4.1: Nonbiopsy of presumed fibroadenomas in patients <30 years: is it safe? A single unit experience and review of European practice
K Taylor, H Vandersluis, P Britton, M Wallis
4.2: Vacuum biopsy in the management of lobular in situneoplasia: a single-centre experience
C Parkin, S Garewal, P Waugh, AJ Maxwell
4.3: Upgrades of B5a (non-invasive) core biopsies to invasive disease at final surgery: a retrospective review across the Scottish Breast Screening Programme
YT Sim, JC Litherland
4.5: Diagnosing breast cancer in a high-risk cohort
EAM O'Flynn, V Houle, ARM Wilson, AZ Evans, SD Allen
4.6: Anisotropy in solid breast lesions at shear wave elastography: relationship to the radial plane and implications for benign/malignant differentiation
K Skerl, S Vinnicombe, P Whelehan, K Thompson, D McLean, A Evans
PB.01: Second-look ultrasound examination of the breast following MRI: MR and sonographic findings
K Alrawi, J Bansal, P Young
PB.02: Magnetic resonance imaging axilla: friend or foe?
CF Hathaway, C Zammit, S Shaheed, G Rubin, J O'Brien
PB.03: Evaluating the role of breast MRI at mid-cycle chemotherapy
D Santosh, G Uruski, A Borley, P Young
PB.04: MRI In lobular and mixed lobular/ductal carcinomas: can we preselect cases based on imaging appearance?
MM Hoosein, L Grosvenor, D Lister, M Al-Attar
PB.05: MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy at 3T: initial experience
M Sreenivas
PB.06: Preliminary results in the performance comparison between the size ratio and colour scoring breast ultrasound elastographic techniques
LCH Leong, THL Moey, LSJ Sim
PB.07: Why are some fibroadenomas stiff using shear wave elastography?
M Elseedawy, P Whelehan, S Vinnicombe, K Thomson, A Evans
PB.10: Breast compression, compressed breast thickness and volumetric breast density
J Khan-Perez, C Mercer, M Bydder, J Sergeant, J Morris, A Maxwell, C Rylance, S Astley
PB.11: Identifying women at high risk of developing breast cancer: implications of adjusting for inter-observer variability in visual analogue scale assessment of percentage breast density
JC Sergeant, M Sperrin, L Bardwell, I Buchan, DG Evans, A Howell, SM Astley
PB.13: Comparison between analogue and digital mammography: a reader's perspective
H Gay, R Pietrosanu, S George, D Tzias, R Mehta, C Patel, S Heller, L Wilkinson
PB.14: Visibility of screen-detected invasive carcinoma on digital breast tomosynthesis: do we need two views?
O Abeyakoon, D Evans, R Rahim, J Morel, R Wasan, A Iqbal, J Golligher, C Peacock, M Michell
PB.15: Pain in mammography: where and why does it arise?
D O'Leary, Z Al Maskari
PB.16: Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: a single-centre experience
SB O'Neill, DC O'Neill, N Marshall, L Duddy, MF Ryan, JE Barry
PB.17: Inter-observer agreement in visual analogue scale assessment of percentage breast density
JC Sergeant, M Wilson, N Barr, U Beetles, C Boggis, S Bundred, M Bydder, S Gadde, E Hurley, A Jain, Y Lim, L Lord, V Reece, DG Evans, A Howell, SM Astley
PB.18: Factors affecting breast density assessment
L Beattie, M Bydder, JC Sergeant, A Maxwell, N Barr, U Beetles, CRM Boggis, S Bundred, S Gadde, E Hurley, A Jain, E Lord, V Reece, M Wilson, P Stavrinos, DG Evans, A Howell, SM Astley
PB.19: Investigation of a novel method for breast discomfort reduction during mammography
D O'Leary, Z Al Maskari
PB.20: Accuracy of specimen radiograph in determining lesion presence in excised specimens, correlating histological and radiological margins
L Sundaram, N Hartley, M Hoosein, M Al-Attar, E Denton, L Grosvenor, D Lister, G McDonald, S Kaneri
PB.21: Relationship between volumetric breast density and socioeconomic status
L Samuels, SM Astley, A Maxwell, JC Sergeant, J Morris, M Wilson, P Stavrinos, DG Evans, A Howell, M Bydder
PB.22: Does the Nottingham predictor of bidimensional product of calcium accurately predict the success of wide local excision for ductal carcinoma in situ surgery in our centre?
R Gray, G Porter, J Steel
PB.23: Effect of detector type on cancer detection in digital mammography
A Mackenzie, LM Warren, DR Dance, J Cooke, M Halling-Brown, P Looney, DP Chakraborty, MG Wallis, RM Given-Wilson, KC Young
PB.24: Is digital breast tomosynthesis helpful within a symptomatic one-stop breast clinic for characterisation of subtle findings?
