The significance of research problem
With the rapid development of information technology, the Internet plus era has gradually integrated into all aspects of our lives. More and more people are using internet based applications and devices. While providing convenience, the internet can also lead to excessive dependence and even addiction. The research on problematic use of internet includes two aspects, general and specific internet addiction. Specific internet addiction emphasizes focusing on specific activities on the internet, while general internet addiction emphasizes engaging in all daily activities on a particular device or internet [
1]. A smartphone is a general term for a type of mobile phone that has an independent operating system, independent running space, and can be installed by users on their own by third-party service providers, and can achieve wireless network access through mobile communication networks [
2,
3]. Therefore, smartphone addiction can be seen as a type of general internet addiction [
4‐
7]. The 51st Statistical Report on Internet Development in China released by the China Internet Network Information Centre (CNNIC) shows that as of December 2022, the number of mobile phone Internet users in China reached 6.5 billion, and the proportion of Internet users using smartphone to access the Internet was 99.8 percent [
8]. Some scholars have found that smartphone addiction is detected at a high rate among university students, with the rate of smartphone addiction among Chinese university students reaching 21.3% [
9], a cross-culturally consistent finding, with 36.4% of university students in South Korea suffering from long-term smartphone addiction [
10], and in Saudi Arabia, the rate of smartphone addiction detection among university students is as high as 48.0% [
11].
Smartphone addiction, also known as problematic smartphone use, refers to addictive behavior in which individuals are unable to control their smartphone usage, leading to impaired physical, psychological, and social functioning [
12,
13]. Chóliz [
14] predicted that smartphone addiction would be one of the most significant addictive behaviors in the twenty-first century, making it a hot topic for scholars. Consequently, researchers have conducted numerous studies on the predictors and negative effects of smartphone addiction to provide guidance for prevention and intervention [
15]. Ran et al. [
16] found that social anxiety is a significant predictor of smartphone addiction in both adolescents and adults. Therefore, it should be considered when designing intervention programs for these age groups.
For studies related to the consequences of smartphone addiction, results show that smartphone addiction leads to reduced sleep quality [
17,
18], impaired cognitive functioning [
19,
20] decreased academic motivation and consequently lower grades [
21,
22], and development of negative emotions such as anxiety, depression, and loneliness [
23‐
26]. In recent years, some researchers have argued that some factors such as self-control and loneliness, which are both antecedents of smartphone addiction, are also affected and are consequences of smartphone addiction [
15]. Therefore, research on smartphone addiction should not only focus on exploring the relationship between smartphone addiction and related factors but also investigate their interactions. Network analysis, as an emerging research method, allows for different variables to be placed into the same visual network model to reveal the interactions between variables [
27‐
29]. This paper adopts network analysis approach to explore the interactions between university students' smartphone addiction and related factors. Its aim is to identify the core factors influencing university students' smartphone addiction.
Network analysis
Network analysis is based on the network theory of mental disorder by placing different personality traits, influences, and symptoms, among others, in the same visual network in order to assess the complex relationships and interactions between them [
28,
29,
43]. Nodes in a network represent observed variables, and edges connecting nodes represent statistical relationships between observed variables [
28]. In recent years, researchers have used network analysis to build networks of relationships between numerous variables or symptoms to explore complex psychological constructions, and this approach has also been widely used in the field of smartphone addiction research. For example, Li et al. [
44] used network analysis to understand the interrelationships between misplaced anxiety, smartphone addiction, and social networking site usage. It has also been found that loss of control and overuse are core symptoms of smartphone addiction [
45]. Most of these studies are based on cross-sectional data at a given time and can illustrate interrelationships between variables or symptoms, but caution is needed regarding causal inferences. Rhemtulla et al. [
46] developed cross-lagged panel network analysis using cross-lagged panel data in conjunction with network analysis. This method can reveal the longitudinal processes that occur within and across structures over time [
47]. Meanwhile, cross-lagged panel network can confirm the stronger impact of core nodes on other nodes, indicating the activation role of core nodes in the entire network [
48,
49].
The objective of this study
This study is guided by the I-PACE model and the network theory of mental disorder, and uses cross-sectional and cross-lagged panel network models to analyze university students' smartphone addiction and its related influencing factors. The study examined smartphone addiction and its influencing factors, including personal core characteristics, affective and cognitive responses, gratification, executive and control functions. The main objective of this study is to explore the transverse correlation and vertical prediction relationship between smartphone addiction and related influencing factors among university students. This paper aims to identify the core factors among these related influencing factors through some central indicators, and provide more specific implications for the future intervention of smartphone addiction in university students.