Anzeige
Erschienen in:
01.02.2013
The diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography with multiplanar reformatted imaging and virtual cystoscopy in the early detection and evaluation of bladder carcinoma: comparison with conventional cystoscopy
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 1/2013
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Purpose
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with multiplanar reformatted imaging and virtual cystoscopy (VC) in early detection and evaluation of bladder masses with comparison with conventional cystoscopic findings.
Materials and methods
This prospective study included 35 patients with suspected bladder cancer were studied by computed tomographic cystography (CTC) and virtual cystography (VC) in both the supine and prone positions after distending the bladder with air. The patient population was divided into three groups based on lesion size at conventional cystoscopy (CC). Results of the CT study were compared with those of CC.
Main outcome measures
Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value was used to study the association between VC and CC as regarding lesion detection.
Results
The size of the tumors varied from 2 mm to occupying more than three quarters of the bladder. Of the 71 lesions detected on CC, 47 lesions were positive in histopathology, 28 were <4 mm (19 were positive and 9 were negative for neoplasia), and four of these were missed on VC, with one of 3 mm missed on CC and correctly located by VC. Thus, all lesions of >4 mm were detected by VC and 24 of 28 <4 mm. The locations of all were correctly described at VC when compared with CC. The overall sensitivity of VC vs. CC was 94.36%, specificity 71.42%, PPV was 97.1%, and NPV was 55.55%.
Conclusion
Cystoscopy remains the standard of reference for the evaluation of the urinary bladder, but MDCT is indicated for examination of patients on whom CC is contraindicated, difficult to perform, unsatisfactory in interpretation, and as an adjuvant tool in the evaluation of areas difficult to assess with CC.