Introduction
Swallowing is a process requiring the coordination of a complex series of motor, sensory, and psychological activities that are voluntary and involuntary, and most changes in its function occur with aging [
1,
2]. Eating and drinking are essential for humans and dysphagia refers to swallowing difficulties [
3]. There are different definitions for dysphagia. Given that the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) classifies swallowing as “the function of clearing food and drink through the oral cavity, pharynx, and oesophagus (gullet) with an appropriate rate”, dysphagia is defined as: the difficulty in transferring food from the mouth to the stomach [
2,
3].
Dysphagia is classified into esophageal dysphagia and oropharyngeal dysphagia [
4]. Oropharyngeal dysphagia refers to any abnormality in the physiology of swallowing in the upper gastrointestinal tract [
5], including an imbalance in the coordination between the respiratory and nutritional functions [
6], and leading to related clinical complications, such as malnutrition, dehydration, and some of the risk factors, such as aspiration pneumonia, asphyxiation, and eventually, premature death [
7‐
9]. Some difficulties, such as loss of muscle mass, changes of the cervical spine, impaired dental status, and reduction of saliva production affect swallowing function. Thus, the risk of OD increases with age and the natural aging processes [
10‐
12].
OD has a variety of causes, including aging, neurological diseases, such as Parkinson’s, dementia, multiple sclerosis, stroke, head and neck cancer, neck surgery, traumatic brain injury, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [
11,
13‐
15].
OD is associated with symptoms, such as painful swallowing (odynophagia), inability to swallow, sensation of food stuck in the throat or chest or behind the chest, saliva, sniff, reflux, frequent heartburn, acid or food reflux to the throat, unexpected weight loss, coughing or nausea when swallowing, and shrinking food or not eating certain foods, due to swallowing disorders [
4‐
6,
11].
Initial assessments, including video fluoroscopy (VFS) and Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) are essential to minimize OD risks [
16].
International data reported the prevalence of OD in the general populations between 2.3 and 16.0% [
11]. Further, the prevalence of OD is high with predisposing conditions, such as aging and stroke. Its prevalence is reported 26.19% in the elderly [
11], 8.1–80% in stroke patients [
17], and 21.9–69.5% in patients taking antipsychotic drugs [
18].
There are several preliminary studies on the prevalence of OD in different populations in different parts of the world, but these studies examine the prevalence in a small environment and have a smaller sample size. Also, the results of studies showed the different values of the prevalence of this disorder in different populations. None of these studies investigated the effect of potential factors, such as age and prevalence over time, so the present study aimed to standardizing the prevalence of OD in different populations by systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods
The present study was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, including identification, screening, eligibility, and included [
19]. The searches, study selection, and data extraction were done independently by two researchers (Z.N. and M.K.) to minimize publication bias and error. Any conflict or disagreement between the two researchers was resolved by the consensus and consultation with a third researcher (F.R.) and the opinion of the third researcher was final.
Identification of studies
A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS) databases, and Google Scholar motor engine to find out the relevant studies assessing the global prevalence rate of OD in different populations. The searches included the combinations of the following MeSH/Emtree and Free Text words: “Prevalen*”, “Oropharyngeal Dysphagia”, and “Dysphagia Oropharyngeal”. No time limitation was considered for the search to retrieve as comprehensive as possible related studies by November 2021. The references of all included articles and also the studies that cited to the included articles were manually reviewed to maximize the comprehensiveness of the search. Table
1 represents the search strategy of different databases.
Table 1
Search strategies
PubMed | ((((Prevalence [MeSH Terms]) OR (Prevalen* [Title/Abstract])) OR (Prevalence* [Title/Abstract])) OR (Prevalent [Title/Abstract])) AND (("Oropharyngeal Dysphagia") OR ("Dysphagia, Oropharyngeal")) | 14 November 2021 | 171 |
Scopus | (TITLE-ABS-KEY (Prevalence*) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (Prevalence*) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (Prevalent)) AND (ALL ("Dysphagia, Oropharyngeal") OR ALL ("Oropharyngeal Dysphagia")) | 16 November 2021 | 839 |
WoS | TS=(Prevalence* OR Prevalence OR Prevalent) AND ALL=(“Oropharyngeal Dysphagia” OR “Dysphagia, Oropharyngeal”) | 16 November 2021 | 462 |
Embase | #1: 'prevalence*':ab,ti OR 'Prevalence*':ab,ti OR 'prevalent':ab,ti OR 'prevalence'/exp/mj #2: 'oropharyngeal dysphagia' #3: #1 AND #2 | 17 November 2021 | 370 |
Google scholar | (Prevalence* OR Prevalence OR Prevalent) AND (“Oropharyngeal Dysphagia” OR “Dysphagia, Oropharyngeal”) | 18 November 2021 | 250 |
Inclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria were original scientific-research articles, observational studies, access to the full text of the article, and studies reported the prevalence rate of OD.
