Mortality in Sepsis Survivors
Using fundamental principles of causality [
31], we recently reported the limited strength of epidemiological evidence supporting the premise that sepsis causes an increase in all-cause mortality after hospital discharge (post-acute mortality) [
25••]. Although the 1-year post-acute mortality was 16.1 % (95%CI =14.1–18.1 %; N = 43 studies), there was evidence of statistical and clinical heterogeneity, bias and residual confounding. Post-acute mortality was associated with age, male, co-morbidities, and deterioration in health prior to sepsis. Since publication of our systematic review, there has been two further publications [
32•,
33•]. The well-conducted study by Prescott et al. focussed on patients older than 65 years and used double robust analysis [
34] with a regression model for mortality and propensity score to account for covariates to show that sepsis is an independent risk factor for post-acute mortality [
32•]. Using propensity score matching, Ou et al. also showed an increase in all cause mortality in sepsis survivors [
33•]. Sepsis associated increased risk of death extends for up to ten years following index hospitalisation [
25••,
32•,
33•,
35].
The magnitude of sepsis-post-acute mortality association varied dependent on the control population chosen for comparison. The additional hazard associated with sepsis was greatest when compared with general populations [
25••]. The magnitude of additional risk of death in sepsis survivors decreased when the selected control population had more severe non-sepsis illnesses. The major implication being that the literature currently over estimates the risk of post-acute death caused by sepsis and therefore preventable fraction is likely to be lower, which needs to be accounted for during sample size estimation in future RCTs designed to reduce late mortality in sepsis survivors.
Rehospitalisation in Sepsis Survivors
Compared to non-sepsis admissions, sepsis survivors had a greater risk of rehospitalisation [
10,
36‐
38], and rehospitalisation increases the risk of death. The average 30-day rehospitalisation rates in sepsis survivors are between 19.9 and 32 % [
7,
36‐
43]. The cumulative rehospitalisation rates increases with follow-up time with the 90-day and 1-year rehospitalisation rates being 40 % [
7,
36] and 63.0 % [
7], respectively, implying persistent risk in sepsis survivors. Pneumonia survivors have lower 30-day rehospitalisation rates (16.5 % [
44] and 18.2 % [
45••]), implying potentially a dose-response effect.
The additional readmissions risk was significantly more common in sepsis survivors with matched hospitalisations with acute medical conditions comparisons and a proportion of these readmissions are potentially preventable [
36]. In a retrospective cohort study, except for parenteral nutrition, the other risk factors for readmissions identified in univariate analyses such as transfusion, duration of antibiotics, disappeared after regression analyses to account for confounding [
38]. In contrast, 30-day rehospitalisation after sepsis has been shown to be independently associated included age, malignancy diagnosis, hospitalizations in the year prior to sepsis admission and low haemoglobin concentrations at discharge [
37].
The most common reason for rehospitalisation in sepsis survivors was infection [
46] and infection-related rehospitalisation represented either unresolved/recurrent infection or new infections [
38]. The risk factors and magnitude of infection-related readmissions differed based on definition used, implying clinical heterogeneity and confounding by indication in studies. Infection-related rehospitalisation was independently associated with index admission pathogens (multidrug resistant pathogens,
E. Coli spp. and
Bacteroides spp. infections), renal dysfunction and urinary tract source, with
E Coli spp. and urinary tract being protective [
43]. The most common site in infection-related rehospitalisation in sepsis survivors was pneumonia, whereas it was urosepsis in non-sepsis survivor rehospitalisation [
46]. In this study, other independent risk factors for infection-related rehospitalisation were prolonged hospitalization, age and the presence of an indwelling catheter [
46], implying admission case-mix is an important determinant for infected-related rehospitalisation in sepsis survivors.
As with post-acute mortality, further research is required to understand the true preventable fraction and modifiable risk factors for rehospitalisation, in particular infection-related rehospitalisation. Most studies censor death, which is a competing risk factor for readmissions. Independent associations generated by regression models represent strength of this relationship not a causal pathway, which is yet to be proven. The duration of additional risk of infection-related rehospitalisation and the underpinning mechanisms needs to be further characterised.
