Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 4/2012

01.08.2012 | Review Article

The Multiple Birth Epidemic: Revisited

verfasst von: Sarit Avraham, Daniel S. Seidman

Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Ausgabe 4/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The modern era of infertility treatment was heralded over half a century ago with the introduction of new hormonal drugs that could effectively induce ovarian ovulation. However, it was quickly recognized that the birth of these new “miracle drugs” was associated with a remarkable increase in the incidence of high-order multiple births. Despite the fantastic improvement in our ability to monitor ovarian response during ovulation induction, and our power to control the number of embryos introduced into the womb through IVF, multiple births remain a leading cause of long-term child morbidity among infertility patients. Efforts to prevent what was coined in the 1960s as the “multiple birth epidemic” remain an urgent concern. A new body of research clearly points at our capacity to reduce the risk of multiple births and their associated long term morbidity without diminishing current high success rates of infertility treatment.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lunenfeld B. Historical perspectives in gonadotropin therapy. Hum Reprod. 2004;10:453–67.CrossRef Lunenfeld B. Historical perspectives in gonadotropin therapy. Hum Reprod. 2004;10:453–67.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Beall SA, Decherney A. History and challenges surrounding ovarian stimulation in the treatment of infertility. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:795–801.PubMedCrossRef Beall SA, Decherney A. History and challenges surrounding ovarian stimulation in the treatment of infertility. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:795–801.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Janvier A, Spelke B, Barrington KJ. The epidemic of multiple gestations and neonatal intensive care unit use: the cost of irresponsibility. J Pediatr. 2011;159:409–13.PubMedCrossRef Janvier A, Spelke B, Barrington KJ. The epidemic of multiple gestations and neonatal intensive care unit use: the cost of irresponsibility. J Pediatr. 2011;159:409–13.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK. Three decades of twin births in the United States, 1980–2009. NCHS data brief, no 80. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics; 2012. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK. Three decades of twin births in the United States, 1980–2009. NCHS data brief, no 80. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics; 2012.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Blondel B, Kaminski M. Trends in the occurrence, determinants, and consequences of multiple births. Semin Perinatol. 2002;26:239–49.PubMedCrossRef Blondel B, Kaminski M. Trends in the occurrence, determinants, and consequences of multiple births. Semin Perinatol. 2002;26:239–49.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ooki S. Estimation of the contribution of assisted and non-assisted reproductive technology fertility treatments to multiple births during the past 30 years in Japan: 1979–2008. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2011;14:476–83.CrossRef Ooki S. Estimation of the contribution of assisted and non-assisted reproductive technology fertility treatments to multiple births during the past 30 years in Japan: 1979–2008. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2011;14:476–83.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Allen VM, Wilson RD, Cheung A. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006;28:220–50.PubMed Allen VM, Wilson RD, Cheung A. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006;28:220–50.PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Herbert DL, Lucke JC, Dobson AJ. Birth outcomes after spontaneous or assisted conception among infertile Australian women aged 28 to 36 years: a prospective, population-based study. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:630–8.PubMedCrossRef Herbert DL, Lucke JC, Dobson AJ. Birth outcomes after spontaneous or assisted conception among infertile Australian women aged 28 to 36 years: a prospective, population-based study. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:630–8.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat McDonald SD, Han Z, Mulla S, et al. Preterm birth and low birth weight among in vitro fertilization twins: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;148:105–13.PubMedCrossRef McDonald SD, Han Z, Mulla S, et al. Preterm birth and low birth weight among in vitro fertilization twins: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;148:105–13.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Roca-de Bes M, Gutierrez-Maldonado J, Gris-Martinez JM. Comparative study of the psychological risks associated with families with multiple births resulting from assisted reproductive technology (ART) and without ART. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:170–4. Roca-de Bes M, Gutierrez-Maldonado J, Gris-Martinez JM. Comparative study of the psychological risks associated with families with multiple births resulting from assisted reproductive technology (ART) and without ART. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:170–4.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Connolly MP, Hoorens S, Chambers GM, ESHRE Reproduction and Society Task Force. The costs and consequences of assisted reproductive technology: an economic perspective. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:603–13.PubMedCrossRef Connolly MP, Hoorens S, Chambers GM, ESHRE Reproduction and Society Task Force. The costs and consequences of assisted reproductive technology: an economic perspective. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:603–13.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bromer JG, Ata B, Seli M, et al. Preterm deliveries that result from multiple pregnancies associated with assisted reproductive technologies in the USA: a cost analysis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;23:168–73.PubMedCrossRef Bromer JG, Ata B, Seli M, et al. Preterm deliveries that result from multiple pregnancies associated with assisted reproductive technologies in the USA: a cost analysis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;23:168–73.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sentilhes L, Audibert F, Dommerques M, et al. Multifetal pregnancy reduction: indications, technical aspects and psychological impact. Presse Med. 2008;37:295–306.PubMedCrossRef Sentilhes L, Audibert F, Dommerques M, et al. Multifetal pregnancy reduction: indications, technical aspects and psychological impact. Presse Med. 2008;37:295–306.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Tadin I, Roje D, Banovic I, et al. Fetal reduction in multifetal pregnancy—ethical dilemmas. Yonsei Med J. 2002;43:252–8.PubMed Tadin I, Roje D, Banovic I, et al. Fetal reduction in multifetal pregnancy—ethical dilemmas. Yonsei Med J. 2002;43:252–8.PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Practice committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Elective single-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:835–42.CrossRef Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Practice committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Elective single-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:835–42.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Thurin A, Hausken J, Hillensjo T, et al. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2392–402.PubMedCrossRef Thurin A, Hausken J, Hillensjo T, et al. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2392–402.