Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Ophthalmology 1/2018

Open Access 01.12.2018 | Case report

Tractional Descemet’s membrane detachment after ocular alkali burns: case reports and review of literature

verfasst von: Xiaoling Zhang, Vishal Jhanji, Haoyu Chen

Erschienen in: BMC Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 1/2018

Abstract

Background

Descemet’s membrane detachment (DMD) is a rare complication after ocular chemical injury and its pathogenesis remains unclear. In this study, we reported two cases of DMD with traction demonstrated on Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT).

Case presentation

Two patients sustained ocular chemical injury with 50% sodium hydroxide. In both cases, AS-OCT revealed detached Descemet’s membrane that was adherent to the underlying iris tissue in the inferior quadrant at 45 days and 34 days after the injury respectively. The first case received intracameral tamponade with 12% C3F8 gas and the second case received corticosteroid and sodium chloride 5% eye drops. However, DMD persisted in both cases.

Conclusions

The atypical features of DMD on anterior segment optical coherence tomography in our cases suggested the presence of an inflammatory component caused adhesions and traction of iris to Descemet’s membrane and prevented reattachment of DMD even with gas tamponade.
Abkürzungen
AS-OCT
Anterior segment optical coherence tomography
C3F8
Perfluoropropane
DMD
Descemet’s membrane detachment

Background

Descemet’s membrane detachment (DMD) is the separation of the Descemet’s membrane from the overlying corneal stroma and is a rare complication of intraocular surgeries (e.g., cataract surgery, surgical iridectomy, etc.) with incidence rates being reported at 2.5% and 0.044–0.5% during extracapsular cataract extraction and phacoemulsification, respectively. [16] Chemical injuries to the eye, however, have also been reported as causing DMD and are even rarer. Generally, factors associated with the occurrence of DMD include shallow anterior chamber, use of blunt keratomes, shelved incisions, inadvertent injection of saline, viscoelastic or antibiotics into the supra Descemet’s space and pre-existing endothelial diseases. [711] Management of DMD depends on its extent, location, and size. For example, while small, peripheral DMDs can resolve spontaneously, larger more central DMDs require intracameral gas tamponade. If left unattended, DMD may result in the formation of a double anterior chamber, corneal edema and loss of vision.
Descemet’s membrane detachment is a relatively rare complication after ocular chemical injury. Since the initial report by Najjar et al. [12] in 2004, only 3 additional cases of DMD after ocular chemical injury have been reported. [1315] However, the cases reported in literatures were examined with slit lamp microscopy, which has low resolution. Herein, we describe two cases of DMD after chemical injury with high resolution anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) showing traction from iris which may be the mechanism of DMD in our cases.

Case presentation

Case 1

A 44-year-old male was referred to our hospital 26 days after an accidental chemical injury in his left eye with 50% sodium hydroxide solution. The patient irrigated his left eye with tap water immediately after the injury and was subsequently treated at a local clinic. At the time of presentation to our hospital, his visual acuity was hand movements in the left eye and 20/20 in the right eye. Slit-lamp examination revealed an inferior corneal epithelial defect involving 2 clock hours along with diffuse corneal epithelial and stromal edema (Fig. 1a). The patient was treated with 0.3% ofloxacin four times a day, pranoprofen 1% four times a day, 0.1% prednisolone acetate eye drops four times a day, 1% atropine sulfate eye gel twice daily and oral 2000 mg vitamin C per day. The patient was advised to follow-up in our clinic on a weekly basis. The epithelial defect resolved at one week follow up, when the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved to 20/400. Six weeks after the initial injury, DMD was noted in the inferonasal quadrant on slit-lamp examination (Fig. 1b) and the BCVA was 20/200. AS-OCT scan confirmed a localized DMD in the inferior quadrant. The detached Descemet membrane was thick and adherent to the underlying iris tissue. The iris was pulled anteriorly (Fig. 1c-f). Confocal scanning microscopy failed to detect the corneal endothelium. On the following day, 0.1 ml of 12% perfluoropropane (C3F8) gas was injected into the anterior chamber. However, the detached Descemet’s membrane persisted postoperatively (Fig. 1g and h). The central cornea clarity improved gradually and the BCVA of the left eye recovered to 20/100 and 20/50 at two and four months after the initial injury.