Exclusion criteria
The exclusion criteria included the irrelevant studies, cross-sectional studies, case reports, case series, papers presented at conferences, letter to the editor, qualitative studies, dissertations, systematic review and meta-analysis, animal studies, and lack of access to the full text of the articles.
Selection process of studies
All articles derived from various databases were imported into EndNote X8 software. After eliminating the duplicates, the title and abstract of the studies were thoroughly screened to excluded the irrelevant studies. The full text of remaining articles was carefully assessed for eligibility and irrelevant studies were removed. Finally, the quality assessment of the studies met inclusion criteria was done. Researchers extracted the articles without knowing the name of authors, institutes, and journals.
Qualitative evaluation of the studies
The quality assessment of studies was done using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for prevalence studies [
20], which consists of 9 different items, including sample frame, participants, sample size, study subjects and the setting described in detail, data analysis, valid methods for identifying conditions, measuring the situation, statistical analysis, and response rate adequate. The sources of bias were identified using the criteria that the reviewers qualified with answers, including yes, no, unclear, or not applicable. The sum of “yes” scores was calculated to evaluate each study. Therefore, the total score range based on the number of “yes” is between 0 and 9.
A pre-prepared electronic checklist was employed to extract the data. The items of this checklist included first author, year of publication, country, sample size, age, study design, diagnostic tools, prevalence rate, and quality assessment score.
Statistical analysis
The prevalence rate of OD was reviewed in this study and the frequency rate of OD, i.e., the frequency of patients suffered from OD was divided by the total number of subjects in each study to combine the results of different studies. The heterogeneity of studies was checked using I2 index and due to the high heterogeneity between the results of the studies included in the meta-analysis (I2 ˃ 75%), the random effects model was applied, which calculates the parameter changes between studies. Thus, the results of random effects model in heterogeneous conditions are more generalizable than those of fixed effect model. Funnel plot and Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation were used to assess the publication bias. In addition, meta-regression was used to examine the relationship between the global prevalence rate of OD and the year of publication, sample size, and mean age. The subgroup analysis was performed according to different continents (Asia, Europe, USA, Africa, and Australia), study population, and type of diagnostic tool. The comprehensive meta-analysis software (version 2) was applied for meta-analysis and P-value less than 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
Discussion
The present systematic review and meta-analysis study aimed to estimate the global prevalence of OD in different populations. After combining the data from 27 articles, the global prevalence of OD was estimated to be 43.8%. The highest prevalence rate of OD (96%) was reported in the study of Almeida et al. [
22] and the lowest rate (7.3%) in the study of Watson and Lally [
21]. The highest quality assessment score based on JBI checklist criteria was related to the study of Wolf et al. [
23], which reported the prevalence rate of OD as 29%.
Kertscher et al. reported the prevalence of OD in the Netherlands between 2.3 and 16% [
11]. Further, the prevalence of OD was estimated between 8.1 and 80% in stroke patients, 11–81% in the Parkinson’s disease, 27–30% in the traumatic brain injury patients, and 91.7% in the community-acquired pneumonia in the systematic review study of Takizawa et al. [
17]. The findings of the present study are not consistent with the results of the afore-mentioned systematic review or meta-analysis studies, which can be attributed to the high number of articles included in the present study (27 articles versus 6 articles in the study of Kertscher et al.). Further, the study of Kertscher et al. examined the studies conducted in the Netherlands while the present study included people with different races and geographies around the world, and the present study was conducted as a systematic review and meta-analysis, while the study of Takizawa et al. was done only systematically and they did not perform statistical analysis.
