Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 9/2008

01.09.2008 | Glaucoma

The use of semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) to monitor advanced glaucomatous visual field loss

verfasst von: J. Nevalainen, J. Paetzold, E. Krapp, R. Vonthein, C. A. Johnson, U. Schiefer

Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 9/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

(i) To compare visual field (VF) results obtained with semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) and automated static perimetry (ASP) in patients with advanced glaucomatous VF loss, (ii) to evaluate test-retest reliability of SKP and ASP and (iii) to assess patients’ preference for SKP and ASP.

Methods

Twenty eyes of 20 patients (11 male, 9 female, aged 38 to 83 years) with advanced glaucomatous VF loss (stage III or IV according to the Aulhorn classification). Each of the 20 patients were examined in 4 sessions every 3 months with SKP (Goldmann stimulus III4e, I4e and at least one additional dimmer stimulus, within the 90° visual field) and ASP within the 30° VF, employing a threshold-related, supra-threshold test strategy with high spatial resolution for the same instrument (Octopus 101 perimeter, Haag-Streit Inc., Koeniz, Switzerland).

Results

Visual field areas (VFA) were compared by analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) with co-variable time, patient effect and their interaction. Test-retest reliability was assessed by ratios (R) of intersection and union of VFA: The mean VFA within the 30° of VF at baseline was 2,344 square degrees (deg2) with SKP (Goldmann stimulus III4e) and 1,844 deg2 with ASP. The patients showed stable visual fields for both SKP and ASP. Comparison of SKP with ASP of the same sessions revealed a median ratio of intersection and union of VFA of 0.78 with the III4e stimulus and of 0.79 with the I4e stimulus. When follow-up SKPs were compared with baseline SKPs the median of the ratios was between 0.80 and 0.93 for the different isopters. The corresponding ratio of ASP’s follow-up and baseline VFs was 0.81 (with the size III static stimulus). Nineteen of 20 patients preferred kinetic perimetry to static perimetry.