Case 2

A 28-year-old male presented to our hospital after ocular chemical injury with 50% sodium hydroxide. The patient irrigated his eyes with tap water immediately after the injury and presented an hour later to our hospital. At the time of presentation, the BCVA was 20/40 in the right eye and 20/200 in the left eye. There was extensive corneal edema along with limbal ischaemia (Fig. 2a). Treatment was commenced in the form of topical levofloxacin 0.5% four times a day, topical pranoprofen 1% four times a day, topical atropine 1% gel nocte and oral vitamin C 2000 mg per day. Five weeks later, slit lamp examination revealed a DMD, which had not been present during the initial examination. AS-OCT showed a localized DMD in the inferior quadrant. Similar to the first case, the detached Descemet membrane was thick, adherent to the underlying iris tissue and pulled the iris anteriorly (Fig. 2c-f). Topical prednisolone acetate 1% eye drops and sodium chloride 5% eye drops were administered every 2 h; however, the DMD persisted at the end of one week and one month (Fig. 2g and h). There was severe corneal neovascularization (Fig. 2b) and the BCVA of left eye dropped to hand movements at one-year follow-up visit. He received penetrating keratoplasty at another institute and the BCVA improved to 20/200 postoperatively.

Discussion and conclusions

In iatrogenic cases, DMD may arise as a result of direct contact between the corneal endothelium and surgical instruments. [711] In cases with chemical injuries, the cause of DMD remains unclear, which may due to limited cases reported in literature. Table 1 summarize the characters and proposed mechanism of the cases reported in literature and current article.
Table 1
Summary of cases of Descemet’s membrane detachment after ocular chemical injuries in literature and our study
Article
Yuen HK 2004
Zhang B 2012
Najjar DM 2004
Najjar DM 2004
Hua MT 2010
Case 1 in our report
Case 2 in our report
Age
40
19
49
45
26
44
28
Gender
Male
Male
Male
Female
Male
Male
Male
Chemical
hydrogen peroxide
sodium cyanide
sodium hydroxide
unknown
ammonia
sodium hydroxide
sodium hydroxide
Onset
3 days
4 days
4 months
4 months
2 months
6 weeks
5 weeks
Location
inferior
Extensive
inferior
inferior
Inferior
inferonasal
inferior
Exam
Slit lamp
UBM
Slit lamp
Slit lamp
Slit lamp
AS-OCT
AS-OCT
Initial VA
HM
20/800
20/80
20/800
HM
HM
20/200
Hyphema
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Management
Intracameral 20% SF6 injection
1% prednisolone and 0.5% levofloxacin eye drops
Intracameral 18% SF6 injection
unknown
Intracameral air bubble injection
Intracameral 12% C3F8 Intracameral
1% prednisolone and 5% NaCl eye drops
Outcome
reattached
reattached
unresponsive
unknown
unknown
unresponsive
unresponsive
Final VA
20/30
20/100
20/400
unknown
unknown
20/50
HM
Proposed mechanism
hydrogen peroxide penetrated and formed gas anterior to DM
Severe cellular damage in the stroma and endothelial layer
1) an inflammatory retrocorneal membrane associated with an organizing hyphema that pulled on DM leading to its detachment.2) retrocorneal membrane develop neovascularization that rupture and fill the space between DM and stroma
Not proposed
contraction of fibrous exudates pulls on the iris and DM together to its detachment
Associated evidences
gas bubble between corneal stroma and Descemet membrane.
no normal keratocytes /endothelial cells could be detected by in vivo confocal microscopy
a thickened, detached DM associated with a hyphema
Accompanied with hyphema
AS-OCT showed that the detached DM was thick and adherent to the iris. There is no hyphema
VA visual acuity; HM hand movement; DM Descemet’s membrane; AS-OCT anterior segment optical coherence tomography
There are two cases developed DMD at 3–4 days after the chemical injury, and reattachment were achieved spontaneously or with 20% SF6 injection. [14, 15] In these cases, the detached Descemet membrane was loose on slit lamp examination. Yuen et al. [14] observed gas bubble between corneal stroma and Descemet membrane, so they suggested that chemicals like hydrogen peroxide may generate gas, which pushes the Descemet membrane thereby detaching it from the overlying corneal stroma. While Zhang et al. [15] found no normal keratocytes /endothelial cells could be detected by in vivo confocal microscopy and proposed cellular damage of stroma count for DMD.
In the cases reported by Najjar et al. [12], Hua et al. [13], DMD occurred 1–4 months after the initial injury. The attempt to reattach the Descemet’s membrane were unclear or failed in these cases. These cases had associated signs of anterior chamber inflammation and hyphema. Najjar et al. [12] hypothesized two possible mechanisms: 1) an inflammatory retrocorneal membrane with an organizing hyphema that pulled on to the Descemet membrane leading to its detachment; 2) development and subsequent rupture of neovascularization on the retrocorneal membrane leading to collection of blood between the corneal stroma and Descemet’s membrane.
Our cases also developed DMD more than 1 month after chemical injury, similar to the cases reported by Najjar et al. [12], Hua et al. [13]. However, no hyphema was noted in our cases. AS-OCT showed that the detached Descemet’s membrane was thick and adherent to the iris. Based on the clinical presentation and AS-OCT features, we hypothesize that the following pathogenesis: chemical injury induced inflammation in anterior chamber; the inflammatory cells and fibrinous exudates gravitate down in the inferior anterior chamber causing adhesions between the iris and Descemet’s membrane; contraction of the fibrinous exudates and iris caused detachment of Descemet’s membrane (Fig. 3). Although we did not have access to the tissue to investigate the histopathological characterization, high resolution AS-OCT provided cross-sectional images and clearly demonstrated the relationship between Descemet’s membrane and the underlying tissue which provides supporting evidence for our hypothesis.
The management options for DMDs include conservative treatment, pneumodescemetopexy, suture fixation and even keratoplasty. To date, no prospective studies on the choice of management of DMDs have been published. [16] The reference of management for DMD after chemical injury is more limited due to small number of cases published. Resolution of post-chemical injury DMD has been reported in early onset cases with 20% SF6 intracameral injection or even spontaneously. The DMD was loose in these cases. The DMD failed to reattach even after intracameral gas tamponade in late onset cases, including Najjar et al.’s case and our first case. This may due to traction force of the underlying iris tissue. In the second case with poor visual acuity, keratoplasty is needed.
In conclusion, DMD is an uncommonly reported complication after ocular chemical injury. The atypical features of DMD on AS-OCT in our cases suggested the presence of an inflammatory component caused adhesions and traction of iris to Descemet’s membrane and prevented reattachment of DMD even with gas tamponade. Further studies with larger sample size is needed to confirm the pathogenesis proposed in this study and to explore therapy for these cases.