Considering the results of the meta-regression, the prevalence of OD showed an increasing trend by increasing the mean age. Additionally, the results of subgroup analysis demonstrated that the prevalence of OD is high in the elderly population. Kertscher et al. reported that the prevalence of OD in the population over 75 years old is more than other age groups [
11], which is consistent with the results of the present study. Many physiological changes occur in body tissue with aging, such as muscle wasting, reduced endurance capacity, and muscle weakness [
48,
49], hormonal changes and decreased ratio of anabolic to catabolic hormones [
50], increased rates of neurological diseases [
51‐
53], cardiovascular diseases [
54], atrophy of the pharyngeal and laryngeal muscles [
55], and many other chronic diseases. Considering these conditions in the treatment process and the improvement of the clinical outcomes of the elderly population can be helpful.
The results of the present study also showed that the prevalence of OD in the pediatric population is high. Although the number of studies investigated in the pediatric population was small (2 articles), the reasons for this could be abnormalities or dental problems, large tongue and tonsils, problems with prenatal development of cranial bones and structures of the mouth and throat (known as Craniofacial abnormalities), prenatal abnormalities of the gastrointestinal tract, such as esophageal atresia (esophageal obstruction) or tracheovasophageal fistula after prolonged exposure to a ventilator (which may occur in premature infants or very sick children), vocal cord paralysis, tracheostomy surgery, esophageal stimulation or ulceration due to gastric acid in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Esophageal obstruction by other body structures, such as enlarged heart, thyroid gland, blood vessels or lymph nodes, growth retardation, and prematurity of the baby [
42,
47].
The results of subgroup analysis revealed that the prevalence of OD in patients with dementia is higher than that in other study population. Dementia is a chronic disease with a set of symptoms, such as memory impairment, language impairment, psychological changes, and behavioral disorders [
56]. When dementia reaches its advanced stages, brain changes lead to the dysfunction of organs and physical activities, such as swallowing disorder, dysphagia, loss of balance, and incontinence [
57,
58]. Dementia is a global challenge that directly affects 47.5 million people worldwide and 7.7 million people each year [
59]. Taking into account these conditions and complications can assist the treatment process and improve the quality of life of patients with dementia.
Based on the results of the present study, the prevalence of OD is high in stroke, which is in line with the results of the systematic review study of Takizawa et al. [
17]. Meng et al. reported that the prevalence of swallowing disorders was 36.3% (95% CI 33.3–39.3%) in patients with stroke [
60]. Stroke is a sudden neurological disorder, resulting in impaired blood flow to the area affected by the stroke. In other words, when blood flow to a part of the brain is disrupted and stopped, that part can no longer function normally [
61,
62]. The post-stroke complications, depending on the location of the stroke and the extent of brain tissue affected [
61], can be vision problems, memory problems, dysphagia (paralysis of the muscles of the pharynx, tongue or mouth), lack of coordination between the eyes and hands, difficulty in decision making, lack of body temperature control, difficulty breathing, urinary and fecal incontinence, nervous system problems, tromboemboli, heart failure, depression, etc. [
63‐
66]. Therefore, it is recommended that health care providers and policy makers pay more attention to the stroke prevention and post-stroke complications, especially OD.
Due to the variation of the population structure in different countries of the world, it was necessary to carefully study the prevalence of OD in different continents in order for planners to pay more attention to the process and its consequences. Therefore, according to the subgroup analyses based on the different continents, the highest prevalence of OD was related to the African continent with 64.2% and the lowest was related to Australia with 7.3%.
The high prevalence of OD in different populations, especially in the elderly and patients with dementia and stroke in the present systematic review and meta-analysis study reveals the need for the investigation and follow-up of OD disorder. Due to the complications of OD and its significant impact on various aspects of life, health care providers and policy makers should pay special attention to the prevalence of OD. Accordingly, we should be aware of OD, find and implement suitable solutions, and follow the results of the measures at the individual, group, and organizational levels to reduce its prevalence.
One of the strengths of this study was estimating the global prevalence of OD for the first time in different populations with a sample size above 9000 people and estimating prevalence of OD in continents and various diagnostic tools. In addition, high heterogeneity among studies (more than 95%) led us to perform subgroup analysis, which reduced a small amount of heterogeneity. However, there is still a lot of heterogeneity in all subgroups, which may be due to the sample size, demographic characteristics, and method.
The present study comes with some limitations, including the lack of uniform reporting of articles, non-random selection of some samples, non-uniform study design, and the lack of access to the full text of articles presented at conferences. Furthermore, the number of studies performed on some populations was limited, therefore, it is suggested to conduct further studies on some patients, such as patients with pneumonia, head and neck cancer, paraplegia, children, etc.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.