Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Radiation Oncology 1/2014

01.03.2014 | Original Research

The use of heterogeneity corrections and its impact on delivered dose in patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy of the lung

verfasst von: C. E. Rutter, Z. A. Husain, B. R. Mancini, S. A. Naqvi, B. Zhang, K. Marter, M. Koshy, A. Dhople, W. D. D’Souza, S. J. Feigenberg

Erschienen in: Journal of Radiation Oncology | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

Tissue density correction algorithms are widely used in North America when planning stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatments and influence calculations regarding delivered dose. In turn, this may have an impact on complications and local control on tumors treated in the lung. This study evaluated the impact of patient-related and tumor-related factors on the dose to the tumor with and without heterogeneity corrections.

Methods

Fifty-one consecutive patients were treated for malignant lung tumors with SBRT using the RTOG 0236 guidelines, without heterogeneity corrections. Using the same beam arrangements and monitor units, dose distributions were recalculated using heterogeneity corrections, and the percent difference in dose to 5 (hot spot), 50, and 95 % of the internal target volume (ITV; D5, D50, and D95) between the two plans was computed. Correlation analysis and independent samples t tests were used to identify significant differences in these statistics based on tumor distance from the chest wall, central vs. peripheral location, lobe involved, ITV, gross target volume (GTV), and body mass index (BMI).

Results

On average, the use of heterogeneity corrections resulted in increases in D95 (3.8 %; range −7.7 to 11.2 %), D50 (7.0 %; range −3.0 to 15.3 %), and D5 (8.7 %; range −14.4 to 17.6 %). Tumors greater than 1 cm away from the chest wall were associated with a significantly larger increase in D5 (10.1 vs. 7.4 %, p = 0.046). Central tumors were associated with a significantly larger increase in D50 (8.9 vs. 6.2 %, p = 0.022). ITV was correlated to the magnitude of increase in D95 (R = .277, p = 0.049), and ITV greater than the median value (13.9 cm3) resulted in a larger increase in D50 (5.8 vs. 8.1 %, p = 0.035) and D95 (1.8 vs. 5.8 %, p = 0.002). Tumors of the lower lobes were associated with trends toward significance for increase in D5 (9.8 vs. 7.8 %, p = 0.079) and D50 (8.3 vs. 6.3 %, p = 0.078), and left upper lobe tumors were associated with smaller increases in D50 (5.0 vs. 7.5 %, p = 0.043). GTV size and BMI had no impact on these values.

