Erschienen in:
29.05.2020 | Original Article
The Italian National Registry for minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: an initiative of the Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Pancreas Surgery (IGoMIPS)
verfasst von:
Alessandro Zerbi, Giovanni Capretti, Niccolò Napoli, Giulio Belli, Roberto Coppola, Massimo Falconi, Roberto Salvia, Andrea Valeri, Sergio Alfieri, Stefano Berti, Giovanni Butturini, Giovanni Conzo, Andrea Coratti, Raffaele Dalla Valle, Gianluca Garulli, Giuseppe Maria Ettorre, Giovanni Ferrari, Alessandro Ferrero, Elio Jovine, Pietro Maida, Francesco Minni, Carlo Molino, Bruno Nardo, Paolo De Paolis, Mario Testini, Ugo Boggi
Erschienen in:
Updates in Surgery
|
Ausgabe 2/2020
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
The value of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery (MIPS) is still uncertain, despite the growing number of publications, including reviews and meta-analyses, and the quick diffusion of these procedures worldwide. The Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Pancreas Surgery (IGoMIPS) was created under the auspices of three Scientific Societies: Associazione Italiana Studio Pancreas (AISP), Associazione Italiana Chirurgia Epato-Bilio-Pancreatica (AICEP, former IT-IHPBA), and Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica (SICE). The main aim of IGoMIPS is to develop and implement a national registry for MIPS. IGoMIPS was founded on February 22, 2019 in Pisa. The IGoMIPS registry became operational in September 2019, following approval by the Ethic Committees of founding Institutions, inscription into the Registry of Patient Registries (RoPR), and a wrap-up meeting held in Bologna during the Annual Congress of the Italian Surgical Society. During this meeting IGoMIPS members approved that the Italian Registry will provide data to the European Registry, while retaining the right to analyze and publish Italian data. An audience survey was also conducted to obtain information on perceived value and current implementation of MIPS in founding Institutions. MIPS is performed in 94.7% of IGoMIPS centers, including pancreaticoduodenectomy in 42.1%. Robotic assistance was employed in 52.6% of Institutions. The annual volume of MIPS was 6–10 cases in 38.9% of the centers, 11–20 cases in 16.7%, 21–30 cases in 22.2%, and > 30 cases in 22.2%. The registry was felt to be extremely important for both safety improvement and educational purposes by 94.5% of the centers.