Conclusions

The comparability between SKP and ASP is satisfactory and within the range of the test-retest reliability of ASP. SKP shows slightly better test-retest reliability than ASP. The majority of patients with advanced glaucomatous visual field loss prefer SKP instead of ASP. SKP is a valuable alternative to ASP in monitoring advanced glaucomatous visual field loss.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Aulhorn E, Karmeyer H (1977) Frequency distribution in early glaucomatous visual field defects. Docum Ophthal Proc Series 14:75–83 Aulhorn E, Karmeyer H (1977) Frequency distribution in early glaucomatous visual field defects. Docum Ophthal Proc Series 14:75–83
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Beck RW, Bergstrom TJ, Lichter PR (1985) A clinical comparison of visual field testing with a new automated perimeter, the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and the Goldmann perimeter. Ophthalmology 92:77–82PubMed Beck RW, Bergstrom TJ, Lichter PR (1985) A clinical comparison of visual field testing with a new automated perimeter, the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and the Goldmann perimeter. Ophthalmology 92:77–82PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Dolderer J, Vonthein R, Johnson CA, Schiefer U, Hart W (2006) Scotoma mapping by semi-automated kinetic perimetry: the effects of stimulus properties and the speed of subjects’ responses. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 84:338–344PubMedCrossRef Dolderer J, Vonthein R, Johnson CA, Schiefer U, Hart W (2006) Scotoma mapping by semi-automated kinetic perimetry: the effects of stimulus properties and the speed of subjects’ responses. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 84:338–344PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Heijl A, Drance SM, Douglas GR (1980) Automatic perimetry (COMPETER). Ability to detect early glaucomatous field defects. Arch Ophthalmol 98:1560–1563PubMed Heijl A, Drance SM, Douglas GR (1980) Automatic perimetry (COMPETER). Ability to detect early glaucomatous field defects. Arch Ophthalmol 98:1560–1563PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hotchkiss ML, Robin AL, Quigley HA, Pollack IP (1985) A comparison of Peritest automated perimetry and Goldmann perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 103:397–403PubMed Hotchkiss ML, Robin AL, Quigley HA, Pollack IP (1985) A comparison of Peritest automated perimetry and Goldmann perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 103:397–403PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hudson C, Wild JM (1992) Assessment of physiologic statokinetic dissociation by automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33:3162–3168PubMed Hudson C, Wild JM (1992) Assessment of physiologic statokinetic dissociation by automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33:3162–3168PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson CA, Keltner JL (1987) Optimal rates of movement for kinetic perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 105:73–75PubMed Johnson CA, Keltner JL (1987) Optimal rates of movement for kinetic perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 105:73–75PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Katz J, Sommer A, Gaasterland DE, Anderson DR (1991) Comparison of analytic algorithms for detecting glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 109:1684–1689PubMed Katz J, Sommer A, Gaasterland DE, Anderson DR (1991) Comparison of analytic algorithms for detecting glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 109:1684–1689PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Katz J, Tielsch JM, Quigley HA, Sommer A (1995) Automated perimetry detects visual field loss before manual Goldmann perimetry. Ophthalmology 102:21–26PubMed Katz J, Tielsch JM, Quigley HA, Sommer A (1995) Automated perimetry detects visual field loss before manual Goldmann perimetry. Ophthalmology 102:21–26PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Mills RP, Budenz DL, Lee PP, Noecker RJ, Walt JG, Siegartel LR, Evans SJ, Doyle JJ (2006) Categorizing the stage of glaucoma from pre-diagnosis to end-stage disease. Am J Ophthalmol 141:24–30PubMedCrossRef Mills RP, Budenz DL, Lee PP, Noecker RJ, Walt JG, Siegartel LR, Evans SJ, Doyle JJ (2006) Categorizing the stage of glaucoma from pre-diagnosis to end-stage disease. Am J Ophthalmol 141:24–30PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Nowomiejska KE, Rejdak R, Zarnowski T, Krapp E, Paetzold J, Schiefer U, Zagorski Z (2004) Comparison of SKP (semi-automated kinetic perimetry) and SASP (suprathreshold automated static perimetry) techniques in patients with advanced glaucoma. Acta Opthalmol Polonica 106:231–233 Nowomiejska KE, Rejdak R, Zarnowski T, Krapp E, Paetzold J, Schiefer U, Zagorski Z (2004) Comparison of SKP (semi-automated kinetic perimetry) and SASP (suprathreshold automated static perimetry) techniques in patients with advanced glaucoma. Acta Opthalmol Polonica 106:231–233
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Nowomiejska KE, Vonthein R, Paetzold J, Zagorski Z, Kardon R, Schiefer U (2005) Comparison between semiautomated kinetic perimetry and conventional Goldmann manual kinetic perimetry in advanced visual field loss. Ophthalmology 112:1343–1354PubMedCrossRef Nowomiejska KE, Vonthein R, Paetzold J, Zagorski Z, Kardon R, Schiefer U (2005) Comparison between semiautomated kinetic perimetry and conventional Goldmann manual kinetic perimetry in advanced visual field loss. Ophthalmology 112:1343–1354PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Odaka T, Fujisawa K, Akazawa K, Sakamoto M, Kinukawa N, Kamakura T, Nishioka Y, Itasaka H, Watanabe Y, Nose Y (1992) A visual field quantification system for the Goldmann Perimeter. J Med Syst 16:161–169PubMedCrossRef Odaka T, Fujisawa K, Akazawa K, Sakamoto M, Kinukawa N, Kamakura T, Nishioka Y, Itasaka H, Watanabe Y, Nose Y (1992) A visual field quantification system for the Goldmann Perimeter. J Med Syst 16:161–169PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Quinn GE, Fea AM, Minguini N (1991) Visual fields in 4 to 10-year-old children using Goldmann and double-arc perimeters. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 28:314–319PubMed Quinn GE, Fea AM, Minguini N (1991) Visual fields in 4 to 10-year-old children using Goldmann and double-arc perimeters. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 28:314–319PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rauscher S, Vonthein R, Sadowski B, Erdmann B, Krapp E, Schiefer U (2002) Computer-Assisted Kinetic Perimetry (CAKP) Using the Octopus 101 Perimeter: age-related normal values of local thresholds using various stimulus conditions and considering individual reaction times. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43: E-abstract 3810 Rauscher S, Vonthein R, Sadowski B, Erdmann B, Krapp E, Schiefer U (2002) Computer-Assisted Kinetic Perimetry (CAKP) Using the Octopus 101 Perimeter: age-related normal values of local thresholds using various stimulus conditions and considering individual reaction times. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43: E-abstract 3810