Cognitive Impairment in Sepsis Survivors
Hospitalization, regardless of aetiology, is associated with cognitive decline [
47,
48]. The relationship between sepsis and cognitive decline is likely to be complex and bidirectional as pre-illness cognitive decline is a risk factor for pneumonia and sepsis [
9,
49,
50••] and sepsis is also an independent risk factor for cognitive decline (OR 95 % CI 3.3 (1.5–7.3)) [
49]. Thus, there is a threefold increase in risk of cognitive decline in sepsis survivors compared to control populations, but the rate of new cognitive decline in those sepsis survivors is similar to that seen with pre-illness deterioration [
49]. Similarly, pneumonia is associated with cognitive decline and increases the hazard for dementia (OR 95 % CI 2.2 (1.6–3.6)) [
50••]. This hazard ratio does not vary with sepsis severity, implying no dose response effect [
50••]. Depression, which is common in sepsis survivors, is also a risk factor for pneumonia [
51] and sepsis [
52] and is significantly associated with post sepsis functional impairment [
52].
Delirium is common during critical illness, prolongs hospitalisation and has minimal attributable mortality [
53•]. Acute delirium is also associated with cognitive impairment including dementia and depression during longer-term follow-up of critical illness survivors [
54,
55] and in hospitalised patients [
56]. Sepsis is associated with delirium [
57] and pre-sepsis episode cognitive decline. Thus, the post-sepsis cognitive decline could either have a causal relationship with sepsis or could be unrelated to sepsis but acting via the delirium pathway. A related concept that is difficult to test with new-onset cognitive decline or dementia is the extent of cognitive reserve, whether and how this reserve is modified by sepsis. This is important as incident cognitive decline is related to cognitive reserve and depends on follow-up duration [
58].
Cardiovascular Complications in Sepsis Survivors
In the last 3 years, numerous studies have reported the long-term risk of cardiovascular events in sepsis survivors. Corrales-Medina et al. followed two community-based cohorts (>65 years of age and 45–64 years of age) and assessed the relationship between index pneumonia episode and subsequent cardiovascular disease (CVD) events over a 10-year period [
59]. In this study, CVD events were myocardial infarction, stroke and fatal coronary heart disease. The older cohort had greater CVD events (34.9 % compared to 16.5 %). In both cohorts, sepsis was an independent risk factor for CVD events and the risk was greatest in the year following index pneumonia episode [
59]. Of note, there were residual imbalances in covariates (e.g. hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking), despite incidence density sampling used to match cases to controls in this study [
59]. Using propensity score based matching; Yende et al. assessed the independent risk of cardiovascular events after sepsis as an explanation for long term increased mortality risk in sepsis survivors [
26••]. The primary outcome was the 1-year incidence rate of hospitalised cardiovascular events in sepsis survivors. Sepsis survivors had statistically significant higher rate of cardiovascular events when compared to propensity matched critically ill, hospitalised infected controls, and hospitalised non-infected controls. However, the magnitude of risk attributable to sepsis was minimal when cardiovascular event risks of acute care and baseline characteristics were accounted for [
26••]. Jafarzadeh et al. assessed the cumulative 5-year risk of cardiovascular events in sepsis and used MSMs to generate a causal inference of additional risk. The odds ratio for sepsis associated any CVD was 2.39 (1.88–3.03), and there was a dose response with increase in severity (Bacteremia = 1.52 (1.21–1.90); Sepsis = 3.60 (2.59–5.00); and Septic shock = 4.55 (3.58–5.78)). In a community acquired bacteremia cohort from Denmark with matched general population controls and hospital controls, Dalager-Pedersen et al. show that the risk of myocardial infarction is greatest in the first 30-days following bacteremia. This independent association disappears by 6 months following index bacteremia [
60]. Similar duration of additional risk for CVD events has been reported in other cohorts [
33•,
61].
Quality of Life in Sepsis Survivors
Winters et al. performed a systematic review and identified 12 studies that used different validated tools to assess the QOL in sepsis survivors, the most common being Short Form 36 (SF-36) [
62]. Overall, sepsis survivors have impaired QOL compared to population norms [
62,
63] and this impaired QOL lasts as long as 5-years after index admission [
64]. To account for pre-illness status and truncation-by-death issues highlighted earlier, Yende et al. used patients enrolled in two randomised controlled trials and who lived independently prior to the index sepsis episode to show impaired QOL in sepsis survivors [
65]. However, the SF-36 scores in sepsis survivors were similar to patients with comorbid conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension and congestive heart failure [
66]. Sepsis survivors also have similar QOL to non-sepsis critically ill survivors [
64,
66‐
68]. Prehospital QOL appears to be an important determinant of QOL after discharge following hospitalisation and the magnitude of additional risk due to critical illness is small compared to all cause hospitalisations [
69]. These observations challenge a causal inference of sepsis effect on QOL.
