Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Häufige urologisch-sexualmedizinische Themen in der Praxis sind das Thema des MMW-Webinars am 5. Juni von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. Konkret geht es um die Frage, wann bei Harnwegsinfektionen auf Antibiotika verzichtet werden kann, und um ein Update zur Therapie von Libido- und Potenzstörungen des Mannes. Der dritte Vortrag behandelt sexuell übertragbare Krankheiten. Stellen Sie Ihre Fragen an die Experten und sammeln Sie 2 CME-Punkte. Jetzt gleich anmelden!
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Cardiology Reports
Erschienen in: Current Cardiology Reports 1/2013

01.01.2013 | Cardiac PET, CT, and MRI (S Achenbach, Section Editor)

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Repair, Imaging, and Electronic Imaging Health Record

verfasst von: Paul Schoenhagen, Juergen Falkner, David Piraino

Erschienen in: Current Cardiology Reports | Ausgabe 1/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Degenerative aortic stenosis (AS) is a common valvular pathology in developed nations. Secondary to advanced age and often multiple co-morbidities, a significant percentage of patients are not considered surgical candidates. For these high-risk patients, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a rapidly emerging less-invasive treatment alternative. Because of the lack of direct exposure and visualization of the operative field, pre-procedural planning and intra-procedural guidance relies on imaging. Large 3-dimensional data files are acquired, which are reconstructed on advanced workstations during review and interpretation. Optimally, the imaging data is organized into a comprehensive digital file as an integral part of the electronic health record (EHR) following the patient. This manuscript will discuss the role of image data management in the context of TAVR.
Literatur
1.
Mocumbi AO, Ferreira MB. Neglected cardiovascular diseases in Africa: challenges and opportunities. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:680–7.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Mocumbi AO. Lack of focus on cardiovascular disease in sub-Saharan Africa. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2012;2:74–7.
3.
Nkomo VR, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, et al. Burden of valvular heart diseases. Lancet. 2006;368:1005–11.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Writing committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:e1–148.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: the euro heart survey on valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:1231–43.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Kapadia SR, Goel SS, Svensson L, et al. Characterization and outcome of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis referred for percutaneous aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:1430–5.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al. PARTNER trial investigators. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1597–607.PubMedCrossRef
8.
•• Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, et al. PARTNER trial investigators. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2187–98. Clinical trial comparing outcome between surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Grube E, Schuler G, Buellesfeld L, et al. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients using the second- and current third-generation self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis: device success and 30-day clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:69–76.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Tamburino C, Capodanno D, Ramondo A, et al. Incidence and predictors of early and late mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in 663 patients with severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2011;123:299–308.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Gurvitch R, Wood DA, Tay EL, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Durability of clinical and hemodynamic outcomes beyond 3 years in a large patient cohort. Circulation. 2010;122:1319–27.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Petronio AS, De Carlo M, Bedogni F, et al. Safety and efficacy of the subclavian approach for transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the CoreValve revalving system. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:359–66.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Svensson LG, Dewey T, Kapadia S, et al. United States feasibility study of transcatheter insertion of a stented aortic valve by the left ventricular apex. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:46–55.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Walther T, Simon P, Dewey T, et al. Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation: multicenter experience. Circulation. 2007;116:I240–5.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Grube E, Naber C, Abizaid A, et al. Feasibility of transcatheter aortic valve implantation without balloon pre-dilation a pilot study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:751–7.PubMedCrossRef
16.
•• Messika-Zeitoun D, Serfaty JM, Brochet E, et al. Multimodal assessment of the aortic annulus diameter. Implication for transcatheter aortic valve implanation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:186–94. Study comparing aortic root measurement with CT and echocardiography.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Ng ACT, Delgado V, van der Kley F, et al. Comparison of aortic root dimensions and geometries before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation by 2-and 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and multislice computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imag. 2010;3:94–102.CrossRef
18.
Wood DA, Tops LF, Mayo JR, et al. Role of multislice computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103:1295–301.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Siegel RJ, Luo H, Biner S. Transcatheter valve repair/implantation. Int J Cardiovasc Imag. 2011;27:1165–77.CrossRef
20.
•• Schwartz JG, Neubauer AM, Fagan TE, et al. Potential role of three-dimensional rotational angiography and C-arm CT for valvular repair and implantation. Int J Cardiovasc Imag. 2011;27:1205–22. Review discussing the emerging role of rotational angiography.CrossRef
21.
•• Schoenhagen P, Numburi U, Halliburton SS, et al. Three-dimensional imaging in the context of minimally invasive and transcatheter cardiovascular interventions using multi-detector computed tomography: from pre-operative planning to intra-operative guidance. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:2727–40. Review discussing principles of 3-D imaging in the context of transcatheter valvular procedures.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Joshi SB, Mendoza DD, Steinberg DH, et al. Ultra-low-dose intra-arterial contrast injection for iliofemoral computed tomographic angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imag. 2009;2:1404–11.CrossRef
23.
Kurra V, Schoenhagen P, Roselli EE, et al. Prevalence of significant peripheral artery disease in patients evaluated for percutaneous aortic valve insertion: preprocedural assessment with multidetector computed tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:1258–64.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Kurra V, Lieber ML, Sola S, et al. Extent of thoracic aortic atheroma burden and long-term mortality after cardiothoracic surgery: a computed tomography study. JACC Cardiovasc Imag. 2010;3:1020–9.CrossRef
25.
