Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Im April diskutierten die Herz-Kreislauf-Spezialisten aus der ganzen Welt auf dem  Kongress des American College of Cardiology (ACC) u.a. neue Therapieansätze bei akutem Myokardinfarkt, koronarer Herzerkrankung, kardiogenem Schock oder Aortenklappenstenose. In unserem Kongress-Dossier haben wir für Sie Berichte über die „Late-Breaking Trials“ und andere wichtige Studien zusammengestellt. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
European Radiology
Erschienen in: European Radiology 12/2006

01.12.2006 | Cardiac

The clinical value of a negative multi-detector computed tomographic angiography in patients suspected of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis

verfasst von: H. J. van der Zaag-Loonen, R. Dikkers, G. H. de Bock, M. Oudkerk

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 12/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The aim of this meta-analysis was to calculate the sensitivity of contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) compared with coronary angiography (CAG) in incident patients suspected of coronary artery disease (CAD). We searched PubMed, Embase, bibliographies of original papers and reviews to identify original papers including ≥20 patients. Two independent reviewers selected papers and judged eligible papers on quality. Heterogeneity was assessed and homogeneous subgroups were pooled. Of the 15 included studies, ten provided moderately homogeneous patient-based analyses with absolute diagnostic numbers (n=630 patients). Pooled sensitivity was 89% (95% confidence interval: 85–92%). Scanners with 16 detectors (n=4) had higher sensitivities (pooled sensitivity: 91%) than four-detector scanners (n=6; pooling not possible due to heterogeneity). Seven studies reported sensitivity for a proximal stenosis, but different definitions were used making pooling impossible; sensitivities ranged from 75 to 100%. The sensitivity of four- and 16-detector MDCT is not sufficient to rule out any stenosis in patients suspected of CAD. No conclusions can be drawn with respect to the sensitivity for clinically relevant or proximal stenoses.
Literatur
1.
Marcus ML, Schelbert HL, Skorton DJ (1991) Cardiac imaging: a companion to Braunwald’s Heart disease
2.
Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM et al (1999) ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:1756–1824CrossRefPubMed
3.
American Heart Association (2005) Heart disease and stroke statistics—2005 update. American Heart Association, Dallas
4.
Johnson LW, Lozner EC, Johnson S et al (1989) Coronary arteriography 1984–1987: a report of the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. I. Results and complications. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 17:5–10PubMed
5.
Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S et al (1999) Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 282:1061–1066CrossRefPubMed
6.
Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB et al (2003) The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 3:25CrossRefPubMed
7.
Haberl R, Tittus J, Bohme E et al (2005) Multislice spiral computed tomographic angiography of coronary arteries in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: an effective filter before catheter angiography? Am Heart J 149:1112–1119CrossRefPubMed
8.
Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F et al (2005) Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:147–154PubMedCrossRef
9.
Kefer J, Coche E, Legros G et al (2005) Head-to-head comparison of three-dimensional navigator-gated magnetic resonance imaging and 16-slice computed tomography to detect coronary artery stenosis in patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:92–100CrossRefPubMed
10.
Gaudio C, Mirabelli F, Alessandra L et al (2005) Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery stenoses by multidetector-row spiral computed tomography: comparison with conventional angiography. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 9:13–21PubMed
11.
Lau GT, Ridley LJ, Schieb MC et al (2005) Coronary artery stenoses: detection with calcium scoring, CT angiography, and both methods combined. Radiology 235:415–422PubMed
12.
Cademartiri F, Runza G, Marano R et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of 16-row multislice CT angiography in the evaluation of coronary segments. Radiol Med (Torino) 109:91–97
13.
Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Krestin GP et al (2005) Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16-row multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:128–132CrossRefPubMed
14.
Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary imaging using 16-detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:123–127CrossRefPubMed
15.
Gerber BL, Coche E, Pasquet A et al (2005) Coronary artery stenosis: direct comparison of four-section multi-detector row CT and 3D navigator MR imaging for detection—initial results. Radiology 234:98–108PubMed
16.
Fine JJ, Hopkins CB, Hall PA et al (2004) Noninvasive coronary angiography: agreement of multi-slice spiral computed tomography and selective catheter angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 20:549–552CrossRefPubMed
17.
Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Cury RC et al (2004) Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease: patient-versus segment-based analysis. Circulation 110:2638–2643PubMedCrossRef
18.
Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D’Eliseo A et al (2004) Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J 25:1043–1048PubMedCrossRef