Conclusions

The use of heterogeneity corrections increases the dose to the ITV. The magnitude of this effect is increased by a larger ITV, tumor location in the lower lobes where diaphragmatic excursion causes greater tumor motion, increased distance from chest wall to tumor, and central location.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lax I, Blomgren H, Näslund I, Svanström R (1994) Stereotactic radiotherapy of malignancies in the abdomen methodological aspects. Acta Oncol 33(6):677–683PubMedCrossRef Lax I, Blomgren H, Näslund I, Svanström R (1994) Stereotactic radiotherapy of malignancies in the abdomen methodological aspects. Acta Oncol 33(6):677–683PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Blomgren H, Lax I, Näslund I, Svanström R (1995) Stereotactic high dose fraction radiation therapy of extracranial tumors using an accelerator. Clinical experience of the first thirty-one patients. Acta Oncol 34(3):861–870PubMedCrossRef Blomgren H, Lax I, Näslund I, Svanström R (1995) Stereotactic high dose fraction radiation therapy of extracranial tumors using an accelerator. Clinical experience of the first thirty-one patients. Acta Oncol 34(3):861–870PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Uematsu M, Shioda A, Tahara K et al (1998) Focal, high dose, and fractionated modified stereotactic radiation therapy for lung carcinoma patients: a preliminary experience. Cancer 82(6):1062–1070PubMedCrossRef Uematsu M, Shioda A, Tahara K et al (1998) Focal, high dose, and fractionated modified stereotactic radiation therapy for lung carcinoma patients: a preliminary experience. Cancer 82(6):1062–1070PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Timmerman R, McGarry R, Yiannoutsos C et al (2006) Excessive toxicity when treating central tumors in a phase II study of stereotactic body radiation therapy for medically inoperable early-stage lung cancer. J Clin Onc 24(30):4833–4839CrossRef Timmerman R, McGarry R, Yiannoutsos C et al (2006) Excessive toxicity when treating central tumors in a phase II study of stereotactic body radiation therapy for medically inoperable early-stage lung cancer. J Clin Onc 24(30):4833–4839CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Timmerman R, Papiez L, McGarry R et al (2003) Extracranial stereotactic radioablation: results of a phase I study in medically inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Chest 124(5):1946–1955PubMedCrossRef Timmerman R, Papiez L, McGarry R et al (2003) Extracranial stereotactic radioablation: results of a phase I study in medically inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Chest 124(5):1946–1955PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat McGarry RC, Papiez L, Williams M, Whitford T, Timmerman RD (2005) Stereotactic body radiation therapy of early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma: phase I study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63(4):1010–1015PubMedCrossRef McGarry RC, Papiez L, Williams M, Whitford T, Timmerman RD (2005) Stereotactic body radiation therapy of early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma: phase I study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63(4):1010–1015PubMedCrossRef
7.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Welsh J, Thomas J, Wei X et al (2009) Skin toxicity and pain in patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75(3):S61CrossRef Welsh J, Thomas J, Wei X et al (2009) Skin toxicity and pain in patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75(3):S61CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagata Y, Takayama K, Matsuo Y et al (2005) Clinical outcomes of a phase I/II study of 48 Gy of stereotactic body radiotherapy in 4 fractions for primary lung cancer using a stereotactic body frame. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63(5):1427–1431PubMedCrossRef Nagata Y, Takayama K, Matsuo Y et al (2005) Clinical outcomes of a phase I/II study of 48 Gy of stereotactic body radiotherapy in 4 fractions for primary lung cancer using a stereotactic body frame. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63(5):1427–1431PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Onishi H, Shirato H, Nagata Y et al (2007) Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HypoFXSRT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: updated results of 257 patients in a Japanese multi-institutional study. J Thor Onc 2(7):S94–S100CrossRef Onishi H, Shirato H, Nagata Y et al (2007) Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HypoFXSRT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: updated results of 257 patients in a Japanese multi-institutional study. J Thor Onc 2(7):S94–S100CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat DesRosiers PM, Moskvin VP, DesRosiers CM et al (2004) Lung cancer radiation therapy: Monte Carlo investigation of “under dose” by high energy photons. Technol Cancer Res Treat 3(3):289–294PubMed DesRosiers PM, Moskvin VP, DesRosiers CM et al (2004) Lung cancer radiation therapy: Monte Carlo investigation of “under dose” by high energy photons. Technol Cancer Res Treat 3(3):289–294PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat RTOG 0236 protocol. A phase II trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the treatment of patients with medically inoperable stage I/II non-small cell lung cancer RTOG 0236 protocol. A phase II trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the treatment of patients with medically inoperable stage I/II non-small cell lung cancer
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang JY, Balter PA, Dong L et al (2008) Stereotactic body radiation therapy in centrally and superiorly located stage I or isolated recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 72(4):967–971PubMedCrossRef Chang JY, Balter PA, Dong L et al (2008) Stereotactic body radiation therapy in centrally and superiorly located stage I or isolated recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 72(4):967–971PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Stephans KL, Djemil T, Reddy CA et al (2009) A comparison of two stereotactic body radiation fractionation schedules for medically inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer: the Cleveland Clinic experience. J Thorac Oncol 4(8):976–982PubMedCrossRef Stephans KL, Djemil T, Reddy CA et al (2009) A comparison of two stereotactic body radiation fractionation schedules for medically inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer: the Cleveland Clinic experience. J Thorac Oncol 4(8):976–982PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiao Y, Papiez L, Paulus R et al (2009) Dosimetric evaluation of heterogeneity corrections for RTOG 0236: stereotactic body radiation therapy of inoperable stage I/II non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 73(4):1235–1242PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Xiao Y, Papiez L, Paulus R et al (2009) Dosimetric evaluation of heterogeneity corrections for RTOG 0236: stereotactic body radiation therapy of inoperable stage I/II non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 73(4):1235–1242PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhuang T, Djemil T, Qi P et al (2013) Dose calculation differences between Monte Carlo and pencil beam depend on the tumor locations and volumes for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 14(2):4011PubMed Zhuang T, Djemil T, Qi P et al (2013) Dose calculation differences between Monte Carlo and pencil beam depend on the tumor locations and volumes for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 14(2):4011PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Benedict SH, Yenice KM, Followill D et al (2010) Stereotactic body radiation therapy: the report of AAPM Task Group 101. Med Phys 37(8):4078–4100PubMedCrossRef Benedict SH, Yenice KM, Followill D et al (2010) Stereotactic body radiation therapy: the report of AAPM Task Group 101. Med Phys 37(8):4078–4100PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The use of heterogeneity corrections and its impact on delivered dose in patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy of the lung
verfasst von
C. E. Rutter
Z. A. Husain
B. R. Mancini
S. A. Naqvi
B. Zhang
K. Marter
M. Koshy
A. Dhople
W. D. D’Souza
S. J. Feigenberg
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Journal of Radiation Oncology / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 1948-7894
Elektronische ISSN: 1948-7908
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13566-013-0133-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

Journal of Radiation Oncology 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Erhöhtes Risiko fürs Herz unter Checkpointhemmer-Therapie

28.05.2024 Nebenwirkungen der Krebstherapie Nachrichten

Kardiotoxische Nebenwirkungen einer Therapie mit Immuncheckpointhemmern mögen selten sein – wenn sie aber auftreten, wird es für Patienten oft lebensgefährlich. Voruntersuchung und Monitoring sind daher obligat.

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

28.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

„Kalte“ Tumoren werden heiß – CD28-kostimulatorische Antikörper sollen dies ermöglichen. Am besten könnten diese in Kombination mit BiTEs und Checkpointhemmern wirken. Erste klinische Studien laufen bereits.

Perioperative Checkpointhemmer-Therapie verbessert NSCLC-Prognose

28.05.2024 NSCLC Nachrichten

Eine perioperative Therapie mit Nivolumab reduziert das Risiko für Rezidive und Todesfälle bei operablem NSCLC im Vergleich zu einer alleinigen neoadjuvanten Chemotherapie um über 40%. Darauf deuten die Resultate der Phase-3-Studie CheckMate 77T.

Positiver FIT: Die Ursache liegt nicht immer im Dickdarm

27.05.2024 Blut im Stuhl Nachrichten

Immunchemischer Stuhltest positiv, Koloskopie negativ – in solchen Fällen kann die Blutungsquelle auch weiter proximal sitzen. Ein Forschungsteam hat nachgesehen, wie häufig und in welchen Lokalisationen das der Fall ist.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.