Ghanem A, Müller A, Nähle CP, et al. Risk and fate of cerebral embolism after transfemoral aortic valve implantation: a prospective pilot study with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:1427–32.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Chenot F, Montant P, Goffinet C, et al. Evaluation of anatomic valve opening and leaflet morphology in aortic valve bioprosthesis by using multidetector CT: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography. Radiology. 2010;255:377–85.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Feuchtner GM, Alkadhi H, Karlo C, et al. Cardiac CT angiography for the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse: comparison with echocardiography1. Radiology. 2010;254:374–83.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, et al. Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J. 2007;29:191–7.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Feuchtner G, Goetti R, Plass A, et al. Dual-step prospective ECG-triggered 128-slice dual-source CT for evaluation of coronary arteries and cardiac function without heart rate control: a technical note. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:2092–9.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Al Ali AM, Altwegg L, Horlick EM, et al. Prevention and management of transcatheter balloon-expandable aortic valve malposition. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;72:573–8.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Tuzcu ME. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement malposition and embolization: innovation brings solutions also new challenges. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;72:579–80.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Bleiziffer S, Ruge H, Hörer J, Hutter A, et al. Predictors for new-onset complete heart block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:524–30.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Tops LF, Wood DA, Delgado V, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography: implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2008;1:321–30.
34.
Akhtar M, Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR, et al. Aortic root morphology in patients undergoing percutaneous aortic valve replacement: evidence of aortic root remodeling. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:950–6.PubMedCrossRef
35.
•• Kempfert J, Van Linden A, Lehmkuhl L, et al. Aortic annulus sizing: echocardiographic vs. computed tomography derived measurements in comparison with direct surgical sizing. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012. doi:10.​1093/​ejcts/​ezs064. Clinical trial discussion impact of annulus measurements of post-procedural aortic regurgitation.
36.
•• Jilaihawi H, Kashif M, Fontana G, et al. Cross-sectional computed tomographic assessment improves accuracy of aortic annular sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement and reduces the incidence of paravalvular aortic regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1275–86. Clinical trial discussion impact of annulus measurements of post-procedural aortic regurgitation.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Cueff C, Serfaty JM, Cimadevilla C, et al. Measurement of aortic valve calcification using multislice computed tomography: correlation with haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis and clinical implication for patients with low ejection fraction. Heart. 2011;97:721–6.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Latsios G, Gerckens U, Buellesfeld L, et al. “Device landing zone” calcification, assessed by MSCT, as a predictive factor for pacemaker implantation after TAVI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;76:431–9.PubMedCrossRef
39.
John D, Buellesfeld L, Yuecel S, et al. Correlation of device landing zone calcification and acute procedural success in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantations with the self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:233–43.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Masson J-B, Kovac J, Schuler G, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: review of the nature, management, and avoidance of procedural complications. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2009;2:811–20.
41.
Kurra V, Kapadia S, Tuzcu M, et al. Pre-procedural imaging of aortic root orientation and dimensions comparison between X-ray angiographic planar imaging and 3-dimensional multidetector row computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2010;3:105–13.
42.
Gurvitch R, Wood D, Leipsic J, et al. Multislice computed tomography for prediction of optimal angiographic deployment projections during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2010;3:1157–65.
43.
Halliburton SS, Schoenhagen P. Cardiovascular imaging with computed tomography: responsible steps to balancing diagnostic yield and radiation exposure. JACC Cardiovasc Imag. 2010;3:536–40.CrossRef
44.
Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B, et al. Estimated radiation dose reduction using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography: the ERASIR study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:655–60.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Moss RR, Ivens E, Pasupati S, et al. Role of echocardiography in percutaneous aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol Imag. 2008;1:15–24.
46.
Bahlmann E, Nienaber CA, Cramariuc D, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, Ray S, Devereux RB, et al. Aortic root geometry in aortic stenosis patients (a SEAS substudy). Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011;12:585–90.PubMedCrossRef
47.
de Heer LM, Budde RP, Mali WP, et al. Aortic root dimension changes during systole and diastole: evaluation with ECG-gated multidetector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imag. 2011;27:1195–204.CrossRef
48.
O’Brien B, Schoenhagen P, Kapadia SR, et al. Integration of three-dimensional imaging data in the assessment of aortic stenosis: impact on classification of disease severity. Circ Cardiovasc Imag. 2011;4:566–73.CrossRef
49.
•• Leon MB, Piazza N, Nikolsky E, et al. Standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation clinical trials: a consensus report from the valve academic research consortium. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:134–5. Clincial consensus position paper recommending standardized endpoint definitions for TAVR outcome trials.CrossRef
50.
•• Cowie MR, Chronaki CE, Vardas P. e-Health innovation: time for engagement with the cardiology community. Eur Heart J. 2012;Jun 24 [Epub ahead of print]. Paper discussing IT infrastructure.
51.
52.
Gunter TD, Terry NP. The emergence of national electronic health record architectures in the United States and Australia: models, costs, and questions. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7:e3.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Srinivasan M, Liederman E, Baluyot N, Jacoby R. Saving time, improving satisfaction: the impact of a digital radiology system on physician workflow and system efficiency. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2006;20(2):123–31.
54.
Lin Y, Chen R, Guo SH, Chiang S, Chang H. Sharing personal health information via service-oriented computing: a case of long-term care. J Med Syst. 2012;36:3563–71.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Dickmann F, Kaspar M, Löhnhardt B, et al. Visualization in health grid environments: a novel service and business approach. In: Hutchison D, Kanade T, Kittler J, Kleinberg JM, Mattern F, Mitchell JC, et al., editors. Lecture notes in computer science. Heidelberg: Springer; 2009. p. 150–9.
56.
Kuo AM. Opportunities and challenges of cloud computing to improve health care services. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13:e67.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Pianykh OS. Digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM): a practical introduction and survival guide. 2nd ed. Heidelberg: Springer; 2012.CrossRef
58.
59.
Mather T, Kumaraswamy S, Latif S, Mather T, Kumaraswamy S, Latif S. Cloud security and privacy: an enterprise perspective on risks and compliance//cloud security and privacy. 1st ed. Beijing: O’Reilly; 2009.
60.
Takabi H, Joshi J, Ahn G. Security and privacy challenges in cloud computing environments. Secur Priv IEEE. 2010;8:24–31.CrossRef
61.
62.
Zibuschka J, Herbert M, Roßnagel H. Towards privacy-enhancing identity management in mashup-providing platforms. In: Hutchison D, Kanade T, Kittler J, Kleinberg JM, Mattern F, Mitchell JC, et al., editors. Lecture notes in computer science. Heidelberg: Springer; 2010. p. 273–86.
Metadaten
Titel
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Repair, Imaging, and Electronic Imaging Health Record
verfasst von
Paul Schoenhagen
Juergen Falkner
David Piraino
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2013
Verlag
Current Science Inc.
Erschienen in
Current Cardiology Reports / Ausgabe 1/2013
Print ISSN: 1523-3782
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-3170
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-012-0319-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

