Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 1/2016

26.02.2016 | Original Article

Understanding Audit in Obstetrics

verfasst von: Georgy Joy Eralil

Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Sonderheft 1/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

Aim of this audit is to analyse indication and proportion of babies delivered by elective caesarean section at less than 39+0 weeks of gestation exposed to antenatal corticosteroids performed in a Premier Hospital, Hywel Dda Health University. The second aim was to learn how an audit can be done and used for improving clinical practice.

Methods

Present study involved all patients who underwent elective caesarean delivery before 39 weeks completed period of gestation in August and September 2014. Data collected from medical record tracking using ICD-9 codes and analysed by clinical audit department.

Exclusion

Patients who underwent elective caesarean section after 39 weeks completed period of gestation.

Discussion

The audit showed 66.6 % of patients were given antenatal corticosteroids. The observation was discussed in consultant meetings, labour forum, and was send as e-mail to every one working in Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. The goal was 100 %. Reaudit is to be performed in year time to know the effect of change in practice. All successful audits are structured programmes with realistic aims and objectives, leadership and attitude of senior management, nondirective, hands-on approach, support of staff, strategy groups and regular discussions, emphasis on team working and support, environment conducive to conducting audit.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology. Caesarean sections. Postnote. 2002;184:1–4. Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology. Caesarean sections. Postnote. 2002;184:1–4.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Menacker F. Trends in cesarean rates for first births and repeat cesarean rates for low-risk women: United States, 1990–2003. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2005;54:1–8. Menacker F. Trends in cesarean rates for first births and repeat cesarean rates for low-risk women: United States, 1990–2003. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2005;54:1–8.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu S, Rusen ID, Joseph KS, et al. Recent trends in caesarean delivery rates and indications for caesarean delivery in Canada. J Obstet Gynecol Can. 2004;26:735–42. Liu S, Rusen ID, Joseph KS, et al. Recent trends in caesarean delivery rates and indications for caesarean delivery in Canada. J Obstet Gynecol Can. 2004;26:735–42.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Black C, Kaye JA, Jick H. Cesarean delivery in the United Kingdom: time trends in the general practice research database. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:151–5.CrossRefPubMed Black C, Kaye JA, Jick H. Cesarean delivery in the United Kingdom: time trends in the general practice research database. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:151–5.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeh J, Wactawski-Wende J, Shelton JA, et al. Temporal trends in the rates of trial of labor in low-risk pregnancies and their impact on the rates and success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:144.CrossRefPubMed Yeh J, Wactawski-Wende J, Shelton JA, et al. Temporal trends in the rates of trial of labor in low-risk pregnancies and their impact on the rates and success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:144.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2581–9.CrossRefPubMed Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2581–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith GC, Pell JP, Cameron AD, et al. Risk of perinatal death associated with labor after previous cesarean delivery in uncomplicated term pregnancies. JAMA. 2002;287:2684–90.CrossRefPubMed Smith GC, Pell JP, Cameron AD, et al. Risk of perinatal death associated with labor after previous cesarean delivery in uncomplicated term pregnancies. JAMA. 2002;287:2684–90.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tita AT, Landon MB, Spong CY, et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD maternal-fetal medicine units network. Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:111–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tita AT, Landon MB, Spong CY, et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD maternal-fetal medicine units network. Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:111–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Yee W, Amin H, Wood S. Elective cesarean delivery, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and neonatal respiratory distress. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:823–8.CrossRefPubMed Yee W, Amin H, Wood S. Elective cesarean delivery, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and neonatal respiratory distress. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:823–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansen AK, Wisborg K, Uldbjerg N, et al. Risk of respiratory morbidity in term infants delivered by elective caesarean section: Cohort study. BMJ. 2008;336:85–7.CrossRefPubMed Hansen AK, Wisborg K, Uldbjerg N, et al. Risk of respiratory morbidity in term infants delivered by elective caesarean section: Cohort study. BMJ. 2008;336:85–7.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrison JJ, Rennie JM, Milton PJ. Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;102:101–6.CrossRef Morrison JJ, Rennie JM, Milton PJ. Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;102:101–6.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Stutchfield P, Whitaker R. Russell I; Antenatal Steroids for Term Elective Caesarean Section (ASTECS) Research Team. Antenatal betamethasone and incidence of neonatal respiratory distress after elective caesarean section: pragmatic randomised trial. BMJ. 2005;331:662.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stutchfield P, Whitaker R. Russell I; Antenatal Steroids for Term Elective Caesarean Section (ASTECS) Research Team. Antenatal betamethasone and incidence of neonatal respiratory distress after elective caesarean section: pragmatic randomised trial. BMJ. 2005;331:662.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat NHS, National Institute for Clinical Excellence, Commission for Health Improvement, Royal College of Nursing, University of Leicester. Principles for best practice in clinical audit. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press; 2002. NHS, National Institute for Clinical Excellence, Commission for Health Improvement, Royal College of Nursing, University of Leicester. Principles for best practice in clinical audit. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press; 2002.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Clinical effectiveness support unit team matters. Br J Cancer. 1994;70:363–70.CrossRef Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Clinical effectiveness support unit team matters. Br J Cancer. 1994;70:363–70.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat McKenzie-McHarg K, Ayres S. Data management. In: O’Brien PMS, Broughton Pipkin F, editors. Introduction to research methodology for specialists and trainees. London: RCOG Press; 1999. p. 140–6. McKenzie-McHarg K, Ayres S. Data management. In: O’Brien PMS, Broughton Pipkin F, editors. Introduction to research methodology for specialists and trainees. London: RCOG Press; 1999. p. 140–6.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Brocklehurst P, Gates S. Statistics. In: O’Brien PMS, Broughton Pipkin F, editors. Introduction to research methodology for specialists and trainees. London: RCOG Press; 1999. p. 147–60. Brocklehurst P, Gates S. Statistics. In: O’Brien PMS, Broughton Pipkin F, editors. Introduction to research methodology for specialists and trainees. London: RCOG Press; 1999. p. 147–60.
Metadaten
Titel
Understanding Audit in Obstetrics
verfasst von
Georgy Joy Eralil
Publikationsdatum
26.02.2016
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Ausgabe Sonderheft 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Elektronische ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-016-0840-z

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 1/2016

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 1/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.