Biological Explanations for Long-Term Effects in Sepsis Survivors
Despite the robustness of statistical methods and independent associations with some of the long-term outcomes following sepsis, the epidemiological causality and biological mechanisms are yet to be proven. The cause of death in sepsis survivors is seldom reported, and the mechanisms leading to accelerated death in sepsis survivors, if this observation is causal, are uncertain. Sepsis often occurs in patients with comorbid conditions [
13,
70], frail and elderly [
8]. Many of the long-term outcomes reported in sepsis survivors are also common in elderly and frail populations, implying accelerated ageing could be a potential mechanism. Aging is a multisystem process characterised by cell damage, responses to these cell damage events and the ensuing phenotype. The cell damage is considered secondary to genomic instability, telomere attrition and epigenetic alterations [
71], which is a nascent literature in sepsis [
72‐
74]. The cell damage events seen in aging results in abnormalities of nutrient sensing, mitochondrial function and cellular senesce [
71], some of which are also seen in sepsis. Ageing results in impaired lymphopoiesis with relative preservation of myelopoiesis, with reduction in stem cells. The T cell memory pool is increased, with skewed expansion of CD8 T cells and CD4 differentiation into Th17 population with reduced B cell diversity. The lymphocytes from sepsis patients share a number of these features [
75], implying accelerated aging of the immune system in sepsis.
In well-characterised caecal ligation and puncture murine models of sepsis, sepsis results in sustained central nervous system inflammation after recovery, which could explain the long-term cognitive impairments reported [
76]. In similar murine models, elevated serum levels of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) was associated with cognitive dysfunction [
77] and is hypothesised to act via the up regulated receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) [
78]. Thus, the hypothesis that neuronal inflammation in sepsis survivors explains cognitive impairment should be studied. Kaynar et al. did a RCT using CLP sepsis models in murines predisposed to atherosclerosis (ApoE-deficient) and with wild-type mice [
79]. The authors showed that sepsis resulted in persistent inflammation that predisposes to accelerated atherosclerosis [
79], which provides an explanation for CVS risk in sepsis survivors in addition to baseline demographic and other risk factors. In the future, understanding of mechanisms underpinning this accelerated atherosclerosis may identify potential intervention targets.
Readmissions due to infections in sepsis survivors could be either due to impaired immune system functions and/or imbalances in the gastrointestinal microbial flora (dysbiosis) in sepsis. The acute immune responses in sepsis characterised using pan leukocyte transcriptome profiles show activation of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory pathways in the innate and adaptive immune systems and leaves residual immunosuppression in sepsis survivors [
17,
80‐
82]. The mechanisms for post-acute immunosuppression in sepsis survivors are not well understood. To date, one pilot study involving just
eight patients highlight abnormalities in T cells and impaired cytokines responses to extrinsic stimuli, long-after index sepsis episode [
83]. Aside from the small sample size, the variable time interval from index sepsis episode to immune assessments (between 9 and 60 months) and high risk of bias preclude meaningful inferences. Similar changes were also observed in splenocytes and lung parenchyma in a landmark paper studying deaths from protracted sepsis [
84]. A healthy microbiome consists of obligate anaerobes (e.g. Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes), and facultative anaerobes (e.g. Proteobacteria) with diverse with metabolic functions that maintain check on pathological bacterial density [
85‐
87]. Acute illness, hospitalisation and antibiotics alter this balance towards a simpler and potentially pathogenic gut bacterial flora alongside increase in risk for Clostridium Difficile infections [
87‐
89]. In a study that did not provide any microbiological evidence but presumed dysbiosis based on the microbiome literature, suggested dysbiosis as a risk factor for infection related rehospitalisation in sepsis survivors [
10]. Thus, it is valid to hypothesise that both immunosuppression and dysbiosis in sepsis survivors potentially contribute to infection related rehospitalisation. Further studies are required to confirm these hypotheses.