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Riddoch G (1917) Dissociation of visual perceptions due to occipital injuries with especial reference to appreciation of movement. Brain 40:15–57CrossRef Riddoch G (1917) Dissociation of visual perceptions due to occipital injuries with especial reference to appreciation of movement. Brain 40:15–57CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Safran AB, Glaser JS (1980) Statokinetic dissociation in lesions of the anterior visual pathways. A reappraisal of the Riddoch phenomenon. Arch Ophthalmol 98:291–295PubMed Safran AB, Glaser JS (1980) Statokinetic dissociation in lesions of the anterior visual pathways. A reappraisal of the Riddoch phenomenon. Arch Ophthalmol 98:291–295PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiefer U, Nowomiejska K, Krapp E, Paetzold J, Johnson CA (2006) K-Train- a computer-based, interactive training program with an incorporated certification system for practicing kinetic perimetry: evaluation of acceptance and success rate. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 244(10):1300–1309PubMedCrossRef Schiefer U, Nowomiejska K, Krapp E, Paetzold J, Johnson CA (2006) K-Train- a computer-based, interactive training program with an incorporated certification system for practicing kinetic perimetry: evaluation of acceptance and success rate. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 244(10):1300–1309PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiefer U, Nowomiejska KE, Paetzold J (2004) Semi-automated kinetic perimetry for assessment of advanced glaucomatous visual field loss. In: Grehn F, Stamper R (eds) Glaucoma. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 51–61 Schiefer U, Nowomiejska KE, Paetzold J (2004) Semi-automated kinetic perimetry for assessment of advanced glaucomatous visual field loss. In: Grehn F, Stamper R (eds) Glaucoma. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 51–61
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiefer U, Rauscher S, Hermann A, Nowomiejska KE, Sadowski B, Vonthein R, Paetzold J, Schiller J (2003) Age dependence of normative values in semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44: E-abstract 1957 Schiefer U, Rauscher S, Hermann A, Nowomiejska KE, Sadowski B, Vonthein R, Paetzold J, Schiller J (2003) Age dependence of normative values in semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44: E-abstract 1957
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiefer U, Schiller J, Paetzold J, Dietrich TJ, Vonthein R, Besch D (2001) Evaluation ausgedehnter Gesichtsfelddefekte mittels computerassistierter kinetischer Perimetrie. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 218:13–20PubMedCrossRef Schiefer U, Schiller J, Paetzold J, Dietrich TJ, Vonthein R, Besch D (2001) Evaluation ausgedehnter Gesichtsfelddefekte mittels computerassistierter kinetischer Perimetrie. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 218:13–20PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiller J, Paetzold J, Vonthein R, Hart WM, Kurtenbach A, Schiefer U (2006) Quantification of stato-kinetic dissociation by semi-automated perimetry. Vision Res 46:117–128PubMedCrossRef Schiller J, Paetzold J, Vonthein R, Hart WM, Kurtenbach A, Schiefer U (2006) Quantification of stato-kinetic dissociation by semi-automated perimetry. Vision Res 46:117–128PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Szatmáry G, Biousse V, Newman NJ (2002) Can Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast perimetry be used as an alternative to Goldmann perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic practice? Arch Ophthalmol 120:1162–1173PubMed Szatmáry G, Biousse V, Newman NJ (2002) Can Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast perimetry be used as an alternative to Goldmann perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic practice? Arch Ophthalmol 120:1162–1173PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Trost DC, Woolson RF, Hayreh SS (1979) Quantification of visual fields for statistical analysis. Arch Ophthalmol 97:2175–2180PubMed Trost DC, Woolson RF, Hayreh SS (1979) Quantification of visual fields for statistical analysis. Arch Ophthalmol 97:2175–2180PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Vonthein R, Rauscher S, Paetzold J, Nowomiejska K, Krapp E, Hermann A, Sadowski B, Chaumette C, Wild JM, Schiefer U (2007) The normal age-corrected and reaction time-corrected isopter derived by semi-automated kinetic perimetry. Ophthalmology 114:1065–1072PubMedCrossRef Vonthein R, Rauscher S, Paetzold J, Nowomiejska K, Krapp E, Hermann A, Sadowski B, Chaumette C, Wild JM, Schiefer U (2007) The normal age-corrected and reaction time-corrected isopter derived by semi-automated kinetic perimetry. Ophthalmology 114:1065–1072PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Wabbels B, Kolling G (2001) Automatische kinetische Perimetrie mit unterschiedlichen Prüfgeschwindigkeiten [Automated kinetic perimetry using different stimulus velocities (in German)]. Ophthalmologe 98:168–173PubMedCrossRef Wabbels B, Kolling G (2001) Automatische kinetische Perimetrie mit unterschiedlichen Prüfgeschwindigkeiten [Automated kinetic perimetry using different stimulus velocities (in German)]. Ophthalmologe 98:168–173PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The use of semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) to monitor advanced glaucomatous visual field loss
verfasst von
J. Nevalainen
J. Paetzold
E. Krapp
R. Vonthein
C. A. Johnson
U. Schiefer
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 9/2008
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-008-0828-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2008

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 9/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.