19.
Martuscelli E, Razzini C, D’Eliseo A et al (2004) Limitations of four-slice multirow detector computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenosis. Ital Heart J 5:127–131PubMed
20.
Herzog C, Britten M, Balzer JO et al (2004) Multidetector-row cardiac CT: diagnostic value of calcium scoring and CT coronary angiography in patients with symptomatic, but atypical, chest pain. Eur Radiol 14:169–177CrossRefPubMed
21.
Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K et al (2003) Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 107:664–666CrossRefPubMed
22.
Giesler T, Baum U, Ropers D et al (2002) Noninvasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT: influence of heart rate on image quality and stenosis detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:911–916PubMed
23.
Mennicke M, Giesler T, Ropers D et al (2002) Influence of heart rate on image quality and detection of coronary stenoses with multislice spiral CT. Biomed Tech (Berl) 47(Suppl 1 Pt 2):782–785CrossRef
24.
Nieman K, Rensing BJ, van Geuns RJ et al (2002) Usefulness of multislice computed tomography for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 89:913–918CrossRefPubMed
25.
Nieman K, Oudkerk M, Rensing BJ et al (2001) Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography. Lancet 357:599–603CrossRefPubMed
26.
Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D et al (2001) Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 103:2535–2538PubMed
27.
Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ et al (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560CrossRefPubMed
28.
Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M et al (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634PubMed
29.
DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188CrossRefPubMed
30.
Abramson JH (2004) WINPEPI (PEPI-for-Windows): computer programs for epidemiologists. Epidemiol Perspect Innov 1:6CrossRefPubMed
31.
32.
de Feyter PJ, Nieman K (2004) Noninvasive multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: an emerging clinical modality. J Am Coll Cardiol 44:1238–1240PubMedCrossRef
33.
Nieman K, van Geuns RJ, Wielopolski P et al (2002) Noninvasive coronary imaging in the new millennium: a comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance techniques. Rev Cardiovasc Med 3:77–84PubMed
34.
Schoenhagen P, Halliburton SS, Stillman AE et al (2004) Noninvasive imaging of coronary arteries: current and future role of multi-detector row CT. Radiology 232:7–17PubMed
35.
Kopp AF, Kuttner A, Trabold T et al (2004) Multislice CT in cardiac and coronary angiography. Br J Radiol 77(Spec No 1):S87–S97CrossRef
36.
Schoepf UJ, Becker CR, Ohnesorge BM et al (2004) CT of coronary artery disease. Radiology 232:18–37PubMed
37.
Nikolaou K, Poon M, Sirol M et al (2003) Complementary results of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the heart and coronary arteries: a review and future outlook. Cardiol Clin 21:639–655CrossRefPubMed
38.
Achenbach S, Ropers D, Pohle K et al (2003) Clinical results of minimally invasive coronary angiography using computed tomography. Cardiol Clin 21:549–559CrossRefPubMed
39.
Rodenwaldt J (2003) Multislice computed tomography of the coronary arteries. Eur Radiol 13:748–757PubMed
40.
Christian TF (2005) Anatomy of an emerging diagnostic test: computed tomographic coronary angiography. Circulation 112:2222–2225CrossRefPubMed
41.
Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Duerinckx A (2003) Clinical utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance techniques for noninvasive coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 42:1867–1878CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zhang SZ, Hu XH, Zhang QW et al (2005) Evaluation of computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with a high heart rate using 16-slice spiral computed tomography with 0.37-s gantry rotation time. Eur Radiol 15:1105–1109PubMedCrossRef
43.
Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552–557PubMedCrossRef
44.
Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA et al (2005) High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112:2318–2323CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The clinical value of a negative multi-detector computed tomographic angiography in patients suspected of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis
verfasst von
H. J. van der Zaag-Loonen
R. Dikkers
G. H. de Bock
M. Oudkerk
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2006
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 12/2006
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0312-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2006

European Radiology 12/2006 Zur Ausgabe

Hepatobiliary-Pancreas

Preoperative volume calculation of the hepatic venous draining areas with multi-detector row CT in adult living donor liver transplantation: impact on surgical procedure

Interventional

A new, easy, fast, and safe method for CT-guided sacroplasty

Cardiac

Cardiac stress MR imaging with dobutamine

Breast

Evaluation of quantitative parametric analysis for characterization of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography

Musculoskeletal

Monitoring therapeutic responses of primary bone tumors by diffusion-weighted image: initial results

Health Economy

Cost comparison of low-field (0.23 T) MRI-guided laser ablation and surgery in the treatment of osteoid osteoma

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise