Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2019

19.02.2019 | Gynecologic Oncology

The impact of EndoPredict ® on decision making with increasing oncological work experience: can overtreatment be avoided?

verfasst von: Fabinshy Thangarajah, Christian Eichler, Julia Fromme, Wolfram Malter, Julia Caroline Radosa, Sebastian Ludwig, Julian Puppe, Stefan Paepke, Matthias Warm

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 5/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Estimating distant recurrence risk in women with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer is still challenging. EndoPredict® is a gene expression-based test predicting the likelihood of recurrent disease. We analyzed the difference in oncological decision making with and without the knowledge of gene expression tests.

Patients and methods

This is a retrospective analysis including patients diagnosed with hormone-receptor positive, Her2 negative breast cancer between 2011 and 2015 at the Municipal Breast Cancer Centre Cologne, Germany. All patients received an evaluation by EndoPredict®. An oncological tumor board (TB) with knowledge of these results served as a baseline (control group). This baseline was compared to the treatment decision (adjuvant chemotherapy yes vs. no) made by oncologists with different experience levels (less than 5 years, between 5 and 15 years, and more than 15 years) who were not provided the EndoPredict® scores. All clinicians had access to clinical as well to histopathological data.

Results

There was no significant difference between control group and the oncologists with different experience levels concerning a chemotherapy indication. A trend could be shown in the subgroup of nodal negative patients between the treatment recommendation and physicians with more than 15 years of experience (p = 0.088). A further trend could be demonstrated in the subgroup of patients with a low Ki67 index (≤ 14%) (p = 0.063) between physician with 5–10 years of clinical experience and official treatment recommendation.

Conclusion

It seems that inexperienced physicians may profit from the use of EndoPredict® to avoid an overtreatment. In nodal negative patients and patients with a low Ki67 index, undertreatment can be avoided with the use of EndoPredict® (borderline significance). Further prospective studies with larger study cohorts are needed to further validate this tool.
Literatur
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Vénat-Bouvet L, Fermeaux V, Leobon S et al (2014) Adjuvant chemotherapy in node-negative breast cancer: UPA/PAI-1 determinations for 163 cases. Anticancer Res 34:1213–1217PubMed Vénat-Bouvet L, Fermeaux V, Leobon S et al (2014) Adjuvant chemotherapy in node-negative breast cancer: UPA/PAI-1 determinations for 163 cases. Anticancer Res 34:1213–1217PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Thangarajah F, Enninga I, Malter W et al (2017) A retrospective analysis of Ki-67 index and its prognostic significance in over 800 primary breast cancer cases. Anticancer Res 37:1957–1964CrossRefPubMed Thangarajah F, Enninga I, Malter W et al (2017) A retrospective analysis of Ki-67 index and its prognostic significance in over 800 primary breast cancer cases. Anticancer Res 37:1957–1964CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The impact of EndoPredict ® on decision making with increasing oncological work experience: can overtreatment be avoided?
verfasst von
Fabinshy Thangarajah
Christian Eichler
Julia Fromme
Wolfram Malter
Julia Caroline Radosa
Sebastian Ludwig
Julian Puppe
Stefan Paepke
Matthias Warm
Publikationsdatum
19.02.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05097-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2019

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.