Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 2/2019

02.10.2018 | Original Article

Trends and outcomes of sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: a national cancer database study

verfasst von: Faisal Shahjehan, Pashtoon M. Kasi, Elizabeth Habermann, Courtney N. Day, Dorin T. Colibaseanu, Kellie L. Mathis, David W. Larson, Amit Merchea

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Previous studies have shown that sphincter-preserving surgery is associated with better quality of life in postsurgical rectal cancer patients. However, the factors predicting the likelihood of undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery have not been well-described. The aim of this study was to report the factors that determined the likelihood of undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery.

Methods

Characteristics of 24,018 rectal cancer patients undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery and abdominoperineal resection diagnosed from 2008 to 2012 from the National Cancer Database were investigated retrospectively for rate, pattern, and differences in mortality. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios for assessing mortality. Odds ratios were calculated using logistic regressions models for outcome sphincter-preserving surgery.

Results

Eighteen thousand four hundred fifty-two (77%) patients had sphincter-preserving surgery. Majority of sphincter-preserving surgery patients were aged < 70 (74%), had private insurance (52%), and got treatment at a comprehensive community cancer program (54%). Multivariable analysis showed that patients with age ≥ 70 (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.80–0.95), male gender (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.84–0.96), having Medicare (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.76–0.90), Medicaid (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63–0.81), and poorly differentiated grade (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.71–0.85) were less likely to undergo sphincter-preserving surgery. Multivariable analysis showed that patients having abdominoperineal resection have higher likelihood of mortality than sphincter-preserving surgery (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.16–1.36).