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Grady R, Alavi N, Vale R, et al. Elective single embryo transfer and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:324–31.PubMedCrossRef Grady R, Alavi N, Vale R, et al. Elective single embryo transfer and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:324–31.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kato K, Takehara Y, Seqawa T, et al. Minimal ovarian stimulation combined with elective single embryo transfer policy: age-specific results of large, single-centre, Japanese cohort. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10:35.PubMedCrossRef Kato K, Takehara Y, Seqawa T, et al. Minimal ovarian stimulation combined with elective single embryo transfer policy: age-specific results of large, single-centre, Japanese cohort. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10:35.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat McClamrock HD, Jones HW Jr, Adashi EY. Ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination at the quarter centennial: implications for the multiple births epidemic. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:802–9.PubMedCrossRef McClamrock HD, Jones HW Jr, Adashi EY. Ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination at the quarter centennial: implications for the multiple births epidemic. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:802–9.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones CA, Christensen AL, Salihu H, et al. Prediction of individual probabilities of live birth and multiple birth events following in vitro fertilization (IVF): a new outcomes counseling tool for IVF providers and patients using HFEA metrics. J Exp Clin Assist Reprod. 2011;8:3.PubMed Jones CA, Christensen AL, Salihu H, et al. Prediction of individual probabilities of live birth and multiple birth events following in vitro fertilization (IVF): a new outcomes counseling tool for IVF providers and patients using HFEA metrics. J Exp Clin Assist Reprod. 2011;8:3.PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright VC, Schieve LA, Reynolds MA, et al. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance—United States, 2002. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2005;54:1–24.PubMed Wright VC, Schieve LA, Reynolds MA, et al. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance—United States, 2002. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2005;54:1–24.PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Reynolds MA, Schieve LA. Trends in embryo transfer practices and multiple gestation for IVF procedures in the USA, 1996–2002. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:694–700.PubMedCrossRef Reynolds MA, Schieve LA. Trends in embryo transfer practices and multiple gestation for IVF procedures in the USA, 1996–2002. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:694–700.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Multiple gestation pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1856–64.CrossRef The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Multiple gestation pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1856–64.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Min JK, Claman P, Hughes E, et al. Guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer following in vitro fertilization No. 182, September 2006. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;102:203–16.CrossRef Min JK, Claman P, Hughes E, et al. Guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer following in vitro fertilization No. 182, September 2006. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;102:203–16.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Min JK, Hughes E, Young D, et al. Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010;32:363–77.PubMed Min JK, Hughes E, Young D, et al. Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010;32:363–77.PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Practice committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1518–9.CrossRef Practice committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1518–9.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Maheshwari A, Griffiths S, Bhattacharya S. Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:107–20.PubMedCrossRef Maheshwari A, Griffiths S, Bhattacharya S. Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:107–20.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ata B, Seli E. Economics of assisted reproductive technologies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22:183–8.PubMedCrossRef Ata B, Seli E. Economics of assisted reproductive technologies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22:183–8.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Veleva Z, Karinen P, Tomas C, et al. Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1632–9.PubMedCrossRef Veleva Z, Karinen P, Tomas C, et al. Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1632–9.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Bensdorp AJ, Slappendel E, Koks C, et al. The INeS study: prevention of multiple pregnancies: a randomised controlled trial comparing IUI COH versus IVF e SET versus MNC IVF in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility. BMC Womens Health. 2009;9:35.PubMedCrossRef Bensdorp AJ, Slappendel E, Koks C, et al. The INeS study: prevention of multiple pregnancies: a randomised controlled trial comparing IUI COH versus IVF e SET versus MNC IVF in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility. BMC Womens Health. 2009;9:35.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat McKelvey A, David AL, Shenfield F, et al. The impact of cross-border reproductive care or “fertility tourism” on NHS maternity service. BJOG. 2009;116:1520–3.PubMedCrossRef McKelvey A, David AL, Shenfield F, et al. The impact of cross-border reproductive care or “fertility tourism” on NHS maternity service. BJOG. 2009;116:1520–3.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Culley L, Hudson N, Rapport F, et al. Crossing borders for fertility treatment: motivations, destinations and outcomes of UK fertility travelers. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:2373–81.PubMedCrossRef Culley L, Hudson N, Rapport F, et al. Crossing borders for fertility treatment: motivations, destinations and outcomes of UK fertility travelers. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:2373–81.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Storrow RF. The pluralism problem in cross-border reproductive care. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2939–43.PubMedCrossRef Storrow RF. The pluralism problem in cross-border reproductive care. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2939–43.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Hopkins L, Labonte R, Runnels V, et al. Medical tourism today: what is the state of existing knowledge? J Public Health Policy. 2010;31:185–98.PubMedCrossRef Hopkins L, Labonte R, Runnels V, et al. Medical tourism today: what is the state of existing knowledge? J Public Health Policy. 2010;31:185–98.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones HW Jr, Cooke I, Kempers R, et al. International Federation of Fertility Societies Surveillance 2010: preface. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:491.PubMedCrossRef Jones HW Jr, Cooke I, Kempers R, et al. International Federation of Fertility Societies Surveillance 2010: preface. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:491.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Multiple Birth Epidemic: Revisited
verfasst von
Sarit Avraham
Daniel S. Seidman
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Ausgabe 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Elektronische ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-012-0309-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2012

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 4/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.