Funding

This study was supported by the Special Support Project of Guangdong Province and “Yangfan” Project of Guangdong Province.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Joint Shantou International Eye Center. Informed consents were obtained from the patients.
Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details and/or clinical images was obtained from the patients. A copy of the consent form is available for review by the Editor of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujimoto H, Mizoguchi T, Kuroda S, Nagata M. Intracorneal hematoma with descemet membrane detachment after viscocanalostomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137(1):195–6.CrossRef Fujimoto H, Mizoguchi T, Kuroda S, Nagata M. Intracorneal hematoma with descemet membrane detachment after viscocanalostomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137(1):195–6.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim IS, Shin JC, Im CY, Kim EK. Three cases of Descemet's membrane detachment after cataract surgery. Yonsei Med J. 2005;46(5):719–23.CrossRef Kim IS, Shin JC, Im CY, Kim EK. Three cases of Descemet's membrane detachment after cataract surgery. Yonsei Med J. 2005;46(5):719–23.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Li YH, Shi JM, Fan F, Duan XC, Jia SB. Descemet membrane detachment after trabeculectomy. Int J Ophthalmol. 2012;5(4):527–9.PubMedPubMedCentral Li YH, Shi JM, Fan F, Duan XC, Jia SB. Descemet membrane detachment after trabeculectomy. Int J Ophthalmol. 2012;5(4):527–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Mulhern M, Barry P, Condon P. A case of Descemet's membrane detachment during phacoemulsification surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80(2):185–6.CrossRef Mulhern M, Barry P, Condon P. A case of Descemet's membrane detachment during phacoemulsification surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80(2):185–6.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ti SE, Chee SP, Tan DT, Yang YN, Shuang SL. Descemet membrane detachment after phacoemulsification surgery: risk factors and success of air bubble tamponade. Cornea. 2013;32(4):454–9.CrossRef Ti SE, Chee SP, Tan DT, Yang YN, Shuang SL. Descemet membrane detachment after phacoemulsification surgery: risk factors and success of air bubble tamponade. Cornea. 2013;32(4):454–9.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Mezaine HS. Descemet's membrane detachment after cataract extraction surgery. Int Ophthalmol. 2010;30(4):391–6.CrossRef Al-Mezaine HS. Descemet's membrane detachment after cataract extraction surgery. Int Ophthalmol. 2010;30(4):391–6.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhattacharjee H, Bhattacharjee K, Medhi J, Altaf A. Descemet's membrane detachment caused by inadvertent vancomycin injection. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2008;56(3):241–3.CrossRef Bhattacharjee H, Bhattacharjee K, Medhi J, Altaf A. Descemet's membrane detachment caused by inadvertent vancomycin injection. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2008;56(3):241–3.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Mannan R, Jhanji V, Sharma N, Titiyal JS, Vajpayee RB. Intracameral C(3)F(8) injection for descemet membrane detachment after phacoemulsification in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea. 2007;26(5):636–8.CrossRef Mannan R, Jhanji V, Sharma N, Titiyal JS, Vajpayee RB. Intracameral C(3)F(8) injection for descemet membrane detachment after phacoemulsification in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea. 2007;26(5):636–8.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Marcon AS, Rapuano CJ, Jones MR, Laibson PR, Cohen EJ. Descemet's membrane detachment after cataract surgery: management and outcome. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(12):2325–30.CrossRef Marcon AS, Rapuano CJ, Jones MR, Laibson PR, Cohen EJ. Descemet's membrane detachment after cataract surgery: management and outcome. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(12):2325–30.