Conclusions

We were able to identify several patient and tumor-related factors impacting the likelihood of undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery. Patients undergoing non-sphincter sparing surgery had a higher mortality that sphincter preservation.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Monson JR, Weiser MR, Buie WD, Chang GJ, Rafferty JF, Buie WD et al (2013) Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised). Dis Colon Rectum 56(5):535–550CrossRefPubMed Monson JR, Weiser MR, Buie WD, Chang GJ, Rafferty JF, Buie WD et al (2013) Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised). Dis Colon Rectum 56(5):535–550CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Dimitriou N, Michail O, Moris D, Griniatsos J (2015) Low rectal cancer: sphincter preserving techniques-selection of patients, techniques and outcomes. World J Gastrointest Oncol 7(7):55–70CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dimitriou N, Michail O, Moris D, Griniatsos J (2015) Low rectal cancer: sphincter preserving techniques-selection of patients, techniques and outcomes. World J Gastrointest Oncol 7(7):55–70CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bordeianou L, Maguire LH, Alavi K, Sudan R, Wise PE, Kaiser AM (2014) Sphincter-sparing surgery in patients with low-lying rectal cancer: techniques, oncologic outcomes, and functional results. J Gastrointest Surg 18(7):1358–1372CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bordeianou L, Maguire LH, Alavi K, Sudan R, Wise PE, Kaiser AM (2014) Sphincter-sparing surgery in patients with low-lying rectal cancer: techniques, oncologic outcomes, and functional results. J Gastrointest Surg 18(7):1358–1372CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Morris E, Quirke P, Thomas JD, Fairley L, Cottier B, Forman D (2008) Unacceptable variation in abdominoperineal excision rates for rectal cancer: time to intervene? Gut 57(12):1690–1697CrossRefPubMed Morris E, Quirke P, Thomas JD, Fairley L, Cottier B, Forman D (2008) Unacceptable variation in abdominoperineal excision rates for rectal cancer: time to intervene? Gut 57(12):1690–1697CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Dodgion CM, Neville BA, Lipsitz SR, Schrag D, Breen E, Zinner MJ, Greenberg CC (2014) Hospital variation in sphincter preservation for elderly rectal cancer patients. J Surg Res 191(1):161–168CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dodgion CM, Neville BA, Lipsitz SR, Schrag D, Breen E, Zinner MJ, Greenberg CC (2014) Hospital variation in sphincter preservation for elderly rectal cancer patients. J Surg Res 191(1):161–168CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdelsattar ZM, Wong SL, Birkmeyer NJ, Cleary RK, Times ML, Figg RE, Peters N, Krell RW, Campbell DA, Russell MM, Hendren S (2014) Multi-institutional assessment of sphincter preservation for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21(13):4075–4080CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Abdelsattar ZM, Wong SL, Birkmeyer NJ, Cleary RK, Times ML, Figg RE, Peters N, Krell RW, Campbell DA, Russell MM, Hendren S (2014) Multi-institutional assessment of sphincter preservation for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21(13):4075–4080CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohammed S, Anaya DA, Awad SS, Albo D, Berger DH, Artinyan A (2015) Sphincter preservation rates after radical resection for rectal cancer in the United States veteran population: opportunity for improvement in early disease. Ann Surg Oncol 22(1):216–223CrossRefPubMed Mohammed S, Anaya DA, Awad SS, Albo D, Berger DH, Artinyan A (2015) Sphincter preservation rates after radical resection for rectal cancer in the United States veteran population: opportunity for improvement in early disease. Ann Surg Oncol 22(1):216–223CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Temple LK, Romanus D, Niland J, Veer AT, Weiser MR, Skibber J, Wilson J, Rajput A, Benson A, Wong YN, Schrag D (2009) Factors associated with sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer at national comprehensive cancer network centers. Ann Surg 250(2):260–267CrossRefPubMed Temple LK, Romanus D, Niland J, Veer AT, Weiser MR, Skibber J, Wilson J, Rajput A, Benson A, Wong YN, Schrag D (2009) Factors associated with sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer at national comprehensive cancer network centers. Ann Surg 250(2):260–267CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Richardson DP, Porter GA, Johnson PM (2013) Population-based use of sphincter-preserving surgery in patients with rectal cancer: is there room for improvement? Dis Colon Rectum 56(6):704–710CrossRefPubMed Richardson DP, Porter GA, Johnson PM (2013) Population-based use of sphincter-preserving surgery in patients with rectal cancer: is there room for improvement? Dis Colon Rectum 56(6):704–710CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ricciardi R, Roberts PL, Read TE, Marcello PW, Schoetz DJ, Baxter NN (2010) Variability in reconstructive procedures following rectal cancer surgery in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 53(6):874–880CrossRefPubMed Ricciardi R, Roberts PL, Read TE, Marcello PW, Schoetz DJ, Baxter NN (2010) Variability in reconstructive procedures following rectal cancer surgery in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 53(6):874–880CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Engel AF, Oomen JL, Eijsbouts QA, Cuesta MA, van de Velde CJ (2003) Nationwide decline in annual numbers of abdomino-perineal resections: effect of a successful national trial? Colorectal Dis 5(2):180–184 Engel AF, Oomen JL, Eijsbouts QA, Cuesta MA, van de Velde CJ (2003) Nationwide decline in annual numbers of abdomino-perineal resections: effect of a successful national trial? Colorectal Dis 5(2):180–184
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Marwan K, Staples MP, Thursfield V, Bell SW (2010) The rate of abdominoperineal resections for rectal cancer in the state of Victoria, Australia: a population-based study. Dis Colon Rectum 53(12):1645–1651CrossRefPubMed Marwan K, Staples MP, Thursfield V, Bell SW (2010) The rate of abdominoperineal resections for rectal cancer in the state of Victoria, Australia: a population-based study. Dis Colon Rectum 53(12):1645–1651CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tilney HS, Heriot AG, Purkayastha S, Antoniou A, Aylin P, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP (2008) A national perspective on the decline of abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 247(1):77–84CrossRefPubMed Tilney HS, Heriot AG, Purkayastha S, Antoniou A, Aylin P, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP (2008) A national perspective on the decline of abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 247(1):77–84CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ricciardi R, Virnig BA, Madoff RD, Rothenberger DA, Baxter NN (2007) The status of radical proctectomy and sphincter-sparing surgery in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 50(8):1119–1127 discussion 26-7 CrossRefPubMed Ricciardi R, Virnig BA, Madoff RD, Rothenberger DA, Baxter NN (2007) The status of radical proctectomy and sphincter-sparing surgery in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 50(8):1119–1127 discussion 26-7 CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Archampong D, Borowski D, Wille-Jorgensen P, Iversen LH. (2012) Workload and surgeon’s specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):Cd005391 Archampong D, Borowski D, Wille-Jorgensen P, Iversen LH. (2012) Workload and surgeon’s specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):Cd005391
16.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Harmon JW, Tang DG, Gordon TA, Bowman HM, Choti MA, Kaufman HS, et al. (1999) Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection. Ann Surg, 230(3):404–11; discussion 11–3 Harmon JW, Tang DG, Gordon TA, Bowman HM, Choti MA, Kaufman HS, et al. (1999) Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection. Ann Surg, 230(3):404–11; discussion 11–3
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Dorrance HR, Docherty GM, O’Dwyer PJ (2000) Effect of surgeon specialty interest on patient outcome after potentially curative colorectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 43(4):492–498CrossRefPubMed Dorrance HR, Docherty GM, O’Dwyer PJ (2000) Effect of surgeon specialty interest on patient outcome after potentially curative colorectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 43(4):492–498CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Trends and outcomes of sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: a national cancer database study
verfasst von
Faisal Shahjehan
Pashtoon M. Kasi
Elizabeth Habermann
Courtney N. Day
Dorin T. Colibaseanu
Kellie L. Mathis
David W. Larson
Amit Merchea
Publikationsdatum
02.10.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3171-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.