GJ Bansal, P Young, K Lim, Z Rees
PB.25: Relationship between volumetric breast density, age and hormonal factors
PF Johnson, JC Sergeant, M Bydder, A Maxwell, S Whiteside, P Stavrinos, M Wilson, DG Evans, A Howell, SM Astley
PB.26: Significance of flat epithelial atypia at image guided breast biopsy
S Dani, S Sudderuddin, G Ralleigh, N Zaman, A Gupta, N Barrett, D Cunningham, B Faissola, S Comitis, W Svensson, A Lim, R Williamson, V Stewart
PB.28: Is second-time vacuum-assisted biopsy effective in improving preoperative diagnosis rate of screen-detected DCIS?
S Pattison, A Kumar, W Teh, R Patel
PB.29: Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted percutaneous excision of breast papillomas: results of long-term follow-up
AJ Maxwell, G Mataka, S Whiteside
PB.30: What is your biopsy threshold in symptomatic clinic and what should it be? B2:B5 biopsy ratio: 18 months in our centre
R Gray, G Porter, J Steel
PB.31: B3 lesions and vacuum-assisted biopsy: a national survey to gauge current practice
CL Strachan, A Shaaban, K Horgan, N Sharma
PB.32: Does vacuum-assisted biopsy decrease the B3 rate in stereotactic biopsy of breast lesions?
T Seaton, S Khan, V Stewart, G Ralliegh, N Zaman, N Barrett, S Comitis, A Gupta, W Svensson, A Lim, R Williamson, D Cunningham
PB.33: Vacuum-assisted biopsy for lesions of uncertain malignant potential: further evidence of its suitability as a safe alternative to surgery
D Tzias, B Bhaludin, LS Wilkinson, S George, H Gay
PB.34: Results by letter for low-risk breast biopsies: an audit of current practice at Nottingham Breast Institute
WK Al-Obaydi, EJ Cornford, SL Tennant
PB.35: Comparison of large-bore vacuum-assisted biopsy and surgical diagnostic excision biopsy in B3 breast lesions
AH Tang, ND Forester
PB.37: Screen-detected, noncalcified, mammographic lesions with normal or benign ultrasound findings: is stereotactic biopsy necessary?
D Tzias, S Yusuf, L Wilkinson
PB.38: In the context of overdiagnosis, does size matter?
S Bhuva, I Haigh, M McMahon, B Dall, D Dodwell, N Sharma
PB.39: Minimising the impact of breast screening extension: a 1-year experience of a South West breast screening unit
K Giles, R Currie
PB.40: Clinical recall audit: are we following national guidelines?
F Kilburn-Toppin, S Karia, M Wallis
PB.41: Audit of screening-detected breast cancers with discordant interpretations on double-read screening mammography
B Batohi, R Rahim, M Adejolu, M Michell
PB.42: Arbitration of round masses: understanding the variability of recall rates
AL Wharton, CG Taylor, JC Cooke
PB.43: Review of the determinants of poor screening uptake at City, Sandwell and Walsall Breast Screening Units and the steps taken to improve attendance
H Khan, S Meraj, A Wilbraham, D Cox, R Bhatt, J Yates, J Waldron, A Powell
PB.44: Audit of interval cancers from family history breast screening
R Dunn, S Astley, M Bydder, DG Evans, A Howell, J Sergeant, AJ Maxwell
PB.45: Evaluation of a pilot MRI breast surveillance project for young women at high risk of breast cancer
S De Souza, N Evans, R Fox, A Murray
PB.46: Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome and carcinoma of the breast: call for new breast imaging surveillance guidelines
FJ Tsang, S Mallappa, W Teh, SK Clark
PB.47: Mammography in symptomatic women aged 35 to 39 years
VW Chan, MG Bell, AL Brown
PB.48: Old habits die hard: breast imaging of symptomatic 35 to 39 year olds
FM Singh, S Gadde
PB.49: Preoperative axillary staging in breast cancer patients: repeat sampling in cases of suspicious ultrasound or inconclusive cytology
L Clarke, P Newton, A Leaver
PB.50: Axillary lymph node ultrasound in breast cancer patients: what minimum threshold for diffuse cortical thickening predicts nodal involvement?
L Clarke, A Leaver, P Newton
PB.51: Axillary lymph node ultrasound and fine needle aspiration in preoperative staging of breast cancer: re-audit
H Kazi, H Humphreys, L Clarke, A Robinson, A Leaver
PB.52: Incidence and clinical significance of focal breast uptake at 18-fluorine fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT in patients without known breast cancer
P Arce-Calisaya, J Simpson, N Sharma, A Scarsbrook
PB.53: Are ethnic minorities more likely to develop triple-negative breast cancer? A systematic review
R Limbada, A Slater, AK Jain