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Mannan R, Pruthi A, Om Parkash R, Jhanji V. Descemet membrane detachment during foldable intraocular lens implantation. Eye Contact Lens. 2011;37(2):106–8.CrossRef Mannan R, Pruthi A, Om Parkash R, Jhanji V. Descemet membrane detachment during foldable intraocular lens implantation. Eye Contact Lens. 2011;37(2):106–8.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Najjar DM, Rapuano CJ, Cohen EJ. Descemet membrane detachment with hemorrhage after alkali burn to the cornea. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137(1):185–7.CrossRef Najjar DM, Rapuano CJ, Cohen EJ. Descemet membrane detachment with hemorrhage after alkali burn to the cornea. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137(1):185–7.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hua MT, Betz P. Descemet membrane detachment after alkali ocular surface burn. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 2010;316:85–6. Hua MT, Betz P. Descemet membrane detachment after alkali ocular surface burn. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 2010;316:85–6.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Yuen HK, Yeung BY, Wong TH, Wu WK, Lam DS. Descemet membrane detachment caused by hydrogen peroxide injury. Cornea. 2004;23(4):409–11.CrossRef Yuen HK, Yeung BY, Wong TH, Wu WK, Lam DS. Descemet membrane detachment caused by hydrogen peroxide injury. Cornea. 2004;23(4):409–11.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang B, Pan F, Yao YF. Spontaneous resolution of extensive descemet membrane detachment caused by sodium cyanide injury to the eye. Cornea. 2012;31(11):1344–7.CrossRef Zhang B, Pan F, Yao YF. Spontaneous resolution of extensive descemet membrane detachment caused by sodium cyanide injury to the eye. Cornea. 2012;31(11):1344–7.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chow VW, Agarwal T, Vajpayee RB, Jhanji V. Update on diagnosis and management of Descemet's membrane detachment. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013;24(4):356–61.CrossRef Chow VW, Agarwal T, Vajpayee RB, Jhanji V. Update on diagnosis and management of Descemet's membrane detachment. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013;24(4):356–61.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Tractional Descemet’s membrane detachment after ocular alkali burns: case reports and review of literature
verfasst von
Xiaoling Zhang
Vishal Jhanji
Haoyu Chen
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2018
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 1/2018
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2415
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0924-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

BMC Ophthalmology 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Ophthalmika in der Schwangerschaft

Die Verwendung von Ophthalmika in der Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit stellt immer eine Off-label-Anwendung dar. Ein Einsatz von Arzneimitteln muss daher besonders sorgfältig auf sein Risiko-Nutzen-Verhältnis bewertet werden. In der vorliegenden …

Operative Therapie und Keimnachweis bei endogener Endophthalmitis

Vitrektomie Originalie

Die endogene Endophthalmitis ist eine hämatogen fortgeleitete, bakterielle oder fungale Infektion, die über choroidale oder retinale Gefäße in den Augapfel eingeschwemmt wird [ 1 – 3 ]. Von dort infiltrieren die Keime in die Netzhaut, den …

Bakterielle endogene Endophthalmitis

Vitrektomie Leitthema

Eine endogene Endophthalmitis stellt einen ophthalmologischen Notfall dar, der umgehender Diagnostik und Therapie bedarf. Es sollte mit geeigneten Methoden, wie beispielsweise dem Freiburger Endophthalmitis-Set, ein Keimnachweis erfolgen. Bei der …

So erreichen Sie eine bestmögliche Wundheilung der Kornea

Die bestmögliche Wundheilung der Kornea, insbesondere ohne die Ausbildung von lichtstreuenden Narben, ist oberstes Gebot, um einer dauerhaften Schädigung der Hornhaut frühzeitig entgegenzuwirken und die Funktion des Auges zu erhalten.   

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.