Current Cardiology Reports 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Cardiac PET, CT, and MRI (S Achenbach, Section Editor)

Coronary Calcium: New Insights, Recent Data, and Clinical Role

Cardiac PET, CT, and MRI (S Achenbach, Section Editor)

Imaging of Inflammation and Calcification in Aortic Stenosis

New Therapies for Cardiovascular Disease (K Mahaffey, Section Editor)

Impediments to Adherence to Post Myocardial Infarction Medications

Cardiac PET, CT, and MRI (S Achenbach, Section Editor)

Modeling of Fractional Flow Reserve Based on Coronary CT Angiography

New Therapies for Cardiovascular Disease (K Mahaffey, Section Editor)

Platelet Function Monitoring and Clopidogrel

Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease (S Malik, Section Editor)

Cardiovascular Effects of Anti-Diabetic Medications in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Nach Herzinfarkt mit Typ-1-Diabetes schlechtere Karten als mit Typ 2?

29.05.2024 Herzinfarkt Nachrichten

Bei Menschen mit Typ-2-Diabetes sind die Chancen, einen Myokardinfarkt zu überleben, in den letzten 15 Jahren deutlich gestiegen – nicht jedoch bei Betroffenen mit Typ 1.

Erhöhtes Risiko fürs Herz unter Checkpointhemmer-Therapie

28.05.2024 Nebenwirkungen der Krebstherapie Nachrichten

Kardiotoxische Nebenwirkungen einer Therapie mit Immuncheckpointhemmern mögen selten sein – wenn sie aber auftreten, wird es für Patienten oft lebensgefährlich. Voruntersuchung und Monitoring sind daher obligat.

GLP-1-Agonisten können Fortschreiten diabetischer Retinopathie begünstigen

24.05.2024 Diabetische Retinopathie Nachrichten

Möglicherweise hängt es von der Art der Diabetesmedikamente ab, wie hoch das Risiko der Betroffenen ist, dass sich sehkraftgefährdende Komplikationen verschlimmern.

TAVI versus Klappenchirurgie: Neue Vergleichsstudie sorgt für Erstaunen

21.05.2024 TAVI Nachrichten

Bei schwerer Aortenstenose und obstruktiver KHK empfehlen die Leitlinien derzeit eine chirurgische Kombi-Behandlung aus Klappenersatz plus Bypass-OP. Diese Empfehlung wird allerdings jetzt durch eine aktuelle Studie infrage gestellt – mit überraschender Deutlichkeit.

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen